# Data-taking strategy for the precise measurement of the $W$ boson mass   with a threshold scan at circular electron positron colliders

**Authors:** P. X. Shen, P. Azzurri, C. X. Yu, M. Boonekamp, C. M. Kuo, P. Z. Lai,, B. Li, G. Li, H. N. Li, Z. J. Liang, B. Liu, J. M. Qian, L. S. Shi

arXiv: 1812.09855 · 2020-01-13

## TL;DR

This paper proposes an optimized data-taking strategy for circular electron-positron colliders to measure the $W$ boson mass and width with high precision using a threshold scan, considering systematic uncertainties.

## Contribution

It introduces a realistic data-taking scheme involving three energy points to maximize measurement precision of the $W$ boson properties at future colliders.

## Key findings

- Achieves 1.0 MeV precision for $W$ mass
- Achieves 3.4 MeV precision for $W$ width
- Recommends data collection at three energy points

## Abstract

Circular electron positron colliders, such as the CEPC and FCC-ee, have been proposed to measure Higgs boson properties precisely, test the Standard Model, search for physics beyond the Standard Model, and so on. One of the important goals of these colliders is to measure the $W$ boson mass with great precision by taking data around the $W$-pair production threshold. In this paper, the data-taking scheme is investigated to maximize the achievable precisions of the $W$ boson mass and width with a threshold scan, when various systematic uncertainties are taken into account. The study shows that an optimal and realistic data-taking scheme is to collect data at three center-of-mass energies and that precisions of 1.0 MeV and 3.4 MeV can be achieved for the mass and width of the $W$ boson, respectively, with a total integrated luminosity of $\mathcal{L}=3.2$~\mbox{ab}$^{-1}$ and several assumptions of the systematic uncertainty sources.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.09855/full.md

## Figures

46 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.09855/full.md

## References

56 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.09855/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.09855