This paper introduces a Real version of the Brauer--Wall group for vector bundles, compares it to the topological Witt group, and explores their topological aspects over real varieties.
Contribution
It defines a Real Brauer--Wall group and relates it to the topological Witt group, providing new insights into their topological invariants over real varieties.
Findings
01
The Real Brauer--Wall group is introduced and characterized.
02
Comparison with the topological Witt group reveals their relationship.
03
The invariants capture topological parts of these algebraic structures.
Abstract
We introduce a version of the Brauer--Wall group for Real vector bundles of algebras (in the sense of Atiyah), and compare it to the topological analogue of the Witt group. For varieties over the reals, these invariants capture the topological parts of the Brauer--Wall and Witt groups.
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Full text
The Real Graded Brauer group
Max Karoubi
Université Denis Diderot Paris 7
Institut Mathématique de Jussieu — Paris Rive Gauche
We introduce a version of the Brauer–Wall group for Real vector
bundles of algebras (in the sense of Atiyah),
and compare it to the topological analogue of the Witt group.
For varieties over the reals, these invariants capture
the topological parts of the Brauer–Wall and Witt groups.
Weibel was supported by NSA and NSF grants.
In this paper we introduce the Real graded Brauer group GBR(X)
of a topological space with involution, and connect it to the
Real Witt group WR(X) introduced in [15],
via a Clifford algebra construction. These topological groups
share many of the properties of their algebraic counterparts,
the Brauer–Wall group and the Witt group of an algebraic variety.
If X is homotopic to a finite CW complex with involution,
GBR(X) is a finite abelian group of exponent 8, and
WR(X) is a finitely generated abelian group.
When V is an algebraic variety defined over R, there are natural
maps from the Brauer–Wall group GB(V) and Witt group W(V) to
GBR(Vtop) and WR(Vtop), where Vtop is the topological
space with involution associated to V⊗RC. These maps are
compatible with the Clifford algebra maps in the algebraic and
topological settings. Moreover, GBR(Vtop) is the (finite)
non-divisible part of GB(V), and
the map W(V)→WR(Vtop) is close to an isomorphism
in low dimensions, depending on the Hodge number h0,2(V):
Main Theorem 0.1**.**
1)
If V is a smooth curve, defined over either R or C,
then the map GB(V)→GBR(Vtop) is an isomorphism.
2)
If V is a smooth projective variety, defined over either R or C,
then there is a split exact sequence
[TABLE]
and τ:GB(V)≅GBR(Vtop) if and only h0,2(V) is [math].
3)
If V is a smooth projective surface defined over R,
with no R-points, then: WR(Vtop) embeds into GBR(Vtop);
there is a split exact sequence
[TABLE]
and τ:W(V)≅WR(Vtop) if and only pg(V)=h0,2(V) is [math].
The number ρ in Theorem 0.1 is the rank of the
cokernel of the first Chern class c1:Pic(V)→HG2(X,Z(1)),
where Z(1) is the sign representation of G; alternatively,
ρ is the rank of the map
HG2(X,Z(1))→HG2(X,Oan).
Part 1 is proven in Corollary 2.10 and
Proposition 4.10 below.
Part 2 is proven in Theorems 6.2 and 6.6, and
Part 3 is proven in Theorems 7.3 and 8.4.
The obstruction in both the real and complex cases is the divisible subgroup
(Q/Z)ρ of the Brauer group of V.
The paper is organized as follows.
Section 1 contains a review of the algebraic situation:
the Brauer–Wall group GB(V) has a
filtration with associated graded groups Het0(V,Z/2),Het1(V,Z/2)
and the Brauer group Br(V). Note that by Cox’ Theorem [7],
Hetn(V,Z/2) is identified with the Borel cohomology
HGn(Vtop,Z/2).
In Sections 2–3,
we define the Real graded Brauer group GBR(X) and
give it a filtration whose associated graded groups are:
HG0(X,Z/2), HG1(X,Z/2) and BR(X), the Real analogue of the
Brauer group; in Section 4 we show that BR(X) is
isomorphic to the torsion subgroup torsHG3(X,Z(1))
of HG3(X,Z(1)).
In Section 5 we show that the
Clifford algebra map WR(X)→GBR(X) is linked to the Stiefel–Whitney
classes of X, parallel to the algebraic setting.
Section 6 establishes Part 2 of Theorem 0.1,
relating GB(V) and GBR(Vtop),
while Sections 7 and 8 establish Part 3,
relating W(V) and WR(Vtop).
Notation:X will always denote a finite dimensional CW complex with involution,
with π0(X) finite.
For example, if V is quasi-projective variety over R then Vtop
is finite dimensional but need not be compact.
A bundle whose fibers are vector spaces over R will be called a
R-linear vector bundle to distinguish it from a Real bundle.
We shall write G for the cyclic group of order 2 and
HG∗(X,Λ) for the (G-equivariant) Borel cohomology
of X with coefficients in the G-module Λ.
By definition, this is the cohomology of the free G-space
XG=X×GEG with local coefficients Λ.
For example, G acts by complex conjugation of the group
μn (resp., μ∞=⋃nμn) of nth roots of unity
(resp., all roots of unity) in C. We shall also write Z(1)
and Q(1) for the sign representations,
so that Q(1)/Z(1)≅μ∞.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Sujatha, J.–L. Colliot-Thélène
and D. Krashen for several discussions.
We are are also grateful to
J. Lannes for the argument of Theorem 5.9, and to
O. Wittenberg for help with
the computation of Br(V) in Theorem 6.3.
1. The Brauer–Wall group of a scheme
The Brauer–Wall group GB(R) of a commutative ring R containing 1/2
was developed by Bass [3, IV] and Small [26] in
the late 1970s, following Wall [28], who introduced and
studied the Brauer–Wall group of a field.
More recent references are the books by
Knus [17, III.6] and Lam [21, IV].
Although the definitions and results generalize easily to schemes
containing 1/2, we could not find any reference for this material.
Therefore this section presents the Brauer–Wall group of a
scheme V whose structure sheaf O=OV contains 1/2.
We say that a sheaf of OV-algebras A is graded if it is
Z/2-graded as a sheaf of rings, i.e., if A=A0⊕A1,
the product takes Ai⊗Aj to Ai+j.
The graded tensor product A⊗^B of two sheaves A, B of
graded algebras is the tensor product of the underlying graded
OV-modules with multiplication determined by
[TABLE]
for homogeneous sections a′ of Ai, b of Bj.
The opposite graded algebra Aop is A with product
a∗b=(−1)ijba for sections a of Ai and b of Aj.
If E=E0⊕E1 is a Z/2-graded OV-module,
its endomorphisms End(E) form a graded algebra;
the degree 0 subalgebra is End(E0)×End(E1).
We say that a locally free sheaf A of algebras is a
(graded) Azumaya algebra if
φ:A⊗^Aop⟶\buildrelEnd(A) is an isomorphism,
where φ(a⊗b)(c)=(−1)jkacb for sections a,b,c of
Ai, Aj, Ak.
Definition 1.2**.**
The Brauer–Wall group of V, which we will write as GB(V), is the
set of equivalence classes of graded Azumaya algebras, where equivalence is
generated by making A and A⊗^End(E) equivalent for every
Z/2-graded locally free sheaf E. Equivalently,
graded Azumaya algebras A and B are equivalent
if and only if A⊗^Bop is isomorphic to End(E)
for some E. It is an abelian group under
the product ⊗^ of (1.1);
the identity element is OV concentrated in degree 0.
Example 1.3**.**
A graded Azumaya algebra with A1=0 is the same thing as
an ungraded Azumaya algebra. If A=A0 and A vanishes
in GB(V) then A0≅End(E) for a graded locally free sheaf E (necessarily concentrated in one degree),
and hence A0 vanishes in Br(V).
Since A⊗^B is just A0⊗B0 when A1=B1=0,
this induces a homomorphism from
the usual Brauer group Br(V) to GB(V).
Hence Br(V) injects into GB(V) as a subgroup.
When V is quasi-projective,
Br(V) is isomorphic to the torsion subgroup of Het2(V,Gm);
this is an unpublished result of Gabber; see [8].
Example 1.4**.**
Let us write M1,1 for End(OV⊕OV[1]); it is the matrix
algebra M2(OV) with the checkerboard grading:
entries in the (i,j)-spot have degree (−1)i+j.
Any ungraded Azumaya algebra A0 is equivalent to
the graded Azumaya algebra M1,1A0=M1,1⊗^A0.
Thus (up to Brauer equivalence)
we can always tensor with M1,1 to assume that A1=0.
A symmetric form(E,q) on V is a locally free sheaf E
on V, equipped with a nondegenerate
symmetric bilinear form q:E⊗E→OX.
They form a monoidal category, where the monoidal operation is
(E1,q1)⊥(E2,q2)=(E1⊕E2,q1⊕q2).
The Grothendieck–Witt group GW(V) is the Grothendieck group of
the monoidal category of symmetric forms (E,q),
modulo the relation that [(E,q)]=[h(L)]
if E has a Lagrangian L (a subobject such that L=L⊥);
h(L) is the hyperbolic form on L⊕L∗.
Definition 1.5**.**
The Witt group W(V) is the cokernel of the hyperbolic map
K0(V)→GW(V) sending [E] to the class of its
associated hyperbolic form h(E) on E⊕E∗.
The Clifford algebraC(q)=C(E,q) of a symmetric form
(E,q) is a graded algebra, equipped with a morphism E→C1(q)
so that q composed with OX⊆C0(q)
is E⊗E→\buildrelC1(q)⊗C1(q)→\buildrelC0(q).
In fact, C(q) is a graded Azumaya algebra on X.
By Knus–Ojanguren [18], C(q) vanishes in GB(V) for
quadratic forms with a Lagrangian, so there is a
Clifford algebra functor GW(V)→GB(V). It induces a homomorphism
C:W(V)→GB(V), because every hyperbolic form h(E)
has a Lagrangian; in fact, C(h(E))≅End(∧∗E).
Quadratic algebras
A quadratic algebra is a commutative OV-algebra
of the form Q=OV⊕L, where L≅Q/OV is an
invertible sheaf, equipped with an isomorphism q:L⊗L≅OV.
