Knot concordances in $S^1\times S^2$ and exotic smooth $4$-manifolds
Selman Akbulut, Eylem Zeliha Yildiz

TL;DR
This paper explores the construction of exotic smooth 4-manifolds using knots in $S^1\times S^2$, demonstrating that certain exotic pairs can be Stein manifolds and providing new examples of such manifolds.
Contribution
It constructs absolutely exotic Stein 4-manifold pairs using hyperbolic knots with trivial symmetry in $S^1\times S^2$, extending previous methods.
Findings
Existence of absolutely exotic Stein manifold pairs.
Construction preserves the Stein property.
Generation of exotic contractible Stein manifolds.
Abstract
It is known that there is a unique concordance class in the free homotopy class of . The constructive proof of this fact is given by the second author. It turns out that all the concordances in this construction are invertible. The knots with hyperbolic complements and trivial symmetry group are special interest here, because they can be used to generate absolutely exotic compact 4-manifolds by the recipe given by Akbulut and Ruberman. Here we built absolutely exotic manifold pairs by this construction, and show that this construction keeps the Stein property of the -manifolds we start out with. By using this we establish the existence of an absolutely exotic contractible Stein manifold pair, and absolutely exotic homotopy Stein manifold pair.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric and Algebraic Topology · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
\addtokomafont
labelinglabel
Knot concordances in and exotic smooth -manifolds
Selman Akbulut
and
Eylem ZELİHA Yildiz
Department of Mathematics, Michigan State University, MI, 48824
(Date: March 2, 2024)
Abstract.
It is known that there is a unique concordance class in the free homotopy class of . The constructive proof of this fact is given by the second author. It turns out that all the concordances in this construction are invertible. The knots with hyperbolic complements and trivial symmetry group are special interest here, because they can be used to generate absolutely exotic compact 4-manifolds by the recipe given by Akbulut and Ruberman. Here we built absolutely exotic manifold pairs by this construction, and show that this construction keeps the Stein property of the -manifolds we start out with. By using this we establish the existence of an absolutely exotic contractible Stein manifold pair, and absolutely exotic homotopy Stein manifold pair.
1991 Mathematics Subject Classification:
58D27, 58A05, 57R65
The first author is partially supported by NSF grant DMS 0905917
0. Introduction
Here we will prove the following theorems which strengthens [AR]:
Theorem 1**.**
There is a pair of compact contractible Stein -manifolds , , which are homeomorphic but not diffeomorphic to each other.
As in the examples of [AR], and are related to each other by cork twisting along a cork , (e.g. [A]). It follows from the construction that and can not be corks (see [ar1]).
Theorem 2**.**
There is a pair of compact Stein -manifolds , homotopy equivalent to , which are homeomorphic but not diffeomorphic to each other.
Similarly, and are related to each other by“anticork” twisting (e.g. [A]) along an anticork contained in . The important feature of our theorems is that the manifolds constructed are all Stein. This property enables us to imbed them into closed symplectic manifolds and relate their exoticity to the nonvanishing gauge theory invariants of closed symplectic manifolds ([T]). The proofs of these theorems will be based on:
Theorem 3**.**
Any knot in , which is freely homotopic to , is invertibly concordant to .
1. Background
Let us recall some basic definitions about knot concordances:
Definition 1**.**
Two knots and are said to be concordant if there is a smooth proper embedding of an annulus , such that its boundary is , where is the knot with the reversed orientation.
Definition 2**.**
[S]** A concordance between knots and is said to be invertible if there is a concordance from to such that is the product concordance . In this case, we say is invertibly concordant to , and splits . In particular when and is the unknot then is called doubly slice.
Definition 3**.**
An invertible cobordism from to is a smooth manifold with , such that there is a cobordism with and .
Following Proposition follows from computations by SnapPy [CDGW], and verifications of these computations are due to [DHL] and [HIKMOT].
Proposition 4**.**
The knot given in the Figure 1 is hyperbolic with trivial symmetry group.
By using Theorem 3 and Proposition 4 we will convert relatively exotic smooth structures on compact -manifolds to absolutely exotic smooth structures, by using the construction given in [AR]. Our goal is to generate Stein exotic examples that can not be obtained from [AR].
Now recall the construction of absolutely exotic smooth structures on compact 4-manifolds, from relatively exotic structures:
Theorem 5** ([AR]).**
Let be self homeomorphism of a compact smooth -manifold, whose restriction to is a diffeomorphism which does not extend to a self diffeomorphism of . Then contains a pair of homeomorphic smooth -manifolds and homotopy equivalent to , but and are not diffeomorphic to each other.
