Maximal abelian extension of $X_0(p)$ unramified outside cusps
Takao Yamazaki, Yifan Yang

TL;DR
This paper constructs a new maximal abelian extension of the modular curve $X_0(p)$ unramified outside cusps, extending Mazur's work by using generalized Dedekind eta functions to produce a cyclic cover of degree $2N_p$.
Contribution
It introduces a new cyclic abelian covering of $X_0(p)$ unramified outside cusps, expanding the understanding of modular curve extensions beyond Mazur's established covers.
Findings
The maximal abelian cover $X_2'(p)$ is cyclic of degree $2N_p$.
Construction utilizes generalized Dedekind eta functions.
Extends Mazur's results on unramified abelian coverings.
Abstract
Let be a prime number. Mazur proved that a geometrically maximal unramified abelian covering of over is given by the Shimura covering , that is, a unique subcovering of of degree . In this short paper, we show that a geometrically maximal abelian covering of over unramified outside cusps is cyclic of degree . The main ingredient for the construction of is the generalized Dedelind eta functions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Analytic Number Theory Research · Coding theory and cryptography
Maximal abelian extension of
unramified outside cusps
Takao Yamazaki and Yifan Yang
Mathematical Institute, Tohoku University, Aoba, Sendai 980-8578, Japan
Department of Mathematics, National Taiwan University and National Center for Theoretical Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan 10617
Abstract.
Let be a prime number. Mazur proved that a geometrically maximal unramified abelian covering of over is given by the Shimura covering , that is, a unique subcovering of of degree . In this short paper, we show that a geometrically maximal abelian covering of over unramified outside cusps is cyclic of degree . The main ingredient for the construction of is the generalized Dedelind eta functions.
Key words and phrases:
Unramified abelian covering, modular curve, generalized Jacobian
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
11G18 (11F03, 11G45, 14G35)
1. Introduction
1.1. Main result
Let be a prime. We consider the modular curves and as geometrically integral smooth proper curves over . We choose a model of over such that the cusp at infinity splits completely in a finite cyclic covering of degree . Note that is possibly ramified. We denote by its (unique) subcovering of degree , which is the maximal unramified subcovering of , called the Shimura covering. We recall an important result due to Mazur.
Theorem 1.1.1** ([3, Theorem 2]).**
The Shimura covering is geometrically maximal over .
Here, we say a finite unramified abelian covering of smooth geometrically integral curves over is geometrically maximal over if any finite unramified abelian covering of is isomorphic to a subcovering of , where is a maximal abelian extension of (see Definition 2.2.2).
Let be an open subscheme such that consists of all (two) cusps. In this short note, we shall construct a geometrically maximal unramified covering of and prove the following result.
Theorem 1.1.2**.**
There exists a cyclic covering of degree such that
- (1)
* is a geometrically maximal unramified covering of over , where ; and* 2. (2)
* factors as , where is a degree two covering that is unramified outside cusps.*
[TABLE]
We shall prepare some general facts on abelian coverings of smooth curves in §2. We then prove Theorem 1.1.2 in §3. The function field of will be obtained as a quadratic extension of generated by a square root of an explicitly constructed rational function in . A key ingredient for this construction is the generalized Dedekind eta functions, which we recall in §3.2.
1.2. Notations and conventions
Let be a profinite group. We write for the quotient of by the closure of its commutator subgroup. For a -module , we denote by and its -invariant subgroup and -coinvariant quotient, respectively. When is locally compact, we write for the Pontryagin dual of . In practice, we shall only consider the cases where is either a discrete torsion group or a compact free -module of finite rank, hence is a -module and , where means the group of -linear maps. Note also that we have canonical isomorphisms
[TABLE]
Indeed, both sides of the first isomorphism are identified with the group of continuous -equivariant homomorphisms . The second follows from the first by replacing by and .
Let be a scheme which is separated and of finite type over a field. We write for the multiplicative group scheme over , and . When is affine, we write . For an étale sheaf on , we write (resp. ) for the étale cohomology (resp. the étale cohomology with compact support). A -module is identified with an étale sheaf on and we write . Suppose now is connected. We write , where is the étale fundamental group of with respect to some geometric point (on which does not depend up to unique isomorphism). In particular, we have a canonical isomorphism
[TABLE]
Let be a field of characteristic zero. We take an algebraic closure and put . We write if , and if . Let be a -module. We write . We define the (twisted) Tate module by . If is torsion, then we define , where . For general , we define its maximal -type subgroup by
[TABLE]
where is the cyclotomic character. (In other words, .)
