Signal Shaping for Generalized Spatial Modulation and Generalized Quadrature Spatial Modulation

TL;DR

This paper develops signal shaping methods for generalized spatial modulation systems, optimizing Euclidean distance metrics under various channel knowledge scenarios, and proposes both optimal and low-complexity sub-optimal solutions.

Contribution

It introduces a unified optimization framework for signal shaping in GenSM and GenQSM, including a high-performance OBSS method and a practical CBSS approach with reduced complexity.

Findings

OBSS achieves optimal performance but is computationally intensive.

CBSS offers comparable performance with lower complexity.

Simulation confirms effectiveness of proposed methods across scenarios.

Abstract

This paper investigates generic signal shaping methods for multiple-data-stream generalized spatial modulation (GenSM) and generalized quadrature spatial modulation (GenQSM) based on the maximizing the minimum Euclidean distance (MMED) criterion. Three cases with different channel state information at the transmitter (CSIT) are considered, including no CSIT, statistical CSIT and perfect CSIT. A unified optimization problem is formulated to find the optimal transmit vector set under size, power and sparsity constraints. We propose an optimization-based signal shaping (OBSS) approach by solving the formulated problem directly and a codebook-based signal shaping (CBSS) approach by finding sub-optimal solutions in discrete space. In the OBSS approach, we reformulate the original problem to optimize the signal constellations used for each transmit antenna combination (TAC). Both the size and entry of all signal constellations are optimized. Specifically, we suggest the use of a recursive design for size optimization. The entry optimization is formulated as a non-convex large-scale quadratically constrained quadratic programming (QCQP) problem and can be solved by existing optimization techniques with rather high complexity. To reduce the complexity, we propose the CBSS approach using a codebook generated by quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) symbols and a low-complexity selection algorithm to choose the optimal transmit vector set. Simulation results show that the OBSS approach exhibits the optimal performance in comparison with existing benchmarks. However, the OBSS approach is impractical for large-size signal shaping and adaptive signal shaping with instantaneous CSIT due to the demand of high computational complexity. As a low-complexity approach, CBSS shows comparable performance and can be easily implemented in large-size systems.