The construction of [AR] relies on finding a knot in which is doubly slice, hyperbolic, and with no symmetry. Here we will remind the original construction, and show that we can use invertible knot concordances in between a knot and , where is a hyperbolic knot with trivial symmetry group, splitting the concordance.
Lemma 6**.**
Let be a knot in , which is freely homotopic to with exterior . Then .
Proof.
Follows from Mayer-Vietoris sequence. ∎
Corollary 7**.**
Let , be knots in the free homotopy class of the in , and be a concordance between and , then and generated by the .
Note that a tubular neighbourhood of in is an embedding of in , where the image of is . The image of is called a meridian of , then a meridian of bounds a disk in the tubular neighbourhood of , and it is homologous to zero in the exterior. Similarly we call the image of as a longitude.
The following lemma is adapted from [AR]. We restate it here in a slightly different way to show that we can use appropriate concordances of knots in instead of in . The only difference here is that the gluing map identifies meridian to meridian not to longitude.
Lemma 8**.**
Suppose that is a framed knot in a closed -manifold , and is an invertible concordance from the to the knot in . Define
[TABLE]
where is a diffeomorphism which sends the meridian of to the meridian of the knot . Then is an invertible homology cobordism from to . If , then the inclusion induces an isomorphism on fundamental groups.
2. Proof of Theorem 3
Proof of Theorem 3.
Start with a knot in the concordance class of . Built a concordance between and as it is explained in [Y, Theorem 2]. is properly embedded in , the last coordinate is the time, and we have at every level. From the construction we see the knot at the top level, and we perform genus zero cobordism, i.e. we attach bunch of bands , turning to union disjoint unknots linking . For , following levels are depicted partially in Figure 2
- •
- •
- •
- •
where each is an unknot in which is the boundary of the corresponding [math]-handle of , and represents a band which is a -handle attached to the surface. in the Definition 2 is here.
Next will be to construct a handlebody decomposition for the concordance complement from the handlebody decomposition of the surface . For a detailed discussion of handlebody decomposition of surface complement in -manifolds one can consult Chapter 1.4 of [A]. To construct the complement of in start from the bottom. First we see complement of in which is . Then as increase, [math]-handles of the surface appears, in the complement which corresponds carving properly embedding of disks from . So we have connected sum of copies of . At the last step the complement gains many -dimensional -handles for the -handles of the surface, as in the middle picture of Figure 3. Alternatively the reader should compare this to [Y], where the cobordism was constructed from top to bottom. For example, Figure 3 describes the concordance from the Mazur knot to
To double the concordance complement, we attach upside-down handles along the dual of the -handles (with zero framing), and dual -handles as upside-down -handles. We use the dual -handles to get rid of the self-linking of the original -handle, therefore ending up with cancelling and handle pairs. After cancellations the complement becomes a product. In Figure 3, reader can verify that sliding over the dual -handle ([math]-framed little circle linking the -handle) will make the -handle trivially link the -handle.
All these cancellations happens away from the endpoints
and provided attaching circles of the two handles are away from the . Note that anything links to can be unlinked by sliding over the middle (red) -handle. So far we have constructed a diffeomorphism from to , which is identity near the endpoints. Next, we prove that this diffeomorphism extends to self diffeomorphism of which takes the surface to the product .
The diffeomorphism above induces a boundary diffeomorphism on . When we restrict this to the partial boundary we get a diffeomorphism which is identity near . By Lemma 3.5 of Waldhausen [W], is isotopic to the identity map rel boundary hence it extends to tubular neighbourhoods of the surfaces. Hence we have a self diffeomorphism of taking to . So diffeomorphic complements uniquely determine the surfaces. ∎
Theorem is related to Light Bulb theorems, that is after doubling the concordance, we have a surface in which is bounded by . By capping both boundaries with s, we get a surface in intersecting at one point, then apply [L] and [G]. The advantage of this construction is, it gives a rel boundary diffeomorphism .
By applying the technique of Section 2 to the curve of Figure 1, we get the Figure 4, where the curve now looks like the standard linking circle to the -handle (dotted curve in the figure).
In Figure 4 the concordance from to K is fully visible (i.e. the handles of the complement of are visible). Clearly cancelling the handles of Figure 4 gives Figure 1 (the dotted circle corresponds to ).
