# Partial renal coverage in EVAR causes unfavorable renal flow patterns in an infrarenal aneurysm model

## TL;DR

This study demonstrates that partial renal artery coverage during EVAR alters renal flow patterns, increasing oscillating shear stress and backflow, which may promote atherosclerosis and stenosis, emphasizing the importance of precise device placement.

## Contribution

It provides the first in-vitro analysis of how partial renal coverage affects flow dynamics and shear stress in an aneurysm model, highlighting clinical implications.

## Key findings

- Partial coverage causes low and oscillating wall shear stress.
- Coverage increases renal backflow area percentage.
- Flow alterations may promote renal artery stenosis.

## Abstract

Objective: To achieve an optimal sealing zone during EVAR, the intended positioning of the proximal end of the endograft fabric should be as close as possible to the most caudal edge of the renal arteries. Some endografts exhibit a small offset between the radiopaque markers and the proximal fabric edge. Unintended partial renal artery coverage may thus occur. This study investigates the consequences of partial coverage on renal flow patterns and wall shear stress. Methods: In-vitro models of an abdominal aortic aneurysm were used to visualize pulsatile flow using 2D particle image velocimetry under physiologic resting conditions. One model served as control and two models were stented with an Endurant endograft, one without and one with partial renal artery coverage with 1.3 mm of stent fabric extending beyond the marker (16\% area coverage). The magnitude and oscillation of wall shear stress, relative residence time and backflow in the renal artery were analyzed. Results: In both stented models, a region along the caudal renal artery wall presented with low and oscillating wall shear stress, not present in the control model. A region with very low wall shear stress (<0.1 Pa) was present in the model with partial coverage over a length of 7 mm, compared to a length of 2 mm in the model without renal coverage. Average renal backflow area percentage in the renal artery incrementally increased from control (0.9%) to the stented model without (6.4%) and with renal coverage (18.8%). Conclusion: In this flow model partial renal coverage after EVAR causes low and marked oscillations in wall shear stress, potentially promoting atherosclerosis and subsequent renal artery stenosis. Awareness of the device-dependent offset between the fabric edge and the radiopaque markers is therefore important in endovascular practice.