Variability in the interpretation of Dutch probability phrases - a risk for miscommunication

TL;DR

This study reveals significant variability in how Dutch probability phrases are interpreted, highlighting potential risks for miscommunication across different populations and contexts.

Contribution

It provides new insights into the interpretation of 29 Dutch probability phrases, including complementary pairs, across diverse groups and contexts.

Findings

Large variability in phrase interpretation among participants

Asymmetry found in interpretation of complementary phrases

No significant differences between statisticians and non-statisticians

Abstract

Verbal probability phrases are often used to express estimated risk. In this study, focus was on the numerical interpretation of 29 Dutch probability and frequency phrases, including several complementary phrases to test (a)symmetry in their interpretation. Many of these phrases had not been studied before. The phrases were presented in the context of ordinary situations. The survey was distributed among both statisticians and non-statisticians with Dutch as their native language. The responses from 881 participants showed a large variability in the interpretation of Dutch phrases, and the neutral contexts seemed to have no structural influence. Furthermore, the results demonstrated an asymmetry in the interpretation of Dutch complementary phrases. The large variability of interpretations was found among both statisticians and non-statisticians, and among males and females, however, no structural differences were found between the groups. Concluding, there is a large variability in the interpretation of verbal probability phrases, even within sub-populations. Therefore, verbal probability expressions may be a risk for miscommunication.