2.1. Proof of Theorem 1
First we proceed as in [AR], i.e. glue the homology product cobordism obtained from Figure 4 to the boundary of the cork (as discussed in Section 1). From this we get a new contractible manifold containing , such that performing the cork twisting gives us an absolutely exotic copy of . Recall from Section 1 we construct by gluing W and the homology product cobordism along the longitudes of and , which is the Figure 5. Here we are using the roping technique of [A] to draw the handlebody of . From the discussion above, Figure 5 is equivalent to Figure 6. By zero and dot exchanges to inside gives .The only remaining issue is to put Stein structure on and (they are homeomorphic by Freedman’s theorem).
For this we will work with the picture of , given in Figure 6. We first put Figure 1 in Legendrian position and get Figure 7, where the -handle has .
The two pictures of Figure 8 are related to each other by zero and dot exchanges. Then we put both handlebodies of Figure 8 in Legendrian position, and connected sum with Figure 7. This gives Figures 11 and 12, which are pictures of and where both are Stein. ∎
2.2. Proof of Theorem 2
As above, we will use the construction of [AR] such a way that the end result will be a pair of Stein manifolds, homotopy equivalent to , which are absolutely exotic copies of each other. Now recall the construction of [A1] (and [A]): The knot on the left of Figure 13 bounds a ribbon in two different ways. Both of these ribbon complements are diffeomorphic to each other, where denotes the tubular neighborhood of . Furthermore, is homotopy equivalent to , and the diffeomorphism is described by the involution of Figure 13 (the “zero-dot exchange” of the two middle pictures of Figure 13) does not extend to a diffeomorphism , but does extend to a hemeomorphism. Note that is the anticork involution in 10.2 of [A].
Next we observe that is a Stein manifold by drawing the first picture of Figure 13 as in Figure 15 (this was first verified by Luke Williams). Then pick a knot with hyperbolic complement and trivial symmetry (again by verifying by SnapPy [CDGW]). The first and last pictures of Figure 13 becomes Figures 15 and Figure 15.
Finally by the roping technique of [A], we glue to by first identifying and , then identifying and getting the manifolds and in Figures 16 and 17. Clearly both are Stein manifolds, and are homeomorphic to each other by Freedman’s theorem (calculations for can be checked from the pictures). ∎
Remark 1**.**
Notice each of the contractible manifolds and can be represented by a single 1/2-handle pairs. To see this in Figure 12 cancel the 1-handle, at top of the picture, with the -handle which goes through it geometrically once. To see this in Figure 11, we first slide the colored -handle over the other -handle (which corresponds the handle slide indicated by the arrow in the first picture of Figure 8) then the resulting -handle in Figure 11 goes through the -handle once. This means that if are the linking circles of the -handles of , for , there is no diffeomorphism taking to ; if there was, we can extend it to a diffeomorphism by using “carving” (Section 2.5 of [A]). It was pointed out to us that this provides an answer to Problem 1.16 in [K], because surgering each along results (since posting of our paper this fact has also been pointed out in [KP] and [HMP] as well).
Acknowledgement. First named author would like to thank Danny Ruberman for enjoyable collaboration in [AR] which was a motivation of this paper. The second named author would like to thank Nathan Dunfield, Nick Ivanov and Kouchi Yasui for valuable conversations.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[A] S. Akbulut, 4-Manifolds , vol. 25, Oxford University Press (2016) ISBN-13: 978-0198784869.
- 2[A 1] S. Akbulut, A solution to a conjecture of Zeeman , Topology, vol.30, no.3, (1991), 513-515.
- 3[AR] S. Akbulut, D. Ruberman Absolutely exotic compact 4-manifolds , Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici (2016) 91(1), 1-19.
- 4[AY] Knot concordances in S 1 × S 2 superscript 𝑆 1 superscript 𝑆 2 S^{1}\times S^{2} and exotic smooth 4 4 4 -manifolds (12 April 2019), https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.00806.pdf
- 5[CDGW] M. Culler, N.M. Dunfield, M. Goerner, J.R. Weeks, Snap Py, a computer program for studying the geometry and topology of 3 3 3 -manifolds , Available at http://snappy.computop.org(09/12/2018) .
- 6[DHL] N. M. Dunfield, N.R. Hoffman, J.E. Licata, Asymmetric hyperbolic L-spaces, Heegaard genus, and Dehn filling , Math. Res. Lett. 22, 1679 1698 (2015) ar Xiv:1407.7827, MR 3507256.
- 7[G] D. Gabai 2017 The 4-dimensional light bulb theorem . ar Xiv preprint ar Xiv:1705.09989.
- 8[HMP] K. Hayden, T. E. Mark, and L. Piccirillo, Exotic Mazur manifolds and knot trace invariants https://arxiv.org/pdf/1908.05269.pdf.