A commutative algebraic group over defines a -module , and hence an étale sheaf on . In this case, to ease the notation we often write for , e.g. and .
2. Abelian coverings of smooth curves
In this section, we collect basic facts about abelian fundamental group of a smooth curve.
2.1. Setting
Let be a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over a field of characteristic zero. Let be an effective reduced divisor on and set . We write for the genus of , and set
[TABLE]
We suppose that admits a degree one divisor. Note that this implies the existence of a degree one divisor supported on by the approximation lemma (see e.g. [6, p. 12]). Indeed, let be a degree one divisor on . For each (resp. ), let be such that (resp. ). By applying the cited result to the family , we obtain such that for all and for all . Then is a degree one divisor supported on .
2.2. Geometrically maximal unramified abelian covering
Let be the maximal abelian extension of . We have and , where is the maximal unramified abelian extension of the function field of . Denote by the kernel of the canonical map . We have an exact sequence
[TABLE]
Remark 2.2.1*.*
It is shown in [1, Theorem 1] that is finite if is finitely generated over its prime subfield.
Definition 2.2.2**.**
We say a finite unramified abelian covering is geometrically maximal over if is geometrically integral over and if the composition is an isomorphism:
[TABLE]
(Equivalently, any finite unramified abelian covering is a subcovering of . See also Remark 2.6.5 and Proposition 2.6.6 below.)
When has a -rational point , a maximal abelian unramified covering of in which splits completely yields a geometrically maximal covering. There is, however, no such a description if no -rational point is available. Given , we are interested in finding a geometrically maximal unramified abelian covering.
2.3. Generalized Jacobian
Let be the generalized Jacobian of with modulus in the sense of Rosenlicht-Serre [5], which is a semi-abelian variety over . It fits in an exact sequence
[TABLE]
where is the Jacobian variety of , and
[TABLE]
We also recall that, if we put , there are isomorphisms
[TABLE]
2.4. A Galois module
We define a divisible torsion -module by
[TABLE]
(See §1.2 for the notations for and ). Although this is not the torsion subgroup of a group , the notation may be justified by the fact that agrees with the group of torsion points of the dual -motive of in the sense of [7, Chapter V, §3]. (We will not use this fact.) Let
[TABLE]
be the character group of from (2.3.2). This is thus a free abelian group of rank (see (2.1.1)), equipped with a continuous -action. Recall that is the genus of .
Lemma 2.4.1**.**
There is an exact sequence of -modules
[TABLE]
In particular, as abelian groups.
Proof.
The first statement follows from (2.3.1) and an isomorphism deduced by the Weil pairing . The last statement follows form (2.4.3). ∎
By taking the Tate twist and the long exact sequence attached to (2.4.3) (see also (1.2.3)), we get an exact sequence that will be used later
[TABLE]
Example 2.4.2*.*
Suppose that consists of two -rational points. Then we have an exact sequence
[TABLE]
Explicitely, the -module can be described as follows. We have
[TABLE]
as an abelian group, and -action is given by
[TABLE]
where and is a fixed element such that is the class of in (see (2.3.3)).
2.5. Abelian fundamental group
The following result is essentially shown in [1], but it is embedded in a (long) proof, and hence we decide to include a proof to cut out the desired part.
Proposition 2.5.1**.**
The exact sequence (2.2.1) splits (non-canonically), and we have a canonical isomorphism (see §1.2 for the notations used in the right hand side)
[TABLE]
Proof.
Set . The spectral sequence yields an exact sequence
[TABLE]
Recall that by assumption we have a degree one divisor supported on (see §2.1). It gives rise to a section of , where is the pull-back along the closed immersion and is the norm (corestriction) map. This shows the injectivity of . By taking the dual sequence, we obtain a short exact sequence (see (1.2.1))
[TABLE]
which splits again by the presence of . We have shown . We also have by the definition (2.4.1).
Hence it remains to show an isomorphism of -modules
[TABLE]
from which the proposition follows by taking -coinvariant quotients. By the definitions of from (2.3.4), there exists an exact sequence of étale sheaves
[TABLE]
for any , where is the open immersion so that . It follows that
[TABLE]
The last isomorphism shows by the Poincaré duality. Now (2.5.1) follows from (1.2.2). ∎
Remark 2.5.2*.*
By applying the functor to (2.5.2), we obtain isomorphisms
[TABLE]
2.6. Covering of
Let be another proper smooth geometrically integral curve over admitting a degree one divisor, and let be a finite -morphism. Put and . (We regard as a reduced effective divisor on .) Set and . We have the pull-back maps and the push-forward maps .
