# New physics in $b \to s e^+ e^-$?

## TL;DR

This paper explores new physics scenarios involving $b o s e^+ e^-$ transitions to explain anomalies in $R_{K^*}$ measurements, using effective field theory and specific models like leptoquarks and $Z'$ bosons.

## Contribution

It demonstrates that including new physics in $b o s e^+ e^-$ can reconcile $R_{K^*}$ anomalies within 1 sigma, using model-independent and specific model analyses.

## Key findings

- Viable new physics scenarios can explain $R_{K^*}$ anomalies.
- Predictions for other $q^2$ bins and $Q_5$ are provided.
- Constraints from lepton-flavor violation and other observables are considered.

## Abstract

At present, the measurements of some observables in $B \to K^* \mu^+\mu^-$ and $B_s^0 \to \phi \mu^+ \mu^-$ decays, and of $R_{K^{(*)}} \equiv {\cal B}(B \to K^{(*)} \mu^+ \mu^-)/{\cal B}(B \to K^{(*)} e^+ e^-)$, are in disagreement with the predictions of the standard model. While most of these discrepancies can be removed with the addition of new physics (NP) in $b \to s \mu^+ \mu^-$, a difference of $>\sim 1.7 \sigma$ still remains in the measurement of $R_{K^*}$ at small values of $q^2$, the dilepton invariant mass-squared. In the context of a global fit, this is not a problem. However, it does raise the question: if the true value of $R_{K^*}^{low}$ is near its measured value, what is required to explain it? In this paper, we show that, if one includes NP in $b \to s e^+ e^-$, one can generate values for $R_{K^*}^{low}$ that are within $\sim 1\sigma$ of its measured value. Using a model-independent, effective-field-theory approach, we construct many different possible NP scenarios. We also examine specific models containing leptoquarks or a $Z'$ gauge boson. Here, additional constraints from lepton-flavour-violating observables, $B_s^0$-${\bar B}_s^0$ mixing and neutrino trident production must be taken into account, but we still find a number of viable NP scenarios. For the various scenarios, we examine the predictions for $R_{K^{(*)}}$ in other $q^2$ bins, as well as for the observable $Q_5 \equiv P^{\prime\mu\mu}_5 -P^{\prime ee}_5$.