(Multiplication in Q is defined by q.)
The set of isomorphism classes of quadratic algebras is denoted Q(V).
A quadratic algebra defines an étale double cover of V.
The prototype is when L is OV, generated by a global section z,
and z2=a is a unit in O(V); we write
O[z]/(z2=a) for this algebra. Since a is independent
of the choice of z up to squares, the map a↦O[z]/(z2=a)
defines an injection of O(V)×/O(V)×2 into Q(V).
In fact, Q(V) is isomorphic to Het1(V,Z/2), with the product
Q∘Q′=OV×(L⊗L′) in Q(V) corresponding to addition;
the identity element of Q(V) is O[z]/(z2−1).
The surjection Q(V)≅Het1(V,Z/2)→2Pic(V)
is the map Q↦L.
A graded quadratic algebra is a graded O-algebra
of the form Q=O⊕L, where L is an invertible sheaf
(either in degree 0 or 1)
equipped with a product L⊗L⟶\buildrel≅O.
A graded quadratic algebra concentrated in degree 0 (i.e., with Q1=0)
is just an ordinary quadratic algebra; if Q1=L, the product is
skew-symmetric.
Definition 1.6**.**
We write Q2(V) for the set of
isomorphism classes of graded quadratic algebras over V.
There is a commutative product ∗ on Q2(V) defined by
letting (OV⊕L)∗(OV⊕L′) be
OV⊕(L⊗L′), with the isomorphism
(L⊗L′)⊗(L⊗L′)→O given by the usual sign convention.
This makes Q2(V) into an abelian group.
Example 1.7**.**
If z1 and z2 are in degree 1,
and z is in degree 0, then
[TABLE]
By construction, there is a homomorphism π:Q2(V)→H0(V,Z/2)
sending Q0⊕Q1 to the rank of Q1 (0 or 1 on each
connected component of V), and the kernel of π
is isomorphic to Q(V). We may consider Q2(V)≅Het1(V,Z/2)
to be a ring in which Q(V) is a square-zero ideal. In summary,
there is an extension
The graded centralizer of a subsheaf S of
homogeneous elements in A is the OV-algebra
C(S)=C0⊕C1
such that Ci commutes with Sj up to (−1)i+j.
We write Z0(A) for the graded centralizer of S=M1,1A0
in the algebra M1,1A of Example 1.4.
If A1 has strictly positive rank, then the graded centralizer
C(A0) of A0 in A is isomorphic to Z0(A).
Theorem 1.9**.**
If A is a graded Azumaya algebra, then
Z0(A) is a graded quadratic algebra, and
Z0:GB(V)→Q2(V) is a homomorphism:
Z0(A⊗^B)≅Z0(A)∗Z0(B).
The inclusion of Example 1.3
and the function Z0 fit into an exact sequence
[TABLE]
Thus the group GB(V) has a filtration by subgroups whose associated
graded groups are
[TABLE]
The extension in Theorem 1.9 can be non-trivial;
for example, if V=Spec(R) we have GB(V)=Z/8.
Theorem 1.9 was first asserted by Bass in [3, IV.4.4]
when V=Spec(R), using C(A0); this was corrected
in [26, 7.10].
Another reference for this result (in the affine setting) is
Knus’ book, [17, 6.4.7]. We remark that Wall always assumes
that A1=0 in [28].
Remark 1.10*.*
Suppose for simplicity that V is connected.
The composition π∘Z0:GB(V)→Z/2 is the parity;
we say that A is even or odd, according to
whether its parity is 0 or 1.
There is a set-theoretic section u:GB(V)→Br(V)
of the inclusion. If A is even, forgetting the
grading yields an Azumaya algebra which we write as uA;
if A is odd, A0 is an Azumaya algebra and we set
uA=A0. This was first observed by Wall in [28, Thm. 1].
2. The Real Brauer group
In this section, we introduce Real vector bundles,
the Real Brauer group BR(X) and the Real graded Brauer group GBR(X).
Let X be a topological space with involution σ.
By a Real vector bundle on X we mean a complex vector bundle
E with an involution σ compatible with the involution on X
and such that for each x∈X the isomorphism
φ:Ex→Eσx is C-antilinear.
Following Atiyah [1], we write KR(X)
for the Grothendieck group of Real vector bundles on a compact space X.
Since the tensor product of Real vector bundles is a Real vector bundle,
KR(X) is a ring.
We write CX for the trivial Real vector
bundle X×C with σ(x,z)=(σ(x),zˉ);
E⊗CX≅E for all E. We will write CX(1) for
the complex vector bundle X×C with the Real vector bundle
structure σ(x,z)=(σ(x),−zˉ);
CX and CX(1) differ if G has a fixed point x on X,
as they have different signatures there.
By a Real algebra on X we mean an algebra object in the
category of Real vector bundles, i.e., a Real vector bundle A
with a map A⊗A→A and a global section 1 making each fiber
Ax into a C-algebra, with each Ax→Aσx
a map of R-algebras. The tensor product of Real algebras on X is the
tensor product of the underlying Real vector bundles.
If E is a Real vector bundle, then
End(E) is a Real algebra whose fibers are matrix algebras;
the map End(Ex)→End(Eσx) sends η to
a↦η(aˉ); see [1].
Definition 2.1**.**
A Real Azumaya algebra on X is a Real algebra A such that
A⊗Aop⟶\buildrel≅End(A).
The Real Brauer groupBR(X) is the set of equivalence
classes of Real Azumaya algebras on X, where equivalence is
generated by making A and A⊗End(E) equivalent for every
Real vector bundle E. It is an abelian group under
the product ⊗ with identity CX.
A Real graded algebraA=A0⊕A1 on X is just a
Z/2-graded algebra object in the category of Real vector bundles,
and the graded tensor product A⊗^B is defined as in
(1.1).
A Real graded Azumaya algebra on X is a Real graded algebra
A=A0⊕A1 such that φ:A⊗^Aop→\buildrel≅End(A).
(As in Section 1, Aop is the Real graded bundle
with product a∗b=(−1)ijba, and φ(a⊗b)(c)=(−1)jkacb.)
Definition 2.2**.**
The Real graded Brauer groupGBR(X) is the set of equivalence
classes of Real Azumaya algebras on X, where ‘equivalence’ is
generated by making A and A⊗^End(E) equivalent for every graded
Real vector bundle E. It is an abelian group with the
product ⊗^; as in the definition
1.2 of GB, the identity is CX. As in Example 1.4,
CX is equivalent to M1,1CX with the checkerboard grading.
Example 2.3**.**
A graded Azumaya algebra with A1=0 is the same as
an ungraded Azumaya algebra on X. As in Example 1.3,
these form a subgroup of GBR(X) isomorphic to the
Real Brauer group BR(X).
Example 2.4**.**
If V is a variety over R, the complex analytic space Vtop
associated to V(C) has an involution (complex conjugation)
and there is a natural homomorphism Br(V)→BR(Vtop).
Indeed, every locally free sheaf E on V naturally determines a
Real vector bundle E on Vtop, and
End(E) determines End(E). This is compatible with products,
so every Azumaya algebra A on V naturally determines a
Real Azumaya algebra A on Vtop.
The same construction shows that every graded Azumaya algebra A on V naturally determines a
Real graded Azumaya algebra A on Vtop,
compatible with products. Hence we have a natural homomorphism
GB(V)→GBR(Vtop), compatible with the map Br(V)→BR(Vtop).
Connection to WR
Recall from [15] that the Real Grothendieck-Witt group GR(X) is
the Grothendieck group of the monoidal category of
symmetric forms (E,q), where E is a Real vector bundle
on X and q:E⊗E→CX is a nondegenerate symmetic bilinear form,
and the monoidal operation is
(E1,q1)⊥(E2,q2)=(E1⊕E2,q1⊕q2).
Example 2.5**.**
Let (E,q) be a Real vector bundle equipped with a symmetric bilinear form
q:E⊗E→CX.
The (complex) Clifford algebraC(q)=C(E,q) is
a Real graded algebra, equipped with a morphism E→C1(q)
so that q composed with CX⊆C0(q)
is the form E⊗E→\buildrelC1(q)⊗C1(q)→\buildrelC0(q).
Since the fiber of C(q) over x is the usual Clifford algebra
of (Ex,qx), each fiber is a graded Azumaya algebra over C.
It follows that C(q) is a Real graded Azumaya algebra on X.
In fact, C is a homomorphism GR(X)→GBR(X).
Definition 2.6**.**
The Real Witt group WR(X) of a compact G-space X
is the cokernel of the hyperbolic map KR(X)→\buildrelhGR(X),
sending [E] to the class of its associated hyperbolic form, h(E).
The map GR(X)→HG0(X,Z), sending (E,q) to its rank,
induces a map WR(X)→HG0(X,Z/2)≅H0(X/G,Z/2); we write
I(X) for the kernel, which consists of forms of even rank.
Remark 2.6.1*.*
WR(X) is also the cokernel of the forgetful map u:KR(X)→KOG(X).
Indeed, by [15, Thm. 2.2], there is an isomorphism GR(X)≅KOG(X)
identifying the hyperbolic map with u.
Lemma 2.7**.**
The Clifford algebra map C:GR(X)→GBR(X) induces
a homomorphism WR(X)→GBR(X).
Proof.
The tensor product C(q1⊥q2) is isomorphic to
C(q1)⊗^C(q2), because it is true fiberwise.
This proves that the functor C induces a group homomorphism
from GR(X) to GBR(X). The composition KR(X)→GBR(X)
is trivial because it sends the class of a Real vector bundle
E to End(∧∗E),
where ∧∗E is the exterior algebra of E.
