On the Reversible Geodesics for a Finsler space with Randers change of Quartic metric
Gauree Shanker, Ruchi Kaushik Sharma

TL;DR
This paper investigates conditions under which a specific Finsler space with a Randers change of a quartic metric has reversible geodesics, exploring its geometric properties and the induced generalized distance.
Contribution
It provides new conditions for reversibility of geodesics in a Finsler space with a quartic Randers metric and studies related geometric properties.
Findings
Conditions for reversible geodesics are derived.
The Finsler metric induces a generalized weighted quasi-distance.
Geometric properties of the space with reversible geodesics are analyzed.
Abstract
In this paper, we consider a Finsler space with a Randers change of Quartic metric F = . The conditions for this space to be with reversible geodesics are obtained. Further, we study some geometrical properties of F with reversible geodesics and prove that the Finsler metric F induces a generalized weighted quasi-distance on M.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Differential Geometry Research
On the Reversible Geodesics for a Finsler space with Randers change of Quartic metric
Gauree Shanker, Ruchi Kaushik Sharma
Abstract. In this paper, we consider a Finsler space with a Randers change of Quartic metric F = . The conditions for this space to be with reversible geodesics are obtained. Further, we study some geometrical properties of F with reversible geodesics and prove that the Finsler metric F induces a generalized weighted quasi-distance on M.
M. S. C. 2010: 58B20, 53B21, 53B40, 53C60.
Keywords - Riemannian spaces; Reversible Geodesics; weighted quasi metric; Randers change; Quartic metric.
1 Introduction
An interesting topic in Finsler geometry is to study the reversible geodesics of a Finsler metric. Recall that, a Finsler space is said to have reversible geodesics if for every one of its oriented geodesic paths, the same path traversed in the opposite sense is also a geodesic. In the last decade many interesting and applicable results have been obtained on the theory of Finsler spaces with reversible geodesics. In [1], Crampin discussed Randers space with reversible geodesics. In ([4], [5]), Masca, Sabau and Shimada have discussed reversible geodesics with (, )-metric and two dimensional Finsler space with (, )-metric to be with reversible geodesic, respectively. In [6], Sabau and Shimada have given some important results on reversible geodesics. In [10], Shanker and Baby have discussed reversible geodesics for generalized ()-metric. Recently, Shanker and Rani [11] have studied weighted quasi metric associated with Finsler spaces with reversible geodesics.
In this paper, we find conditions for a Finsler space (M, F) with Randers change of Quartic metric F = to be with reversible geodesics. The main results of this paper lies in theorem (3.1), (4.1), (4.2), (5.1) and (5.2).
2 Preliminaries
Let = () be a connected n-dimensional Finsler manifold and let TM = denotes the tangent bundle of M with local coordinates u = (x, y) = , where i = 1, …, n, y = .
If : [0, 1] M is a piecewise curve on M, then its Finslerian length is defined as
[TABLE]
and the Finslerian distance function : M M [0, ) is defined by , where infimum is taken over all piecewise curves on M joining the points p, q M. In general, this is not symmetric.
A curve : [0, 1] M is called a geodesic of (M, F) if it minimizes the Finslerian length for all piecewise curves that keep their endpoints fixed. We denote the reverse Finsler metric of F as : TM (0, ), given by = . One can easily see that is also a Finsler metric.
Lemma 2.1
A Finsler metric is with a reversible geodesic if and only if for any geodesic (t) of F, the reverse curve = (1-t) is also a geodesic of F.
Lemma 2.2
Let be a connected, complete Finsler manifold with associated distance function : M M [0, ). Then, is a symmetric distance function on M M if and only if F is a reversible Finsler metric, i.e., .
Lemma 2.3
A smooth curve : [0, 1] M is a constant Finslerian speed geodesic of if and only if it satisfies + 2 (, ) = 0, i = 1, …, n, where the functions : TM are given by
[TABLE]
with \Gamma_{jk}^{i}(x,y)=\dfrac{g^{is}}{2}\Bigl{(}\dfrac{\partial g_{sj}}{\partial x^{k}}+\dfrac{\partial g_{sk}}{\partial x^{j}}-\dfrac{\partial g_{jk}}{\partial x^{s}}\Bigr{)}.
Remark 1. It is well known [7] that the vector field = , is a vector field on TM, whose integral lines are the canonical lifts = ((t), ) of the geodesics of . This vector field is called the canonical geodesics spray of the Finsler space and are called the coefficients of the geodesics spray .
