This paper investigates the surjectivity of the Cauchy-Riemann operator on weighted smooth vector-valued functions on strips with holes, characterizing weights that allow duality and applying functional analysis techniques to solve parameter dependence problems.
Contribution
It characterizes weights for weighted holomorphic functions, proves the kernel of the Cauchy-Riemann operator has property (Ω), and establishes surjectivity for vector-valued functions, solving a key parameter dependence problem.
Findings
01
Characterization of weights for weighted holomorphic functions.
02
Proof that the kernel of the Cauchy-Riemann operator has property (Ω).
03
Surjectivity of the Cauchy-Riemann operator on vector-valued function spaces.
Abstract
This paper is dedicated to the question of surjectivity of the Cauchy-Riemann operator on spaces EV(Ω,E) of C∞-smooth vector-valued functions whose growth on strips along the real axis with holes K is induced by a family of continuous weights V. Vector-valued means that these functions have values in a locally convex Hausdorff space E over C. We characterise the weights V which give a counterpart of the Grothendieck-K\"othe-Silva duality O(C∖K)/O(C)≅A(K) with non-empty compact K⊂R for weighted holomorphic functions. We use this duality to prove that the kernel ker∂ of the Cauchy-Riemann operator ∂ in EV(Ω):=EV(Ω,C) has the property…
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Full text
The inhomogeneous Cauchy-Riemann equation for weighted smooth
This paper is dedicated to the question of surjectivity of the Cauchy-Riemann operator on spaces
EV(Ω,E) of C∞-smooth vector-valued functions whose
growth on strips along the real axis with holes K is induced
by a family of continuous weights V. Vector-valued means that these functions have values in
a locally convex Hausdorff space E over C.
We characterise the weights V which give a counterpart of the Grothendieck-Köthe-Silva duality
O(C∖K)/O(C)≅A(K) with non-empty compact K⊂R
for weighted holomorphic functions.
We use this duality and splitting theory to prove the surjectivity of the Cauchy-Riemann operator
∂:EV(Ω,E)→EV(Ω,E)
for certain E.
This solves the smooth (holomorphic, distributional) parameter dependence problem for the Cauchy-Riemann operator
on EV(Ω,C).
The smooth (holomorphic, distributional) parameter dependence problem for the Cauchy-Riemann operator
∂:=(1/2)(∂1+i∂2) on the space C∞(Ω) of
smooth complex-valued functions on an open set Ω⊂R2
is whether for every family (fλ)λ∈U in C∞(Ω)
depending smoothly (holomorphically, distributionally) on a parameter λ in an open set U⊂Rd
there is a family (uλ)λ∈U in C∞(Ω) with the same kind of parameter dependence
such that
[TABLE]
Here, smooth (holomorphic, distributional) parameter dependence of (fλ)λ∈U means that
the map λ↦fλ(x) is an element of C∞(U) (of the space of holomorphic functions
O(U) on U⊂C open, the space of distributions D(V)′ for open V⊂Rd where
U=D(V)) for each x∈Ω.
The parameter dependence problem for a variety of partial differential operators on several spaces of
(generalised) differentiable functions has been extensively studied,
see e.g. [4, 7, 8, 38, 39, 19]
and the references and background in [3, 27].
The answer to this problem for the Cauchy-Riemann operator is affirmative since the Cauchy-Riemann operator
[TABLE]
on the space C∞(Ω,E) of E-valued smooth functions is surjective if E=C∞(U)
(O(U), D(V)′) by [9, Corollary 3.9, p. 1112]
which is a consequence of the splitting theory of Bonet and Domański for PLS-spaces [3, 4],
the topological isomorphy of C∞(Ω,E) to Schwartz’ ε-product
C∞(Ω)εE and the fact that
∂:C∞(Ω)→C∞(Ω) is surjective on the
nuclear Fréchet space C∞(Ω) (with its usual topology).
More generally, the Cauchy-Riemann operator (1) is surjective if E is a Fréchet space
by Grothendieck’s classical theory of tensor products [14] or if E:=Fb′ where F is a Fréchet space
satisfying the condition (DN) by [38, Theorem 2.6, p. 174] or if E is an ultrabornological
PLS-space having the property (PA) by [9, Corollary 3.9, p. 1112] since ker∂
has the property (Ω) by [38, Proposition 2.5 (b), p. 173].
The first and the last result cover the case that E=C∞(U) or O(U) whereas
the last covers the case E=D(V)′ as well.
More examples of the second or third kind of such spaces E are arbitrary Fréchet-Schwartz spaces,
the space S(Rd)′ of tempered distributions,
the space D(V)′ of distributions, the space D(w)(V)′ of ultradistributions of Beurling type
and some more (see [4], [9, Corollary 4.8, p. 1116] and [27, Example 3, p. 7]).
In this paper we consider the Cauchy-Riemann operator on spaces EV(Ω,E) of weighted smooth E-valued functions where
E is a locally convex Hausdorff space over C with a system of seminorms (pα)α∈A
generating its topology. These spaces consist of functions f∈C∞(Ω,E)
fulfilling additional growth conditions induced by a family V:=(νn)n∈N of continuous functions
νn:Ω→(0,∞) on a sequence of open sets (Ωn)n∈N with Ω=⋃n∈NΩn
given by the constraint
[TABLE]
for every n∈N, m∈N0 and α∈A. The aim is to derive sufficient conditions on
V and (Ωn)n∈N such that
[TABLE]
is surjective if E:=Fb′ where F is a Fréchet space satisfying the condition (DN) or if E is an ultrabornological
PLS-space having the property (PA).
In [28, 24] this was done in the case that E is a Fréchet space using conditions on
V and (Ωn)n∈N which guarantee that EV(Ω) is a nuclear Fréchet space,
EV(Ω,E) is topological isomorphic to EV(Ω)εE for complete E
and ∂:EV(Ω)→EV(Ω) is surjective.
By proving that ker∂ has property (Ω) under some additional assumptions on V
this was extended in [27] to E:=Fb′ where F is a Fréchet space satisfying the condition (DN) or
ultrabornological PLS-spaces E with (PA) in the case that the Ωn
are strips along the real axis, i.e. Ωn:={z∈C∣∣Im(z)∣<n} for n∈N
(see [27, Corollary 17, p. 21]). In particular, these conditions are satisfied
if νn(z):=exp(an∣Re(z)∣γ), z∈C, for some 0<γ≤1 and an↗0
by [27, Corollary 18, p. 21].
In the present paper we consider the case that the Ωn are strips along the real axis with holes around
non-empty compact sets K⊂[−∞,∞] and we are confronted with the task of
deriving sufficient conditions on V such that ker∂
has (Ω). The corresponding spaces EV(Ω,E) and their subspaces of holomorphic functions
are of interest because they are the basic spaces for the theory of vector-valued Fourier hyperfunctions,
see e.g. [15, 16, 18, 20, 22, 29, 30].
Let us summarise the content of our paper. In Section 2 we recall necessary definitions
and preliminaries which are needed in the subsequent sections.
Section 3 is dedicated to a counterpart for weighted holomorphic functions
of the Silva-Köthe-Grothendieck duality
[TABLE]
where K⊂R is a non-empty compact set
and A(K) the space of germs of real analytic functions on K
(see Theorem 3.10, Corollary 3.11, Corollary 3.13).
In Section 4 we use this duality to characterise the weights V such
that the kernel ker∂ satisfies property (Ω)
in the case that (Ωn)n∈N is a sequence of strips along the real axis
with holes around a non-empty compact set K⊂[−∞,∞]
(see Theorem 4.3, Corollary 4.4).
The preceding conditions on V are used in Section 5
to obtain the surjectivity of the Cauchy-Riemann operator on EV(Ω,E)
in the case that (Ωn)n∈N is a sequence of strips along the real axis
with holes around K for E:=Fb′ where F is a Fréchet space
satisfying the condition (DN) or an ultrabornological PLS-space E having the property (PA)
(see Theorem 5.1). Especially, these conditions hold
if νn(z):=exp(an∣Re(z)∣γ), z∈C, for some 0<γ≤1 and an↗0
(see Corollary 5.2).
2. Notation and Preliminaries
The notation and preliminaries are essentially the same as in [25, 28, 27, Section 2].
We denote by R:=R∪{±∞} the two-point compactifaction of R and set C:=R+iR.
We define the distance of two subsets M0,M1⊂R2 w.r.t. the Euclidean norm ∣⋅∣ on R2 via
[TABLE]
Moreover, we denote by Br(x):={w∈R2∣∣w−x∣<r} the Euclidean ball around x∈R2
with radius r>0 and identify R2 and C as (normed) vector spaces.