∎
Two test cases
Example 2.8**.**
When the involution on X is trivial, every Real vector bundle
has a canonical form E⊗C, where E is an R-linear bundle
and the involution acts by complex conjugation. In this case, an
Azumaya algebra has the form A′⊗C, where A′ is an
R-linear algebra bundle on X, and similarly for Real graded
Azumaya algebras. The groups of equivalence classes of the A′
are isomorphic to BR(X) and GBR(X); they were studied by
Donovan and Karoubi, who showed in [10, Thms. 3,6]
that (for connected X)
[TABLE]
GBR(pt)=Z/8 is a summand of GBR(X), and there is an extension
[TABLE]
By [10, pp. 10-11], if a∈H1(X,Z/2) then
a+a=β(a)∈H2(X,Z/2), where β:H1(X,Z/2)→H2(X,Z/2) is the Bockstein. Thus the number of
Z/4 summands in GBR(X) equals the rank of the Bockstein.
For example, this implies that GBR(RP2)≅Z/8⊕Z/4.
By way of comparison, we showed in [15, Ex. 2.5] that
WR(RP2)≅Z⊕Z/4.
If Sn denotes the n-sphere for n>2, with G acting trivially,
then GBR(Sn)≅Z/8.
If H is the rank 2 R-linear G-bundle on S2 underlying the
canonical (Hopf) complex line bundle, then its Clifford algebra
C(H) is the nontrivial element of BR(S2)
vanishing on BR(pt)≅Z/2.
Proposition 2.9**.**
If X=G×Y then
[TABLE]
Proof.
Real vector bundles on X=G×Y are the same as
complex vector bundles on Y.
Thus GBR(X) recovers the graded Brauer group
GBrU(Y) studied by Donovan and Karoubi in [10].
For any finite CW complex Y, Theorem 11 of loc. cit. states
that GBrU(Y) is the direct sum of H0(Y,Z/2) and an
extension HU(X) of H1(Y,Z/2) by the torsion subgroup
of H3(Y,Z), equipped with a canonical section
i:H1(Y,Z/2)→GBrU(Y).
To see that the extension splits,
recall that, if β~ is the integral Bockstein and
a,b∈H1(Y,Z/2), i(a)+i(b)=i(a+b)+β~(a∪b)
in H3(Y,Z) by [10, pp. 10-11].
Since the cohomology operation β~Sq1 is zero,
i(a)+i(a)=β~Sq1(a)=0, and the extension splits.
A similar elementary argument shows that
β~(a∪b)=0, so i is a homomorphism.
∎
Corollary 2.10**.**
If V is a connected algebraic curve defined over C, then
[TABLE]
Indeed, we have Vtop≅Y×G, where Y=V(C) is 2-dimensional.
In this case, Br(V)=0 and the result follows from Cox’ Theorem,
Theorem 1.9 and Proposition 2.9.
3. Real quadratic algebras
In this section, X will be a G-space.
By analogy with the algebraic setting, a commutative Real algebra Q
on X of rank 2 is called a Real quadratic algebra if it has
the form CX⊕L for a rank 1 Real vector bundle L equipped with
an equivariant isomorphism θ:L⊗L⟶\buildrel≅CX.
Definition 3.1**.**
The set Q(X) of isomorphism classes of Real quadratic algebras
becomes a group with product ∘, as in Section 1.
The identity of Q(X) for ∘ is the Real quadratic algebra
Q(+)=CX[u]/(u2=1) with underlying Real bundle CX⊕CX.
Example 3.1.1**.**
There is another Real quadratic algebra, Q(−), which is the
algebra CX[u]/(u2=1) with underlying Real bundle
CX⊕CX(1); Q(−) has order 2 in Q(X).
It is useful to note that if t=iu then Q(−) is the algebra
CX[t]/(t2=−1) with underlying Real bundle CX⊕CX.
We write PicG(X) for the group of rank 1 R-linear
G-vector bundles on X with product ⊗;
its unit ‘1’ is the trivial line bundle RX.
If L0 is such a bundle, L0⊗L0 is trivial.
The proof of the following result
is inspired by [14, Prop. 1].
Proposition 3.2**.**
For every X, Q(X)≅PicG(X)→\buildrel≅HG1(X,Z/2).
Proof.
We proved in [15, 2.2] that a quadratic form θ on a
Real line bundle L determines111Fix a G-invariant Hermitian metric on L and define
T by ⟨Tu,v⟩=θ(u,v); L0 is the family
of +1 eigenspaces of T.
The bilinear map θ is determined up to isomorphism by the choice
of an equivariant Riemannian metric on L0.
an equivariant R-linear line bundle L0
such that L≅L0⊗C; the map σ:Lx→Lσx
sends λ⊗z to σ(λ)⊗zˉ.
If L=L0⊗C, we recover L0.
Thus PicG(X) and Q(X) are isomorphic.
To classify PicG(X), let
OR(U) denote the group of continuous R-valued functions on U;
OR is a G-sheaf. The usual description of a bundle using
(equivariant) Čech cocycles in HˇG1(X,OR×)
as patching data (and Cartan’s criterion [23, III.2.17])
shows that there is an
isomorphism PicG(X)→HG1(X,OR×) of abelian groups.
Consider the exact exponential sequence of equivariant sheaves:
[TABLE]
Since the first sheaf is soft, hence acyclic, we get an isomorphism from
PicG(X)≅H1(X×GEG,OR×) to
H1(X×GEG,Z/2)≅HG1(X,Z/2).
∎
Example 3.3**.**
Let x∈X be a fixed point, and L0 an R-linear line bundle on X.
The involution on the fiber of L0 over x must be
multiplication by ±1.
In particular, PicG(pt)≅{±1}.
If XG has ν components, this induces a natural sign map
[TABLE]
It is the composition of HG1(X,Z/2)→HG1(XG,Z/2) with
[TABLE]
Remark 3.3.1*.*
The sign map is not always onto when ν≥2;
it is onto when ν=1, as X→pt induces the splitting
Pic(pt)→PicG(X). The sign map is onto when X=XG,
by Example 2.8. It is also onto if dim(X)=1,
since in that case HG1(X,Z/2)→HG1(XG,Z/2) is onto.
Lemma 3.4**.**
Let PicG0(X) denote the kernel of the sign map.
There is a natural isomorphism w:PicG0(X)→\buildrel≅H1(X/G,Z/2)
and hence an exact sequence
[TABLE]
Proof.
The map w is defined as follows.
If L is a rank 1 R-linear G-bundle on X with trivial sign, the
identifications Lx≅Lσx imply that L
descends to a line bundle L/G on X/G, and the rank 1 R-linear
bundle L/G on X/G is classified by an element w(L) of
the group H1(X/G,Z/2).
Conversely, w∈H1(X/G,Z/2) determines a line bundle on X/G,
and its pullback along X→X/G is an equivariant line bundle on X
with trivial sign, i.e., an element of PicG0(X).
∎
Example 3.4.1**.**
Let RX(1) denote the trivial R-linear line bundle
with G acting by −1.
By Proposition 3.2, the Real quadratic algebra
corresponding to RX(1) is the algebra Q(−)
of Example 3.1.1.
If X is connected, then RX(1) is nontrivial in PicG(X).
This is clear if XG=∅, as the sign of RX(1) is
−1 on each component of XG.
When XG=∅, it is a nonzero element of
PicG0(X)≅H1(X/G,Z/2). This is because X→X/G is
a nontrivial covering space (as X is connected), covering spaces
with group G are classified by elements of H1(X/G,Z/2), and
we showed in Example 2.7 of [15] that the isomorphism of
Proposition 3.2 sends RX(1)
to the element classifying this particular cover.
The hypothesis that X be connected is necesssary;
when X=Y×G, RX(1) is trivial in
PicG(X)≅H1(Y,Z/2).
Example 3.4.2**.**
Let T=S1,1 be the unit circle in C, with the induced complex
conjugation as involution.
The trivial Real line bundle CT carries a canonical
Real symmetric form θ=t, which is multiplication by t on
the fiber over t∈T. The corresponding quadratic algebra is
CX[z]/(z2=t), and the corresponding nontrivial element of
PicG(T)≅{±1}2 is the R-linear subbundle of CT
whose fiber over t is it⋅R.
The sign of this element is different at the two fixed points of T.
Definition 3.5**.**
A Real graded quadratic algebra on X is a graded-commutative
Real algebra Q=Q0⊕Q1 of the form CX⊕L for a
Real vector bundle L of rank 1, equipped with
an isomorphism L⊗L⟶\buildrel≅CX.
(L may be in degree 0 or 1.)
We shall write Q2(X) for the set of isomorphism classes
of Real graded quadratic algebras on X.
As in Definition 1.6, there is a commutative product ∗
on Q2(X) making it into a commutative group, with
identity Q(+).
By definition, Q(X) is a subgroup of Q2(X).
There is a homomorphism
Q2(X)→\buildrelπHG0(X,Z/2)≅H0(X/G,Z/2)
sending a Real graded quadratic algebra
to the rank of its degree 1 component.
Example 3.6**.**
We have π(C⟨1⟩)=1, where
C⟨1⟩ denotes the Clifford algebra of the quadratic bundle
(CX,1) with its usual grading.
As in Example 1.7, C⟨1⟩∗C⟨1⟩ is the Real
quadratic algebra Q(−) of Example 3.1.1
concentrated in degree 0.
For completeness, we note that C⟨1⟩∗Q(−) is the
Clifford algebra C⟨−1⟩ of the quadratic bundle
(CX,−1)≅(CX(1),1), and C⟨1⟩∗C⟨−1⟩=Q(+).
Here is the analogue of the extension (1.8).
The proof shows that the group operation ∗ in Q2(X) is
determined by the fact that C⟨1⟩∗C⟨1⟩ is the
Real quadratic algebra Q(−) of Example 3.1.1.
Proposition 3.7**.**
There is a group extension
[TABLE]
If X is connected, so HG0(X,Z/2)≅Z/2,
this is a nontrivial extension, i.e., Q2(X) has exponent 4.
In particular, Q2(pt)≅Z/4.
Proof.
The sequence is exact at the first two spots by
Proposition 3.2, because
π(Q)=0 if and only if Q is a Real quadratic algebra.
By Example 3.6, π(C⟨1⟩)=1 (so π is onto)
and C⟨1⟩∗C⟨1⟩ is the Real quadratic algebra Q(−).
By Example 3.4.1, Q(−) corresponds
to RX(1), and is nontrivial when X is connected.
∎
Let M1,1A be the checkerboard-graded algebra of
Example 1.4, associated to a Real graded algebra
A on X.
