# Composition Dependence of the Charge Driven Phase Transition in Group-VI Transition Metal Dichalcogenides

## TL;DR

This study uses first-principles calculations to analyze how composition influences charge-driven phase transitions in group-VI transition metal dichalcogenides, revealing barriers that affect phase stability and explaining experimental observations.

## Contribution

It provides a detailed computational analysis of the energetics and barriers of phase transitions in TMDs, highlighting composition-dependent effects and their implications.

## Key findings

- High transition barriers explain metallic phase proportions in WS₂ monolayers.
- Calculated barriers do not fully account for low metallic phase in MoS₂, indicating other effects.
- Charge-induced phase transition barriers vary with composition and influence phase stability.

## Abstract

Materials exhibiting multiple stable phases can be used as functional components in electronic and optical applications if the phase transition is controllable. Group-VI transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs, MX$_2$, where M=Mo, W and X = S, Se) are known to undergo charge induced transitions from semi-conducting H phases to metallic T phases. This occurs, for example, when bulk TMDs are exfoliated with the aid of alkali ion intercalants. However, it is difficult to experimentally decouple the effect of composition-dependent phase transition barriers from indirect effects related to the exfoliation process. Here, using first-principles calculations, we study the energetics of transition between the different structural polytypes of four group-VI TMDs upon lithium adsorption. We find that both the activation barrier from the H phase to the metallic phase in charged monolayers and the reverse barrier in neutral monolayers are required to explain experimental results. We show that the high proportion of metallic phase found in WS$_2$ monolayers after alkali treatment can be explained by high transition barriers to revert back to the H phase once in a neutral state. The calculated barriers however cannot explain the low proportion of metallic phase found in MoS$_2$ monolayers in some experiments and so non-electronic effects must also play a role.