Congruences for sporadic sequences and modular forms for non-congruence subgroups
Matija Kazalicki

TL;DR
This paper proves a conjectured congruence relation for a sporadic sequence related to Apery numbers by analyzing Atkin and Swinnerton-Dyer congruences in the context of non-congruence modular forms.
Contribution
It establishes the remaining congruence for Zagier's sporadic sequences using Fourier coefficients of non-congruence cusp forms, completing previous partial results.
Findings
Proved the conjectured congruence for the sixth sporadic sequence.
Demonstrated Atkin and Swinnerton-Dyer congruences for non-congruence modular forms.
Connected sporadic sequences with non-congruence modular forms through congruence relations.
Abstract
In the course of the proof of the irrationality of zeta(2) R. Apery introduced numbers b_n = \sum_{k=0}^n {n \choose k}^2{n+k \choose k}. Stienstra and Beukers showed that for the prime p > 3 Apery numbers satisfy congruence b((p-1)/2) = 4a^2-2p mod p, if p = a^2+b^2 (where a is odd). Later, Zagier found some generalizations of Apery numbers, so called sporadic sequences, and recently Osburn and Straub proved similar congruences for all but one of the six Zagier's sporadic sequences (three cases were already known to be true) and conjectured the congruence for the sixth sequence. In this paper we prove that remaining congruence by studying Atkin and Swinnerton-Dyer congruences between Fourier coefficients of certain cusp form for non-congurence subgroup.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
\marginsize
2.5cm2.5cm2.5cm2.5cm
Congruences for sporadic sequences and modular forms for non-congruence subgroups
Matija Kazalicki
Department of Mathematics, University of Zagreb, Bijenička cesta 30, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Abstract.
In 1979, in the course of the proof of the irrationality of Robert Apéry introduced numbers that are, surprisingly, integral solutions of recursive relations
[TABLE]
Zagier performed a computer search on first 100 million triples and found that the recursive relation generalizing
[TABLE]
with the initial conditions and has (non-degenerate i.e. ) integral solution for only six more triples (whose solutions are so called sporadic sequences) .
Stienstra and Beukers showed that for the prime
[TABLE]
Recently, Osburn and Straub proved similar congruences for all but one of the six Zagier’s sporadic sequences (three cases were already known to be true by the work of Stienstra and Beukers) and conjectured the congruence for the sixth sequence (which is a solution of recursion determined by triple .
In this paper we prove that remaining congruence by studying Atkin and Swinnerton-Dyer congruences between Fourier coefficients of certain cusp form for non-congurence subgroup.
1. Introduction
In 1979, in the course of his famous proof of the irrationality of and Robert Apéry [1] introduced numbers and . These numbers, which was important for the proof, are integral solutions of recursive relations
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
respectively. The integrality came as a big surprise since to calculate (or ) in each step one has to divide by (or ) so a priori one would expect that these numbers have denominators of the size (or . Inspired by Beukers [3], Zagier [18] performed a computer search on first 100 million triples and found that the recursive relation generalizing
[TABLE]
with the initial conditions and has (non-degenerate i.e. ) integral solution for only six more triples (whose solutions are so called sporadic sequences)
[TABLE]
Interestingly, Stienstra and Beukers [15] showed that the generating function of Apéry’s numbers is a holomorphic solution of Picard-Fuchs differential equation of elliptic K3-surface (other sporadic sequences are related in this way to K3 surfaces as well, see [18]). Using this connection they also proved that for prime
[TABLE]
Here one can interpret the right-hand side of the congruences as a -th Fourier coefficient of a certain modular form of weight 3 whose -function is a factor of the zeta function of . (Later Beukers [3] proved a similar result for the numbers - this time relating them to the coefficients of Hecke eigenform of weight 4.) For a beautiful survey of these results see [19].
Recently, Osburn and Straub [11] proved similar congruences for all but one of the six Zagier’s sporadic sequences (three cases were already known to be true by the work of Stienstra and Beukers) and conjectured the congruence for the sixth sequence (which is a solution of recursion determined by triple . In this paper we prove that remaining congruence.
Denote by
[TABLE]
the sporadic sequence corresponding to triple . For and let
[TABLE]
be a newform. Our main result is the following theorem.
Theorem 1**.**
For all primes we have
[TABLE]
Remark 1*.*
One can check that is CM form such that for prime
[TABLE]
In Section 2 using the method of Beukers [3, Proposition 3.] and Verrill [17, Theorem 1.1] we reduce Theorem 1 to showing that the weight three cusp form (for non-congruence subgroup of )
[TABLE]
satisfies a three-term Atkin and Swinnerton-Dyer congruence relation with respect to for all primes (see Proposition 2). The similar idea was used previously by the author [6] in proving three term congruence relations for some multinomial sums by employing Atkin and Swinnerton-Dyer congruence relations satisfied by the Fourier coefficients of certain weakly holomorphic modular forms (but for congruence subgroups).
In Section 3 we explain how using Scholl’s theory [12] we can reduce Proposition 2 to the equivalence of two strictly compatible families of -adic Galois representations: isomorphic to -adic realization of the motive associated to the space of cusp forms , and attached to the newform by Deligne’s work.
