A note on the supersolvability of a finite group with prime index of some subgroups
V.S. Monakhov, A.A. Trofimuk

TL;DR
This paper establishes a characterization of supersoluble finite groups by showing that such a group is supersoluble if and only if it contains a supersoluble subgroup of prime index for every prime dividing its order.
Contribution
It provides a new necessary and sufficient condition for supersolvability based on the existence of specific prime index subgroups.
Findings
A finite group is supersoluble iff it has a supersoluble subgroup of prime index for each prime dividing its order.
The result offers a practical criterion for verifying supersolvability in finite groups.
The characterization simplifies the analysis of group structure through subgroup properties.
Abstract
In this paper, we proved that a group is supersoluble if and only if for any prime there exists a supersoluble subgroup of index .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinite Group Theory Research · Advanced Topics in Algebra
A note on the supersolvability of a finite group with prime index of some subgroups
V. S. Monakhov, A. A. Trofimuk
(January 16, 2019)
Abstract
In this paper, we proved that a group is supersoluble if and only if for any prime there exists a supersoluble subgroup of index .
All groups considered in this paper will be finite. Denote by the set of all prime divisors of order of . The notation means that is a subgroup of .
By Huppert [1, Theorem 6], a group is supersoluble if and only if every maximal subgroup of has prime index. The following observation is generated by Huppert’s result.
Theorem 1. Let be a group. Then is supersoluble if and only if for any prime there exists a supersoluble subgroup of index .
Proof. If is supersoluble, then for every maximal subgroup of that contains a Hall -subgroup is supersoluble and has index .
Conversely, let , and be a supersoluble subgroup such that , where . It is clear that is normal in . Let be a Sylow -subgroup of . Then is normal in . We use induction on the order of . Suppose that . Then
[TABLE]
and is supersoluble by induction. So is supersoluble. Therefore, we consider that and is elementary abelian. By Mashke’s theorem [2, Theorem I.17.6], , where is a minimal normal subgroup of , where . Since , it follows that is not contained in and there is a subgroup for some such that it is not contained in . Hence , and . Now is supersoluble by [3, Lemma 4.46]. The theorem is proved.
Corollary 1. ([4, Theorem 3.1]) Let and be supersoluble subgroups of and . If each subgroup of permutes with every subgroup of , then is supersoluble.
Proof. We use induction on the order of . We can assume that for all proper subgroups of and of . Let , and . By induction, is supersoluble and . Similarly, if , and , then is supersoluble and . Since , it follows that is supersoluble by Theorem 1.
Asaad and Shaalan’s theorem [4, Theorem 3.1] was developed by Guo W., Shum K. P., Skiba A. N., see [5, Theorem A]. This result can also be obtained from Theorem 1. We introduce the following
Definition. The subgroups and are said to be -permutable if for any and there exists an element such that . Note that the equality is equivalent to is a subgroup.
Lemma 1. Let and be subgroups of . If and are -permutable, then the subgroups and are -permutable for any .
Proof. Let and . Then , and there exists an element such that is a subgroup. Since , it follows that there exists an element such that . Because , we have
[TABLE]
Hence is a subgroup. Consequently, and are -permutable.
Corollary 2. ([5, Theorem A]) Let and be supersoluble subgroups of and . If for any and there exists an element such that , then is supersoluble.
Proof. It is obvious that and are -permutable. We use induction on the order of . We can assume that for any proper subgroups of and of .
Let , and . By hypothesis, there exists an element such that . Since for some and , we have and . Because , it follows that . By Lemma 1, and are -permutable. Hence the subgroups and satisfy the hypothesis of the corollary. By induction, is supersoluble.
Similarly, if , and , then there exists an element such that is supersoluble in and has index . Now is supersoluble by Theorem 1.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] B. Huppert. Normalteiler und maximale Untergruppen endlicher Gruppen. Math. Zeit. 60 (1954), 409–434.
- 2[2] B. Huppert. Endliche Gruppen I (Springer-Verl., 1967).
- 3[3] V. S. Monakhov. Introduction to the Theory of Finite groups and their Classes (Vyshejshaja shkola, 2006) (Russian).
- 4[4] M. Asaad and A. Shaalan. On supersolvability of finite groups. Arch. Math. 53 (1989), 318–326.
- 5[5] W. Guo, K.P. Shum, A.N. Skiba. Criterions of supersolubility for products of supersoluble groups. Publ. Math. Debrecen. 68 : 3-4 (2006), 433–449.
