# On posterior contraction of parameters and interpretability in Bayesian   mixture modeling

**Authors:** Aritra Guha, Nhat Ho, XuanLong Nguyen

arXiv: 1901.05078 · 2019-01-17

## TL;DR

This paper investigates how Bayesian mixture models' parameters converge post-data, comparing different priors and addressing model misspecification, with implications for interpretability and model complexity.

## Contribution

It provides new theoretical results on posterior contraction rates under various priors and misspecification, highlighting the impact of kernel choices on interpretability.

## Key findings

- Optimal contraction rates with explicit component priors.
- Consistent recovery of the number of components with nonparametric priors.
- Kernel choice significantly affects contraction under misspecification.

## Abstract

We study posterior contraction behaviors for parameters of interest in the context of Bayesian mixture modeling, where the number of mixing components is unknown while the model itself may or may not be correctly specified. Two representative types of prior specification will be considered: one requires explicitly a prior distribution on the number of mixture components, while the other places a nonparametric prior on the space of mixing distributions. The former is shown to yield an optimal rate of posterior contraction on the model parameters under minimal conditions, while the latter can be utilized to consistently recover the unknown number of mixture components, with the help of a fast probabilistic post-processing procedure. We then turn the study of these Bayesian procedures to the realistic settings of model misspecification. It will be shown that the modeling choice of kernel density functions plays perhaps the most impactful roles in determining the posterior contraction rates in the misspecified situations. Drawing on concrete posterior contraction rates established in this paper we wish to highlight some aspects about the interesting tradeoffs between model expressiveness and interpretability that a statistical modeler must negotiate in the rich world of mixture modeling.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.05078/full.md

## Figures

12 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.05078/full.md

## References

55 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.05078/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.05078