We denote the complement of a subset M⊂R2 by MC:=R2∖M,
the closure of M by M and the boundary of M by ∂M.
For a function f:M→C and K⊂M we denote by f∣K the restriction of f to K and by
[TABLE]
the sup-norm on K. By C(Ω) we denote the space of continuous C-valued functions on a set Ω⊂R2 and
by L1(Ω) the space of (equivalence classes of) C-valued Lebesgue integrable functions on
a measurable set Ω⊂R2.
By E we always denote a non-trivial locally convex Hausdorff space over the field
C equipped with a directed fundamental system of seminorms (pα)α∈A.
If E=C, then we set (pα)α∈A:={∣⋅∣}.
We recall that for a disk D⊂E, i.e. a bounded, absolutely convex set,
the vector space ED:=⋃n∈NnD becomes a normed space if it is equipped with
gauge functional of D as a norm (see [17, p. 151]). The space E is called locally
complete if ED is a Banach space for every closed disk D⊂E (see [17, 10.2.1 Proposition, p. 197]).
Further, we denote by L(F,E) the space of continuous linear maps from
a locally convex Hausdorff space F to E and sometimes use the notation ⟨T,f⟩:=T(f), f∈F,
for T∈L(F,E). If E=C, we write F′:=L(F,C) for the dual space of F.
If F and E are (linearly topologically) isomorphic, we write F≅E.
We denote by Lb(F,E) the space L(F,E) equipped with the locally convex topology of uniform convergence
on the bounded subsets of F.
We recall the following well-known definitions concerning continuous partial differentiability of
vector-valued functions (c.f. [23, p. 237]). A function f:Ω→E on an open set
Ω⊂R2 to E is called continuously partially differentiable (f is C1)
if for the nth unit vector en∈R2 the limit
[TABLE]
exists in E for every x∈Ω and (∂en)Ef
is continuous on Ω ((∂en)Ef is C0) for every n∈{1,2}.
For k∈N a function f is said to be k-times continuously partially differentiable
(f is Ck) if f is C1 and all its first partial derivatives are Ck−1.
A function f is called infinitely continuously partially differentiable (f is C∞)
if f is Ck for every k∈N.
The linear space of all functions f:Ω→E which are C∞
is denoted by C∞(Ω,E).
Let f∈C∞(Ω,E). For β=(βn)∈N02 we set
(∂βn)Ef:=f if βn=0, and
[TABLE]
if βn=0 as well as
[TABLE]
Due to the vector-valued version of Schwarz’ theorem (∂β)Ef is independent of the order of the partial
derivatives on the right-hand side, we call ∣β∣:=β1+β2 the order of differentiation
and write ∂βf:=(∂β)Cf.
A function f:Ω→E on an open set
Ω⊂C to E is called holomorphic if the limit
[TABLE]
exists in E for every z0∈Ω. As before we define derivatives of higher order recursively, i.e. for n∈N0 we set ((∂z∂)0)Ef:=f and
((∂z∂)n)Ef:=(∂z∂)E((∂z∂)n−1)Ef,
n≥1, if the corresponding limits exist.
Further, we write f(n):=((∂z∂)n)Cf.
The linear space of all functions f:Ω→E which are holomorphic
is denoted by O(Ω,E).
If E is locally complete and f∈O(Ω,E), then ((∂z∂)n)Ef(z0) exists in E
for every z0∈Ω and n∈N0 by [11, 2.2 Theorem and Definition, p. 18]
and [11, 5.2 Theorem, p. 35].
Now, the precise definition of the spaces of weighted smooth resp. holomorphic vector-valued functions
from the introduction reads as follows.
2.1 Definition** ([23, 3.2 Definition, p. 238]).**
Let Ω⊂R2 be open and (Ωn)n∈N a family of non-empty
open sets such that Ωn⊂Ωn+1 and Ω=⋃n∈NΩn.
Let V:=(νn)n∈N be a countable family of positive continuous functions
νn:Ω→(0,∞) such that νn≤νn+1 for all n∈N.
We call V a directed family of continuous weights on Ω and set for n∈N
a)
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
2. b)
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
3. c)
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
The subscript α in the notation of the seminorms is omitted in the C-valued case.
The letter E is omitted in the case E=C as well, e.g. we write
Eνn(Ωn):=Eνn(Ωn,C)
and EV(Ω):=EV(Ω,C) .
3. Duality
We recall the well-known topological Silva-Köthe-Grothendieck isomorphy
[TABLE]
where E is a quasi-complete locally convex Hausdorff space, ∅=K⊂R is compact, O(C∖K,E)
is equipped with the topology of uniform convergence on compact subsets of C∖K,
the quotient space with the induced quotient topology
and A(K) is the space of germs of real analytic functions on K with its inductive limit topology
(see e.g. [35, p. 6], [13, Proposition 1, p. 46],
[36, Satz 9, p. 90], [21, §27.4, p. 375-378],
[33, Theorem 2.1.3, p. 25]).
The aim of this section is to prove a counterpart of this isomorphy
for weighted vector-valued holomorphic functions and non-empty compact K⊂R.
For a compact set K⊂R and t∈R, t≥1, we define the open sets
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where the closure and the complement are taken in C. The definition of S1(K) is motivated by
[TABLE]
3.1 Definition**.**
Let K⊂R be a compact set, V:=(νn)n∈N
a directed family of continuous weights on C and E a locally convex Hausdorff space.
Using Definition 2.1, we set
[TABLE]
with Ωn:=Sn(K) for all n∈N and
[TABLE]
for n∈N, m∈N0 and α∈A.
We omit the index K in ∣f∣K,n,α,m and ∣f∣K,n,α if no confusion seems to be likely.
The spaces OV(C∖K,E) play the counterpart of O(C∖K,E)
for our version of the isomorphy (2).
Next, we introduce some conditions which guarantee the existence of a counterpart of A(K)
for our purpose.
Condition**.**
Let K⊂R be a non-empty compact set and V:=(νn)n∈N
a directed family of continuous weights on C.
For every n∈N let
(qV∞)
there be I1(n)>n such that for every ε>0 there is a compact set Q⊂UI1(n)(K) with
νn(z)≤ενI1(n)(z) for all z∈UI1(n)(K)∖Q.
2. (qL1)
νn(z)=νn(∣Re(z)∣) for all z∈C. In addition, if K∩{±∞}=∅, let there be I2(n)>n such that
νI2(n)νn∈L1([0,∞)) .
Condition (qV∞) means that the quotientνI1(n)νnvanishes at infinity whereas (qL1) means that the quotientνI2(n)νn is an L1-function if K∩{±∞}=∅.
Let Ω⊂C be open and f∈O(Ω). For z∈Ω and n∈N0 we denote the point evaluation
of the nth complex derivative at z by δz(n)f:=f(n)(z).
3.2 Proposition**.**
Let K⊂R be a non-empty compact set and V:=(νn)n∈N a directed family
of continuous weights on C.
For n∈N let
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
and the spectral maps for n,k∈N, n≤k, be given by the restrictions
[TABLE]
If V fulfils (qV∞), then
a)
the inductive limit
[TABLE]
exists and is a DFS-space.
2. b)
the span of the set of point evaluations of complex derivatives {δx0(n)∣x0∈K∩R,n∈N0}
is dense in OVind−1(K)b′ if K⊂R or K∩{±∞} contains
no isolated points in K.
3. c)
the span of the set of point evaluations {δx0∣x0∈K∩R}
is dense in OVind−1(K)b′ if K has no isolated points.
Proof.
a)(i) First, we prove that the normed space Oνn−1(Un(K)) is a Banach space.
Let (fk)k∈N be a Cauchy sequence in Oνn−1(Un(K)).
Let ε>0 and M⊂Un(K) be compact.
Then there exists N∈N such that for all k,m≥N
[TABLE]
Thus (fk)k∈N is also a Cauchy sequence in the Fréchet space
O(Un(K))∩C(Un(K))
equipped with the topology induced by
the system of seminorms ∥⋅∥M with compact M⊂Un(K).
Therefore it converges to f∈O(Un(K))∩C(Un(K)).
Since every Cauchy sequence is bounded, there exists C(n)≥0
with ∣fk(z)∣νn(z)−1≤C(n) for all z∈Un(K)
and k∈N, implying f∈Oνn−1(Un(K)) by pointwise convergence.
Using the pointwise convergence again, we get for all z∈Un(K) and k≥N
[TABLE]
and therefore ∥fk−f∥n≤ε, which proves that Oνn−1(Un(K)) is a Banach space.
(ii) The maps πn,m:Oνn−1(Un(K))→Oνm−1(Um(K)),
n≤m, are injective by virtue of the identity theorem and the definition of sets Un(K).