Definition 2.6.1**.**
We define
[TABLE]
Note that with , because . It follows that is finite and hence . Similarly, is finite too. The canonical maps and from (2.4.3) induce .
Lemma 2.6.2**.**
- (1)
The map is injective. 2. (2)
Suppose that for all , where denotes the ramification index. Then is an isomorphism.
Proof.
Let and be the character groups from (2.4.2). By Lemma 2.4.1, we have a commutative diagram with exact rows:
[TABLE]
This shows (1). For (2), it suffices to show the injectivity of the right vertical map under the stated assumption. We have a commutative diagram with exact rows:
[TABLE]
Here -component of the middle vertical map is given by [math] if and by if . The lemma follows. ∎
Example 2.6.3*.*
Let and consider the canonical map , with respect to divisors consisting of all cusps. If is square free, then is unramified at all cusps, and hence , where is the sum of all cusps on .
Lemma 2.6.4**.**
Let (resp. ) be the maximal unramified abelian subcovering of (resp. ). Then we have
[TABLE]
In particular, and (see (1.2.3)).
Proof.
Since the first statement is a special case of second (for ), we only prove the latter. For a -scheme , we write . Let be the maximal unramified abelian subcovering of the base change of . Let be a Galois closure of . We have a commutative diagram
[TABLE]
The left two squares are Cartesian since (and hence too) are geometrically integral over . It follows that . Using (2.5.3) and (1.2.2), we get
[TABLE]
The last statement follows since acts on trivially. ∎
Note that this lemma implies and .
Remark 2.6.5*.*
Suppose that (resp. ) is a finite abelian unramified covering. Then is geometrically maximal (see Definition 2.2.2) if and only if (resp. ).
Proposition 2.6.6**.**
Suppose that is finitely generated over its prime subfield. Given , there exists a geometrically maximal abelian unramified covering .
Proof.
This follows from Proposition 2.5.1 and Remark 2.2.1. ∎
3. Modular curves
In this section, we are going to prove Theorem 1.1.2.
3.1. First reduction
Let be a prime and set . Recall that consists of two -rational points (i.e. [math] and cusps). It follows that with trivial -action, and hence (see Example 2.4.2). By (2.4.4), we get an exact sequcne
[TABLE]
Since is a cyclic group of order by Theorem 1.1.1, the order of is either or . In view of Proposition 2.5.1 and Lemma 2.6.4, this implies that if is a cyclic covering of degree such that is geometrically integral and such that the condition (2) in Theorem 1.1.2 holds, then it automatically satisfies (1) as well. We are going to construct such . If or , we may take to be the map under the identification . Below we assume . We need a preparation.
3.2. Generalized Dedekind eta functions
Let be a positive integer. For an integer not congruent to [math] modulo , define the generalized Dedekind eta function by
[TABLE]
where is the second Bernoulli polynomial (see [4]). Up to scalars, these functions are also called Siegel functions (see [2]). We have the following properties of .
Proposition 3.2.1** ([8, Corollaries 2 and 3 and Lemma 2]).**
- (1)
We have
[TABLE] 2. (2)
Let . We have, for ,
[TABLE]
and, for ,
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE] 3. (3)
Suppose that is a product of generalized Dedekind eta functions satisfying
[TABLE]
Then is a modular function on . Moreover, if is odd, then the conditions can be reduced to
[TABLE] 4. (4)
Given a matrix
[TABLE]
the Fourier expansion of starts from , where is a root of unity and
[TABLE]
where is the second Bernoulli function, denotes the fraction part of , and .
3.3. The modular curve
Let be a prime with and be an odd generator of . To ease the notation, set
[TABLE]
Let be the group generated by and any matrix of the form and be the corresponding modular curve. By [3, §II, 2], is the maximal unramified subcover of . We have
[TABLE]
For an integer not congruent to [math] modulo , using (3.2.1), we set
[TABLE]
Lemma 3.3.1**.**
The functions have the following properties.
- (1)
. 2. (2)
**
Proof.
The fact that follows immediately from (3.2.2) in Proposition 3.2.1 since is a product of generalized Dedekind eta functions. By the same property of the generalized Dedekind eta functions, we have
[TABLE]
Since is assumed to be odd, we find that . We next prove Part (2).
By the definition of , we have
[TABLE]
Now . Hence from (3.2.2) in Proposition 3.2.1 again, we find that
[TABLE]
It follows that
[TABLE]
This completes the proof. ∎
Let be the character of order of defined by
[TABLE]
for . In addition, if is even, i.e., if , there is a unique character of order of with . Explicitly, for , let be an integer such that . Then is equal to . Note that if , then is odd and is simply the character of nebentype.
