# Deep learning for seismic phase detection and picking in the aftershock   zone of 2008 Mw7.9 Wenchuan earthquake

**Authors:** Lijun Zhu, Zhigang Peng, James McClellan, Chenyu Li, Dongdong Yao,, Zefeng Li, Lihua Fang

arXiv: 1901.06396 · 2019-07-24

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a CNN-based classifier, CPIC, capable of accurately detecting seismic phases in small datasets, significantly improving speed and reliability in aftershock monitoring of the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake and adaptable to other regions.

## Contribution

The development of CPIC, a CNN model that maintains high accuracy with limited training data and can be efficiently applied to different seismic regions.

## Key findings

- Detects 97.5% of phases in aftershock data
- Maintains over 95% accuracy with only a few thousand training samples
- Achieves 97% accuracy after minimal fine-tuning on a different regional dataset

## Abstract

The increasing volume of seismic data from long-term continuous monitoring motivates the development of algorithms based on convolutional neural network (CNN) for faster and more reliable phase detection and picking. However, many less studied regions lack a significant amount of labeled events needed for traditional CNN approaches. In this paper, we present a CNN-based Phase- Identification Classifier (CPIC) designed for phase detection and picking on small to medium sized training datasets. When trained on 30,146 labeled phases and applied to one-month of continuous recordings during the aftershock sequences of the 2008 MW 7.9 Wenchuan Earthquake in Sichuan, China, CPIC detects 97.5% of the manually picked phases in the standard catalog and predicts their arrival times with a five-times improvement over the ObsPy AR picker. In addition, unlike other CNN-based approaches that require millions of training samples, when the off-line training set size of CPIC is reduced to only a few thousand training samples the accuracy stays above 95%. The online implementation of CPIC takes less than 12 hours to pick arrivals in 31-day recordings on 14 stations. In addition to the catalog phases manually picked by analysts, CPIC finds more phases for existing events and new events missed in the catalog. Among those additional detections, some are confirmed by a matched filter method while others require further investigation. Finally, when tested on a small dataset from a different region (Oklahoma, US), CPIC achieves 97% accuracy after fine tuning only the fully connected layer of the model. This result suggests that the CPIC developed in this study can be used to identify and pick P/S arrivals in other regions with no or minimum labeled phases.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.06396/full.md

## Figures

51 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.06396/full.md

## References

47 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.06396/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.06396