Cohomology of Restricted Filiform Lie Algebras $\mathfrak{m}_2^\lambda(p)$
Tyler J. Evans, Alice Fialowski

TL;DR
This paper computes the cohomology of a family of restricted filiform Lie algebras over fields of prime characteristic, providing explicit bases and formulas for their algebraic structures and extensions.
Contribution
It explicitly describes the cohomology and algebraic structures of a new family of restricted filiform Lie algebras parameterized by elements of the field.
Findings
Explicit bases for ordinary and restricted cohomology spaces.
Formulas for brackets and p-operations in central extensions.
Classification of restricted Lie algebra structures for the given family.
Abstract
For the -dimensional filiform Lie algebra over a field of prime characteristic with nonzero Lie brackets for and for , we show that there is a family of restricted Lie algebra structures parameterized by elements . We explicitly describe bases for the ordinary and restricted 1- and 2-cohomology spaces with trivial coefficients, and give formulas for the bracket and -operations in the corresponding restricted one-dimensional central extensions.
| \tsep1pt | |
|---|---|
| \tsep1pt | |
| , \tsep1pt | |
| \tsep1pt | |
| , \tsep1pt | |
| \tsep1pt |
| \tsep2pt | |
| \tsep2pt | |
| \bsep2pt | |
| \tsep2pt | |
| \bsep2pt | |
| \tsep2pt | |
| \tsep2pt | |
| \tsep2pt | |
| \tsep2pt | |
| \tsep2pt | |
| \tsep2pt | |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
\FirstPageHeading
\ShortArticleName
Cohomology of Restricted Filiform Lie Algebras
\ArticleName
Cohomology of Restricted Filiform Lie Algebras ††This paper is a contribution to the Special Issue on Algebra, Topology, and Dynamics in Interaction in honor of Dmitry Fuchs. The full collection is available at https://www.emis.de/journals/SIGMA/Fuchs.html
\Author
Tyler J. EVANS † and Alice FIALOWSKI ‡§
\AuthorNameForHeading
T.J. Evans and A. Fialowski
\Address
† Department of Mathematics, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA 95521, USA \EmailD[email protected] \URLaddressDhttps://sites.google.com/humboldt.edu/tylerjevans
\Address
‡ Institute of Mathematics, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary \EmailD[email protected]
\Address
§ Institute of Mathematics Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary \EmailD[email protected]
\ArticleDates
Received August 19, 2019, in final form November 24, 2019; Published online December 01, 2019
\Abstract
For the -dimensional filiform Lie algebra over a field of prime characteristic with nonzero Lie brackets for and for , we show that there is a family of restricted Lie algebra structures parameterized by elements . We explicitly describe bases for the ordinary and restricted 1- and 2-cohomology spaces with trivial coefficients, and give formulas for the bracket and -operations in the corresponding restricted one-dimensional central extensions.
\Keywords
restricted Lie algebra; central extension; cohomology; filiform Lie algebra
\Classification
17B50; 17B56
*We dedicate this paper to Dmitry B. Fuchs
on the occasion of his 80th birthday*
1 Introduction
-graded Lie algebras of maximal class have been intensively studied in the last decade. A Lie algebra of maximal class is a graded Lie algebra
[TABLE]
over a field , where , dim for and for .
A Lie algebra of dimension is called filiform if
[TABLE]
Lie algebras of maximal class with two generators over fields of characteristic zero have been classified, and exactly three of these algebras are of filiform type [9]. We list them with the nontrivial bracket structures:
[TABLE]
Filiform -graded Lie algebras of dimension over a field of characteristic zero that satisfy and for (which is equivalent to having 2 generators) are classified in [14]. They include the natural “truncations” of and obtained by taking the quotient by the ideal generated by . The algebra (the Witt algebra) is isomorphic to the algebra of derivations of the polynomial algebra . If has characteristic , then the truncation of is the derivation algebra of the quotient of by the ideal generated by . The algebra is called the (modular) Witt algebra.
The above picture is more complicated in the modular case (that is, over fields of positive characteristic), see [1, 2, 13], but , , and their truncations always show up. We refer the reader to the book [15] for a general treatment of modular Lie algebras. In this paper, we show that if the field has characteristic , then the Lie algebra admits a family of restricted Lie algebra structures parameterized by elements . We describe the isomorphism classes of these algebras, calculate the ordinary and restricted cohomology spaces with trivial coefficients H^{q}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p)\big{)} and H_{*}^{q}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p)\big{)} for and give explicit bases for those spaces. We also give the bracket structures and -operations for the corresponding restricted one-dimensional central extensions of these restricted Lie algebras.
