The Limits of Morality in Strategic Games
Rui Cao, Pavel Naumov

TL;DR
This paper introduces a modal logical system to quantify blameworthiness in strategic games based on prevention costs, providing a formal framework and a completeness proof.
Contribution
It develops a novel modal logic for reasoning about blameworthiness degrees, incorporating prevention costs, and proves its completeness.
Findings
Formal modal logic system for blameworthiness
Completeness theorem established for the logic
Framework for quantifying blame in strategic scenarios
Abstract
A coalition is blameable for an outcome if the coalition had a strategy to prevent it. It has been previously suggested that the cost of prevention, or the cost of sacrifice, can be used to measure the degree of blameworthiness. The paper adopts this approach and proposes a modal logical system for reasoning about the degree of blameworthiness. The main technical result is a completeness theorem for the proposed system.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Game Theory and Applications · Game Theory and Voting Systems