Thus the considered spectrum is an embedding spectrum.
(iii) For all M⊂Un(K) compact and
f∈Bn:={g∈Oνn−1(Un(K))∣∥g∥n≤1} we have
[TABLE]
Thus Bn is bounded in O(Un(K)) w.r.t. the system of seminorms generated by ∥⋅∥M for
compact M⊂Un(K).
As this space is a Fréchet-Montel space, Bn is relatively compact and hence relatively sequentially compact in O(Un(K)).
(iv) What remains to be shown is that for all n∈N there exists m>n such that
πn,m is a compact map. Because the considered spaces are Banach spaces, it suffices
to prove the existence of m>n such that (πn,m(fk))k∈N has a convergent
subsequence in Oνm−1(Um(K))
for every sequence (fk)k∈N in Bn.
According to (qV∞), we choose m:=I1(n)>n. Let ε>0. Then there is a compact set
Q⊂Um(K) with
[TABLE]
In addition, we set C(n,ε):=supz∈Qνm(z)−1>0.
Now, let (fk)k∈N be a sequence in Bn.
By (iii) it has a convergent subsequence (fkl)l∈N w.r.t. system of seminorms ∥⋅∥M, M⊂Un(K) compact.
Then there exists N∈N such that for l,j≥N
[TABLE]
and therefore
[TABLE]
Hence the subsequence (πn,m(fkl))l∈N converges in Oνm−1(Um(K)),
proving the compactness of πn,m.
It follows from (i)−(iv) and [31, Proposition 25.20, p. 304]
that the inductive limit OVind−1(K) exists and is a DFS-space.
b) We set F:=span{δx0(n)∣x0∈K∩R,n∈N0}.
Let x0∈K∩R and n∈N0. Then δx0(n) is linear and for k∈N and
f∈Oνk−1(Uk(K)) we derive from Cauchy’s inequality that
[TABLE]
Hence δx0(n) is continuous on Oνk−1(Uk(K)) for any k∈N,
implying F⊂OVind−1(K)′.
As OVind−1(K) is a DFS-space by part a),
it is reflexive by [31, Proposition 25.19, p. 303], i.e. the canonical embedding
J:OVind−1(K)→(OVind−1(K)b′)b′
is a topological isomorphism. We consider the polar set of F, i.e.
[TABLE]
Let y∈F∘. Then there is f∈OVind−1(K) such that
y=J(f). For T:=δx0(n)∈F
[TABLE]
is valid for any n∈N0. Thus f is identical to zero on a neighbourhood of x0 (by Taylor series expansion)
since f is holomorphic near x0∈Un(K). Due to the assumptions every component of Un(K) contains a point
x0∈K∩R so f is identical to zero on Un(K) by the identity theorem and continuity,
yielding to y=0. Therefore F∘={0} and thus F is dense in OVind−1(K)b′
by the bipolar theorem.
c) The proof is similar to b). We define F:=span{δx0∣x0∈K∩R}.
Then, like above, for y∈F∘ there is f∈OVind−1(K) with y=J(f)
such that for T:=δx0∈F, x0∈K∩R,
[TABLE]
Due to the assumptions every component Z of Un(K) contains a point x0∈K∩R and every point in Z∩K∩R
is an accumulation point of Z∩K∩R. So f is identical to zero on Un(K) by the identity theorem.
∎
The parts (iii)-(iv) of the proof of Proposition 3.2 a) are just slight modifications of
[2, Theorem (b), p. 67-68]
which cannot be directly applied due to the closure Un(K) being involved.
In the case νn(z)−1:=exp((1/n)∣Re(z)∣), z∈C, for all n∈N the spaces OVind−1(K)
play an essential in the theory of Fourier hyperfunctions and it is already mentioned in [20, p. 469] resp. proved in [18, 1.11 Satz, p. 11] and [22, 3.5 Theorem, p. 17] that they are DFS-spaces.
3.3 Remark**.**
Let K⊂R be a non-empty compact set and V:=(νn)n∈N a directed family
of continuous weights on C.
a)
If K⊂R, then (qV∞) is fulfilled, which follows from the choices
I1(n):=2n and Q:=UI1(n)(K) for n∈N.
2. b)
If K⊂R, then OVind−1(K)≅A(K).
Now, we take a closer look at the sets Ut(K) (c.f. [22, 3.3 Remark, p. 13]).
3.4 Remark**.**
Let K⊂R be compact and t∈R, t≥1.
a)
The set Ut(K) has finitely many components.
2. b)
Let K=∅ and Z be a component of Ut(K). We define a:=min(Z∩K) and b:=max(Z∩K) if existing (in R).
(i)
If Z is bounded, there exists 0<R≤1/t such that for all 0<r≤R: {z∈C∣d({z},[a,b])<r}⊂Z
2. (ii)
If Z∩R is bounded from below and unbounded from above and a exists, there exists 0<R≤1/t such that for all 0<r≤R:
{z∈C∣d({z},[a,∞))<r}⊂Z
3. (iii)
If Z∩R is bounded from above and unbounded from below and b exists, there exists 0<R≤1/t such that for all 0<r≤R:
{z∈C∣d({z},(−∞,b])<r}⊂Z
4. (iv)
If Z∩R is unbounded from below and above, there exists 0<R≤1/t such that for all 0<r≤R:
{z∈C∣d({z},R)<r}⊂Z
5. (v)
If Z∩R is bounded from below and unbounded from above and a does not exist, then Z=(t,∞)+i(−1/t,1/t).
If Z∩R is bounded from above and unbounded from below and b does not exist, then Z=(−∞,−t)+i(−1/t,1/t).
Proof.
a) We only consider the case ∞∈K, −∞∈/K.
Let (Zj)j∈J denote the (pairwise disjoint) components of Ut(K). Then Ut(K)=⋃j∈JZj
and by definition of a component there is k∈J such that Zk is the only component including (t,∞)+i(−1/t,1/t).
Furthermore there exists m∈R with ⋃j∈J∖{k}(Zj∩R)⊂[m,t] by assumption.
For j=k the length λ(Zj∩R) of the interval Zj∩R, where λ denotes the Lebesgue measure,
is estimated from below by λ(Zj∩R)≥2/t by definition of Ut(K).
Since all Zj are pairwise disjoint, this implies that J has to be finite. The others cases follow analogously.
b)(i) Since Z∩K is closed in R and therefore compact, a and b exist. Hence [a,b]⊂Z
by the definition of Ut(K) and as Z is connected. [a,b] being a compact subset of the open set Z
implies that there is 0<R<1/t such that ([a,b]+i(−R,R))⊂Z by the tube lemma,
which completes the proof.
(ii) If Z∩K∩(−∞,t]=∅, then a exists and analogously to (i)
there exists 0<R<1/t such that for all 0<r≤R
[TABLE]
By definition of Ut(K) this brings forth {z∈C∣d({z},[a,∞))<r}⊂Z.
If Z∩K∩(−∞,t]=∅ and a exists, the desired 0<R<1/t exists by the definition
of Ut(K) since t∈Z∩K and Z∩K is closed in R, which implies d({t},Z∩K)>0.
(iii) Analogously to (ii).
(iv) By the assumptions Z∩K∩[−t,t]=∅. Analogously to (i) there exists 0<R<1/t such that for all 0<r≤R
[TABLE]
Like in (ii) and (iii) this brings forth {z∈C∣d({z},R)<r}⊂Z.
(v) This follows directly from the definition of Ut(K) and as Z is a component of Ut(K).
∎
3.5 Definition**.**
Let n∈N, K⊂R be a non-empty compact set and (Zj)j∈J denote the components of Un(K).
A component Zj of Un(K) fulfils one of the cases of Remark 3.4 b)
and so for a=aj, b=bj (in the cases (i)-(iii)), for 0<rj<Rj=R (in the cases (i)-(iv))
resp. 0<rj<1/n=:Rj (in the case (v)) we define
[TABLE]
where Zj fulfils (v) in the last two cases. By Remark 3.4 a)
there is w.l.o.g. k∈N with Un(K)=⋃j=1kZj.
We set r:=(rj)1≤j≤k and the path
[TABLE]
where γj is the path along the boundary of Vrj(Zj) in C in the positive sense (counterclockwise).
3.6 Proposition**.**
Let K⊂R be a non-empty compact set and V:=(νn)n∈N a directed family
of continuous weights on C which fulfils (qV∞) and (qL1).
Let n∈N, γK,n,r be the path from Definition 3.5 and E a locally convex Hausdorff space.
