# Measurement of marked correlation functions in SDSS-III Baryon   Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey using LOWZ galaxies in Data Release 12

**Authors:** Siddharth Satpathy, Rupert Croft, Shirley Ho, Baojiu Li

arXiv: 1901.01447 · 2019-01-08

## TL;DR

This study measures galaxy marked correlation functions in SDSS-III BOSS data, compares them with simulations, and finds no significant deviations from the standard cosmological model, highlighting the potential for future constraints on modified gravity.

## Contribution

First measurement of marked correlation functions in SDSS-III BOSS data compared to simulations, assessing their power to test gravity models.

## Key findings

- No significant deviations from ΛCDM in observed marked correlation functions.
- Current modeling limitations restrict the constraining power on small scales.
- Future improved models could definitively test modified gravity theories.

## Abstract

Marked correlation functions, which are sensitive to the clustering of galaxies in different environments, have been proposed as constraints on modified gravity models. We present measurements of the marked correlation functions of galaxies in redshift space using 361,761 LOWZ ($z_{\rm eff} = 0.32$) galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey III (SDSS III) Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) Data Release 12 (DR12) and compare them to $\Lambda$CDM+General Relativity simulations. We apply mass cuts to find the best match between the redshift space autocorrelation function of subhaloes in the simulation and in the observations. We then compare the marked correlation functions, finding no significant evidence for deviations of the marked correlation functions of LOWZ galaxies from $\Lambda$CDM on scales $6 \ h^{-1}$Mpc $ \leq s \leq$ $69 \ h^{-1}$Mpc. The constraining power of marked correlation functions in our analysis is limited by our ability to model the autocorrelation function of galaxies on small scales including the effect of redshift distortions. The statistical errors are well below the differences seen between marked correlation functions of $f$(R) gravity models and $\Lambda$CDM in recent publications (Armijo et al., Hern\'{a}ndez-Aguayo et al.) indicating that improved future theoretical analyses should be able to rule out some models definitively.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.01447/full.md

## Figures

66 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.01447/full.md

## References

107 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.01447/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.01447