Efficient Geometrical parametrization for Finite-Volume based Reduced Order Methods
Giovanni Stabile, Matteo Zancanaro, Gianluigi Rozza
TL;DR
This paper introduces an efficient geometrical parametrization method for finite-volume based reduced order models, avoiding common domain mappings and utilizing D-EIM to manage non-affinity and non-linearities, demonstrated on heat transfer and fluid flow problems.
Contribution
It proposes a novel geometrical parametrization approach for finite-volume reduced order methods that does not require domain mapping, enhancing efficiency and flexibility.
Findings
Effective handling of parametrized geometries without domain mapping.
Comparison of mesh motion strategies for heat transfer problems.
Successful application to Navier-Stokes flow with segregated reduced order modeling.
Abstract
In this work, we present an approach for the efficient treatment of parametrized geometries in the context of POD-Galerkin reduced order methods based on Finite Volume full order approximations. On the contrary to what is normally done in the framework of finite element reduced order methods, different geometries are not mapped to a common reference domain: the method relies on basis functions defined on an average deformed configuration and makes use of the Discrete Empirical Interpolation Method (D-EIM) to handle together non-affinity of the parametrization and non-linearities. In the first numerical example, different mesh motion strategies, based on a Laplacian smoothing technique and on a Radial Basis Function approach, are analyzed and compared on a heat transfer problem. Particular attention is devoted to the role of the non-orthogonal correction. In the second numerical example…
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 22
Figure 23
Figure 24
Figure 25
Figure 26
Figure 27
Figure 28
Figure 29
Figure 30
Figure 31
Figure 32
Figure 33
Figure 34
Figure 35
Figure 36
Figure 37
Figure 38
Figure 39
Figure 40Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.