The graded centralizer Z0(A) of S=M1,1A0 in M1,1A is a
Real graded quadratic algebra, by Theorem 1.9 applied to
each fiber. As in loc. cit., if A1 is nowhere zero then
the graded centralizer of A0 in A is isomorphic to Z0(A).
Theorem 3.8**.**
Z0(A)* is a Real graded quadratic algebra, and
Z0 is a homomorphism:
Z0(A⊗^B)≅Z0(A)∗Z0(B).
The inclusion i of Example 2.3
and the function Z0 fit into an exact sequence:*
[TABLE]
Proof.
The first sentence follows from Theorem 1.9 because
each fiber of Z0(A) is a graded quadratic algebra,
compatible with the graded tensor product ⊗^,
and the involution preserves centralizers.
This shows that the displayed sequence is exact at GBR(X),
suppose that A is a Real graded algebra on X with
Z0(A)=Q(+) in degree 0. By Theorem 1.9,
each fiber Ax is a graded Azumaya algebra over C with
Z0(Ax)=C. That is, A is a Real Azumaya algebra.
To show that Z0 is onto, let Q=Q0⊕Q1
be a Real graded quadratic algebra on X. If Q1=0,
then Q is also a Real graded Azumaya algebra, and
Z0(Q)=Q. If Q1=0 then Q=Q0=CX⊕L and
we consider A=Q⊕Qu with u2=−1 and
λu=−uλ for λ∈L. This is a Real
graded Azumaya algebra on X with Z0(A)=Q;
see [17, I(1.3.7)].
∎
Remark 3.8.1*.*
Suppose for simplicity that X is connected.
The composition π∘Z0:GBR(X)→Z/2 is the parity;
we say that A is even or odd, according to
whether its parity is 0 or 1.
There is a set-theoretic section u:GBR(X)→BR(X)
of the inclusion in Example 2.3. If A is even, forgetting the
grading yields an Azumaya algebra which we write as uA;
if A is odd, A0 is an Azumaya algebra and we set uA=A0.
By Remark 1.10, u is well defined.
If X is a point, u is the section Z/8→Z/2 of
BR(pt)⊂GBR(pt).
Lemma 3.9**.**
The composition WR(X)→\buildrelCGBR(X)→\buildrelZ0Q2(X) is onto,
and WR(X)→Q2(X)→HG0(X,Z/2) is the rank mod 2.
Proof.
Since we saw in Example 3.6 that the Clifford algebra C⟨1⟩
of (CX,1) has π(C⟨1⟩)=1, it suffices to show that
I(X) maps onto Q(X).
Suppose that C=C0⊕C1 is the Clifford algebra of a
Real quadratic space of even rank on X. To show that
Z0(C) is in Q(X), we may proceed fiberwise.
By Knus [17, IV(2.2.3)], each fiber Cx is a
graded Azumaya algebra of even type.
In particular, Z0(Cx) is a quadratic algebra over C;
it follows that Z0(C) is a Real quadratic algebra on X.
To show that the map is onto, let CX⊕L be a
Real quadratic algebra with a symmetric form θ on L,
and consider the Real vector bundle E=CX⊕L with
symmetric form q=(1⊕−θ)
The Clifford algebra C(E,q) has
Z0(C(E,q))=Z0(C(CX,1))∗Z0(C(L,−θ)).
The Clifford algebra Q=C(L,−θ) also has π(Q)=1,
and Q∗C⟨1⟩ is the Real quadratic algebra CX⊕L,
with L⊗L→CX given by θ (see Definition 1.6).
Now Z0∘C is a group homomorphism,
by Lemma 2.7 and Theorem 3.8, so
I(X) maps onto Q(X).
∎
Lemma 3.10**.**
If V is a variety over R, then Q2(V)→\buildrel≅Q2(Vtop),
and the kernel and cokernel of GB(V)→GBR(Vtop)
are the same as the kernel and cokernel of Br(V)→BR(Vtop).
By (1.8) and Proposition 3.7,
Q2(V)⟶\buildrel≅Q2(Vtop).
By Theorems 1.9 and 3.8,
there is a commutative diagram
[TABLE]
The result follows by the Snake Lemma.
∎
Example 3.11**.**
If X is a circle with involution, there are three cases:
•
S2,0, the circle with the antipode involution.
Then BR(X)=0 by Lemma 4.7, and
GBR(X)≅Q2(X)≅Z/4 by
Theorem 3.8 and Proposition 3.7.
•
S0,2, the circle with trivial involution.
By Example 2.8,
[TABLE]
•
S1,1, the unit circle T in C.
Since T/G is contractible, Lemma 3.4 implies that
Q(X)≅(Z/2)2 on the
elements of Examples 3.4.1 and 3.4.2;
the projection GBR(X)→GBR(XG)≅Z/8⊕Z/8
shows that GBR(S1,1)≅Z/8⊕Z/4.
An interesting element of BR(S1,1) is given by the
Real algebra bundle A whose underlying algebra is X×M2(C),
but whose involution over a point z with Im(z)≥0
is the composition of complex conjugation with conjugation by the matrix
(−sin(t/2)cos(t/2)cos(t/2)sin(t/2))
where t is the angle of z. The fixed algebra by the involution over
the fixed points is either M2(R) or the skew field of quaternions.
4. Classification of BR(X)
As pointed out in Example 1.3, the Brauer group of a quasi-projective variety V is isomorphic to
torsHet2(V,Gm), the torsion subgroup
of Het2(V,Gm). In this section, we prove the topological analogue,
replacing étale cohomology by Borel’s equivariant cohomology.
Theorem 4.1**.**
BR(X)* is isomorphic to torsHG3(X,Z(1)),
the torsion subgroup of the equivariant cohomology group HG3(X,Z(1)).*
The proof of Theorem 4.1 is postponed until after the technical
Lemmas 4.4–4.7 below.
Combining Theorems 3.8 and 4.1 with Proposition 3.7,
we deduce:
Corollary 4.2**.**
There is a filtration on GBR(X) with associated graded groups:
[TABLE]
Using Atiyah’s notation [1], S5,0 denotes the 4-sphere with antipodal involution.
Since the groups in 4.2 only depend on the 4-skeleton
of X, we have:
Corollary 4.3**.**
GBR(X)≅GBR(X(4)), where X(4) is the 4-skeleton of X.
In addition, GBR(X)≅GBR(X×S5,0).
In preparation for the proof of Theorem 4.1,
we do some simple calculations. Since π0(X) is assumed finite,
we may assume that X/G is connected.
Lemma 4.4**.**
There is a natural injective homomorphism
[TABLE]
Proof.
As observed by Bruno Kahn [14, p. 698],
Real vector bundles of rank n on a Real space X are
classified by the equivariant cohomology set HG1(X;Un) where
G acts on Un by complex conjugation. By the Skolem-Noether theorem,
the group of automorphisms of Mn(C) is
PUn=Un/U1≅SUn/μn, so
Real Azumaya algebras of rank n are classified by HG1(X;PUn).
Because U1 is in the center of Un,
we get exact sequences of pointed sets
[TABLE]
As in Grothendieck [12, 1.4],
it follows that the image of HG1(X;PUn) in HG2(X;U1)
is n-torsion.
Tensoring with End(W) for a rank r bundle has the effect of
replacing n by rn; we write U⊗, PU⊗ and μ∞
for the direct limit of the groups Un, PUn and μn
as n varies multiplicatively. Thus there is an exact sequence
[TABLE]
An easy calculation,
similar to [12, 1.4] or [10, Thm. 8],
shows that ∂(A)∪∂(A′)=∂(A⊗A′),
and we get an injective homomorphism
ρX:BR(X)→torsHG2(X;U1), natural in X.
Finally, the target is torsHG3(X,Z(1)) by
Lemma 4.5.
∎
Lemma 4.5**.**
For all i>0, HGi(X;U1) and HGi+1(X;Z(1)) are isomorphic, and
their torsion subgroup is the image
of HGi(X;μ∞) in HGi(X;U1).
Proof.
We have a diagram of distinguished triangles in the derived category
of equivariant sheaves on X:
[TABLE]
Here ‘OR’ denotes the soft sheaf of continuous sections of RX,
so HGi(X,U1)≅HGi+1(X,Z(1) for i>0.
The cohomology of the terms in the bottom row are uniquely divisible.
The result now follows from the cohomology sequences of the columns,
such as
[TABLE]
Remark 4.5.1*.*
If G acts trivially on X,
HGn(X,Z(1))≅Hn(X×BG,Z(1)).
This equals the group hypercohomology Hn(G,C∗(X)⊗Z(1)).
Using the hypercohomology spectral sequence
IE2pq=HpHq(G,C∗(X)(1))
of [29, 6.1.15], and the fact that
HG3(pt,Z(1))≅Z/2 is a summand of HGn(X,Z(1)), we see that
HG3(X,Z(1))≅H0(X,Z/2)⊕H2(X,Z/2).
Lemma 4.6**.**
If X is the free bouquet of spheres Sn(G+)=⋁GSn,
then HG3(X,pt,Z(1)) is 0 for n=3, and Z for n=3.
If G acts freely on X, we have HG3(X,Z(1))≅H3(X/G,Z)=0,
and H0(XG)=0 as well. If G acts trivially on X, then
HG3(X,Z(1))≅H0(X,Z/2) by Example 2.8.
Thus we may assume X is connected with a fixed base point.
We need to show that HG3(X,pt,Z(1))=0.
For visual simplicity, let us write
HGn(Y) for HGn(Y,pt,Z(1)) when Y is pointed.
We have an exact sequence
[TABLE]
The first and last terms in the display are 0, because
X/XG is a bouquet of copies of Y=S1∧(G+),
and HG3(Y)=HG4(Y)=0.
Hence HG3(X,Z(1))≅HG3(XG,Z/2).
By Example 2.8 this is H0(XG,Z/2).
∎
By Lemma 4.4, ρX is an injection; we need
to show it is onto.
When G acts trivially, ρX is the isomorphism
[TABLE]
of Example 2.8 and Remark 4.5.1.
When X=Sn(G+), the map ρX is trivially onto,
because HG3(X,pt,Z(1)) is torsion-free by Lemma 4.6.