If
(i)
K⊂R* and E is locally complete, or*
2. (ii)
E* is sequentially complete,*
then
a)
F⋅φ* is Pettis-integrable along γK,n,r for all F∈OV(C∖K,E)
and φ∈Oνn−1(Un(K)).*
2. b)
there are m∈N and C>0 such that for all α∈A, F∈OV(C∖K,E)
and φ∈Oνn−1(Un(K))
[TABLE]
3. c)
for all F∈OV(C∖K,E), φ∈Oνn−1(Un(K))
and r:=(rj)1≤j≤k with 0<rj<Rj for all 1≤j≤k
[TABLE]
4. d)
for all F∈OV(C,E) and φ∈Oνn−1(Un(K))
[TABLE]
Proof.
a)+b) We have to show that there is eK,n,r∈E such that
[TABLE]
which gives ∫γK,n,rF(ζ)φ(ζ)dζ=eK,n,r.
First, let Vrj(Zj) be bounded for some 1≤j≤k. Then
there is a parametrisation γj:[0,1]→C which has a continuously differentiable extension
γj on (−1,2).
As the map (e′∘(F⋅φ)∘γj)⋅γj′ is continuous on [0,1] for every e′∈E′,
it is an element of L1([0,1]) for every e′∈E′. Thus the map
[TABLE]
is well-defined and linear. We estimate
[TABLE]
Let us denote by acx((F⋅φ)(γj([0,1]))) the closure of the
absolutely convex hull of the set (F⋅φ)(γj([0,1])).
Since e′∘(F⋅φ∘γj)∈C1((−1,2)) for every e′∈E′,
the absolutely convex set acx((F⋅φ)(γj([0,1]))) is compact in
the locally complete space E by [5, Proposition 2, p. 354],
yielding Ij∈(Eκ′)′≅E by the theorem of Mackey-Arens, i.e. there is ej∈E such that
[TABLE]
Therefore F⋅φ is Pettis-integrable along γj. Furthermore,
we choose mj∈N such that (1/mj)<rj and
for α∈A we set Bα:={x∈E∣pα(x)<1}. We note that
[TABLE]
where we used [31, Proposition 22.14, p. 256] in the first and second to last equation
to get from pα to supe′∈Bα∘ and back. If K⊂R, then all
Vrj(Zj), 1≤j≤k, are bounded and we deduce
our statement with eK,n,r:=∑j=1kej, m:=max1≤j≤kmj and
C:=kmax1≤j≤kℓ(γj)∥νn/νmj∥γj([0,1]).
Second, let us consider the case ∞∈K, −∞∈K. Let Zk be the unique unbounded component of Un(K).
For q∈N, q>1/rk>n, we denote by γk,q the part of γk in {z∈C∣Re(z)≤q}.
Like in the first part the Pettis-integral
[TABLE]
exists (in E) and for α∈A and mk∈N, (1/mk)<rk, we have
[TABLE]
Next, we prove that (ek,q)q>1/rk is a Cauchy sequence in E.
We choose M:=max(mk,I2(n)) with I2(n)
from condition (qL1). For q,p∈N, q>p>1/rk>n, we obtain
[TABLE]
and observe that (∫0qνI2(n)(t)νn(t)dt)q
is a Cauchy sequence in C by condition (qL1).
Therefore (ek,q)q>1/rk is a Cauchy sequence in E, has a limit ek in the sequentially complete space E and
[TABLE]
We fix p∈N, p>1/rk>n, and conclude that
[TABLE]
Consequently, our statement holds also in the case ∞∈K, −∞∈K and in the remaining cases it follows analogously.
c) We note that
[TABLE]
for all e′∈E′. Thus statement c) follows from Cauchy’s integral theorem and the Hahn-Banach theorem if K⊂R.
Now, let us consider the case ∞∈K, −∞∈K. We denote by γk resp. γk the part of
γK,n,r resp. γK,n,r in the unbounded component of Un(K). It suffices to show that
[TABLE]
We choose I1(n) from condition (qV∞).
Let ε>0 and w.l.o.g. rk<rk.
Then there is a compact set Q⊂UI1(n)(K) with
νn(z)≤ενI1(n)(z) for all
z∈UI1(n)(K)∖Q. We choose q∈R such that q>1/rk
and q∈UI1(n)(K)∖Q
and define the path γ0,q+:[rk,rk]→C, γ0,q+(t):=q+it.
We deduce that for mk∈N, (1/mk)<min(rk,1/I1(n)), and every e′∈E′
[TABLE]
where we used condition (qL1) for the second equality.
In the same way we obtain with γ0,q−:[−rk,−rk]→C, γ0,q−(t):=q+it, that
[TABLE]
Hence we get (5) by Cauchy’s integral theorem and the Hahn-Banach theorem as well.
The remaining cases follow similarly.
d) The proof is similar to c). Let F∈OV(C,E). Again, it suffices to prove that
[TABLE]
This follows from Cauchy’s integral theorem and the Hahn-Banach theorem if K⊂R.
Again, we only consider the case ∞∈K, −∞∈K and only need to show that
[TABLE]
where γk is the part of γK,n,r in the unbounded component of Un(K).
Let ε>0 and choose q as in c).
Then we have with γ0,q:[−rk,rk]→C, γ0,q(t):=q+it, that
[TABLE]
for every e′∈E′ by (qV∞) and (qL1).
Cauchy’s integral theorem and the Hahn-Banach theorem imply our statement.
∎
An essential role in the proof of O(C∖K,E)/O(C,E)≅Lb(A(K),E) for
non-empty compact K⊂R and quasi-complete E (see (2))
plays the fundamental solution z↦1/(πz) of the Cauchy-Riemann operator.
By the identity theorem we can consider OV(C,E) as a subspace of OV(C∖K,E) and
we equip the quotient space OV(C∖K,E)/OV(C,E) with the induced locally convex
quotient topology (which may not be Hausdorff, see Remark 3.12).
We want to prove the isomorphy
[TABLE]
for non-empty compact K⊂R under some assumptions on K, the weights V and the space E.
Since we have to deal with functions having some growth given by the weights V, we have to use a fundamental
solution z↦g(z)/(πz), where g is an entire function with g(0)=1, of the Cauchy-Riemann operator which is suitable
for our growth conditions.
Condition (CT)****.
Let K⊂R be a non-empty compact set and V:=(νn)n∈N a directed family
of continuous weights on C.
Let there be gK∈O(C), gK(0)=1, such that with GK(z):=gK(z−⋅), z∈C∖K, it holds that
for all z0∈C∖K there is n∈N such that
GK(B1/n(z0))⊂Oνn−1(Un(K)) and
[TABLE]
exists in Oνn−1(Un(K)).
2. 2)
for all n∈N there is J2(n)>n such that
[TABLE]
3. 3)
for all n∈N there is J3(n)>n such that
[TABLE]
for all x0∈K∩R.
4. 4)
for all n∈N there are p:=J4(n), m:=J4(p) with 2≤p<m and C>0 such that
for all z∈S1/n:={w∈C∣∣Im(w)∣≤(1/n)}
[TABLE]
5. 5)
for all n∈N and z∈C∖K
[TABLE]
(CT) stands for Cauchy transformation which is the name of the inverse of the isomorphism we are searching for.
3.7 Remark**.**
a)
Since gK is an entire function, the estimates in the conditions (CT.2) and (CT.3) imply that
GK(Sn(K))⊂OνJ2(n)−1(UJ2(n)(K))
and GK(Sn({x0}))⊂OνJ3(n)−1(UJ3(n)({x0})).
2. b)
If K⊂R, then (CT.2) implies (CT.3). Indeed, we choose J3(n):=J2(n), observe that
M:=Sn({x0})∖Sn(K) is a compact set as K⊂R and
[TABLE]
We will see that the conditions (qV∞), (qL1) and (CT)
hold with gK(z):=exp(−z2), z∈C,
for νn(z):=exp(an∣Re(z)∣γ), z∈C, where 0<γ≤1 and (an)n∈N is increasing without change of sign.
3.8 Proposition**.**
Let K⊂R be a non-empty compact set and V:=(νn)n∈N a directed family
of continuous weights on C which fulfils (qV∞) and (qL1), γK,n,r the path from Definition 3.5
and E a locally convex Hausdorff space.
If
(i)
K⊂R* and E is locally complete, or*
2. (ii)
E* is sequentially complete,*
then the map
[TABLE]
given by
[TABLE]
for f=[F]∈OV(C∖K,E)/OV(C,E) and
φ∈Oνn−1(Un(K)), n∈N,
is well-defined, linear and continuous. For all non-empty compact sets K1⊂K it holds that
[TABLE]
on OVind−1(K).
