# Comparison of computational methods for the electrochemical stability window of solid-state electrolyte materials

## TL;DR

This paper reviews computational methods for determining the electrochemical stability window of solid-state electrolytes in batteries, comparing their results and discussing their relation to experimental data.

## Contribution

It introduces and compares various computational approaches for assessing SSE stability windows, including the stoichiometry stability method, and provides implementations for material screening.

## Key findings

- The stoichiometry stability method bridges HOMO-LUMO and phase stability methods.
- Comparison of computational results with experimental stability windows.
- Discussion of methods' applicability to Li- and Na-based SSE materials.

## Abstract

Superior stability and safety are key promises attributed to all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs) containing solid-state electrolyte (SSE) compared to their conventional counterparts utilizing liquid electrolyte. To unleash the full potential of ASSBs, SSE materials that are stable when in contact with the low and high potential electrodes are required. The electrochemical stability window is conveniently used to assess the SSE-electrode interface stability. In the present work, we review the most important methods to compute the SSE stability window. Our analysis reveals that the stoichiometry stability method represents a bridge between HOMO-LUMO method and phase stability method (grand canonical phase diagram). Moreover, we provide computational implementations of these methods for SSE material screening. We compare their results for the relevant Li- and Na-SSE materials LGPS, LIPON, LLZO, LLTO, LATP, LISICON, and NASICON, and we discuss their relation to published experimental stability windows.