# A structure theorem for almost low-degree functions on the slice

**Authors:** Nathan Keller, Ohad Klein

arXiv: 1901.08839 · 2019-01-28

## TL;DR

This paper extends the Kindler-Safra theorem to Boolean functions on the slice, showing they can be approximated by low-degree functions depending on few variables, using harmonic polynomials and hypercontractivity.

## Contribution

It proves a structure theorem for almost low-degree functions on the slice, confirming a conjecture and improving approximation bounds.

## Key findings

- Functions with small high-degree weight are close to low-degree functions
- Approximation rate can be significantly improved
- The theorem confirms a conjecture by Filmus et al.

## Abstract

The Fourier-Walsh expansion of a Boolean function $f \colon \{0,1\}^n \rightarrow \{0,1\}$ is its unique representation as a multilinear polynomial. The Kindler-Safra theorem (2002) asserts that if in the expansion of $f$, the total weight on coefficients beyond degree $k$ is very small, then $f$ can be approximated by a Boolean-valued function depending on at most $O(2^k)$ variables.   In this paper we prove a similar theorem for Boolean functions whose domain is the `slice' ${{[n]}\choose{pn}} = \{x \in \{0,1\}^n\colon \sum_i x_i = pn\}$, where $0 \ll p \ll 1$, with respect to their unique representation as harmonic multilinear polynomials. We show that if in the representation of $f\colon {{[n]}\choose{pn}} \rightarrow \{0,1\}$, the total weight beyond degree $k$ is at most $\epsilon$, where $\epsilon = \min(p, 1-p)^{O(k)}$, then $f$ can be $O(\epsilon)$-approximated by a degree-$k$ Boolean function on the slice, which in turn depends on $O(2^{k})$ coordinates. This proves a conjecture of Filmus, Kindler, Mossel, and Wimmer (2015). Our proof relies on hypercontractivity, along with a novel kind of a shifting procedure.   In addition, we show that the approximation rate in the Kindler-Safra theorem can be improved from $\epsilon + \exp(O(k)) \epsilon^{1/4}$ to $\epsilon+\epsilon^2 (2\ln(1/\epsilon))^k/k!$, which is tight in terms of the dependence on $\epsilon$ and misses at most a factor of $2^{O(k)}$ in the lower-order term.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.08839/full.md

## References

46 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.08839/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.08839