With this, we complete the description of all three types of truncated filiform restricted Lie algebras (, , and ), their low dimensional cohomology spaces with trivial coefficients and their restricted one-dimensional central extensions. The algebras were studied in [5], and the algebra was studied in [6] (where it is denoted by ).
Remark 1.1**.**
For and , so these algebras were treated in [5].
In this paper, all cochain and cohomology spaces are with coefficients in the trivial -module. The organization is as follows. In Section 2 we construct the restricted Lie algebra family , determine the isomorphism classes of these restricted Lie algebras, and describe both the ordinary and restricted 1- and 2-cochains, including formulas for all differentials. In Section 3 we calculate both the ordinary and restricted 1-cohomology by giving explicit cocycles. Section 4 contains the calculation of the ordinary and restricted 2-cohomology spaces, again by giving explicit cocycles. In Section 5 we describe all restricted one-dimensional central extensions and give their brackets and -operations.
2 Preliminaries
2.1 The Lie algebra
Let be a prime, and let be a field of characteristic . Define the -vector space
[TABLE]
and define a bracket on by
[TABLE]
with all other brackets (for ) being [math]. Note that is a graded Lie algebra with -th graded component for . If and , , then
[TABLE]
2.2 The restricted Lie algebras
We refer the reader to [12, Chapter V, Section 7] and [15, Section 2.2] for the definition of a restricted Lie algebra, and for the construction of the -mapping on a given Lie algebra ( in the current paper) used below. For any and , we denote the -fold bracket
[TABLE]
Since , (2.1) implies that the center of the algebra is and -fold brackets are zero. Therefore for each , setting for each defines a restricted Lie algebra that we denote by . Because -fold brackets in are zero, for all , ,
[TABLE]
and therefore the -mapping on is -semilinear (see also [15, Chapter 2, Lemma 1.2]). From this we get that if , then
[TABLE]
Everywhere below, we write to denote both the graded Lie algebra and the graded restricted Lie algebra for a given . The Lie brackets and restricted -operators for these algebras are explicitly given by (2.1) and (2.2), respectively.
Remark 2.1**.**
For there are several other possible -mappings, namely any 2-semilinear transformation on .
2.3 Isomorphism classes
Proposition 2.2**.**
Let . If , the graded restricted Lie algebras and are isomorphic if and only if there exists a non-zero such that for .
Proof.
We only consider isomorphisms that preserve the grading as we are interested in these algebras as graded restricted Lie algebras. Assume that there exists a graded restricted Lie algebra isomorphism , and let for some non-zero . Since preserves the Lie bracket, we must have , , . On the other hand, as , we also must have . From this it follows that and for .
Moreover, preserves the restricted -structure so that
[TABLE]
for (here denotes the restricted -structure on ). Now,
[TABLE]
so and hence
[TABLE]
It remains to show that the above condition on gives rise to a graded restricted Lie algebra isomorphism between and . If, for , we define , , then it is easy to check that the argument above is reversible, and we obtain a graded isomorphism between the restricted Lie algebras. ∎
2.4 Cochain complexes with trivial coefficients
For the convenience of the reader and to establish our notations, we briefly recall the definitions of the cochain spaces used below to compute both the ordinary and restricted Lie algebra 1- and 2-cohomology. The reader can find more details on these complexes in [3, 4, 5, 10, 11].
2.4.1 Ordinary cochain complex
For ordinary Lie algebra cohomology with trivial coefficients, the relevant cochain spaces from the Chevalley–Eilenberg complex (with bases) for our purposes are
[TABLE]
( denotes the dual vector space) and the differentials are defined by
[TABLE]
The cochain spaces C^{n}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p)\big{)} are graded
[TABLE]
and the differentials are graded maps. If we adopt the convention that whenever , we can write for
[TABLE]
Using the convention that unless , we can write
[TABLE]
2.4.2 Restricted cochain complex
The relevant restricted cochain spaces are
[TABLE]
We recall that if \varphi\in C^{2}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p)\big{)}, then a map has the -property with respect to if for all and all we have and
[TABLE]
Here is the number of factors equal to . Moreover, given , we can assign the values of arbitrarily on a basis for and use (2.5) to define that has the -property with respect to (see [5, pp. 249–250]). Recall the space of Frobenius homomorphisms from the -vector space to the -vector space is defined by
[TABLE]
for all and . A map has the -property with respect to if and only if . In particular, if , then the map defined by
[TABLE]
has the -property with respect to [math].