Thus ρX is a bijection for all of the test G-spaces
Sn((G/H)+) of the Appendix.
We claim that ρX is an isomorphism if dim(X)≤1.
By Brown’s Theorem A.2, this will imply that
ρX is a bijection for all X.
So suppose that dim(X)=1 and that XG has ν>0 components.
By Lemma 3.4 and Remark 3.4.1, there are Real vector
bundles Li and symmetric forms θi:Li⊗2→\buildrel≅CX
on X whose classes [(Li,θi)] in PicG(X)≅PicG(XG)
map to a basis of (Z/2)ν under the sign map of Example 3.3.
The Clifford algebras
Ai=C(Li⊕CX,θi⊥1) have
Z0(Ai)=A0≅CX⊕Li, because this is true fiberwise.
∎
Proposition 4.8**.**
When X is a connected 1-dimensional G-complex,
and XG has ν components, we have BR(X)≅(Z/2)ν and
[TABLE]
where H1(X/G,Z/2) denotes the
quotient of H1(X/G,Z/2) by the subgroup generated by
the element [−1]=w1(X×R(1)).
Proof.
Recall from Theorem 3.8 that GBR(X) is an extension of
Q2(X) by BR(X), and that BR(X)≅(Z/2)ν
by Lemma 4.7. By Proposition 3.7 and
Lemma 3.4, Q2(X) is a nontrivial extension of Z/2 by
Q(X)≅(Z/2)ν⊕H1(X/G,Z/2).
The case ν=0 is now immediate.
If ν>0 then Q2(X)≅Z/4⊕(Z/2)ν−1⊕H1(X/G,Z/2)
by Example 3.3, Lemma 3.4 and
Proposition 3.7. The projection
GBR(X)→GBR(XG)→⊕νGBR(pt)≅(Z/8)ν
shows that the extension GBR(X) of Q2(X) by BR(X)
is as described.
∎
Remark 4.8.1*.*
When X is connected, dim(X)=1 and ν>0 we have
[TABLE]
and WR(X)→GBR(X) is onto.
Since the proof requires slightly more machinery,
we will prove this in [16, 3.1].
Example 4.9**.**
Let X be a compact connected oriented 2-manifold of genus g.
If G acts freely on X, then
[TABLE]
Indeed, we saw in [15, 4.6] that
H1(X/G,Z/2)≅(Z/2)g+1; by Lemma 3.4 this is
HG1(X,Z/2). Since HG3(X)=H3(X/G)=0,
GBR(X)≅Q2(X)
and the result follows from Proposition 3.7.
If G does not act freely, and
XG is the union of ν>0 circles, similar calculations
(which we omit) show that BR(X)=(Z/2)ν and
GBR(X)≅Z/8⊕(Z/4)ν−1⊕(Z/2)g.
Proposition 4.10**.**
Let V be a smooth projective curve of genus g,
defined over R (and geometrically irreducible).
If V(R) has ν components, then
[TABLE]
We also have GB(V)⟶\buildrel≅GBR(Vtop) when
V is a smooth affine curve defined over R.
Proof.
Set X=Vtop. We know that Het1(V,Z/2)≅(Z/2)g+1+s,
where s=0 if ν=0 and s=ν−1 if ν>0; see [25, 0.5].
By Proposition 3.7, we have
Q2(V)≅Q2(X)≅Z/4⊕(Z/2)g+s.
By Theorem 4.1, it suffices to observe that Br(V)=(Z/2)ν
(see [25, 0.1]) and BR(Vtop)=(Z/2)ν as well.
∎
5. Stiefel–Whitney classes
Following Atiyah and Segal [2], we recall that vector bundles on XG
may be identified with equivariant vector bundles on X×EG;
the pullback of a bundle on XG to X×EG
is an equivariant vector bundle.
Thus the map X×EG→X induces natural “Atiyah–Segal” maps
KOG(X)→KO(XG), where KO(XG) is defined to be
representable K-theory.
Definition 5.1**.**
The equivariant Stiefel-Whitney classes
[TABLE]
are the composition of the Atiyah-Segal map
with the usual Stiefel-Whitney classes
wn:KO(XG)→Hn(XG,Z/2)≅HGn(X,Z/2).
When X=G×Y, for example,
we have KOG(X)≅KO(Y) and HGn(X)≅Hn(Y).
In this case, the wn are the usual Stiefel-Whitney classes
wn:KO(Y)→Hn(Y,Z/2).
Remark 5.1.1*.*
In [14], Bruno Kahn defined equivariant Chern classes
cn:KR(X)→HG2n(X,Z(n)) for Real vector bundles, with
the first Chern class c1 inducing an isomorphism between the group of
rank 1 Real vector bundles on X and HG2(X,Z(1)).
(Z(1) is the sign representation of G.)
In particular, c1:KR(X)→HG2(X,Z(1)) is a surjection.
In the algebraic setting, the discriminant does not factor
through W(V), because the discriminant of h(E) is (−1)rankE;
instead, it factors through the ideal I(V). The same is true
in our setting: w1 does not factor through WR(X);
the case X=pt shows that the composition
KR(X)⟶\buildrelhKOG(X)⟶\buildrelw1HG1(X,Z/2)
need not be zero.
To see that w1 factors through the ideal I(X)
of forms in WR(X) of even degree, let I^(X) denote the
kernel of rank:KOG(X)→Z.
The quotient map KOG(X)→WR(X) sends I^(X) onto the
ideal I(X) of WR(X) because if E has rank 2n then
[E]−[h(n)] has rank 0.
By Proposition 3.2 and Lemma 3.9, the map
[TABLE]
sends I(X) of WR(X) to the subgroup HG1(X,Z/2) of Q2(X).
Lemma 5.2**.**
The composition
[TABLE]
agrees with the Stiefel–Whitney class w1:KOG(X)→HG1(X,Z/2).
Hence it induces a
Stiefel–Whitney class w1:I(X)→HG1(X,Z/2).
Proof.
By construction, the map w1:KOG(X)→HG1(X,Z/2)
is the composition of the determinant map KOG(X)→PicG(X)
with the isomorphism between PicG(X)≅PicG(X×EG)
and HG1(X,Z/2). Given an equivariant R-linear bundle F
of even rank d, corresponding to the symmetric form q on the
Real bundle E=F⊗C,
let A denote the Clifford algebra C(q); the determinant bundle
∧dE is a summand of A0. A direct calculation
shows that Z0(A)x=C⊕∧dEx on each fiber,
and hence that Z0(A)=∧dE, as asserted.
∎
Theorem 5.3**.**
The algebraic discriminant of a smooth variety V factors as
[TABLE]
Proof.
It suffices to consider elements of W(V) of the form
u=(E,θ)−(OVn,1), where θ is a symmetric form on
an algebraic vector bundle E of rank n.
Since disc(u)=disc(detE,detθ), we may
replace E by detE to assume that E has rank 1.
Note that disc(OV,1) is trivial.
By restricting V to an open subvariety U,
we may assume that E is trivial and θ is a global unit.
This doesn’t affect the discriminant,
as Het1(V,Z/2)≅H0(V,H1) is a subgroup of
Het1(U,Z/2), by the Bloch–Ogus sequence
[TABLE]
and the sequence of
Theorem 5.3 is natural in V.
Since the discriminant is a homomorphism,
we are reduced to the case when E is the
trivial bundle OV and θ is given by a global
unit a of H0(V,OV)⊂F.
By construction, the algebraic discriminant sends
[OV,a] to the class of a∈F×/F×2.
Since the map W(V)→WR(Vtop) sends the class of (OV,a)
to the class (Vtop×C,a), we need to evaluate w1
on forms (E,a), E=Vtop×C.
By Example 3.4.2, the trivial Real line bundle CT on
the unit circle T in C carries a canonical
Real symmetric form θ=t, which is multiplication by t on
the fiber over t∈T, and w1(CT,t) is nontrivial in
HG1(T,Z/2)≅{±1}2.
If V=Spec(A), A=R[t,1/t]), then Vtop=C−{0}≃T and
under the isomorphism
HG1(T,Z/2)≅Het1(V,Z/2)≅A×/A×2,
w1(CT,t) is the class of the unit t of A.
A global unit a of a variety V over R defines an
equivariant map Vtop→\buildrelaC−{0}≃T, and
a∗:KOG(T)→KOG(Vtop) sends (TC,t) to (E,a).
By naturality,
[TABLE]
We remark that Theorem 5.3 is well known in the affine
case; see [21, V.2.5]. Our argument uses I^(V)
to avoid the cases of the signed determinant that arise in loc. cit.
The class w2
Recall that rank 2 real bundles on Y are classified by
H1(Y,O2), and that the orthogonal group O2 is the
semidirect product S1⋊O1, where O1≅Z/2
is the diagonal subgroup diag(±1,1) of O2.
(O1 acts by complex conjugation).
Multiplication by 2 on S1 extends to an
endomorphism q of O2 fixing O1.
Thus there is an exact sequence
[TABLE]
The boundary map H1(Y,O2)⟶\buildrel∂H2(Y,Z/2)
gives an invariant of rank 2 real bundles.
Lemma 5.5**.**
Let E be an R-linear vector bundle on Y of rank 2, classified by
ξ∈H1(Y,O2). Then the element ∂(ξ) of
H2(Y,Z/2) is the Stiefel–Whitney class w2(E).
Proof.
(Folklore)
Since E is the pullback of EO2, the universal bundle on BO2,
we may assume that Y=BO2 and E=EO2.
Now the vector space H2(BO2,Z/2)
is 2-dimensional, with basis {w12,w2}, so we can write
∂(ξ) as aw12(E)+bw2(E). The restriction E′ of E to BSO2
is an oriented bundle satisfying w12(E′)=0 and w2(E′)=0
[24, 12.4], so ∂(ξ) restricts to w2(E′) in
H2(BSO2,Z/2)≅Z/2; hence b=1. On the other hand,
the restriction of EO2 to BO1=RP∞ is L⊕1,
and its pullback by q is trivial.
Since w12(L)=0, w2(L)=0 we see that a=0.