Definition 2.1
If F and are two different fundamental Finsler functions on the same manifold M, then they are said to be projectively equivalent if their geodesics coincide as set points.
Lemma 2.4
A Finsler structure () is with a reversible geodesic if and only if F and its reverse function are projectively equivalent.
3 Reversible Geodesics for a Finsler space with Randers change of Quartic metric.
Consider a Finsler space () with a special ()-metric F = . Here, F can be treated as the Randers change of Quartic-metric . One can easily see that .
As we know that [6] if is a non-Riemannian n(n 2)-dimensional Finsler space with ()-metric, which is not absolute homogeneous, then F is with reversible geodesics if and only if , where is absolute homogeneous ()-metric, is a non-zero constant and is a closed 1-form on the Manifold M.
In our case, = , which is absolute homogeneous. If is a closed 1-form, then F is with reversible geodesics. Further, a necessary and sufficient condition for F to have reversible geodesics is that [6]
[TABLE]
where is the reverse of , the geodesic spray of F; moreover is geodesic spray of . We have F = + , where, .
Therefore,
[TABLE]
For the Riemannian metric , the Euler-Lagrange equation gives \tilde{\Gamma}\Bigl{(}\dfrac{\partial\alpha}{\partial y^{i}}\Bigr{)}-\dfrac{\partial\alpha}{\partial x^{i}} = 0. Also, one knows [6] that if (M, F()) is a Finsler space with (, )-metric, then = 0, i = 1, 2, …, n, implies that f = g = 0, for any smooth functions f and g on TM. It is known that, if is closed and F is projectively equivalent to the Riemannian metric , then
= 0
and hence by using lemma 2.7 of [6], we find that
Again, since F = , therefore .
Now, using the above results, the equation (3.2) reduces to the form
[TABLE]
Now, can not be zero. Therefore, from equation (3.1) and (3.3) we conclude that F is with reversible geodesics if and only if \Bigl{(}\dfrac{\partial b_{i}}{\partial x^{j}}-\dfrac{\partial b_{j}}{\partial x^{i}}\Bigr{)}y^{j} = 0.
i.e., is with reversible geodesic if and only if is closed 1-form. Hence, we have the following theorem:
Theorem 3.1
A Finsler space with Randers change of Quartic metric F = , is with reversible geodesics if and only if the differential 1-form is closed on M.
4 Projective Flatness of Randers change of Quartic metric
A Finsler space is called (locally) projectively flat if all its geodesics are straight lines [8]. An equivalent condition is that the spray coefficients of F can be expressed as , where = .
An equivalent characterization of projective flatness is the Hamel’s relation [2]
[TABLE]
Recall that ([10], [11]) if F = + is a Finsler metric, where is an absolute homogeneous (, )-metric, then any two of the following properties imply the third one:
(1) F is projectively flat;
(2) is projectively flat;
(3) is closed.
In our case, F = + , where , which is absolute homogeneous. Hence, we have the following:
Theorem 4.1
Let be a Finsler space with Randers change of Quartic metric F = . Then, F is projectively flat if and only if is projectively flat.
Proof: Let be projectively flat, then by Hamel’s relation for projective flatness, we have
[TABLE]
The proof of the theorem directly follows from it.
Theorem 4.2
Let be a Finsler space with Randers change of Quartic metric. If F is projectively flat, then it is with reversible geodesics.
Proof. Applying Hammel’s equation, one can easily see that F is projectively flat if and only if is projectively flat, which implies that both F and are projectively equivalent to the standard Euclidean metric and therefore F must be projective to . Thus, F must be with a reversible geodesic.
5 Weighted quasi metric associated with Randers change of Quartic metric
It is well known that the Riemannian spaces can be represented as metric spaces. Indeed, for a Riemannian space (M, ), one can define the induced metric space (M, ) with the metric
[TABLE]
where = { : [a, b] M is piecewise, (a) = x, (b) = y} is the set of curves joining x and y, is the tangent vector to at (t). Then is a metric on M satisfying the following conditions:
-
Positiveness : 0, if x y, (x, x) = 0, x, y X.
-
Symmetry : (x, y) = (y, x), x, y M.
-
Triangle inequality: (x, y) (x, z) + (z, y), x, y, z M.
Similar to the Riemannian space, one can induce the metric to a Finsler space (M, F), given by
[TABLE]
But unlike the Riemannian case, here lacks the symmetric condition. In fact, is a special case of quasi metric defined below:
Definition 5.1
*A quasi metric d on a set X is a function d : X X [0, ) that satisfies the following axioms:
-
Positiveness : d(x, y) 0, if x y, d(x, x) = 0, x, y X.
