Formulation of the laws of conservation and non-conservation
Friedrich Herrmann

TL;DR
This paper discusses the formulation of conservation and non-conservation laws for various substance-like quantities, emphasizing the need for clear, unified statements to improve understanding and teaching.
Contribution
It proposes a simplified, consistent framework for expressing conservation laws, addressing ambiguities in traditional formulations.
Findings
Unified formulation enhances clarity of conservation laws
Simplifies teaching and understanding of physical quantities
Addresses inconsistencies in traditional conservation statements
Abstract
For each substance-like quantity, a theorem about its conservation or non-conservation can be formulated. For the electric charge e.g. it reads: Electric charge can neither be created nor destroyed. Such a statement is short and easy to understand. For some quantities, however, the proposition about conservation or non-conservation is usually formulated in an unnecessarily complicated way. Sometimes the formulation is not generally valid; in other cases only a consequence of the conservation or non-conservation is pronounced. A clear and unified formulation could improve the comprehensibility and simplify teaching.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
