# A Comparative Study of a Class of Mean Field Theories of the Glass   Transition

**Authors:** Indranil Saha, Manoj Kumar Nandi, Chandan Dasgupta, Sarika Maitra, Bhattacharyya

arXiv: 1901.05659 · 2019-09-04

## TL;DR

This paper compares two microscopic mean field theories of the glass transition, analyzing their ability to predict transition temperatures and the influence of their structural assumptions, revealing that both can accurately predict transition points despite differences in their dynamical predictions.

## Contribution

It provides a detailed comparison of two mean field theories, clarifying why both can predict transition temperatures even when their dynamical predictions differ.

## Key findings

- Both theories can predict the correct dynamical transition temperature.
- The absence of the Vineyard approximation affects the prediction of system dynamics.
- Despite shortcomings, the Schweizer-Saltzman theory can accurately predict transition temperatures.

## Abstract

In a recently developed microscopic mean field theory, we have shown that the dynamics of a system, when described only in terms of its pair structure, can predict the correct dynamical transition temperature. Further, the theory predicted the difference in dynamics of two systems (the Lennard-Jones and the WCA) despite them having quite similar structures. This is in contrast to the Schweizer-Saltzman (SS) formalism which predicted the dynamics of these two systems to be similar. The two theories although similar in spirit have certain differences. Here we present a comparative study of these two formalisms to find the origin of the difference in their predictive power. We show that not only the dynamics in the potential energy surface, as described by our earlier study, but also that in the free energy surface, like in the SS theory, can predict the correct dynamical transition temperature. Even an approximate one component version of our theory, similar to the system used in the SS theory, can predict the transition temperature reasonably well. According to our analysis, the absence of the Vineyard approximation in the SS formalism led it to predict similar dynamics for the two systems. Interestingly, we show here that despite the above mentioned shortcomings the SS theory can actually predict the correct transition temperatures. Thus microscopic mean field theories of this class which express dynamics in terms of the pair structure of the liquid while being unable to predict the actual dynamics of the system are successful in predicting the correct dynamical transition temperature.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.05659/full.md

## Figures

14 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.05659/full.md

## References

32 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.05659/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.05659