-
Triangle inequality : d(x, y) d(x, z) + d(z, y), x, y, z X.
-
Separation axiom : d(x, y) = d(y, x) = 0 x = y, x, y X.
One special class of quasi metric spaces are the so called weighted quasi metric spaces (M, d, w), where d is a quasi-metric on M and for each d, there exist a function w : M [0, ), called the weight of d that satisfies
- Weightability : d(x, y) + w(x) = d(y, x) + w(y), x, y M.
In this case, the weight function w is -valued, and is called generalized weight.
Theorem 5.1
Let (M, F) be an n-dimensional simply connected smooth Finsler manifold with F as Randers change of Quartic metric. Then, F induces generalized weighted quasi metric on M.
Proof. We consider that (M, F) is a Finsler space with F = , which can be written as F = + , where = is an absolute homogeneous Finsler metric on M and an exact 1-form.
Let be an F-geodesic, which is at the same time -geodesic, then from equation (5.2), we get
[TABLE]
Consider a fixed point and define the function by .
From the equation (5.3) it follows that
[TABLE]
where we have used the Stokes theorem for the 1-form on the closed domain D with boundary D := .
It can be easily seen that is an anti-derivative of . This is well defined if and only if the integral in the R.H.S. of equation(5.4) is path independent, i.e., must be exact.
Then is a weighted quasi-metric with generalized weight . Next we have
[TABLE]
where we have again used the Stokes theorem for the one form on the closed domain with boundary .
Similarly,
[TABLE]
From the equations (5.5) and (5.6) we conclude that is weighted quasi-metric with generalized weight .
This completes the proof.
Next, recall the following:
Lemma 5.1
([3], [9]) Let (M, d) be any quasi-metric space. Then d is weightable if and only if there exists w : M [0, ) such that
[TABLE]
where is the symmetrized distance function of d. Moreover, we have
[TABLE]
The proof is trivial from the definition of weighted quasi-metric.
Remark 2. If (M, F) is a Finsler space with a special (, )-metric F = , then the induced quasi-metric and the symmetrized metric induce the same topology on M. This follows immediately from ([7], [8]).
Remark 3. From Lemma 5.1, It can be seen that the assumption of w to be smooth is not essential.
Next, we discuss an interesting geometric property concerning the geodesic triangles.
Theorem 5.2
Let (M, F) be a Finsler space with the Randers change of Quartic-metric F = . Then the parameteric length of any geodesic triangle on M does not depend on the orientation, that is,
[TABLE]
Proof. Since the Randers change of Quartic metric F = can be treated as the Randers change of absolute homogeneous Finsler metric , i.e., F = + with d = 0, from theorem 5.1, it follows that the quasi-metric is weightable and therefore equation (5.7) holds good. By using the formula (5.7), a simple calculation gives the required result.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] M. Crampin, Randers spaces with reversible geodesics , Publ. Math. Debrecen, 67/3 (2005), 401-409.
- 2[2] G. Hamel, U ¨ b e r ¨ 𝑈 𝑏 𝑒 𝑟 \ddot{U}ber die Geomtrieen in denen die Geraden die K u ¨ r z e i n t e n ¨ 𝑢 𝑟 𝑧 𝑒 𝑖 𝑛 𝑡 𝑒 𝑛 \ddot{u}rzeinten sind , Math. Ann., 57 (1903) .
- 3[3] H. P. A. Kunzi, V. Vajner, Weighted quasi-metrics , Annals New York Acad. Sci., 728 (1994), 64-77.
- 4[4] I. Masca, S. V. Sabau, H. Shimada, Reversible geodesics for ( α 𝛼 \alpha , β 𝛽 \beta )-metrics , Intl. J. Math., 21 (2010), 1071-1094.
- 5[5] I. Masca, S. V. Sabau, H. Shimada, Two dimensional ( α 𝛼 \alpha , β 𝛽 \beta )-metrics with reversible geodesics , Publ. Math. Debrecen, 82 (2013), 485-501.
- 6[6] S. V. Sabau, H. Shimada Finsler manifolds with reversible geodesics , Rev. Roumaine Math. Pures Appl, 57 (2012), 91-103.
- 7[7] Z. Shen, Differential geometry of sprays and Finsler spaces , Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, (2001).
- 8[8] Z. Shen, On projectively flat ( α 𝛼 \alpha , β 𝛽 \beta )-metrics , Canad. Math. Bull., 52 (2009), 132-144.
