# The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox and SU(2) relativity

**Authors:** Paul O'Hara

arXiv: 1901.07371 · 2019-10-02

## TL;DR

This paper explores the EPR paradox and Bell's inequality through the lens of $SU(2)$ relativity, providing new insights into quantum non-locality and spin entanglement by linking them to relativistic rotation properties.

## Contribution

It introduces an interpretation of Bell's inequality using $SU(2)$ group properties and relativistic rotations, offering a more intuitive understanding of quantum non-locality.

## Key findings

- $SU(2)$ properties clarify non-locality concepts
- Relativistic rotations relate to spin entanglement
- New interpretation enhances understanding of Bell's inequality

## Abstract

The EPR paradox dates back to 1935 when Einstein et al., through the use of non commuting operators, proposed that quantum mechanics was not complete in that it suggested a `spooky action at a distance.' Later in 1964 John Bell was able to express the dilemma in a simple inequality involving spin-singlet states. If the inequality were satisfied then Einstein was correct and if it were violated then it favored the quantum mechanics point of view. In what follows, we present two approaches to Bell's inequality, and then offer an interpretation from the viewpoint of quantum mechanics based on the principle that the whole is more than the sum of its parts. This is then combined with the properties of the $SU(2)$ group to give a more intuitive understanding of non-locality and spin entanglement from the perspective of the relativistic characteristics of rotations.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.07371/full.md

## References

14 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.07371/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.07371