Proof.
In the following we omit the index K in HK if no confusion seems to be likely.
Let f=[F]∈OV(C∖K,E)/OV(CE)
and φ∈OVind−1(K).
Then there is n∈N such that φ∈Oνn−1(Un(K)).
Due to Proposition 3.6 a) and d) H(f)(φ)∈E
and H(f) is independent of the representative F of f.
From Proposition 3.6 c) follows that H(f) is well-defined on OVind−1(K), i.e. for all k∈N, k≥n, and φ∈Oνn−1(Un(K)) it holds that
[TABLE]
For every n∈N there are m∈N and C>0 such that for all
f=[F]∈OV(C∖K,E)/OV(CE),
φ∈Oνn−1(Un(K)) and α∈A
[TABLE]
by Proposition 3.6 b), which implies that H(f)∈L(Oνn−1(Un(K)),E)
for every n∈N. We deduce that H(f)∈L(OVind−1(K),E)
by [10, 3.6 Satz, p. 117]. Let
[TABLE]
denote the quotient map. We equip the quotient space with its usual quotient topology generated by
the system of quotient seminorms given by
[TABLE]
for l∈N and α∈A.
Then the quotient space, equipped with these seminorms, is a locally convex space (but maybe not Hausdorff).
Since (7) holds for every representative F of f, we obtain for every
f∈OV(C∖K,E)/OV(C,E),
φ∈Oνn−1(Un(K)), n∈N, and α∈A that
[TABLE]
Now, let M⊂OVind−1(K) be a bounded set.
Since the sequence (Bn)n∈N of closed unit balls Bn of
Oνn−1(Un(K)) is a fundamental system of bounded sets
in OVind−1(K) by [31, Proposition 25.19, p. 303],
there exist n∈N and λ>0 with M⊂λBn. We derive from (8) that
[TABLE]
proving the continuity of H.
Moreover, let K1⊂R be compact and K1⊂K.
We observe that for every F∈OV(C∖K1,E) and
φ∈Oνn−1(Un(K)), n∈N, it holds that
[TABLE]
by (qV∞) and (qL1) using Cauchy’s integral theorem and the Hahn-Banach theorem as
in Proposition 3.6 c) and d). This yields to
[TABLE]
on OVind−1(K).
∎
Now, we take a closer look at the potential inverse of HK.
3.9 Proposition**.**
Let K⊂R be a non-empty compact set and V:=(νn)n∈N a directed family
of continuous weights on C which fulfils (qV∞), (CT.1) and (CT.2),
and E be a locally convex Hausdorff space.
Then the map
[TABLE]
given by
[TABLE]
is well-defined, linear and continuous.
Proof.
We omit the index K in gK and GK from condition (CT). Due to condition (qV∞)
the inductive limit OVind−1(K) exists by Proposition 3.2 a).
For z∈C∖K and ζ∈C∖{z} we define
[TABLE]
and note that g(z,⋅)∈O(C∖{z}).
Let z∈C∖K. Then there is n∈N such that
G(B1/n(z))⊂Oνn−1(Un(K)) by (CT.1).
Further, there is k=k(z)∈N such that
[TABLE]
We set m:=max(k,n) and obtain
[TABLE]
for all w∈B1/m(z).
We deduce that g(w,⋅)∈Oνm−1(Um(K)) for all
w∈B1/m(z).
We note that G′(z)(ζ)=g(1)(z−ζ) for all ζ∈Un(K) since the topology of
Oνn−1(Un(K)) is stronger than the topology of pointwise convergence,
which implies that
[TABLE]
for all ζ∈Un(K). Let h∈C with 0<∣h∣<1/k. Then
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
for all ζ∈Uk(K). It follows that
[TABLE]
for all ζ∈Um(K), which implies
[TABLE]
We conclude that ∂z∂g(z,⋅)∈Oνm−1(Um(K))
and hg(z+h,⋅)−g(z,⋅) converges to
∂z∂g(z,⋅) in Oνm−1(Um(K))
as h→0 by (CT.1).
Hence for all T∈L(OVind−1(K),E) the limit
[TABLE]
exists in E, meaning that (z↦2πi1⟨T,z−⋅g(z−⋅)⟩)∈O(C∖K,E).
Let l∈N. Then there is J2(l)>l such that
G(Sl(K))⊂OνJ2(l)−1(UJ2(l)(K)) by (CT.2).
Moreover, there is k∈N such that
[TABLE]
Again, it follows that g(Sl(K),⋅)⊂Oνm−1(Um(K)) with m:=max(J2(l),k).
Furthermore, we observe that M:={g(z,⋅)νl(z)∣z∈Sl(K)}⊂Oνm−1(Um(K)) and
[TABLE]
by (CT.2), showing that M is bounded in OVind−1(K)
by [31, Proposition 25.19, p. 303].
For every α∈A and T∈L(OVind−1(K),E) we have
[TABLE]
and therefore the map
[TABLE]
is well-defined, clearly linear and continuous.
∎
The map ΘK is sometimes called (weighted) Cauchy transformation for obvious reasons (see [32, p. 84]).
3.10 Theorem**.**
Let K⊂R be a non-empty compact set and V:=(νn)n∈N a directed family
of continuous weights on C which fulfils (qV∞), (qL1) and (CT),
and E a locally convex Hausdorff space.
If
(i)
K⊂R* and E is locally complete, or*
2. (ii)
K∩{±∞}* has no isolated points in K and E is sequentially complete,*
then the map
[TABLE]
is a topological isomorphism with inverse ΘK.
Proof.
As before we omit the index K of HK, ΘK and GK if it is not necessary.
As a consequence of Proposition 3.8 and Proposition 3.9
the maps H and Θ are linear and continuous. First, we prove that Θ∘H=id on
OV(C∖K,E)/OV(C,E), which implies
the injectivity of H.
Let p∈N, p≥2. We choose n∈N such that d∣⋅∣(Sp(K),Un(K))>0.
We define the path Γp:=Γ−−Γ+ with
[TABLE]
Further, we choose m∈N such that 1/m<min1≤j≤krj<1/n and m>p
where r=(rj)1≤j≤k is from the path γK,n,r in the definition of H.
Due to this choice Γ± and γK,n,r are within Sm(K).
Let f=[F]∈OV(C∖K,E)/OV(C,E) and
z=x+iy∈Sp(K).
Let u∈R, u=x, and [t0,t1]⊂[−p,p] such that the path γu:[t0,t1]→C,
γu(t):=u+it, is within Sm(K). The map ζ↦F(ζ)z−ζG(z)(ζ)
is holomorphic on C∖{z} with values in E and like in Proposition 3.6 a) and b) we deduce that
it is Pettis-integrable along γu and Γ±∣[s0,s1] with [s0,s1]⊂R
using [5, Proposition 2, p. 354] and the Mackey-Arens theorem.
Then we have by (CT.5)
[TABLE]
for all e′∈E′.
Hence we derive from Cauchy’s integral formula that
[TABLE]
for all e′∈E′ and z∈Sp(K). Thus we have
[TABLE]
for all z∈Sp(K).
By (the proof) of Proposition 3.9 the function
g(z,⋅)=z−⋅G(z)∈OVind−1(K) for all
z∈C∖K and
[TABLE]
is an element of OV(C∖K,E)
since T:=H([F])∈L(OVind−1(K),E) by Proposition 3.8.
It follows that
[TABLE]
for all z∈Sp(K).
But the right-hand side Wp of (3), as a function in z, is weakly holomorphic on
Sp(∅)={z∈C∣∣Im(z)∣<p}, which follows from
[TABLE]
and differentiation under the integral sign. The weak holomorphy and the local completeness of E imply
that Wp is holomorphic on Sp(∅)
by [12, Corollary 2, p. 404].
Thus W is extended by Wp to a function in O(C,E) and
the extensions for each p∈N coincide because of the identity theorem. We denote this extension by W as well.
For l∈N we choose p:=J4(l)≥2 and m:=J4(p)>p
from condition (CT.4).
Then we have for z=x+iy∈S1/l⊂Sp(∅)
[TABLE]
and by (CT.4) there exists C>0 such that for all α∈A
[TABLE]
yielding to
[TABLE]
Hence W∈OV(C,E) and thus
[TABLE]
i.e. H is injective.
Second, we prove that H∘Θ=id on L(OVind−1(K),E),
which implies the surjectivity of H.
Due to the Hahn-Banach theorem this is equivalent to the condition that
[TABLE]
holds for all T∈L(OVind−1(K),E), φ∈OVind−1(K)
and e′∈E′.
Since
[TABLE]
all T∈L(OVind−1(K),E), φ∈Oνn−1(Un(K)), n∈N,
and e′∈E′, it suffices to show the result for E=C.