In Section 4 and Section 5 we prove that these two -adic families are isomorphic by showing that they are isomorphic to the third -adic family which is constructed from the explicit model of the universal family of elliptic curves over modular curve of .
2. Elliptic surfaces, modular forms and the proof of Theorem 1
Consider modular rational elliptic surface attached to (see third example in [17, Section 4.2.2.])
[TABLE]
with fibration , . For the preimage is an elliptic curve with a distinguished point of order . Picard-Fuchs differential equation associated to this elliptic surface
[TABLE]
has a holomorphic solution around
[TABLE]
(Our notation is slightly different from [17, Section 4.2.2.] since , with defined in [17]) If we identify with a modular function (for )
[TABLE]
then is a weight one modular form for .
Now consider a two cover of , a K3-surface given by the equation
[TABLE]
where . Then is a corresponding modular function for index two genus zero subgroup .
By identifying -line with the modular curve , we can identify singular fibers of K3-surface with cusps of modular curve . More precisely, using Tate’s algorithm one finds that Kodaira types of singular fibers at and are and respectively. Hence all the cusps of are regular.
In general, for a finite index subgroup of of genus such that and odd, [14, Theorem 2.25] gives the formula for the dimension of
[TABLE]
where is the number of regular cusps, is the number of irregular cusps, and are the orders of elliptic points. Since has no elliptic points ( is a free group), we have that .
Our starting point for studying congruences involving is the following proposition of Beukers [3].
Proposition 1** (Beukers).**
Let be a prime and
[TABLE]
a differential form with . Let ,, and suppose
[TABLE]
Suppose there exist with such that
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
Moreover, if is -adic unit then the second congruence implies the first, and we have that .
Given prime , if we apply the previous proposition to a differential form
[TABLE]
and - the -expansion of modular function (where ), we obtain that , where are Fourier coefficients of weight cusp form
[TABLE]
Remark 2*.*
- a)
For the Fourier coefficients of are not -integral so we can not use Proposition 1.
- b)
It is well known that a differential operator maps modular functions to meromorphic modular forms of weight . Holomorphicity and cuspidality of then follow since zeros of cancel out the poles of .
- c)
Since Fourier coefficients of have unbounded denominators, it follows that is non-congruence subgroup of (for congruence subgroups the Hecke eigenforms (which form the basis for the space of cuspforms) have Fourier coefficients that are algebraic integers).
We will show that, for all primes , the cusp form satisfies a three term Atkin and Swinnerton-Dyer congruence relation with respect to the quadratic twist of the newform by quadratic character . Hence Theorem 1 follows from Proposition 1 and the following proposition.
Proposition 2**.**
Let be a prime. Then for all , we have that
[TABLE]
3. Atkin and Swinnerton-Dyer congruences for
For a finite index non-congruence subgroup and a prime , we say that weight cusp form satisfy Atkin and Swinnerton-Dyer (ASD) congruence at if there exist an algebraic integer and a root of unity such that for all non-negative integers and we have
[TABLE]
(In our example and are rational integers, and .)
In the absence of the useful theory of Hecke operators for non-congruence subgroups, such can be regarded as Hecke eigenfunction at prime . A discovery of these congruences by Atkin and Swinnerton-Dyer [2] initiated a systematic study of modular forms for non-congruence subgroups. For more information see a survey article by Li, Long and Yang[8].
In the case when the space of cusp forms is one dimensional and generated by (which is the case for and ), Scholl [12] proved that the ASD congruence holds for all but finitely many . The congruences were obtained by embedding the module of cusp forms into certain de Rham cohomology group which is the de Rham realization of the motive associated to the relevant space of modular forms. At a good prime , crystalline theory endows with a Frobenius endomorphism whose action on -expansion gives rise to Atkin and Swinnerton-Dyer congruences, i.e. if is a characteristic polynomial of Frobenius acting on then congruence (1) holds ( is the trace of Frobenius). See [7, Section 2] for the summary of these results.
To calculate the trace of Frobenius , following Scholl [12, Sections 4 and 5], we associate to the subgroup a strictly compatible family of -adic Galois representations of , , that is isomorphic to -adic realization of the motive associated to the space of cusp forms . From [13, 2.7. Proposition] and algebraic relation between and modular -invariant
[TABLE]
it follows that is unramified outside and .
In particular, for and prime we have that [12, Theorem 5.4.]
[TABLE]
4. Compatible families of -adic Galois representations of
Denote by a strictly compatible family of two dimensional -adic Galois representation of attached to the newform by the work of Deligne [5]. Hence,
[TABLE]
for prime and .
We will prove that representations and are isomorphic by showing that both of them are isomorphic to the representation which we define now. Proposition 2 then follows from (2) and (3).
Let be the complement in of the cusps. Denote by the inclusion of into , and by the restriction of elliptic surface to . For a prime we obtain a sheaf
[TABLE]
on , and also sheaf on (here is the constant sheaf on the elliptic surface , and is derived functor). The action of on the -vector space
[TABLE]
defines -adic representation . Representation is unramified outside and . By the argument similar to [9, Proposition 5.1.], is isomorphic to up to a twist by quadratic character.
Using explicit equation for , we can calculate and
[TABLE]
for using the following theorem.
Theorem 2**.**
Let be a power of prime . The following are true:
- (1)
We have that
[TABLE]
- (2)
If the fiber is smooth, then
[TABLE]
- (3)
If the fiber is singular, then
[TABLE]
5. Serre-Faltings method and proof of Proposition 2
We will prove the following proposition.
Proposition 3**.**
For every prime the representations and are isomorphic.
Since the families are strictly compatible, by Chebotarev density theorem it is enough to prove that and are isomorphic. We apply the method of Serre and Faltings as formulated in [13, Section 5].
Theorem 3**.**
For a finite set of primes of , let be a maximal independent set of quadratic characters of unramified outside , and a subset of such that the map is surjective.
Let be continuous semisimple representation unramified away from , whose images are pro-2-groups. If for every
[TABLE]
then and are isomorphic.
Proposition 4**.**
Images of representations and are pro-2-groups.
Proof.
We can assume that the images of both representations are contained in . It is enough to prove that the images of their mod reductions have order (since the kernel of the natural homomorphism is a -group). For primes using Theorem 2 and an explicit model for surface , we compute that
[TABLE]
Moreover, if , we find that and the eigenvalues of are from which it follows that mod reduction of has order . If , then the eigenvalues mod are equal, and mod reduction of is trivial.
Since the group is isomorphic to the symmetric group , if we assume that the mod image is not of order two, then it must be the whole group. In that case, denote by a Galois extension of cut out by mod reduction of (i.e. is the fixed field of the kernel of the mod reduction of ). Then contains a unique quadratic field which is unramified outside and in which and split and is inert. It follows that . We know by the Hermite-Minkowski theorem that there are finitely many extensions of unramified outside and , and using LMFDB [10] we find that there is only one such field , where , whose Galois group contains . This field contains a cubic field , where . One finds that is inert in , hence has order . This is impossible since is an even number which implies that mod reduction of has order or . ∎
To apply Theorem 3 for we choose characters
[TABLE]
and . Using Theorem 2 and (3) we can check that
[TABLE]
for all , hence Proposition 3 follows.
To prove Proposition 2 (and consequently Theorem 1), we need to show that representations and are isomorphic. In particular, it is enough to prove this claim for . By the argument similar to [9, Proposition 5.1.], it follows that is isomorphic to up to a twist by a quadratic character. Since both representations are unramified outside and , this character is an element of the group generated by characters , and . For every nontrivial from that group, we can find a prime such that , and numerically check that ASD congruence relation for the Fourier coefficients of
[TABLE]
does not hold for some choice of and . The claim follows.
All the computations in this paper were done in SageMath [16] and Magma [4].
6. Future work
It is natural to ask do similar mod congruences exist for the numbers , where and ? E.g. when , by considering the -cover (defined by ) of the elliptic surface , one can show that for we have , where is the trace of under the Galois representation defined analogously to (in this situation the representation is four-dimensional).
In the paper under the preparation, we are going to investigate this phenomena for sequence and other Apéry numbers.
7. Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank Robert Osburn and Armin Straub for bringing this problem to his attention.
The author was supported by the QuantiXLie Centre of Excellence, a project co-financed by the Croatian Government and European Union through the European Regional Development Fund - the Competitiveness and Cohesion Operational Programme (Grant KK.01.1.1.01.0004), and by the Croatian Science Foundation under the project no. IP-2018-01-1313.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] R. Apéry , Irrationalité de ζ 2 𝜁 2 \zeta 2 et ζ 3 𝜁 3 \zeta 3 , Astérisque, (1979), pp. 11–13. Luminy Conference on Arithmetic.
- 2[2] A. O. L. Atkin and H. P. F. Swinnerton-Dyer , Modular forms on noncongruence subgroups , (1971), pp. 1–25.
- 3[3] F. Beukers , Another congruence for the Apéry numbers , J. Number Theory, 25 (1987), pp. 201–210.
- 4[4] W. Bosma, J. Cannon, and C. Playoust , The Magma algebra system. I. The user language , J. Symbolic Comput., 24 (1997), pp. 235–265. Computational algebra and number theory (London, 1993).
- 5[5] P. Deligne , Formes modulaires et représentations de GL ( 2 ) GL 2 {\rm GL}(2) , (1973), pp. 55–105. Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 349.
- 6[6] M. Kazalicki , Modular forms, hypergeometric functions and congruences , Ramanujan J., 34 (2014), pp. 1–9.
- 7[7] M. Kazalicki and A. J. Scholl , Modular forms, de Rham cohomology and congruences , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 368 (2016), pp. 7097–7117.
- 8[8] W.-C. W. Li, L. Long, and Z. Yang , Modular forms for noncongruence subgroups , Q. J. Pure Appl. Math., 1 (2005), pp. 205–221.
