# Can a black hole-neutron star merger explain GW170817, AT2017gfo,   GRB170817A?

**Authors:** Michael W. Coughlin, Tim Dietrich

arXiv: 1901.06052 · 2019-11-15

## TL;DR

This paper investigates whether the gravitational wave event GW170817 and its electromagnetic counterparts could originate from a black hole-neutron star merger, using multi-messenger data analysis to constrain system parameters.

## Contribution

It provides the first joint multi-messenger analysis to compare black hole-neutron star and neutron star-neutron star merger scenarios for GW170817.

## Key findings

- Black hole-neutron star merger can explain the observed signals.
- Constraints on neutron star tidal deformability: Λ > 425.
- Mass ratio constraint: q < 2.03 at 90% confidence.

## Abstract

The discovery of the compact binary coalescence in both gravitational waves and electromagnetic radiation marks a breakthrough in the field of multi-messenger astronomy and has improved our knowledge in a number of research areas. However, an open question is the exact origin of the observables and if one can confirm reliably that GW170817 and its electromagnetic counterparts resulted from a binary neutron star merger. To answer the question if the observation of GW170817, GRB170817A, and AT2017gfo could be explained by the merger of a neutron star with a black hole, we perform a joint multi-messenger analysis of the gravitational waves, the short gamma-ray burst, and the kilonova. Assuming a black-hole neutron star system, we derive multi-messenger constraints for the tidal deformability of the NS of $\Lambda > 425$ and for the mass ratio of $q < 2.03$ at 90\% confidence, with peaks in the likelihood near $\Lambda = 830$ and $q = 1.0$. Overall, we find that a black hole-neutron star merger could explain the observed signatures, however, our analysis shows that a binary neutron star origin of GW170817 seems more plausible.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.06052/full.md

## Figures

12 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.06052/full.md

## References

98 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.06052/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.06052