Maximal monotone normal cones in locally convex spaces
M.D. Voisei

TL;DR
This paper investigates conditions under which the normal cone in locally convex spaces is maximal monotone, exploring implications like Bishop-Phelps and sum representability results.
Contribution
It provides new equivalent conditions for maximal monotonicity of normal cones in general locally convex spaces.
Findings
Identifies conditions for maximal monotonicity of normal cones.
Derives Bishop-Phelps and sum representability results.
Extends theory to general locally convex spaces.
Abstract
Equivalent conditions that make the normal cone maximal monotone are investigated in the general settings of locally convex spaces. Some consequences such as Bishop Phelps and sum representability results are presented in the last part.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOptimization and Variational Analysis · Fixed Point Theorems Analysis · Advanced Banach Space Theory
Maximal monotone normal cones in locally convex spaces
M.D. Voisei
Abstract
Equivalent conditions that make the normal cone maximal monotone are investigated in the general settings of locally convex spaces. Some consequences such as Bishop Phelps and sum representability results are presented in the last part.
1 Preliminaries
The aim of this paper is to characterize the subsets of a locally convex space whose normal cone is a maximal monotone operator.
Here is a non-trivial (that is, ) real Hausdorff separated locally convex space (LCS for short), is its topological dual usually endowed with the weak-star topology denoted by , is identified with , , for , denotes the duality product or *coupling *of , and stands for the graph of .
Rockafellar showed in [3, Theorem A] that when is a Banach space and is proper convex lower semicontinuous then its convex subdifferential , defined by if is finite and for every , , is maximal monotone ( for short). In particular the normal cone to which is given by , whenever is closed convex. Here , for ; , for denotes the indicator function of .
Therefore it is interesting to find when a normal cone is maximal monotone outside the Banach space context.
Our main argument stems from the explicit form of the normal cone Fitzpatrick function (see Theorem 1 below) and our characterization of maximal monotone operators as representable and of type NI (see [4, Theorem 2.3] or [5, Theorem 3.4]).
Recall that the Fitzpatrick function of a multi-valued operator is given by (see [2])
[TABLE]
As usual, given a LCS and we denote by “” the convex hull of , “” the linear hull of , “” the closure of , “” the *topological interior *of , “” the algebraic interior of . The use of the notation is not enforced when the topology is clearly understood.
For we set ; the sets , , and being defined in a similar manner. We write shorter for , for every .
For a multi-function , , stand for the domain and the range of respectively, where , denote the projections of onto , respectively. When no confusion can occur, will be identified with .
The restriction of an operator to is the operator defined by .
The operator whose graph is describes all that are monotonically related (m.r. for short) to , that is iff, for every , .
We consider the following classes of functions and operators on
the class formed by proper convex functions . Recall that is proper if is nonempty and does not take the value ,
the class of functions that are –lower semi-continuous (*–*lsc for short),
the class of non-empty monotone operators (). Recall that is monotone if, for all ,
[TABLE]
or, equivalently, .
the class of maximal monotone operators . The maximality is understood in the sense of graph inclusion as subsets of . It is easily seen that iff .
To a proper function we associate the following notions:
is the epigraph of ,
,
the convex hull of , which is the greatest convex function majorized by , for ,
,
the lsc convex hull of , which is the greatest *–*lsc convex function majorized by , for ,
is the convex conjugate of with respect to the dual system , for .
Accordingly, , for . Recall that whenever (or equivalently ) is proper, where for functions defined in , the conjugates are taken with respect to the dual system .
Throughout this article the conventions , , and are enforced while the use of the topology notation is avoided when the topology is clearly understood.
All the considerations and results of this paper can be done with respect to a separated dual system of vector spaces .
2 Support points and the maximality of the normal cone
Given a LCS and , we denote by
[TABLE]
the set of *support points of * and by
[TABLE]
the *portable hull of * which is the intersection of all the supporting half-spaces that contain and are supported at points in .
C^{\#}$$C$$\operatorname*{Supp}C
From their definitions, , , and
[TABLE]
with the remarks that, for every , one has and ; while when , e.g., .
Theorem 1
Let be a LCS. For every ,
[TABLE]
In particular, for every , , , and
[TABLE]
The last part of Theorem 1 says that any monotone extension of has or that we can extend monotonically only inside .
Theorem 2
Let be a LCS and let . The following are equivalent
(i)* ,*
(ii) , ,
(iii)* *
(iv)* .*
Concerning the previous result note that is non-empty closed convex whenever . Also, subpoint (iv) can be restated equivalently as
(iv)′ is non-empty and .