∎
Proposition 5.6**.**
The reduction modulo 2 of the equivariant Chern class c1 of a
Real vector bundle is the equivariant Stiefel-Whitney class w2
of its underlying R-linear bundle.
That is, the left square commutes in the diagram:
[TABLE]
Hence the map w2:KOG(X)→HG2(X,Z/2) induces a homomorphism
[TABLE]
Proof.
As pointed out by Atiyah (in the proof of Theorem 2.5 in [1]),
there is a Splitting Principle for Real vector bundles.
As a consequence, it is enough to consider the case of a Real line bundle L.
Consider the diagram of equivariant sheaves of groups,
whose second row is (5.4), and where exp(t)=e2πit:
[TABLE]
The right vertical map j is the standard inclusion, and the middle vertical
is the map t↦exp(t/2). The Real line bundle L determines
an element [L] in HG1(X,C×)≅HG1(X,S1),
and the Chern class c1(L) in HG2(X,Z(1)) is the coboundary
∂([L]); see [14, Prop. 1].
Now j[L]∈HG1(X,O2) is the class of the underlying R-linear
G-bundle ξ.
By naturality and Lemma 5.5 applied to Y=X×GEG,
the reduction modulo 2 of c1(L) is ∂(j[L])=w2(ξ).
∎
Remark 5.6.1*.*
Proposition 5.6 is analogous to the classical fact [24, 14-B]
that for a complex vector bundle E, the reduction modulo 2 of
the usual Chern class c1(E) is w2(E).
When X=XG, the proof of 5.6
is due to B. Kahn [14, Thm. 4].
Recall from Remark 3.8.1 that forgetting the grading yields a function u:GBR(X)→BR(X).
Lemma 5.7**.**
The ungraded Clifford algebra map
[TABLE]
is wˉ2=β~w2.
Thus the image of u∘C in BR(X) has exponent 2.
Proof.
Recall that HG3(X,Z(1))≅HG3(X×S5,0,Z(1)),
where S5,0 is the 4-sphere with antipodal involution.
Thus we may replace X by X×S5,0 to assume that G
acts freely on X. In this case, KOG(X)≅KO(X/G)
and we noted in Example 2.8 and Theorem 4.1,
[TABLE]
Suppose then that G acts freely on X. As noted in Remark 2.6.1, WR(X) is a quotient of
KOG(X)≅KO(X/G). If F is an R-linear vector bundle
on X/G, Donovan and Karoubi proved in [10, Lemma 7]
that w2(F)∈H2(X/G,Z/2)≅HG2(X,Z/2)
coincides with the class of the ungraded R-linear Clifford algebra
u(CR(F)) on X/G or, equivalently, with the class of
u(CR(F)⊗C)=uCC(E,q) on X.
The isomorphism KOG(X)≅GR(X) of Remark 2.6.1
sends the class of F to the class of the Real vector bundle
E=F⊗RC on X with form q. From Proposition 5.6
we see that wˉ2(E,q)=β~w2(F).
Since w2(F)=uCR(F), we are done.
∎
Lemma 5.8**.**
The algebraic Hasse invariant on a smooth variety V
is compatible with the equivariant wˉ2 on X=Vtop
in the sense that the following diagram commutes:
[TABLE]
Proof.
We showed in [15, 1.2] that the left square commutes as
a special case of a general result about Hermitian categories.
The lower right map is well defined because the map
Pic(V)→HG2(X,Z/2) factors through the Chern class
c1:KR(X)→HG2(X,Z(1)) of Remark 5.1.1,
and there is a short exact sequence:
[TABLE]
Commutativity of the right square is immediate from this.
Thus it suffices to show that the middle square commutes.
Let θ be a symmetric form on an algebraic vector bundle E.
As in the proof of 5.3,
we may restrict V to any dense open subvariety U, because
H0(V,H2)→H0(U,H2) is an injection;
both are subgroups of Het2(F,Z/2) by Bloch–Ogus [4].
Over the function field F, (E,θ) is isomorphic to a sum of
1-dimensional forms. Such an isomorphism is defined over a
dense open U. Replacing V by such a U, we may assume that
(E,θ) is a Whitney sum of rank 1 forms (Ei,θi).
By construction, the algebraic Hasse invariant of (E,θ) is
the class of ∏i<jdisc(Ei,θi)∪disc(Ej,θj).
By Theorem 5.3, this equals
w2(E,θ)=∏i<jw1(Ei,θi)∪w1(Ej,θj).
∎
It is not generally the case that every element of H2(X,Z/2)
is the second Stiefel–Whitney class of a vector bundle
(see Example 5.10 below).
The following criterion was communicated to us by J. Lannes.
Let β denote the integral Bockstein K(Z/2,4)→K(Z,5),
representing the cohomology operation H4(−,Z/2)→H5(−,Z).
Theorem 5.9** (Lannes).**
Let u be a cohomology class in H2(X,Z/2).
A necessary condition for u to be w2(E)
for an R-linear vector bundle E on X is that β(u2)=0.
*If dim(X)≤7 and β(u2)=0 in H5(X,Z),
then there is a vector bundle E such that u=w2(E).
This is always the case if dim(X)≤4.
*
Proof.
Let P denote the homotopy pullback of the Steenrod square
Sq2:K(Z/2,2)→K(Z/2,4) along the reduction
K(Z,4)→K(Z/2,4). The Stiefel–Whitney map w2:BSO→K(Z/2,2)
and the Pontrjagin class p1:BSO→K(Z,4) are compatible
(see [24, 15-A]), so (up to homotopy)
they factor through a map s:BSO→P.
Thus we have the diagram:
[TABLE]
As the composition BSO→K(Z,5) is null-homotopic,
a necessary condition
for u∈H2(X,Z/2) to be w2(E) is that β(u2)=0.
Now suppose that β(u2)=0. Since the bottom sequence is a
homotopy fibration sequence,
the map u2:X→K(Z/2,4) lifts to a map X→K(Z,4)
and hence to a map X→P. If dim(X)≤7,
this lifts to a map f:X→BSO, because
the map s is 7-connected.
The classifying map f determines a stable vector bundle E on X
with w2(E)=u.
∎
Remark 5.9.1*.*
If dim(X)≤3 then w2 maps the kernel of
(rank,det):KO(X)→H0(X,Z)⊕H1(X,Z/2) isomorphically
onto H2(X,Z/2). This follows from the proof of Theorem 5.9
but it is also a consequence of the Atiyah–Hirzebruch spectral sequence.
Example 5.10**.**
Cartan proved in [6] that βSq2(u)=β(u2)
is a nonzero cohomology operation H2(X,Z/2)→H5(X,Z).
Equivalently, the universal class
u∈H2(K(Z/2,2),Z/2) has β(u2)=0.
This is easily proven, using universal coefficients and the
well known cohomology groups H∗(K(Z/2,2),Z/2).
If X is the 6-skeleton of K(Z/2,2), the restriction uˉ∈H2(X,Z/2) of u cannot be w2(E) for any
R-linear vector bundle E on X, as β(uˉ2)=0.
Theorem 5.11**.**
If dim(X)≤4, and G acts freely on X,
the image of WR(X)→\buildrelCGBR(X)
fits into an extension:
[TABLE]
Proof.
Recall from Lemma 3.9 that
WR(X)→\buildrelCGBR(X)→\buildrelZ0Q2(X) is onto.
Let us write I2(X) for the kernel of this map.
By Lemma 5.7,
we have a commmutative diagram with exact rows:
[TABLE]
By Theorem 5.9,
KOG(X)≅KO(Y)→\buildrelw2H2(Y,Z/2)≅HG2(X,Z/2) is onto,
where Y=X/G.
By Proposition 5.6, w2 induces a surjection
wˉ2:I2(X)→2HG3(X,Z(1))≅2BR(X).
∎
Remark 5.11.1*.*
We do not think the assumption that G acts freely on X is
necessary in Theorem 5.11. For example,
when G acts trivially on X then KOG(X)≅KO(X)⊗R(G) and
w2:KOG(X)→KO(X)→H2(X,Z/2) is onto by Theorem 5.9.
In addition, the map β~:H2(X,Z/2)→2HG3 is a surjection.
Thus the proof of 5.11 goes through, using Example 2.8.
6. Brauer–Wall versus GBR(X)
In this section, we compare the groups GB(V) and GBR(Vtop)
for smooth varieties defined over R.
First, suppose that V is a complex variety, with
underlying topological space V(C).
In this case, the topological space Vtop with involution
associated to V is G×V(C), because
V⊗RC is two copies of V.
From Proposition 2.9
we see that
[TABLE]
This calculation of GBR(Vtop) also follows from
Theorems 3.8 and 4.1.
If V is smooth and projective over C, Hp+q(V(C),C)
has a Hodge decomposition as the sum of Hp(X,Ωq),
and we write hq,p for the dimension of Hp(X,Ωq).
In particular h0,2 is the dimension of
H2(V,OV)≅Han2(V,Oan).
Abelian varieties of dimension n have h0,2=(2n), while
projective spaces and ruled surfaces have h0,2=0.
Let ρ denote the rank of the natural map
Han2(V,Z(1))→Han2(V,Oan).
Theorem 6.2**.**
Suppose that V is a smooth complex projective variety. Then
(1)
Br(V)≅(Q/Z)ρ⊕torsH3(V(C),Z)**
2. (2)
there is a split exact sequence
[TABLE]
where ρ≥2h0,2, and ρ=0 when h0,2=0.
3. (3)
GB(V)→GBR(Vtop)*
is an isomorphism if and only if h0,2=0.*
Proof.
Recall [8] that the Brauer group
is the torsion subgroup of H2(V,Gm),
and that Han2(V,Oan) and Han3(V,Oan) are torsionfree.
Consider the exponential sequence,
in which we have identified Z and Z(1):
[TABLE]
If h0,2=0, the second term is zero, so the torsion subgroups of
H2(V,Gm) and Han3(V,Z)≅H3(V(C),Z) are isomorphic.
Now suppose that h0,2(V)>0, and write D for the cokernel of η;
since D is divisible, it is a summand of H2(V,Gm).
Thus
[TABLE]
By Lemma 3.10, it remains to determine D.
