The CGLMP Bell Inequalities
B. J. Dalton

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the CGLMP Bell inequalities, showing they can effectively test quantum non-locality and rule out local hidden variable theories, even with measurement ambiguities and contextuality issues.
Contribution
It clarifies the applicability of CGLMP inequalities for testing quantum non-locality and addresses their limitations and potential for macroscopic systems.
Findings
CGLMP inequalities involve a local hidden variable model for joint probabilities.
Violation of CGLMP inequalities can distinguish quantum predictions from LHVT.
Potential for experimental tests in macroscopic systems like Bose condensates.
Abstract
Quantum non-locality tests have been of interest since the 1960's paper by Bell on the original EPR paradox.The present paper discusses whether the CGLMP (Bell) inequalities are possible tests for showing that quantum theory is not underpinned by local hidden variable theory (LHVT). It is found by applying Fine's theorem that the CGLMP approach involves a LHVT for the joint probabilities associated with the measurement of one observable from each of the two sub-systems, even though the underlying probabilities for joint measurements of all four observables may involve a non-local HVT. The latter HVT probabilities involve simultaneous measurements of observables corresponding to non-commuting quantum operators - allowable in classical theory. Although the CGLMP inequalities involve probabilities for measurements of one observable per sub-system and are compatible with the Heisenberg…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · DNA and Biological Computing · semigroups and automata theory