As the span of the set of point evaluations of complex derivatives {δx0(n)∣x0∈K∩R,n∈N0}
is dense in OVind−1(K)b′ by Proposition 3.2 b), we only need to show that
(H∘Θ)(δx0(n))(φ)=⟨δx0(n),φ⟩ for all
x0∈K∩R, n∈N0 and φ∈OVind−1(K).
Let x0∈K∩R and n∈N0. Now, we have
[TABLE]
for all φ∈Oνk−1(Uk(K)), k∈N.
Let us take a closer look at the integral on the right-hand side of (10).
Let m∈N, m≥2.
Then g(z,⋅)=z−⋅gK(z−⋅)∈O(B1/m(x0))
for every z∈Sm({x0}). We fix the notation gz(ζ):=g(z,ζ)
for z∈Sm({x0}) and ζ∈B1/m(x0).
We set l:=J3(m)>m with J3(m) from condition (CT.3).
Then we get by Cauchy’s inequality
[TABLE]
for every z∈Sm({x0}). We deduce from (CT.3) that with GK(z)=gK(z−⋅)
[TABLE]
implying (z↦⟨δx0(n),g(z,⋅)⟩)∈OV(C∖{x0}).
This means that the path of the integral on the right-hand side of (10) can be deformed
using Cauchy’s integral theorem
in combination with condition (qV∞) (like in Proposition 3.6 a) and b)) and we get
with s:=minjrj>0 for r=(rj)
[TABLE]
for all φ∈Oνk−1(Uk(K)).
Since g∈O(C), g(0)=1, there is a sequence (aj)j∈N0 in C such that a0=g(0)=1 and
[TABLE]
Thus the Laurent series of g(z,⋅)=z−⋅g(z−⋅) in ζ=z is
[TABLE]
and so
[TABLE]
with an entire function h(⋅,x0). By Cauchy’s integral theorem and Cauchy’s integral formula for derivatives we have
[TABLE]
for all φ∈Oνk−1(Uk(K)), k∈N.
∎
If K∩{±∞} has isolated points in K, e.g. K={+∞},
then we cannot apply the preceding theorem directly
since a counterpart for Proposition 3.2 b) is missing. However, we can make use of the relation (6)
if OVind−1(R) is dense in OVind−1(K).
3.11 Corollary**.**
Let K⊂R be a non-empty compact set and V:=(νn)n∈N a directed family
of continuous weights on C which fulfils (qV∞) and (qL1) for K and R as well as
(CT.1) and (CT.2) for K, and (CT) for R with
gK=gR.
If E is a sequentially complete locally convex Hausdorff space and
OVind−1(R) dense in OVind−1(K),
then the map
[TABLE]
is a topological isomorphism with inverse ΘK and
[TABLE]
Proof.
HK and ΘK are well-defined, linear and continuous maps by Proposition 3.8
and Proposition 3.9.
HR is a topological isomorphism with inverse ΘR
by Theorem 3.10 (ii).
The embedding of OVind−1(R) into
OVind−1(K)
is continuous and dense, hence defines the embedding of L(OVind−1(K),E) into
L(OVind−1(R),E) (the density of the first embedding implies
the injectivity of the latter one) and we have
[TABLE]
since gR=gK. Furthermore, it follows from (6) that
[TABLE]
on OVind−1(R).
We conclude for every f∈OV(C∖K,E)/OV(C,E) that
[TABLE]
and for every T∈L(OVind−1(K),E) that
[TABLE]
by Theorem 3.10. Thus HK is bijective and ΘK its inverse.
∎
3.12 Remark**.**
Under the conditions of Theorem 3.10 resp. Corollary 3.11 it follows that
OV(C∖K,E)/OV(C,E)
is Hausdorff since E and thus Lb(OVind−1(K),E) is Hausdorff.
In particular, OV(C,E) is closed in OV(C∖K,E)
by [31, Lemma 22.9, p. 254].
3.13 Corollary**.**
Let E be a locally convex Hausdorff space, K⊂R a non-empty compact set,
(an)n∈N strictly increasing,
an<0 for all n∈N or an≥0 for all n∈N
and V:=(exp(anμ))n∈N where
[TABLE]
for some 0<γ≤1. If
(i)
K⊂R* and E is locally complete, or*
2. (ii)
K∩{±∞}* has no isolated points in K and E is sequentially complete, or*
3. (iii)
K* is arbitrary, an<0 for all n∈N, limn→∞an=0, γ=1 and E sequentially complete,*
then the map
[TABLE]
is a topological isomorphism with inverse ΘK.
Proof.
We only need to prove that the conditions of Theorem 3.10 in (i)-(ii)
resp. Corollary 3.11 in (iii)
are fulfilled. For (iii), i.e. K⊂R is a non-empty compact set,
an<0 for all n∈N, limn→∞an=0 and γ=1,
we remark that OVind−1(R) is dense in
OVind−1(K) by [20, Theorem 2.2.1, p. 474]
and its correction in [34, Remark, p. 247-248]
(where OVind−1(R) is called P∗).
Let M∈{K,R}, gM:C→C, gM(z):=exp(−z2), and n∈N.
(qV∞): The choices I1(n):=2n and
[TABLE]
guarantee that this condition is fulfilled.
(qL1): Obviously, μ(z)=μ(∣Re(z)∣) for all z∈C and with I2(n):=2n we have
[TABLE]
where Γ is the gamma function, implying that condition (qL1) is satisfied.
(CT.1): Next, we prove that GM′(z0)=−2(z0−⋅)GM(z0) for all z0∈C.
We remark that for all z=z1+iz2∈C
[TABLE]
and we deduce that GM(z)∈Oνn−1(Un(M)).
For ζ=ζ1+iζ2∈Un(M), z0=z1+iz2∈C and h∈C, 0<∣h∣≤1, we observe that
[TABLE]
yielding to
[TABLE]
We conclude that −2(z0−⋅)GM(z0)∈Oνn−1(Un(M))
(inequality above and triangle inequality) and (CT.1) holds.
(CT.2), (CT.3): Let N⊂M be a non-empty compact set.
We choose J2(n):=J3(n):=2n and note that for ζ1,z1∈R
[TABLE]
It follows that
[TABLE]
which means that (CT.2) and (CT.3) hold.
(CT.4): We set p:=J4(n):=2n and m:=J4(p):=2p=4n.
Then 2≤p<m and for all z=z1+iz2∈S1/n={w∈C∣∣Im(w)∣≤(1/n)}
[TABLE]
yielding (CT.4).
(CT.5): For all z∈C∖M it holds that
[TABLE]
Thus (CT.5) is satisfied.
∎
The isomorphy OV(C∖K,E)/OV(C,E)≅Lb(OVind−1(K),E)
in Corollary 3.13 (iii) is already known for special cases like E=C
[20, Theorem 3.2.1, p. 480] and Fréchet spaces E [18, 3.9 Satz, p. 41]
but the proof is of homological nature.
In the special case K=[a,∞], a∈R, and E=C the duality in
Corollary 3.13 (iii) was proved in
[32, Theorem 3.3, p. 85-86] and served as an initial point to prove
Corollary 3.13 (iii) for complete E in
[22, 4.1 Theorem, p. 41].
4. (Ω) for OV-spaces on strips with holes
In this section we derive sufficient conditions such that OV(C∖K)
satisfies (Ω) for a non-empty compact set K⊂R.
The basic idea is to prove that, under suitable conditions, the strong dual
OVind−1(K)b′ satisifies (Ω),
then we use the duality
OV(C∖K)/OV(C)≅OVind−1(K)b′
from the preceding section to obtain (Ω) for OV(C∖K)
if OV(C) satisfies (Ω).
Let us recall that a Fréchet space F with an increasing fundamental system of
seminorms (∣∣∣⋅∣∣∣k)k∈N satisfies (Ω) by [31, Chap. 29, Definition, p. 367] if
[TABLE]
where Uk:={x∈F∣∣∣∣x∣∣∣k≤1}.
We start with the following helpful observation
concerning the inductive limit OVind−1(K),
namely, that the choice of the sequence (1/n)n∈N for the neighbourhoods Un(K)=U1/(1/n)(K) is irrelevant.
4.1 Remark**.**
Let K⊂R be a non-empty compact set, V:=(νn)n∈N a directed family
of continuous weights on C, (cn)n∈N a strictly decreasing sequence in R with cn≤1 for all n∈N
and limn→∞cn=0. For n∈N let
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
and the spectral maps for n,k∈N, n≤k, be given by the restrictions
[TABLE]
If V fulfils (qV∞), then
[TABLE]
Proof.