We will use the following bases for the restricted cochains
[TABLE]
where is the map that vanishes on the basis and has the -property with respect to . More generally, given , let be the map that vanishes on the basis for and has the -property with respect to . The restricted differentials are defined by
[TABLE]
where \operatorname{ind}^{1}(\psi)(g):=\psi\big{(}g^{[p]}\big{)} and \operatorname{ind}^{2}(\varphi,\omega)(g,h):=\varphi\big{(}g\wedge h^{[p]}\big{)}. If \psi\in C^{1}_{*}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p)\big{)} and (\varphi,\omega)\in C^{2}_{*}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p)\big{)}, then has the -property with respect to [7, Lemma 4]. If , , and , then
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Remark 2.3**.**
For a given \varphi\in C^{2}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p)\big{)}, if (\varphi,\omega),(\varphi,\omega^{\prime})\in C^{2}_{*}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p)\big{)}, then . In particular, with trivial coefficients, depends only on .
3 The cohomology \boldsymbol{H^{1}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p)\big{)}} and \boldsymbol{H^{1}_{*}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p)\big{)}}
In this short section we compute, for , both the ordinary and restricted 1-cohomology spaces and , and in particular we show that these spaces are equal.
Theorem 3.1**.**
If and , then
[TABLE]
and the classes of \big{\{}e^{1},e^{2}\big{\}} form a basis.
Proof.
Easily, the differential (2.3) has a kernel spanned by \big{\{}e^{1},e^{2}\big{\}}, and , so that
[TABLE]
As for any restricted Lie algebra, H^{1}_{*}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p)\big{)} consists of those ordinary cohomology classes [\psi]\in H^{1}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p)\big{)} for which (see [11, Theorem 2.1] or [7, Theorem 2]). If is any ordinary cocycle, then () so that for any , we have
[TABLE]
and hence H^{1}_{*}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p)\big{)}=H^{1}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p)\big{)}. ∎
Remark 3.2**.**
An alternate proof is the following
[TABLE]
where denotes the vector space dual of and
[TABLE]
(see [8, Proposition 2.7]).
In particular, since \mathop{\rm span}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p)^{[p]}\big{)}\subseteq\mathbb{F}e_{p}\subseteq\big{[}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p),\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p)\big{]}, the ordinary and the restricted 1-cohomology spaces coincide.
Remark 3.3**.**
For , formula (2.3) shows that for , . For , let
[TABLE]
The set is a basis for the image {\rm d}^{1}\big{(}C^{1}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p)\big{)}\big{)}.
4 The cohomology \boldsymbol{H^{2}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p)\big{)}} and \boldsymbol{H^{2}_{*}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p)\big{)}}
4.1 Ordinary cohomology
Lemma 4.1**.**
Let . For , let {\rm d}^{2}_{k}\colon C^{2}_{k}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p)\big{)}\to C^{3}_{k}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p)\big{)} denote the restriction of the differential {\rm d}^{2}\colon C^{2}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p)\big{)}\to C^{3}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p)\big{)} to the th graded component C^{2}_{k}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p)\big{)} of C^{2}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p)\big{)}. Then \ker\big{(}{\rm d}^{2}_{k}\big{)}=0 for , and for , basis elements of \ker\big{(}{\rm d}^{2}_{k}\big{)} are listed in the following table:
Proof.
A direct calculation using (2.4) shows that for , {\rm d}^{2}_{6}\big{(}\sigma_{1,5}e^{1,5}+\sigma_{2,4}e^{2,4}\big{)}=(-\sigma_{1,5}+\sigma_{2,4})e^{1,2,3} and {\rm d}^{2}_{7}\big{(}\sigma_{1,6}e^{1,6}+\sigma_{2,5}e^{2,5}+\sigma_{3,4}e^{3,4}\big{)}=(-\sigma_{1,6}+\sigma_{2,5}+\sigma_{3,4})e^{1,2,4}.