Theorem 2 has strong ties with the separation theorem. Assume that is closed and convex. Then for every there is such that . In the next theorem we see that the maximality of is equivalent to the possibility of picking, in the previous separation argument, of a non-zero that attains its global maximum on , that is, which is also called a support functional of (see e.g. [1]).
Theorem 3
Let be a LCS and let . Then (or ) iff for every there is such that .
Corollary 4
Let be a LCS and let be non-empty closed and convex. If is a Banach space or , or is weakly compact then .
Note that , the portable hull of , is the smallest set formed by intersecting half-spaces that contain and are supported at points in , and, at the same time, the largest set on which the normal cone can be extended monotonically.
Proposition 5
Let be a LCS. For every , , , , and .
Remark 6
Every (maximal) monotone extension of has the domain contained in , that is, . Therefore is a maximal monotone extension of with the largest possible domain. In general, is not the only maximal monotone extension of (even with the largest possible domain or with a normal cone structure). For example, for , admits and as two different maximal monotone extensions; moreover has an infinity of maximal monotone extensions with the largest possible domain .**
The maximality of the subdifferential allows us to reprove and extend some of the Bishop-Phelps results (see [1]).
Theorem 7
Let be a LCS. If, for every closed convex , , then, for every closed convex , is dense in .
Remark 8
The previous results still holds for a fixed closed convex if, for every closed convex such that , .
Theorem 9
Let be a LCS and let be closed convex, free of lines, and finite-dimensional, that is, . Then and .
If, in addition, is bounded, then .
Proposition 10
under review
Corollary 11
Let be a LCS such that for every , . Then for every closed convex bounded the support functionals of are weak-star dense in .
Corollary 12
Let be a Banach space. Then for every closed convex bounded the support functionals of are strongly dense in .
If is merely closed and convex then the support functionals of are strongly dense in the domain of . In other words for every , such that there is , such that (that is, ) and .
3 Partial portable hulls and sum representability
Let be a LCS and . We denote by the partial portable hull of on which is the intersection of all the (supporting) half-spaces that contain and are supported at points in ,
[TABLE]
Equivalently
[TABLE]
with the remarks that when and that, for every , , , .
Note also that whenever .
C^{\#}_{S}$$C$$S\cap\operatorname*{Supp}C
Proposition 13
Let be a LCS and let . Then
(i)* and*
[TABLE]
In particular .
(ii)* . In particular .*
Theorem 14
under review
Recall the following notion ( see Definition 14 in [6])
Definition 15
Let be a LCS. An operator is representable in or representable if and there is such that and .
Using the partial portable hull we can recover the representability of the sum between a representable operator and the normal cone (see Theorem 35 in [6])
Theorem 16
Let be a LCS, let , and let be closed convex such that . Then or
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
In particular, if, in addition, is representable then is representable.
4 Concluding remarks
Let be a LCS and let us call a set portable if (or ). Some of the results of this paper can be summarized as follows:
- •
is portable iff for every there is such that or, equivalently, .
- •
If is closed convex and is a Banach space or , or is weakly compact then is portable.
- •
For every , is portable.
- •
If every closed convex is portable then for every closed convex , is dense in .
- •
Every closed convex, free of lines, and finite-dimensional set is portable.
The results in this article are an incentive for studying the following problems:
(P1)
Find cha racterizations of all LCS with the property that, for every closed convex , .
(P2)
Find characterizations of all LCS with the property that, for every , .
(P3)
Find characterizations of all LCS with the property that, for every , .
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Errett Bishop and R. R. Phelps. The support functionals of a convex set. In Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Vol. VII , pages 27–35. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R.I., 1963.
- 2[2] Simon Fitzpatrick. Representing monotone operators by convex functions. In Workshop/Miniconference on Functional Analysis and Optimization (Canberra, 1988) , volume 20 of Proc. Centre Math. Anal. Austral. Nat. Univ. , pages 59–65. Austral. Nat. Univ., Canberra, 1988.
- 3[3] R. T. Rockafellar. On the maximal monotonicity of subdifferential mappings. Pacific J. Math. , 33:209–216, 1970.
- 4[4] M. D. Voisei. A maximality theorem for the sum of maximal monotone operators in non-reflexive Banach spaces. Math. Sci. Res. J. , 10(2):36–41, 2006.
- 5[5] M. D. Voisei. The sum and chain rules for maximal monotone operators. Set-Valued Anal. , 16(4):461–476, 2008.
- 6[6] M.D. Voisei. Location, identification, and representability of monotone operators in locally convex spaces. 2016.
