Seamless phase II/III clinical trials using early outcomes for treatment or subgroup selection: Methods and aspects of their implementation
Tim Friede, Nigel Stallard, Nicholas Parsons

TL;DR
This paper introduces a unified framework and simulation tools for adaptive seamless phase II/III clinical trials that utilize early outcomes for treatment or subgroup selection, enhancing trial efficiency.
Contribution
It presents a comprehensive framework linking treatment and subgroup selection methods and extends the R package asd for adaptive enrichment design simulations.
Findings
Framework links treatment and subgroup selection literature
Extended R package asd for adaptive enrichment designs
Illustrative examples in COPD and oncology trials
Abstract
Adaptive seamless designs combine confirmatory testing, a domain of phase III trials, with features such as treatment or subgroup selection, typically associated with phase II trials. They promise to increase the efficiency of development programmes of new drugs, e.g. in terms of sample size and / or development time. It is well acknowledged that adaptive designs are more involved from a logistical perspective and require more upfront planning, often in form of extensive simulation studies, than conventional approaches. Here we present a framework for adaptive treatment and subgroup selection using the same notation, which links the somewhat disparate literature on treatment selection on one side and on subgroup selection on the other. Furthermore, we introduce a flexible and yet efficient simulation model that serves both designs. As primary endpoints often take a long time to observe,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Optimal Experimental Design Methods · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
