Utility Preserving Secure Private Data Release
Jasjeet Dhaliwal, Geoffrey So, Aleatha Parker-Wood, Melanie Beck

TL;DR
This paper introduces a private data release mechanism combining the Johnson-Lindenstrauss transform with Laplace noise, ensuring data privacy and utility for machine learning tasks like clustering.
Contribution
It presents a novel mechanism that guarantees differential privacy and data unreconstructability while preserving utility, supported by theoretical proofs and empirical validation.
Findings
Mechanism maintains pairwise distances in expectation
Variance of the mechanism is proportional to subspace dimensionality
Effective utility demonstrated in clustering tasks
Abstract
Differential privacy mechanisms that also make reconstruction of the data impossible come at a cost - a decrease in utility. In this paper, we tackle this problem by designing a private data release mechanism that makes reconstruction of the original data impossible and also preserves utility for a wide range of machine learning algorithms. We do so by combining the Johnson-Lindenstrauss (JL) transform with noise generated from a Laplace distribution. While the JL transform can itself provide privacy guarantees \cite{blocki2012johnson} and make reconstruction impossible, we do not rely on its differential privacy properties and only utilize its ability to make reconstruction impossible. We present novel proofs to show that our mechanism is differentially private under single element changes as well as single row changes to any database. In order to show utility, we prove that our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Cryptography and Data Security · Access Control and Trust
