Comparison between DeepESNs and gated RNNs on multivariate time-series prediction
Claudio Gallicchio, Alessio Micheli, Luca Pedrelli

TL;DR
This paper compares Deep Echo State Networks and gated RNNs for multivariate time-series prediction, showing DeepESNs are more efficient and accurate on most tasks, with GRUs outperforming LSTMs and simple RNNs.
Contribution
It provides an experimental comparison highlighting the efficiency and accuracy of DeepESNs versus fully-trained gated RNNs on multivariate time-series tasks.
Findings
DeepESN outperforms ESN in accuracy and efficiency.
GRU generally outperforms LSTM and RNN.
DeepESN is the most efficient and accurate on 3 out of 4 tasks.
Abstract
We propose an experimental comparison between Deep Echo State Networks (DeepESNs) and gated Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) on multivariate time-series prediction tasks. In particular, we compare reservoir and fully-trained RNNs able to represent signals featured by multiple time-scales dynamics. The analysis is performed in terms of efficiency and prediction accuracy on 4 polyphonic music tasks. Our results show that DeepESN is able to outperform ESN in terms of prediction accuracy and efficiency. Whereas, between fully-trained approaches, Gated Recurrent Units (GRU) outperforms Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and simple RNN models in most cases. Overall, DeepESN turned out to be extremely more efficient than others RNN approaches and the best solution in terms of prediction accuracy on 3 out of 4 tasks.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeural Networks and Reservoir Computing · Neural Networks and Applications · Model Reduction and Neural Networks