Let be the kernel of the character
[TABLE]
on .
Lemma 3.3.2**.**
The group is a normal subgroup of and is cyclic of order .
Proof.
Let be a character on of order with kernel . By definition, is the kernel of the character (resp. ) if is odd (resp. even) on of order . ∎
Combined with this lemma, Theorem 1.1.2 follows from the following result:
Proposition 3.3.3**.**
The modular curve associated to admits a geometrically integral model over and the covering ramifies precisely at each cusp.
We first prove the proposition assuming .
Lemma 3.3.4**.**
Assume that , i.e., that . Let be an integer not congruent to [math] modulo .
- (1)
For , we have . 2. (2)
Let . Then
[TABLE] 3. (3)
For any , is a modular function on defined over . 4. (4)
The order of at any cusp of is odd, and is zero elsewhere.
Proof.
Assume that , i.e., that . Let be a matrix in . By Part (2) of Proposition 3.2.1, for any ,
[TABLE]
Notice that is a th root of unity independent of and . Thus,
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
We check directly from the definition of that
[TABLE]
Since is assumed to be greater than , we have
[TABLE]
Also, is even since either is even or is even. We conclude that and
[TABLE]
We next prove Part (2). Assume that . By Part (1), . Let be a nonnegative integer such that . By Lemma 3.3.1, we have
[TABLE]
This yields the formula in Part (2). The first statement of Part (3) is an immediate consequence of Part (2), and the second statement follows immediately from the definition (3.3.1).
We now prove Part (4). The statement for non-cusp points are obvious from the definition (3.3.1). Let , , be a cusp of . Consider first the case . Let be a matrix in . By Part (4) of Proposition 3.2.1, the Fourier expansion of starts from the term for any . Since such a cusp has width and is the product of exactly , the order of at is .
Now consider the case . Such a cusp has width . By Part (4) of Proposition 3.2.1, the order of at is
[TABLE]
Observe that for any integer , if we let , then
[TABLE]
and hence
[TABLE]
It follows that
[TABLE]
That is, the order of at the cusp is odd. This completes the proof. ∎
It follows from the lemma that is a quadratic extension of generated by a square root of , that is algebraically closed in , and that the covering ramifies exactly at each cusp, showing Proposition 3.3.3 in this case.
To show the proposition for the case , we need a slightly different construction of modular functions. In this case, . Let be any triplet of integers not congruent to [math] modulo such that and define . Then is a modular function on by Proposition 3.2.1. Also, by the same computation as above, the order of at each cusp is odd. In addition, we can verify as above that for ,
[TABLE]
Therefore, the proposition holds for the case . ∎
Remark 3.3.5*.*
If , then
[TABLE]
is also a modular function on , but not on . Thus, the function field of can be obtained by adjoining either or . The relation betwen and is
[TABLE]
(In particular, if is odd, i.e., if , then for .)
Acknowledgement. The first author would like to thank Masataka Chida and Fu-Tsun Wei for fruitful discussion. He is partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant (18K03232). The second author was partially supported by Grant 106-2115-M-002-009-MY3 of the Ministry of Science and Technology, Republic of China (Taiwan).
The authors would like to thank the anonymous referee for the detailed comments.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Nicholas M. Katz and Serge Lang. Finiteness theorems in geometric classfield theory. Enseign. Math. (2) , 27(3-4):285–319 (1982), 1981. With an appendix by Kenneth A. Ribet.
- 2[2] Daniel S. Kubert and Serge Lang. Modular units , volume 244 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Science] . Springer-Verlag, New York, 1981.
- 3[3] Barry Mazur. Modular curves and the Eisenstein ideal. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. , (47):33–186 (1978), 1977.
- 4[4] Bruno Schoeneberg. Elliptic modular functions: an introduction . Springer-Verlag, New York, 1974. Translated from the German by J. R. Smart and E. A. Schwandt, Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 203.
- 5[5] Jean-Pierre Serre. Groupes algébriques et corps de classes . Publications de l’institut de mathématique de l’université de Nancago, VII. Hermann, Paris, 1959.
- 6[6] Jean-Pierre Serre. Local fields . Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 67. Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1979.
- 7[7] John Tate. Les conjectures de Stark sur les fonctions L 𝐿 L d’Artin en s = 0 𝑠 0 s=0 , volume 47 of Progress in Mathematics . Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1984. Lecture notes edited by Dominique Bernardi and Norbert Schappacher.
- 8[8] Yifan Yang. Transformation formulas for generalized Dedekind eta functions. Bull. London Math. Soc. , 36(5):671–682, 2004.