Follows directly from Proposition 3.2 a) and [10, 4.2 Satz, p. 122].
∎
We recall an equivalent description of the property (Ω).
By [31, Lemma 29.13, p. 369] a Fréchet space F with an increasing
fundamental system of seminorms (∣∣∣⋅∣∣∣k)k∈N satisfies (Ω) if and only if
[TABLE]
holds where
[TABLE]
is the dual norm. We introduce the following condition which we need for an application of
Hadamard’s Three Circles Theorem.
Condition (H3CT)****.
Let K⊂R be a non-empty compact set with K∩{±∞}=∅
and V:=(νn)n∈N a directed family of continuous weights on C.
Let there be a strictly decreasing sequence (cn)n∈N in R with cn≤1 for all n∈N
and limn→∞cn=0 such that
[TABLE]
We note that 0<θ<1 and state the following improvement of [22, 5.21 Lemma, p. 88].
4.2 Lemma**.**
Let K⊂R be non-empty compact set. If condition (qV∞) and, in addition, (H3CT)
if K∩{±∞}=∅ are fulfilled, then the following holds.
a)
[TABLE]
with cn from (H3CT) if K∩{±∞}=∅
resp. cn:=1/n, n∈N, if K⊂R.
2. b)
OVind−1(K)b′* satisfies (Ω).*
Proof.
a) Let p,q,k∈N, p<q<k, and f∈Oνp−1(U1/cp(K)).
Considering the components of U1/cp(K) we have to distinguish three different cases.
(i) Let Zp be a bounded component of U1/cp(K).
By Remark 3.4 a) there are only finitely many components
Zq of U1/cq(K) with Zq⊂Zp.
For every such component Zq we choose ζ∈Zq∩K, which exists since Zq is bounded.
Let Zk be the (unique) component of U1/ck(K) which contains ζ.
Zp is a proper simply connected subset of C. Thus there exists a biholomorphic map
ψ:Zp→B1(0) with ψ(ζ)=0 due to the Riemann mapping theorem
(and Möbius transformation). In addition, Zp and B1(0) are Jordan domains
(for the definition see [1, 2.8.5 Lemma, p. 193, 1.8.5 Jordan Curve Theorem, p. 68])
and so there exists a homeomorphism ψ:Zp→B1(0)
such that ψ∣Zp=ψ by [1, 2.8.8 Theorem (Caratheodory), p. 195].
Since ψ(Zq)⊂ψ(Zp)=B1(0) and ψ(Zq) is compact,
as Zq is compact and ψ continuous, there is 0<rq<1 such that
ψ(Zq)⊂Brq(0).
Moreover, there exists 0<rk<rq such that Brk(0)⊂ψ(Zk)
since 0∈ψ(Zk), ψ(Zk) is open by the open mapping theorem (from complex analysis)
and ψ(Zk)⊂ψ(Zq).
The function u:=f∘(ψ−1) is holomorphic on B1(0) and continuous on B1(0),
in particular, ∣u∣ is subharmonic on B1(0) and continuous on B1(0).
Setting
[TABLE]
we obtain by virtue of [1, 4.4.32 Proposition (Hadamard’s Three Circles Theorem), p. 338]
[TABLE]
and hence
[TABLE]
with θ:=ln(1/rk)ln(1/rq). We note that 0<θ<1 because 0<rk<rq<1.
By the maximum principle we have
[TABLE]
as well as
[TABLE]
and therefore
[TABLE]
(ii) Let K∩{±∞}=∅. Let Zp be an unbounded component of U1/cp(K),
w.l.o.g. the real part of Zp is bounded from below and unbounded from above. Let ζ∈R such that ζ≥1+ck−1.
Then we have Bcj(ζ)⊂([cj−1,∞)+i[−cj,cj]) for j∈{p,q,k} since
cp−1<cq−1<ck−1 and cj≤1.
Applying Hadamard’s Three Circles Theorem to u:=∣f∣,
we get M(cq)≤M(ck)θM(cp)1−θ with θ:=ln(cp/ck)ln(cp/cq)
fulfilling 0<θ<1.
Like in (i) we obtain
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Due to condition (H3CT) there is C2>0, independent of ζ, such that
[TABLE]
and thus
[TABLE]
(iii) Let K∩{±∞}=∅ and Zp be w.l.o.g. like in (ii).
We define Zp:=Zp∩((−∞,1+ck−1)+iR).
By Remark 3.4 a) there are only finitely many components
Zq of U1/cq(K)∩((−∞,1+ck−1)+iR) with Zq⊂Zp.
For every such component Zq we choose ζ∈Zq∩(K∪{x∈R∣x>ck−1}).
Let Zk be the (unique) component of U1/ck(K)∩((−∞,1+ck−1)+iR) which contains ζ.
The rest is analogous to (i) and thus there are C0, C1>0 and 0<θ<1 such that
[TABLE]
(iv) First, let us remark the following. Let B be a set, B0⊂B, 0<θ0<θ1<1,
h:B0→[0,∞), g:B→[0,∞) and h≤g on B0. Then
[TABLE]
Now, we take the minimum of all the θs which appear in (i)-(iii).
There are finitely many of them and denote their minimum again with θ.
Take the maximum of the constants C0C1, C2 and C0C1
which appear in (i)-(iii).
There are again finitely many of them and denote their maximum with C.
We apply the remark above to B0:=U1/ck(K), B:=U1/cp(K),
h(z):=∣f(z)∣νk(z)−1 and g(z):=∣f(z)∣νp(z)−1. Then we deduce from (4),
(4) and (15) that
[TABLE]
b) We recall Remark 4.1 and identify both inductive limits.
Let p∈N and choose q∈N, q>p. Let k∈N. If k≤p, then we get for any 0<θ<1 and all
y∈(OVind−1(K)b′)′ by definition of the dual norm
[TABLE]
Let k>p. If k≤q, we have for any 0<θ<1 and
all y∈(OVind−1(K)b′)′ by definition of the dual norm
[TABLE]
Let k>q and y∈(OVind−1(K)b′)′.
If ∥y∥p,cp∗=∞, then (12) is obviously fulfilled.
Let ∥y∥p,cp∗<∞. As OVind−1(K) is a DFS-space by Proposition 3.2 a),
the sets Bn:={f∈Oνn−1(U1/cn(K))∣∥f∥n,cn≤1}, n∈N,
are a fundamental system of bounded sets of OVind−1(K)
by [31, Proposition 25.19, p. 303] and hence the seminorms
[TABLE]
form a fundamental system of seminorms of OVind−1(K)b′.
Furthermore, OVind−1(K) is reflexive and thus there is a unique
f∈OVind−1(K) such that y(x)=x(f) for all x∈OVind−1(K)′.
Then we obtain by [31, Proposition 22.14, p. 256] for all n∈N, n≥p,
[TABLE]
In particular, this means that {t>0∣f∈tBn}=∅ and
thus we have f∈Oνn−1(U1/cn(K)) as well as
[TABLE]
for all n≥p. So by part a), there are C>0 and 0<θ<1, only depending on p, q and k, such that
[TABLE]
∎
The idea to use Hadamard’s Three Circles Theorem in the proof of Lemma 4.2 a) is taken from
the proof of [37, Lemma 5.2 (a)(3), p. 263-264].
If K⊂R is non-empty and compact, Lemma 4.2 b) is already known.
Indeed, the space O(C∖K) satisfies (Ω) by [38, Proposition 2.5 (b), p. 173]
and thus the quotient space
O(C∖K)/O(C) as well by [31, Lemma 29.11 (2), p. 368].
Since (Ω) is a linear-topological invariant by [31, Lemma 29.11 (1), p. 368],
it follows from OVind−1(K)b′≅A(K)b′≅O(C∖K)/O(C) by (2) that
OVind−1(K)b′ also satisfies (Ω).
4.3 Theorem**.**
Let K⊂R be a non-empty compact set and OV(C) satisfy (Ω).
Let (qV∞), (qL1), (CT.1) and (CT.2) be fulfilled for K and, in addition,
(H3CT) if K∩{±∞}=∅.
If
(i)
K⊂R, or K∩{±∞} has no isolated points in K and (CT.3)-(CT.5)*
is fulfilled for K, or*
2. (ii)
(qV∞), (qL1) and (CT) are fulfilled for R with gK=gR
and OVind−1(R) is dense in OVind−1(K),
then OV(C∖K) satisfies (Ω).
Proof.
The spaces OV(C∖K) and OV(C)
are Fréchet spaces which is easily checked (similar to [23, 3.7 Proposition, p. 240]).
