A characterization of maximal ideals in the Fr\'{e}chet algebras of holomorphic functions $F^p$ $(1<p<\infty$
Romeo Me\v{s}trovi\'c

TL;DR
This paper characterizes the structure of maximal ideals and multiplicative linear functionals in the Fréchet algebras of holomorphic functions $F^p$, providing a complete description of their algebraic and functional properties.
Contribution
It offers a complete characterization of closed maximal ideals and multiplicative linear functionals in the $F^p$ algebras, advancing understanding of their algebraic structure.
Findings
Complete description of closed maximal ideals in $F^p$
Characterization of multiplicative linear functionals on $F^p$
Connection between $F^p$ and Privalov space $N^p$
Abstract
The space () consists of all holomorphic functions on the open unit disk for which where with . Stoll [5, Theorem 3.2] proved that the space with the topology given by the family of seminorms defined for as is a countably normed Fr\'{e}chet algebra. Notice that for each , is the Fr\'{e}chet envelope of the Privalov space . In this paper we study the structure of maximal ideals in the algebras (). In particular, we give a complete characterization of closed maximal ideals in . Moreover, we characterize multiplicative linear functionals on .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHolomorphic and Operator Theory · Functional Equations Stability Results · Advanced Banach Space Theory
A characterization of maximal ideals in the Fréchet algebras
of holomorphic functions )
Romeo Meštrović
University of Montenegro, Maritime Faculty Kotor, Dobrota 36, 85330 Kotor, Montenegro, e-mail: [email protected]
Abstract.
The space () consists of all holomorphic functions on the open unit disk for which where with . Stoll [5, Theorem 3.2] proved that the space with the topology given by the family of seminorms defined for as , is a countably normed Fréchet algebra.
Notice that for each , is the Fréchet envelope of the Privalov space . In this paper we study the structure of maximal ideals in the algebras (). In particular, we give a complete characterization of closed maximal ideals in . Moreover, we characterize multiplicative linear functionals on .
†† Mathematics Subject Classification (2010). 30H05, 46J15, 46J20.
1. Introduction, Preliminaries and Results
Let denote the open unit disk in the complex plane and let denote the boundary of . Let be the familiar Lebesgue space on the unit circle .
The Privalov class is defined as the set of all holomorphic functions on such that
[TABLE]
holds, where . These classes were firstly considered by Privalov in [1, pages 93–10], where is denoted as .
Notice that for , the condition (1) defines the Nevanlinna class of holomorphic functions in . Recall that the Smirnov class is the set of all functions holomorphic on such that
[TABLE]
where is the boundary function of on ; that is,
[TABLE]
is the radial limit of which exists for almost every . We denote by the classical Hardy space on .
It is known (see [2, 3, 4]) that the following inclusion relations hold:
[TABLE]
where the above containment relations are proper.
The study of the spaces was continued in 1977 by M. Stoll [5] (with the notation in [5]). Further, the topological and functional properties of these spaces have been studied by several authors (see [2], [6], [7], [8] and [9]–[23]).
M. Stoll [5, Theorem 4.2] proved that for each the space (with the noatation in [5]) equipped with the topology given by the metric defined by
[TABLE]
becomes an -algebra, that is, is an -space (a complete metrizable topological vector space with the invariant metric) in which multiplication is continuous.
Recall that the function defined on the Smirnov class by (5) with induces the metric topology on . N. Yanagihara [24] showed that under this topology, is an -space.
In connection with the spaces , Stoll [5] (see also [6] and [18, Section 3]) also studied the spaces (with the notation in [5]), consisting of those functions holomorphic on such that
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
Here, as always in the sequel, we will need some Stoll’s results concerning the spaces only with , and hence, we will assume that be any fixed number.
Theorem 1 (see [5, Theorem 2.2]). Suppose that is a holomorphic function on . Then the following statements are equivalent:
- (a)
;
- (b)
there exists a sequence of positive real numbers with such that
[TABLE]
- (c)
for any ,
[TABLE]
Remark 2. Notice that in view of Theorem 1 ((a)(c)), by (10) it is well defined the family of seminorms on .
Recall that a locally convex -space is called a Fréchet space, and a Fréchet algebra is a Fréchet space that is an algebra in which multiplication is continuous. Stoll [5] also proved the following result.
Theorem 3 (see [5, Theorem 3.2]). The space equipped with the topology given by the family of seminorms defined for as
[TABLE]
is a countably normed Fréchet algebra.
For our purposes, we will need the following result which characterizes the topological dual of the space .
Theorem 4 (see [5, Theorem 3.3]). If is a continuous linear functional on , then there exists a sequence of complex numbers with
[TABLE]
such that
[TABLE]
where , with convergence being absolute. Conversely, if is a sequence of complex numbers for which
[TABLE]
then (13) defines a continuous linear functional on .
Notice that the Privalov space is not locally convex (see [6, Theorem 4.2] and [14, Corollary]), and hence, is properly contained in . Moreover, is not locally bounded (see [19, Theorem 1.1]). Moreover, Stoll showed ([5, Theorem 4.3]) that for each is a dense subspace of and the topology on defined by the family of seminorms (10) is weaker than the topology on given by the metric defined by (5). Furthermore, Eoff showed [6, Theorem 4.2, the case ] that is the Fréchet envelope of . For more information on Fréchet envelope, see [25, Theorem 1], [22, Section 1] and [26, Corollary 22.3, p. 210].
Remark 5. For , the space has been denoted by and has been studied by N. Yanagihara in [27, 24]. It was shown in [27, 24] that is actually the containing Fréchet space for , i.e., with the initial topology embeds densely into , under the natural inclusion, and and the Smirnov class have the same topological duals.
Observe that the space topologised by the family of seminorms given by (10) is metrizable by the metric defined as with
Since Privalov space and its Fréchet envelope are algebras, they can be also considered as rings with respect to the usual ring’s operations addition and multiplication. Notice that these two operations are continuous on and because the spaces and become -algebras.
Motivated by several results on the ideal structure of some spaces of holomorphic functions given in [28] [2], [12] and [29]-[35], related investigations for the spaces and their Fréchet envelopes were given in [2], [9], [12], [36], [18] and [23]. Note that a survey of these results was given in [37]. The -analogue of the famous Beurling’s theorem for the Hardy spaces [29] was proved in [36]. Moreover, it was proved in [9, Theorem B]) that is a ring of Nevanlinna–Smirnov type in the sense of Mortini. The structure of closed weakly dense ideals in was established in [18]. The ideal structure of and the multiplicative linear functionals on were studied in [2] and [23, Theorem ]. These results are similar to those obtained by Roberts and Stoll [30] for the Smirnov class .
Motivated by results of Roberts and Stoll given in [31, Section 2] concerning a characterization of multiplicative linear functionals on and closed maximal ideals in , in this paper we prove the analogous results for the spaces given by Proposition 5, Proposition 6, Theorem 7 and Theorem 8.
Proposition 5. Let and let be a functional on defined as
[TABLE]
for every . Then is a continuous multiplicative linear functional on .
For , we define
[TABLE]
Proposition 6. The set defined by is a closed maximal ideal in for each .
Theorem 7. Let be a nontrivial multiplicative linear functional on . Then there exists such that
[TABLE]
for every . Moreover, is a continuous map.
Theorem 8. Let and let be a closed maximal ideal in . Then there exists such that .
2. Proof of the results
Proof of Proposition 5. Clearly, for each is a multiplicative linear functional on the space . In order to show that is a continuous functional on , note that for any function () we have
[TABLE]
Clearly, the sequence defined as () satisfies the asymptotic condition (11) of Theorem 4. This together with the equality (17) implies that is a continuous functional on , and the proof is completed.
Proof of Proposition 6. Notice that in view of (15), is the kernel of the functional defined on by (14). From this and the fact that by Proposition 5, is a continuous multiplicative linear functional on the space , we conclude that is a closed maximal ideal in .
Proof of Theorem 7. If we take , then . If we suppose that , then () is a bounded function on the closed unit disk . Therefore, () is an invertible element of the algebra . If is any invertible element in , then , and thus, . Especially, we have . A contradiction, and hence, it must be . Then consider the set
[TABLE]
For each , let be a set defined by (15). Then obviously, . Moreover, if , then by (6) and (7) easily follows that can be expressed as a product with . Therefore,
[TABLE]
whence it follows that
[TABLE]
where denotes the kernel of the functional . By Proposition 6, is a closed maximal ideal in . This together with the inclusion relation (20) implies that . Moreover, for all and is continuous on by Proposition 5. This completes the proof of the theorem.
Proof of Theorem 8. We proceed as in [32, Theorem 2]. If we set , then in the terminology of Arens [38], is complete, metrizable, convex complex topological division algebra. Therefore, by [38], . Thus, there exists a multiplicative linear functional on such that . Then by Theorem 7, for some , as asserted.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] I. I. Privalov, Boundary Properties of Analytic Functions , Izdat. Moskovskogo Universiteta, Moscow, Russia, 1941.
- 2[2] N. Mochizuki, “Algebras of holomorphic functions between H p superscript 𝐻 𝑝 H^{p} and N ∗ subscript 𝑁 N_{*} ,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society , vol. 105, pp. 898–902, 1989.
- 3[3] R. Meštrović and Ž. Pavićević, “Remarks on some classes of holomorphic functions,” Mathematica Montisnigri , vol. 6, pp. 27–37, 1996.
- 4[4] Y. Iida, “Bounded subsets of classes M p ( X ) superscript 𝑀 𝑝 𝑋 M^{p}(X) of holomorphic functions,” Journal of Function Spaces , vol. 2017, Article ID 7260602, 4 pages, 2017.
- 5[5] M. Stoll, “Mean growth and Taylor coefficients of some topological algebras of analytic functions,” Annales Polonici Mathematici , vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 139–158, 1977.
- 6[6] C. M. Eoff, “Fréchet envelopes of certain algebras of analytic functions,” Michigan Mathematical Journal , vol. 35, pp. 413–426, 1988.
- 7[7] C. M. Eoff, “A representation of N α + subscript superscript 𝑁 𝛼 N^{+}_{\alpha} as a union of weighted Hardy spaces,” Complex Variables, Theory and Application , vol. 23, pp. 189–199, 1993.
- 8[8] Y. Iida and N. Mochizuki, “Isometries of some F 𝐹 F -algebras of holomorphic functions,” Archiv der Mathematik , vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 297–300, 1998.
