# A pilot survey of the binarity of Massive Young Stellar Objects with $K$   band adaptive optics

**Authors:** Robert Pomohaci (University of Leeds, UK), Ren\'e D. Oudmaijer, (University of Leeds, UK), Simon P. Goodwin (University of Sheffield, UK)

arXiv: 1901.04716 · 2019-01-23

## TL;DR

This study used adaptive optics in the K band to identify binary companions of Massive Young Stellar Objects, revealing a high multiplicity rate that increases with stellar mass and suggesting specific formation mechanisms.

## Contribution

First AO-assisted survey of MYSO binarity, providing new statistical insights into their multiplicity and companion properties compared to other stellar types.

## Key findings

- 31% multiplicity fraction among MYSOs
- More companions than T Tauri or O stars at similar separations
- Mass ratios generally larger than 0.5, inconsistent with random IMF sampling

## Abstract

We present the first search for binary companions of Massive Young Stellar Objects (MYSOs) using AO-assisted $K$ band observations, with NaCo at the VLT. We have surveyed 32 MYSOs from the RMS catalogue, probing the widest companions, with a physical separation range of 400 - 46,000 au, within the predictions of models and observations for multiplicity of MYSOs. Statistical methods are employed to discern whether these companions are physical rather than visual binaries. We find 18 physical companions around 10 target objects, amounting to a multiplicity fraction of 31$\pm$8\% and a companion fraction of 53$\pm$9\%. For similar separation and mass ratio ranges, MYSOs seem to have more companions than T Tauri or O stars, respectively. This suggests that multiplicity increases with mass and decreases with evolutionary stage. We compute very rough estimates for the mass ratios from the $K$ band magnitudes, and these appear to be generally larger than 0.5. This is inconsistent with randomly sampling the IMF, as predicted by the binary capture formation theory. Finally, we find that MYSOs with binaries do not show any different characteristics to the average MYSO in terms of luminosity, distance, outflow or disc presence.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.04716/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.04716/full.md

## References

57 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.04716/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.04716