Spinoriality of orthogonal representations of reductive groups
Rohit Joshi, Steven Spallone

TL;DR
This paper provides a straightforward criterion to determine when an orthogonal representation of a connected reductive group over a characteristic zero field lifts to the spin group, based on the highest weights of its irreducible components.
Contribution
It introduces a simple, weight-based criterion for spin-liftability of orthogonal representations of reductive groups, simplifying previous complex methods.
Findings
Criterion based on highest weights for spin-liftability
Applicable to all orthogonal representations of reductive groups
Simplifies the analysis of spin structures in representation theory
Abstract
Let G be a connected reductive group over a field of characteristic zero, and consider an orthogonal representation of G. We give a simple criterion for whether the representation lifts to the spin group, in terms of the highest weights of the irreducible constituents of the representation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Spinoriality of Orthogonal Representations of Reductive Groups
Rohit Joshi
and
Steven Spallone
Bhaskaracharya Pratishthana 56/14, Erandavane, Damle Path, Off Law College Road, Pune - 411 004,Maharashtra,India
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune-411021,Maharashtra,India
Abstract.
Let be a connected reductive group over a field of characteristic [math], and an orthogonal representation over . We give criteria to determine when lifts to the double cover .
Key words and phrases:
reductive groups, orthogonal representations, Dynkin index, lifting criterion, Weyl dimension formula
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary 20G15, Secondary 22E46
Contents
1. Introduction
Let be a connected reductive group over a field of characteristic [math]. Let be a representation of , which in this paper always means a finite-dimensional -representation of . Suppose that is orthogonal, i.e., carries a symmetric nondegenerate bilinear form preserved by . Thus is a morphism from to . Write for the usual isogeny ([Veldkamp]). Following [Bou.Lie.7-9], we say that is spinorial when it lifts to , i.e., provided there exists a morphism so that . We call aspinorial otherwise.
By an argument in Section LABEL:reduction.closed, we may assume that is algebraically closed, which we do for the rest of this introduction. Let be a maximal torus of . Write for the fundamental group of (the cocharacter group of modulo the subgroup generated by coroots), and for a maximal torus of containing . Then induces a homomorphism , and is spinorial iff is trivial. If we take a set of cocharacters whose images generate , then is spinorial iff each cocharacter of lifts to . (See Section LABEL:s3.)
Write for the Lie algebra of , and for the character group of . Suppose is an orthogonal representation of . Write for the Casimir element associated to the Killing form. Given a cocharacter of , put
[TABLE]
We introduce the integer
[TABLE]
Theorem 1**.**
Suppose that is simple and let be an orthogonal representation of . Then is spinorial iff the integer
[TABLE]
*is even. *
Alternatively, this can be reformulated in terms of the Dynkin index ‘’ of and the dual Coxeter number of . (We recall these integers in Section LABEL:s7.)
