# Noise Analysis of Open-Loop and Closed-Loop SAW Magnetic Field Sensor   Systems

**Authors:** Phillip Durdaut, Anne Kittmann, Enrico Rubiola, Jean-Michel Friedt,, Eckhard Quandt, Reinhard Kn\"ochel, Michael H\"oft

arXiv: 1901.01428 · 2020-01-22

## TL;DR

This paper analyzes and compares the noise performance of open-loop and closed-loop SAW magnetic field sensors, providing theoretical models and experimental validation to optimize their detection limits.

## Contribution

It introduces a phase noise analysis framework for both sensor configurations and derives expressions for their detection limits, demonstrating their equivalence under certain conditions.

## Key findings

- Phase noise of SAW oscillator can be accurately predicted.
- Detection limits of open-loop and closed-loop configurations are analytically shown to be equivalent.
- Experimental measurements confirm the theoretical predictions.

## Abstract

Transmission surface acoustic wave (SAW) sensors are widely used in various fields of application. In order to maximize the limit of detection (LOD) of such sensor systems, it is of high importance to understand and to be able to quantify the relevant noise sources. In this paper, low noise readout systems for the application with a SAW delay line magnetic field sensor in an open-loop and closed-loop configuration are presented and analyzed with regard to their phase noise contribution. By applying oscillator phase noise theory to closed-loop sensor systems, it is shown that the phase noise of the SAW delay line oscillator can be predicted accurately. This allows the derivation of expressions for the limits of detection for both readout structures. Based on these equations, the equivalence between the LOD of open-loop and closed-loop SAW delay line readout can be shown analytically, assuming that the sensor contributes the dominant phase noise. This equality is verified by measurements. These results are applicable to all kinds of phase sensitive delay line sensors.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.01428/full.md

## Figures

12 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.01428/full.md

## References

45 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.01428/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.01428