On the nonexistence of F{\o}lner sets
Isaac Goldbring

TL;DR
The paper demonstrates the nonexistence of F{46}lner sets in certain groups using model-theoretic methods, revealing limitations of first-order expressibility and properties of existentially closed groups.
Contribution
It constructs specific systems of equations showing no F{46}lner sets exist in some groups and connects this to model theory and properties of existentially closed groups.
Findings
No amenable group can be existentially closed.
Existentially closed groups cannot be exact, have the Haagerup property, or property (T).
F{46}lner set existence cannot be uniformly expressed in first-order logic for large enough parameters.
Abstract
We show that there is , a finite system of equations and inequations having a solution in some group, where has length , and such that: for any group and any , if the system has a solution in , then there is no -F{\o} lner set in . The proof uses ideas from model-theoretic forcing together with the observation that no amenable group can be existentially closed. Along the way, we also observe that no existentially closed group can be exact, have the Haagerup property, or have property (T). Finally, we show that, for large enough and for small enough, the existence of -F{\o} lner sets, where has size at most , cannot be expressed in a first-order way uniformly in all groups.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms
