A Theorem on Divergence in the General Sense for Continued Fractions
Douglas Bowman, James Mc Laughlin

TL;DR
This paper establishes a theorem that clarifies the conditions under which continued fractions with differing odd and even part limits converge in the general sense, especially for certain classes of $q$ continued fractions.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive theorem on general convergence for a broad class of continued fractions with differing odd and even limits, and applies it to specific $q$ continued fractions.
Findings
If $|q|>1$, the $q$ continued fraction either converges or does not converge in the general sense.
Divergence of odd and even parts implies the growth of partial quotients.
The theorem applies to two broad classes of $q$ continued fractions.
Abstract
If the odd and even parts of a continued fraction converge to different values, the continued fraction may or may not converge in the general sense. We prove a theorem which settles the question of general convergence for a wide class of such continued fractions. We apply this theorem to two general classes of continued fraction to show, that if is one of these continued fractions and , then either converges or does not converge in the general sense. We also show that if the odd and even parts of the continued fraction converge to different values, then .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
A Theorem on Divergence in the General Sense for Continued Fractions
Douglas Bowman
Department Of Mathematical Sciences, Northern Illinois University, De Kalb, IL 60115
and
James Mc Laughlin
Mathematics Department, Trinity College, 300 Summit Street, Hartford, CT 06106-3100
(Date: April, 18, 2002)
Abstract.
If the odd and even parts of a continued fraction converge to different values, the continued fraction may or may not converge in the general sense. We prove a theorem which settles the question of general convergence for a wide class of such continued fractions.
We apply this theorem to two general classes of continued fraction to show, that if is one of these continued fractions and , then either converges or does not converge in the general sense.
We also show that if the odd and even parts of the continued fraction converge to different values, then .
Key words and phrases:
Continued Fractions, General Convergence, q-continued fraction, Rogers-Ramanujan
1991 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary:11A55,Secondary:40A15
The second author’s research supported in part by a Trjitzinsky Fellowship.
1. Introduction
In [7], Jacobsen revolutionised the subject of the convergence of continued fractions by introducing the concept of general convergence. General convergence is defined in [9] as follows.
Let the -th approximant of the continued fraction
[TABLE]
be denoted by ( is the -th numerator convergent and is the -th denominator convergent) and let
[TABLE]
Define the chordal metric on by
[TABLE]
when and are both finite, and
[TABLE]
Definition: The continued fraction is said to converge generally to if there exist sequences , such that and
[TABLE]
Remark: Jacobson shows in [7] that, if a continued fraction converges in the general sense, then the limit is unique.
The idea of general convergence is of great significance because classical convergence implies general convergence (take and , for all ), but the converse does not necessarily hold. General convergence is a natural extension of the concept of classical convergence for continued fractions.
The even part of the continued fraction at (1.1) is the continued fraction whose -th numerator (denominator) convergent equals (), for . The odd part of is the continued fraction whose zero-th numerator convergent is , whose zero-th denominator convergent is , and whose -th numerator (respectively denominator) convergent equals (respectively ), for .
In this present paper we investigate the general convergence of continued fractions whose odd and even parts each converge, but to different values. Such continued fractions may or may not converge in the general sense as the following examples show.
Example 1**.**
Let
[TABLE]
If then the odd and even parts of converge but does not converge generally.
The continued fraction is the famous Rogers-Ramanujan continued fraction. It was stated without proof by Ramanujan that, if , then the odd part of converges to and the even part converges to (See Entry 59 of [1] for a proof of Ramanujan’s claim). However, is easily seen to be equivalent to the following continued fraction:
[TABLE]
It is an easy consequence of the Stern-Stolz Theorem below, as extended by Lorentzen and Waadeland, that this continued fraction does not converge in the general sense for any outside the unit circle.
Example 2**.**
Let
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
Then the odd and even parts of tend to different values and converges in the general sense.
Proof.
It is easy to check that the numerators and denominators satisfy
[TABLE]
Thus the odd approximants tend to 1 and the even approximants tend to 3. Observe that
[TABLE]
Each of these expressions converges to 3, when, for example, is the constant sequence with value 1 and when it is the constant sequence with value 2. Thus the continued fraction converges generally to 3. ∎
It is therefore desirable to have criteria, based on the partial quotients of a continued fraction, for determining whether a continued fraction whose odd and even parts converge diverges in the general sense.
An example of a theorem on divergence in the general sense is the Stern-Stolz Theorem, as extended by Lorentzen and Waadeland.
Theorem 1**.**
The Stern-Stolz Theorem [9], p.94 The continued fraction diverges generally if . In fact,
[TABLE]
for , where
[TABLE]
However, if a continued fraction is not already of the form , these may become quite complicated once an equivalence transformation is applied to the continued fraction to bring it to this form and it may not be so easy to determine if the series converges.
In the present paper, we prove a theorem which gives a simple criterion, based on the partial quotients, for deciding if a continued fraction diverges in the general sense, provided it is known that the odd- and even parts converge and whether these limits are equal.
We then apply our theorem to two classes of -continued fraction described in our paper [6] to show that if and is a continued fraction in either class, then either converges or does not converge generally.
2. A Theorem on Divergence in the General Sense
We now prove the following theorem.
Theorem 2**.**
Let the odd and even parts of the continued fraction converge to different limits. Further suppose that there exist positive constants , and such that, for ,
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Then does not converge generally.
Remark: It might seem that Condition 2.1 prevents the application of this theorem to continued fractions in which the become unbounded but a similarity transformation to put the continued fraction in the form removes this difficulty.
Proof of Theorem 2. Let the -th approximant of be denoted by . Suppose the odd approximants tend to and that the even approximants tend to . Further suppose that converges generally to and that , are two sequences such that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
It will be shown that these two conditions lead to a contradiction. Suppose first that and, without loss of generality, that . (If , then and we proceed similarly). We write
[TABLE]
where and as . By assumption it follows that and , where as . Then
[TABLE]
By simple algebra we have
[TABLE]
Similarly,
[TABLE]
Note that , for sufficiently large, since the odd and even parts of the continued fraction converge. If , then
[TABLE]
Hence ,
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Now we show that
[TABLE]
For if not, then there is a sequence and a positive constant such that for all , and then
[TABLE]
Similarly, after substituting for , we have that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
We now show that
[TABLE]
If not, then there is a sequence and some such that for all . Then and .
Finally, we show that it is impossible to have both and . For ease of notation let be denoted by , so that and , as . From the recurrence relations for the ’s, namely, , we have
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Thus
[TABLE]
and by (2.1) and (2.2) the left side tends to 1 and the right side tends to 0, as , giving the required contradiction.
If , then we write
[TABLE]
where . With the ’s as above we find that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
In this case it follows easily that .
3. Application to -Continued Fractions
In [6], one type of continued fraction we considered was of the form
[TABLE]
where , for . Thus, for and ,
[TABLE]
Many well-known -continued fractions, including the Rogers-Ramanujan continued fraction at (1.2) and the three Ramanujan-Selberg continued fractions studied by Zhang in [10], namely,
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
are of this form, with at most 2. Following the example of these four continued fractions, we made the additional assumptions that, for ,
[TABLE]
where is a fixed positive integer, and that all of the polynomials had the same leading coefficient. The odd- and even parts of each of the four continued fractions above converge for , (see [1] and [10], where the authors also determined the limits). In [6], we extended these results on convergence outside the unit circle to the class of continued fractions described above. We proved the following theorem [6]:
Theorem 3**.**
[6]** Suppose is such that the satisfy (3.1) and (3.2). Suppose further that each has the same leading coefficient. If then the odd and even parts of both converge.
It is now an easy matter to apply our Theorem 2 to the continued fractions of Theorem 3 to conclude that for each outside the unit circle, either the continued fraction converges or does not converge generally. As an illustration we have the following example.
Example 3**.**
Let
[TABLE]
If , then the odd and even parts of converge. If the odd and even parts are not equal, then does not converge generally.
In [6] we also studied continued fractions of the form
[TABLE]
where , for . Thus, for and ,
[TABLE]
An example of a continued fraction of this type is the Göllnitz-Gordon continued fraction (),
[TABLE]
We restricted the type of continued fraction examined as follows. We supposed that degree , degree , and that, for ,
[TABLE]
where and are fixed positive integers and and are non-negative integers. Condition 3.4 means that, for , has degree equal to and that has degree equal to . We also supposed that each has the same leading coefficient and that each has the same leading coefficient .
For such continued fractions we had the following theorem [6]:
Theorem 4**.**
[6]** Suppose is such that the and the satisfy (3.3) and (3.4). Suppose further that each has the same leading coefficient and that each has the same leading coefficient . If then converges everywhere outside the unit circle. If , then converges outside the unit circle to values in , except possibly at points satisfying or , depending on the sign of . If , then the odd and even parts of converge everywhere outside the unit circle.
Remark: Both our Theorem 3 and 4 were derived from theorems on limit–periodic continued fractions and give stronger results than can be derived from applying simple convergence criteria such as Worpitzky’s Theorem.
Once again it is easy to apply our Theorem 2 to the continued fractions of Theorem 4 to conclude, in the case , that for each outside the unit circle, either the continued fraction converges or does not converge generally. As an illustration we have the following example.
Example 4**.**
Let
[TABLE]
If , then the odd and even parts of converge. If the odd and even parts are not equal, then does not converge generally.
4. Continued fractions whose odd and even parts tend to different limits
Since our Theorem 2 deals with continued fractions whose odd and even parts converge to different values, it is desirable to know something about the form of such continued fractions. We have the following theorem.
Theorem 5**.**
Suppose the odd and even parts of the continued fraction converge to different values. Then .
We need two preliminary results.
Lemma 1**.**
Suppose is the sequence of classical approximants of the continued fraction , where , for . If the continued fraction also has as it sequence of classical approximants and , for , then for .
Proof.
Elementary. ∎
We also use the following result, proved by Daniel Bernoulli in 1775 [2] (see, for example, [8], pp. 11–12).
Proposition 1**.**
Let be a sequence of complex numbers such that , for . Then is the sequence of approximants of the continued fraction
[TABLE]
Proof of Theorem 5. Let denote the sequence of classical approximants of the continued fraction . By assumption there exist such that
[TABLE]
Hence there exist two null sequences and such that
[TABLE]
By Lemma 1, Proposition 1 and (4.1), it follows that
[TABLE]
Since and and are null sequences, it follows that . That follows similarly.
5. Concluding Remarks
Let be a positive integer. A continued fraction for which the odd- and even parts tend to different limits may be regarded as a special case () of continued fractions for which the sequence of approximants in each arithmetic progression modulo tends to a different limit. We will investigate such continued fractions in a later paper and also look at the question of whether or not they converge in the general sense.
We close with a question. Does there exist a continued fraction whose odd and even parts converge to different values, for which the sequence is bounded and whose Stern–Stolz series diverges? This would mean that our Theorem 2 could show divergence in the general sense for a continued fraction that the Stern-Stolz Theorem could not be applied to.
On the other hand, it may be that if is any sequence of non-zero complex numbers such that the sequence is bounded and the continued fraction is such that its odd and even parts converge to different values, then the Stern–Stolz series for converges. A proof of this would be interesting. In this latter situation our Theorem 2 does not give anything new and may just be easier to apply to certain types of continued fraction.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Andrews, G. E.; Berndt, Bruce C.; Jacobsen, Lisa; Lamphere, Robert L. The continued fractions found in the unorganized portions of Ramanujan’s notebooks . Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 99 (1992), no. 477, vi+71pp
- 2[2] Daniel Bernoulli, Disquisitiones ulteriores de indola fractionum continuarum, Novi comm. , Acad. Sci. Imper. Petropol. 20 (1775)
- 3[3] Bowman, D; Mc Laughlin, J On the Divergence of the Rogers-Ramanujan Continued Fraction on the Unit Circle. To appear in the Transactions of the American Mathematical Society.
- 4[4] Bowman, D; Mc Laughlin, J The Convergence Behavior of q 𝑞 q -Continued Fractions on the Unit Circle To appear in The Ramanujan Journal.
- 5[5] Bowman, D; Mc Laughlin, J On the divergence in the general sense of q 𝑞 q -continued fraction on the unit circle. Commun. Anal. Theory Contin. Fract. 11 (2003), 25–49.
- 6[6] Bowman, D; Mc Laughlin, J The Convergence and Divergence of q 𝑞 q -Continued Fractions outside the Unit Circle To appear in The Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics.
- 7[7] Jacobsen, Lisa General convergence of continued fractions . Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 294 (1986), no. 2, 477–485.
- 8[8] Alexey Nikolaevitch Khovanskii, The application of continued fractions and their generalizations to problems in approximation theory , Translated by Peter Wynn, P. Noordhoff N. V., Groningen 1963 xii + 212 pp.