By Theorem 3.10 in (i) resp. Corollary 3.11 in (ii)OV(C∖K)/OV(C)
is topologically isomorphic to OVind−1(K)b′,
in particular, the quotient is a Fréchet space as OVind−1(K) is
a DFS-space by Proposition 3.2 a).
Since (Ω) is a linear-topological invariant by [31, Lemma 29.11 (1), p. 368],
OV(C∖K)/OV(C) satisfies (Ω)
due to Lemma 4.2 b). The sequence
[TABLE]
is an exact sequence of Fréchet spaces where i means the inclusion and q the quotient map.
OV(C) satisfies (Ω) by assumption
and OV(C∖K)/OV(C) as well,
thus OV(C∖K) by [40, 1.7 Lemma, p. 230], too.
∎
Conditions for OV(C) to satisfy (Ω) can be found in
[27, Theorem 10, p. 14], [27, Corollary 13, p. 17]
and more general in [6, 3.1 Proposition].
In particular, the preceding theorem generalises [22, 5.22 Theorem, p. 92]
which is case (ii) of the following corollary.
4.4 Corollary**.**
Let K⊂R be a non-empty compact set,
(an)n∈N strictly increasing, an<0 for all n∈N or an≥0 for all n∈N,
limn→∞an=0 or limn→∞an=∞
and V:=(exp(anμ))n∈N where
[TABLE]
for some 0<γ≤1. If
(i)
K⊂R, or K∩{±∞} has no isolated points in K, or
2. (ii)
K* is arbitrary, an<0 for all n∈N, limn→∞an=0 and γ=1,*
then OV(C∖K) satisfies (Ω).
Proof.
By [27, Corollary 14, p. 18] OV(C) satisfies (Ω). Due to Theorem 4.3 and (the proof of) Corollary 3.13
we only need to check that (H3CT) is fulfilled if K∩{±∞}=∅.
Let cn:=exp(1/an) for all n∈N if an<0 for all n∈N
and cn:=exp(−an) for all n∈N if an≥0 for all n∈N. Then (cn) is a strictly decreasing sequence,
cn≤1 for all n∈N and limn→∞cn=0. Let p,q,k∈N such that p<q<k and θ:=ln(cp/ck)ln(cp/cq).
Let ζ∈R with ∣ζ∣≥1+ck−1.
For z∈C with ∣z−ζ∣≤cn, n∈{p,q,k}, we deduce from the inequalities
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
if an<0, as well as
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
if an≥0. Now, we only need to prove that there is C>0 such that
[TABLE]
resp.
[TABLE]
If an<0, we observe that
[TABLE]
and, if an≥0, that
[TABLE]
What remains to be shown is that
[TABLE]
because then we are done with C:=exp(∣aq∣(cp+cq)γ). If an<0, then
In our last section we prove our main result on the surjectivity of the Cauchy-Riemann operator
on EV(C∖K,E) for non-empty compact K⊂R.
This is done by using the results obtained so far and splitting theory.
We recall that a Fréchet space (F,(∣∣∣⋅∣∣∣k)k∈N) satisfies (DN)
by [31, Chap. 29, Definition, p. 359] if
[TABLE]
A PLS-space is a projective limit X=⟵N∈NlimXN, where the
inductive limits XN=⟶n∈Nlim(XN,n,∣∣∣⋅∣∣∣N,n) are DFS-spaces, and it satisfies (PA) if
[TABLE]
where ∣∣∣⋅∣∣∣∗ denotes the dual norm of ∣∣∣⋅∣∣∣ and iNM, iNK the linking maps
(see [4, Section 4, Eq. (24), p. 577]).
Let EV(Ω) be a Schwartz space and EV∂(Ω)
a nuclear subspace satisfying property (Ω).
Assume that the scalar-valued operator ∂:EV(Ω)→EV(Ω)
is surjective. Moreover, if
a)
E:=Fb′* where F is a Fréchet space over C satisfying (DN), or*
2. b)
E* is an ultrabornological PLS-space over C satisfying (PA),*
then
[TABLE]
is surjective.
The case a) is included in case b) if F is a Fréchet-Schwartz space by [27, Remark 2, p. 6].
If E is a Fréchet space over C the preceding theorem is also valid but the assumption
that EV∂(Ω) satifies property (Ω) is not needed
(see [28, 4.9 Corollary, p. 21]).
5.2 Corollary**.**
Let K⊂R be a non-empty compact set,
(an)n∈N strictly increasing, an<0 for all n∈N, limn→∞an=0
and V:=(exp(anμ))n∈N where
[TABLE]
for some 0<γ≤1. If
(i)
K⊂R, or K∩{±∞} has no isolated points in K, or
2. (ii)
K* is arbitrary and γ=1,*
and
a)
E:=Fb′* where F is a Fréchet space over C satisfying (DN), or*
2. b)
E* is an ultrabornological PLS-space over C satisfying (PA),*
then
[TABLE]
is surjective.
Proof.
We only need to check that the conditions of Theorem 5.1 are fulfilled.
EV(C∖K) is nuclear, in particular a Schwartz space, and thus its subspace
EV∂(C∖K) as well by [26, Theorem 3.1, p. 188],
[26, 2.8 Example (ii), p. 179], [26, Remark 2.7, p. 178-179]
and [26, Remark 2.3 (b), p. 177].
Furthermore, EV∂(C∖K)=OV(C∖K)
by [27, Proposition 7 (b), p. 11] and [27, Example 6, p. 11].
Due to Corollary 4.4 the space OV(C∖K)
satisfies (Ω). The Cauchy-Riemann operator ∂:EV(C∖K)→EV(C∖K) in the C-valued case is surjective by [28, Corollary 5.6, p. 27]
which follows from [28, Example 5.7 (a), p. 27-28]
in the case that K⊂R or K∩{±∞} has no isolated points in K.
If K∩{±∞} has isolated points in K, then the proof that the conditions of
[28, Corollary 5.6, p. 27]
are fulfilled is verbatim as in [28, Example 5.7 (a), p. 27-28]. Hence
all conditions of Theorem 5.1 are fulfilled.
∎
Corollary 5.2, together with [27, Corollary 18, p. 21] (K=∅),
generalises [22, 5.24 Theorem, p. 95] which is case (ii).
Acknowledgements
The present paper is a generalisation of parts of Chapter 4 and 5 of the author’s PhD thesis [22],
written under the supervision of M. Langenbruch. The author is deeply grateful to him for his support and advice.
Further, it is worth to mention that some of the results appearing in the PhD thesis
and thus their generalised counterparts in this work are essentially due to him.
Bibliography40
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
1Berenstein and Gay [1991] C. A. Berenstein and R. Gay. Complex variables . Grad. Texts in Math. 125. Springer, New York, 1991. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-3024-3 . · doi ↗
2Bierstedt et al. [1975] K.-D. Bierstedt, B. Gramsch, and R. Meise. Lokalkonvexe Garben und gewichtete induktive Limites 𝔉 𝔉 \mathfrak{F} -morpher Funktionen. In J. Blatter, J. B. Prolla, and W. Rueß, editors, Function spaces and dense approximation (Proc., Bonn, 1974) , Bonner Math. Schriften 81, pages 59–72, Bonn, 1975. Inst. Angew. Math., Univ. Bonn.
3Bonet and Domański [2006] J. Bonet and P. Domański. Parameter dependence of solutions of differential equations on spaces of distributions and the splitting of short exact sequences. J. Funct. Anal. , 230(2):329–381, 2006. doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2005.06.007 . · doi ↗
4Bonet and Domański [2008] J. Bonet and P. Domański. The splitting of exact sequences of PLS-spaces and smooth dependence of solutions of linear partial differential equations. Adv. Math. , 217:561–585, 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.aim.2007.07.010 . · doi ↗
5Bonet et al. [2002] J. Bonet, E. Jordá, and M. Maestre. Vector-valued meromorphic functions. Arch. Math. (Basel) , 79(5):353–359, 2002. doi: 10.1007/PL 00012457 . · doi ↗
6Debrouwere [2021] A. Debrouwere. Sequence space representations for spaces of entire functions with rapid decay on strips. J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 497(1):124872, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2020.124872 . · doi ↗
7Dierolf [2014] B. Dierolf. Splitting theory for PLH spaces . Ph D thesis, Universität Trier, 2014. doi: 10.25353/ubtr-xxxx-4b 2b-53a 5 . · doi ↗
8Dierolf and Sieg [2019] B. Dierolf and D. Sieg. Splitting and parameter dependence in the category of PLH spaces. RACSAM Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Ser. A Mat. , 113(1):59––93, 2019. doi: 10.1007/s 13398-017-0424-5 . · doi ↗