If and \varphi=\sum\sigma_{i,j}e^{i,j}\in C^{2}_{k}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p)\big{)}, then (2.4) implies that will contain the terms
[TABLE]
where if is even and if is odd. If, in addition, is a cocycle, then we have the system of equations
[TABLE]
where and . Note that every coefficient of occurs in the system (4.1). Now, if is even, then contains exactly one term with , and hence . The system (4.1) then implies that for all , and hence . Likewise, if is odd, then occurs once in forcing , and hence . We can use (2.4) to directly check that \ker\big{(}{\rm d}^{2}_{2p-2}\big{)}=\ker\big{(}{\rm d}^{2}_{2p-1}\big{)}=0 so that \ker\big{(}{\rm d}^{2}_{k}\big{)}=0 for .
Finally, if , then will also contain the terms
[TABLE]
in addition to the term . If is a cocycle, then we have the system of equations
[TABLE]
The same argument used for above shows that the system (4.2) implies for . Therefore and spans \ker\big{(}{\rm d}^{2}_{k}\big{)}. ∎
Theorem 4.2**.**
If , then
[TABLE]
and the cohomology classes of the cocycles \big{\{}e^{1,4},e^{1,5}+e^{2,4},e^{2,5}-e^{3,4}\big{\}} form a basis.
If , then
[TABLE]
and the cohomology classes of the cocycles \big{\{}e^{1,4},e^{1,6}+e^{3,4},e^{1,p}+e^{2,p-1}\big{\}} form a basis.
Proof.
If , then the results of Lemma 4.1 still hold except for where we have {\rm d}^{2}_{7}\big{(}\sigma_{2,5}e^{2,5}+\sigma_{3,4}e^{3,4}\big{)}=\big{(}\sigma_{2,5}+\sigma_{3,4}\big{)}e^{1,2,4} and \ker\big{(}{\rm d}^{2}_{8}\big{)}=0. It follows that
[TABLE]
is a basis for \ker\big{(}{\rm d}^{2}\big{)}. We can replace with in this basis so that, by Remark 3.3, the classes of \big{\{}e^{1,4},e^{1,5}+e^{2,4},e^{2,5}-e^{3,4}\big{\}} form a basis for H^{2}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(5)\big{)}.
If , then Lemma 4.1 gives a basis for \ker\big{(}{\rm d}^{2}\big{)}. We can again replace with in this basis so that, by Remark 3.3, the classes of \big{\{}e^{1,4},e^{1,6}+e^{3,4},e^{1,p}+e^{2,p-1}\big{\}} form a basis for H^{2}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p)\big{)}. ∎
4.2 Restricted cohomology for
If , then (2.6) shows that so that every ordinary 2-cocycle \varphi\in C^{2}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{0}(p)\big{)} gives rise to a restricted 2-cocycle (\varphi,\tilde{\varphi})\in C^{2}_{*}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{0}(p)\big{)}. Moreover, in the case that is a 1-coboundary, we can replace with and \big{(}\varphi,\operatorname{ind}^{1}(\psi)\big{)}=\big{(}{\rm d}^{1}(\psi),\operatorname{ind}^{1}(\psi)\big{)}={\rm d}^{1}_{*}(\psi) is a restricted 1-coboundary as well, and {\rm d}^{2}_{*}(\varphi,\tilde{\varphi})={\rm d}^{2}_{*}\big{(}\varphi,\operatorname{ind}^{1}(\psi)\big{)} by Remark 2.3. Finally, {\rm d}^{2}_{*}\big{(}0,\overline{e}^{k}\big{)}=(0,0) for all , and the \big{(}0,\overline{e}^{k}\big{)} are clearly linearly independent. Together these remarks prove the following
Theorem 4.3**.**
Let . If , then
[TABLE]
and the cohomology classes of the cocycles
[TABLE]
form a basis where .
If , then
[TABLE]
and the cohomology classes of
[TABLE]
form a basis where .
