# The distance, rotation, and physical parameters of zeta Pup

**Authors:** Ian D. Howarth, Floor van Leeuwen

arXiv: 1901.08020 · 2019-02-13

## TL;DR

This paper confirms the distance to zeta Pup, refines its physical parameters, and discusses implications for its rotation, evolution, and wind variability, suggesting a binary interaction history and challenging some models of stellar wind behavior.

## Contribution

It provides a reliable distance measurement, constrains the star's rotation period, and links physical properties to binary evolution and wind variability models.

## Key findings

- Distance to zeta Pup is 332+/-11 pc.
- Rotation period is less than 3.7 days, ruling out ~5.1 days.
- Physical parameters are below canonical values, indicating binary interaction history.

## Abstract

We scrutinize the Hipparcos parallax for the bright O supergiant zeta Pup, and confirm that the implied distance of 332+/-11pc appears to be reliable. We then review the implications for the star's physical parameters, and the consequences for the interpretation of P(phot), the 1.78-d photometric period. The equatorial rotation period is <3.7d (with 95% confidence), ruling out a proposed ~5.1d value. If the photometric period is the rotation period then i, the inclination of the rotation axis to the line of sight, is 33.2+/-1.8 degrees. The inferred mass, radius, and luminosity are securely established to be less than canonical values for the spectral type, and are not in agreement with single-star evolution models. The runaway status, rapid rotation, and anomalous physical properties are all indicative of an evolutionary history involving binary (or multiple-star) interaction. We perform simple starspot modelling to show that the low axial inclination required if P(rot) = 1.78d has testable spectroscopic consequences, which have not been identified in existing time series. If P(phot) is directly related to drivers of systematic, high-velocity stellar-wind variability (`discrete absorption components') in zeta Pup, antisolar differential rotation is required. Model line profiles calculated on that basis are at variance with observations.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.08020/full.md

## Figures

7 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.08020/full.md

## References

109 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.08020/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.08020