The kernel of the map η in the displayed exponential sequence is
the image of Pic(V)=H1(V,Gm) in Han2(V,Z); this is the
Néron-Severi group NS(V); see [13, p. 447].
Since Han2(V,Oan) is torsionfree, NS(V) contains
the torsion subgroup of Han2(V,Z); let N denote NS(V) modulo
torsion.
By universal coefficients, Han2(V,C)≅Han2(V,Z)⊗C,
so Han2(V,Z) has rank h1,1+2h0,2.
Since the rank of N is ≤h1,1, the image
Han2=Han2(V,Z)/N
of Han2(V,Z) in Han2(V,Oan) is a free abelian group of
rank ρ, ρ≥2h0,2>0.
Since Han2
is the image of η, the torsion subgroup of
D is the nonzero group (Q/Z)ρ, as required.
∎
Next, we suppose that V is geometrically connected over R, i.e., that
V⊗RC is connected. In this case, X=Vtop is connected.
Recall that h0,2(V)=dimRH2(V,OV) equals h0,2(V⊗RC),
because (by [GAGA]),
H2(V,OV)≅H2(V⊗C,OV⊗C)G≅Han2(X,Oan)G.
As observed by Krasnov in [19, proof of 1.3],
this group is also isomorphic to HG2(X,Oan)
(because Oan is a torsionfree G-sheaf).
The proof of the following result of Krasnov [19, (0.4)]
was communicated to us by Olivier Wittenberg.
Theorem 6.3**.**
Let V be a smooth geometrically connected projective variety
over R, with underlying G-space Vtop. Then
[TABLE]
where ρ0≥h0,2(V). If h0,2=0 then ρ0=0.
Remark 6.3.1*.*
Recall from Theorem 4.1 that torsHG3(Vtop,Z(1))
is isomorphic to the finite group BR(Vtop).
Thus Theorem 6.3 implies that
The exponential sequence
0→Z(1)→Oan→Oan×→1
of analytic G-sheaves on the G-space X=Vtop
yields an exact sequence
[TABLE]
where we have abbreviated Oan as O for visual simplicity.
Note that the groups HGn(X,O) are torsionfree and divisible.
By Krasnov [19, 0.1], the Brauer group
Br(V) is the torsion subgroup of HG2(X,Gm).
If h0,2=0 then the conclusion that
Br(V)≅torsHG3(X,Z(1)) is immediate.
Let ρ0 denote the Z-rank of the image of the map η.
As observed by Krasnov [19, 0.2],
it follows that the torsion subgroup Br(V) of HG2(X,Gm)
is the direct sum of (Q/Z)ρ0 and torsHG3(X,Z(1)).
Finally, Lemma 6.4 below shows that ρ0≥h0,2.
∎
Let τ be the involution on H2(X,C)
given by complex conjugation on the coefficients;
the τ-eigenspace decomposition is
H2(X,C)≅H2(X,R)⊕H2(X,R(1)).
By universal coefficients, H2(X,Z(1))⊗R≅H2(X,R(1)).
When the group G acts on both X and the coefficients, we
have the de Rham action σ; it commutes with τ and we have
[TABLE]
Lemma 6.4**.**
The map
H2(X,R(1))G→H2(X,Oan)G≅Rh0,2
is onto. Hence the image of
HG2(X,Z(1))→\buildrelηHG2(X,Oan)
has rank ρ0≥h0,2.
Proof.
Write H0,2 for H2(X,Oan), and
define f:H0,2→H2(X,C) by f(x)=(x−τx)/2;
since τ(f(x))=−f(x), f(x) is in H2(X,R(1)).
As σ commutes with τ,
f sends (H0,2)G to H2(X,R(1))G.
Since η(f(x))=x, the map
[TABLE]
is onto. Hence the image I of H2(X,Z(1))
spans the h0,2-dimensional R-vector space HG2(X,Oan).
Thus the rank ρ0 of I is least h0,2.
∎
Remark 6.5*.*
Krasnov defines the Lefschetz number of V to be ρ0,
the Z-rank of the image of η:HG2(X,Z(1))→HG2(X,Oan).
Krasnov also showed in [20, (0.6)] that
Theorem 6.3 holds for any smooth quasi-projective surface
defined over R.
However, if h0,2=0 we may have ρ0>0.
Theorem 6.6**.**
Let V be a smooth quasi-projective variety over R.
If V is geometrically connected, there is an exact sequence
[TABLE]
If V is projective, then ρ0≥h0,2(V), and
GB(V)→GBR(Vtop) is an
isomorphism if and only if h0,2(V)=0.
In this section, we compare WR(Vtop) and W(V) when
V is a complex surface. As in the previous section,
Vtop=G×Y, where Y=V(C).
Proposition 7.1**.**
Let Y be a connected 4-dimensional CW complex, and set X=G×Y.
Then WR(X)→GBR(X) is an injection, and
[TABLE]
Thus WR(X)→GBR(X) is an isomorphism if and only if the torsion in H3(Y,Z) has exponent 2.
Proof.
We saw in [15, Ex. 2.4(b)] that WR(G×Y) is the
cokernel of the ‘realization’ map KR(G×Y)=KU(Y)→KO(Y).
Let KU(Y) denote the kernel of rank:KU(Y)→Z.
By the Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence,
there is an exact sequence
[TABLE]
Similarly, the map (rank,w1):KO(Y)→Z×H1(Y,Z/2) is onto,
and its kernel SKO(Y) fits into an exact sequence
[TABLE]
(The surjection SKO(Y)→H2(Y,Z/2) is w2 by Theorem 5.9.)
By naturality, there is a morphism between these spectral sequences
compatible with KU∗(Y)→KO∗(Y). Since complex bundles are
oriented, they have w1=0 [24, 12-A], so the cokernel of
KU(Y)→Z×H1(Y,Z/2) is Z/2×H1(Y,Z/2).
The map H4(Y,Z)→H4(Y,Z) is a surjection,
because it is induced from the coefficient isomorphism
Z≅KU4⟶\buildrel≃KO4.
Hence the cokernel of KU(Y)→SKO(Y) is
the cokernel of H2(Y,Z)→H2(Y,Z/2), i.e., 2H3(Y,Z).
Finally, WR(X) is a module over WR(G)=Z/2, so all of the
potential extensions split.
∎
Remark 7.1.1*.*
As remarked in the proof of 7.1,
KO(Y)⟶\buildrelw1H1(Y,Z/2) vanishes on the image of KU(Y).
By the remark after Definition 5.1,
this implies that the map w1:WR(X)→HG1(X,Z/2)=H1(Y,Z/2)
is well defined when X=G×Y.
Now suppose that V is a smooth quasi-projective complex surface.
F. Fernández-Carmena [11] proved that W(V) is a split
extension of Z/2×Het1(V,Z/2) by
H0(V,H2)≅2Br(V), the quotient of Het2(V,Z/2)
by the image Pic(V)/2 of the Chern class c1. That is, there is a
split extension
[TABLE]
When V is a projective surface, its geometric genuspg
is the same as h0,2.
Surfaces with pg=0 include the projective plane P2,
rational surfaces, ruled surfaces, K3 surfaces, and Enriques surfaces
(see [13]).
Some surfaces of general type also have pg=0, such as Godeaux surfaces,
Burniat surfaces and Mumford’s fake projective plane.
Theorem 7.3**.**
Suppose that V is a smooth projective surface over C. Then there is an exact sequence
[TABLE]
where ρ≥2pg, and ρ=0 when pg=0.
Thus W(V)→WR(Vtop) is an isomorphism if and only if pg=0.
Proof.
By Theorem 6.2,
2Br(V)≅(Z/2)ρ⊕2H3(V(C),Z).
Now combine (7.2) and Proposition 7.1.
∎
Remark 7.4*.*
Suppose that V is a smooth quasi-projective surface over C,
which is not projective. Then we still know that
the kernel and cokernel of W(V)→WR(Vtop) are the same as
the kernel and cokernel of 2Br(V)→2H3(V(C),Z).
This follows from Proposition 7.1 and (7.2).
The invariant ρ is arithmetic, and not topological,
as the following example shows.
Example 7.5**.**
Consider the surface V=E×E, where
E is an elliptic curve over C.
Then ρ≥2, since pg(V)=1.
By the Künneth formula, X=Vtop has H1(X,Z/2)=(Z/2)4
and H3(S1,Z) is torsionfree.
By (6.1) and Proposition 7.1,
where ρ is either 4 (the general case)
or 3 (when E has complex multiplication).
This follows from Kummer theory, H2(X,Z)≅Z6, and the fact that
the Picard group Pic(V) is NS(V)⊕Pic0(V), where
Pic0(V) is divisible and the Néron-Severi group NS(V)
is either Z2 (the general case) or Z3
(when E has complex multiplication).
8. WR and GBR for surfaces with no R points
In this section, we compare W(V) and WR(Vtop) when
V has no R-points, i.e., G acts freely on Vtop.
Theorem 7.3 describes the situation when V is defined over C,
so we may assume that V is geometrically connected, i.e.,
Vtop is connected.
Our first goal is to determine WR(X) when G acts freely on X
and dim(X)≤4. By Propoition 3.7, Q2(X) is a nontrivial
extension of Z/2 by HG1(X,Z/2)=H1(X/G,Z/2). If we write
H1(X/G,Z/2) for the quotient of H1(X/G,Z/2) by the class of
RX(1), then Q2(X) is the product of Z/4 and H1(X/G,Z/2).
Theorem 8.1**.**
Let X be a connected 4-dimensional G-CW complex.
If G acts freely on X, then WR(X) is a Z/8-algebra, and:
(1)
WR(X)* is an extension:*
[TABLE]
2. (2)
C:WR(X)→GBR(X)* is an injection. It is an isomorphism
if and only if the torsion in HG3(X,Z(1)) has exponent 2;*
Proof.
The image of WR(X) in GBR(X) is an
extension of Q2(X) by 2BR(X), by Theorem 5.11. Moreover,
BR(X) is the torsion
subgroup of HG3(X,Z(1)) by Theorem 4.1. Thus
it suffices to show that the kernel of WR(X)→Q2(X)
has the same cardinality as 2BR(X).