Remark 4.4**.**
If , the maps are identically zero for because the -fold bracket in (2.5) always gives a multiple of so that vanishes on when . This, in turn, implies that \tilde{\varphi}_{k}\in\operatorname{Hom}_{\rm Fr}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}(p),\mathbb{F}\big{)}, and since for all , we have . Likewise, , , and unless . The restriction of to is equal to so that . If , then the restriction of to is equal to so . We can then use (2.5) to give explicit descriptions for and (when ):
[TABLE]
Remark 4.5**.**
The dimensions in Theorem 4.3 can also be deduced from Theorems 3.1 and 4.2 and the six-term exact sequence in [11] precisely as in [5, Remark 4].
4.3 Restricted cohomology for
If and (\varphi,\omega)\in C^{2}_{*}\big{(}\mathfrak{m}_{2}^{\lambda}\big{)}, then (2.6) shows that
[TABLE]
Therefore, if , then {\rm d}^{2}_{*}(\varphi,\omega)=\big{(}{\rm d}^{2}\varphi,\operatorname{ind}^{2}(\varphi,\omega)\big{)}=(0,0) if and only if and .
Theorem 4.6**.**
If , then
[TABLE]
and the cohomology classes of
[TABLE]
form a basis.
If , then
[TABLE]
and the cohomology classes of
[TABLE]
form a basis where .
5 One-dimensional central extensions
One-dimensional central extensions of an ordinary Lie algebra are parameterized by the cohomology group [10, Chapter 1, Section 4.6], and restricted one-dimensional central extensions of a restricted Lie algebra with are parameterized by the restricted cohomology group [11, Theorem 3.3]. If is a restricted 2-cocycle, then the corresponding restricted one-dimensional central extension has Lie bracket and -operation defined by
[TABLE]
where and denote the Lie bracket and -operation in , respectively [7, equations (26) and (27)]. We can use (5.1) to explicitly describe the restricted one-dimensional central extensions corresponding to the restricted cocycles in Theorems 4.3 and 4.6. For the rest of this section, let and denote two arbitrary elements of .
Let denote the one-dimensional restricted central extension of determined by the cohomology class of the restricted cocycle \big{(}0,\overline{e}^{k}\big{)}. Then just as with and (see [5, Theorem 5.1] and [6, Theorem 3.1]), the \big{(}0,\overline{e}^{k}\big{)} span a -dimensional subspace of , and (5.1) gives the bracket and -operation in :
[TABLE]
For restricted cocycles with , we summarize the corresponding restricted one-dimensional central extensions in the following tables. Everywhere in the tables, we omit the brackets and -operation for brevity.
If , then there are three restricted cocycles with for a given prime (Theorem 4.3). We note that if , then (2.2) implies for all .
If and , then the only restricted cocycle with is . If , then the restricted cocycles with are and (Theorem 4.6).
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Dmitry Fuchs for fruitful conversations, and the referees whose comments greatly improved the exposition of this paper.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Caranti A., Mattarei S., Newman M.F., Graded Lie algebras of maximal class, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 349 (1997), 4021–4051. · doi ↗
- 2[2] Caranti A., Newman M.F., Graded Lie algebras of maximal class. II, J. Algebra 229 (2000), 750–784, ar Xiv:math.RA/9906160 . · doi ↗
- 3[3] Chevalley C., Eilenberg S., Cohomology theory of Lie groups and Lie algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 63 (1948), 85–124. · doi ↗
- 4[4] Evans T.J., Fialowski A., Restricted one-dimensional central extensions of restricted simple Lie algebras, Linear Algebra Appl. 513 (2017), 96–102, ar Xiv:1506.09025 . · doi ↗
- 5[5] Evans T.J., Fialowski A., Restricted one-dimensional central extensions of the restricted filiform Lie algebras 𝔪 0 λ ( p ) superscript subscript 𝔪 0 𝜆 𝑝 {\mathfrak{m}}_{0}^{\lambda}(p) , Linear Algebra Appl. 565 (2019), 244–257, ar Xiv:1801.08178 . · doi ↗
- 6[6] Evans T.J., Fialowski A., Penkava M., Restricted cohomology of modular Witt algebras, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 144 (2016), 1877–1886, ar Xiv:1502.04531 . · doi ↗
- 7[7] Evans T.J., Fuchs D., A complex for the cohomology of restricted Lie algebras, J. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 3 (2008), 159–179. · doi ↗
- 8[8] Feldvoss J., On the cohomology of restricted Lie algebras, Comm. Algebra 19 (1991), 2865–2906. · doi ↗