Recall from [15, 2.4(b)] that KOG(X)=KO(X/G).
We will determine WR(X) by comparing the Atiyah-Hirzebruch
spectral sequences for KOG(X) and KR(X),
using the hyperbolic map h:KR→KOG.
It is convenient to write Y for X/G, so KOG(X)=KO0(Y).
Recall that the rank and determinant define a surjection
KO(Y)→Z⊕H1(Y,Z/2), and we write SKO(Y)
for the kernel of this surjection.
The Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence for KO∗(Y) yields a
filtration on KO0(Y) whose associated graded groups are
Z, H1(Y,Z/2), H2(Y,Z/2), 0, and the cokernel of
d31,−2:H1(Y,Z/2)→H4(Y,Z). The first two layers correspond to the
rank and determinant, and the rest describe SKO(Y) as an extension.
There is also an Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence for KR∗(X),
with E2p,q=0 when q is odd, and E2p,q=Hp(Y,Z)
when q≡0(mod4). When q≡2(mod4), we have
E2p,q=Hp(Y,Z(1)) (cohomology with twisted coefficients);
this is because G acts freely, so
X has a covering by open sets of the form G×U.
Thus the associated graded groups of KR0(X) are
Z, 0, H2(Y,Z(1)), 0, and the cokernel of
d3:H1(Y,Z/2)→H4(Y,Z).
We now compare the two spectral sequences.
The top quotient is the injection Z→\buildrel2Z, so modulo the
second layer I2 of the filtration of WR(X) we have the extension
Q2(X) of Z/2 by HG1(X,Z/2) discussed in
Lemmas 3.9 and 5.2.
The second layer is determined by the following
commutative diagram with exact sequences; the map
c1 is onto by Remark 5.1.1, and w2 is onto because
HG2(X,Z/2)≅H2(Y,Z/2).
[TABLE]
As in the proof of Proposition 7.1, the second vertical is the isomorphism H4(Y,KU4)→H4(Y,KO4).
Thus the cokernel of the third vertical h
is the cokernel 2HG3(X,Z(1))
of HG2(X,Z(1))→HG2(X,Z/2).
∎
Recall that GBR(X) is an extension of Q2(X)
by the torsion subgroup of HG3(X,Z(1)), and that Q2(X)
is the nontrivial extension Z/4×H1(X,Z/2) of
Z/2 by H1(X,Z/2), H1(X,Z/2) being the cokernel of
H1(pt,Z/2)→H1(X,Z/2).
(See Theorems 3.8 and 4.1, and Proposition 3.7.)
The following example shows that the extensions for GBR(X) and
WR(X) can be nontrivial.
Example 8.2**.**
Let X=S5,0 be the 4-sphere with antipodal involution.
Then
[TABLE]
Indeed, X is the 4-skeleton of EG=RP∞, so the
Borel cohomology HGn(X,−) agrees with
HGn(EG,−)≅HGn(pt,−) for n<4.
In particular,
[TABLE]
Hence WR(X)≅GBR(X) by Theorem 8.1, and
we showed in [15, Ex. 2.5] that WR(X)≅Z/8.
Now suppose that V is a smooth geometrically connected algebraic surface
defined over R, with V(R)=∅. It is well known that W(V) is a nontrivial extension of Z/2 by
the augmentation ideal I(V).
The following result is due to Sujatha [27, Lem. 3.4].
Theorem 8.3** (Sujatha).**
Let V be a smooth geometrically connected surface over R
with no real points. Then we have a short exact sequence
[TABLE]
The map from W(V) to Q2(V)=Z/4×Het1(V,Z/2)
is given by the rank and discriminant of a symmetric form.
Proof.
Since V has no real points, W(V) is a torsion group.
Sujatha proves in [27, 2.1, 2.2] that
the discriminant I(V)→Het1(V,Z/2)
is a surjection with kernel I2(V), and that the Hasse invariant
I2(V)→2Br(V) is an isomorphism.
Sujatha writes Γt(V,H1) and Γt(V,H2) for
Het1(V,Z/2) and 2Br(V); the reinterpretation
is standard, using [4].
∎
For V as in Theorem 8.3, the map
W(V)→GB(V)
is an injection, and is an isomorphism exactly when
the Brauer group Br(V) has exponent 2.
Putting together the pieces, and using Lemma 3.10, we see that
in the setting of Theorem 8.1,
we have a commutative diagram with exact rows.
[TABLE]
Recall that the Lefschetz number ρ0 is the rank of the cokernel
of the equivariant Chern class Pic(V)→H2(X,Z(1)) of
Remark 5.1.1, and that pg=h0,2.
Combining Theorems 6.3 and 6.6,
we have proven:
Theorem 8.4**.**
Let V be a smooth geometrically connected projective surface over R
with no real points. Then there is a split exact sequence
[TABLE]
(with ρ0 as in Theorem 6.6),
and W(V)→WR(Vtop) is
an isomorphism if and only if V has geometric genus pg=h0,2=0.
Appendix A An equivariant Theorem of Brown
In this Appendix, we give an equivariant version of
a Theorem of E. Brown, taken from [9, 7.1].
Let W∗ denote the category of finite pointed, connected CW complexes.
A homotopy invariant contravariant functor F:W∗→Sets
is called half-exact if the natural maps
F(X1∨X2)→∏F(Xi) are bijections and for every
subcomplex A of X the map F(X∪AX)→F(X)×F(A)F(X) is onto.
Brown’s Theorem:
Let ρ:E→F be a natural transformation between half-exact
functors from the category W∗ to Sets.
If ρSn is a bijection for every sphere Sn, then
ρX is a bijection for every connected X in W∗.
Let G be a finite group, and let W∗(G) denote the category of
finite pointed G-spaces with X/G connected, and equivariant maps.
The notion of a G-half-exact functor is the same as that of a half-exact
functor, with W∗ replaced by W∗(G).
Given an equivariant map f:A→X in W∗(G), we can form the
mapping cone Cf and the long exact Puppe sequence of pointed sets
[TABLE]
See [5, III.4]. Because SA is a co-H-space object
in W∗(G), F(SA) is a group, and acts on F(Cf); the action
F(SA)×F(Cf)→Cf is given by the
usual co-multiplication δ:Cf→SA∨Cf.
See [30, III(6.20)].
The proof of [30, III(6.21)] and/or
[9, 5.6] goes through to prove:
Lemma A.1**.**
Elements a,b∈F(Cf) agree in F(X) if and only if
there is a γ∈F(SA) so that γ⋅a=b.
Recall that for every orbit G/H of G there is a family of
test G-spaces eHn=Sn∧(G/H)+. If X(n) is the n-skeleton
of X, its (n+1)-skeleton is the mapping cylinder of attaching maps
⋁iei→X(n), where each ei is Sn∧(G/Hi)+
for some Hi.
Theorem A.2**.**
Let ρ:E→F be a natural transformation between half-exact functors
from W∗(G) to Sets such that ρX is a bijection for
every G-cell X=Sn(G/H+), and for every X of dimension ≤1.
Then ρX:E(X)→F(X) is a bijection for every connected
X in W∗(G).
Proof.
The result is true for 1–dimensional X,
by assumption. We proceed by induction on dim(X).
Suppose that X=X(n+1) and the result is true for the n-skeleton
X(n). Then X is the mapping cylinder of the attaching maps
⋁iei⟶\buildrelαX(n).
By hypothesis, F(⋁iei)≅∏F(ei),
so we have a diagram of pointed sets with exact rows:
[TABLE]
For notational convenience, we write C for ⋁Sei=S(⋁ei).
To see that ρX is onto, suppose given b∈F(X); a
diagram chase shows that
there is an a∈E(X) so that ρX(a) and b agree
in F(X(n)). By Lemma A.1, there is a γ in
E(C)≅F(C) so that
b=γ⋅ρX(a)=ρX(γ⋅a).
To see that ρX is into, we mimick Dold’s argument
[9, 7.2], using the mapping torus W of
id,δ:C⇉C∨X.
Given a,a1 in E(X) agreeing in F(X),
a diagram chase (using Lemma A.1) shows that
a1=γ⋅a for some γ∈E(C), and hence
γ stabilizes b=ρX(a).
By [9, 5.7], the pair (γ,b) lifts to F(W).
Since ρW is onto (by Lemma A.1),
(γ,b) lifts to w∈E(W). The image (γ′,a′)
of this element in E(C)×E(X) satisfies
γ′⋅a′=a′, and maps to (γ,b) in
E(C)×F(X), so γ′=γ
(recall that E(C)≅F(C) by assumption).
In addition, since i∗(a)=i∗(a′) (by the same argument),
a=γ′′⋅a′ for some γ′′. Now
E(C) is a commutative group, because n≥2, so we conclude:
[TABLE]
Bibliography31
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
1[1] M. Atiyah, K 𝐾 K -theory and Reality , Quart. J. Math. Oxford 17 (1966), 367–386.
2[2] M. Atiyah and G. Segal, Equivariant K-theory and completion. J. Differential Geometry 3 (1969), 1–18.
3[3] H. Bass, Lectures on topics in algebraic K-theory , Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Lectures on Mathematics, No. 41, Bombay, 1967.
4[4] S. Bloch and A. Ogus, Gersten’s Conjecture and the homology of schemes, Ann. Sci. École Norm. (Paris) 7 (1974), 181–202.
5[5] G. Bredon, Equivariant Cohomology Theories , Lecture Notes in Math. 34, Springer-Verlag, 1967.
6[6] H. Cartan, Détermination des algèbres H ∗ ( Π , n , ℤ ) subscript 𝐻 Π 𝑛 ℤ H_{*}(\Pi,n,\mathbb{Z}) , Exposé 11 in Séminaire Henri Cartan de l’Ecole Normale Supérieure, 1954/1955, Paris, 1956.
7[7] D. Cox, The étale homotopy type of varieties over ℝ ℝ \mathbb{R} , Proc. AMS 76 (1979), 17–22.
8[8] A.J. de Jong, A result of Gabber, unpublished preprint, 2003. Available at www.math.columbia.edu/ dejong/papers/2-gabber.pdf