A Bezout ring of stable range 2 which has square stable range 1
Bohdan Zabavsky, Oleh Romaniv

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new class of rings with specific stable range properties and characterizes their structure, linking square stable range 1 to elementary divisor rings and Toeplitz rings.
Contribution
It defines rings of stable range 2 with square stable range 1 and establishes their equivalence to known classes like elementary divisor rings and Toeplitz rings under certain conditions.
Findings
Hermitian rings with square stable range 1 are elementary divisor rings if and only if they are duo rings of neat range 1.
Commutative Hermitian rings are Toeplitz rings if and only if they have square stable range 1.
Abstract
In this paper we introduced the concept of a ring of stable range 2 which has square stable range 1. We proved that a Hermitian ring which has (right) square stable range 1 is an elementary divisor ring if and only if is a duo ring of neat range 1. And we proved that a commutative Hermitian ring is a Toeplitz ring if and only if is a ring of (right) square range 1.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
A Bezout ring of stable range 2 which has square stable range 1
Bohdan Zabavsky, Oleh Romaniv
Department of Mechanics and Mathematics
Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Ukraine
[email protected], [email protected]
November, 2018
Abstract: In this paper we introduced the concept of a ring of stable range 2 which has square stable range 1. We proved that a Hermitian ring which has (right) square stable range 1 is an elementary divisor ring if and only if is a duo ring of neat range 1. And we proved that a commutative Hermitian ring is a Toeplitz ring if and only if is a ring of (right) square range 1. We proved that if be a commutative elementary divisor ring of (right) square stable range 1, then for any matrix one can find invertible Toeplitz matrices and such that where is a divisor of .
Key words and phrases: Hermitian ring, elementary divisor ring, stable range 1, stable range 2, square stable range 1, Toeplitz matrix, duo ring, quasi-duo ring.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 06F20,13F99.
1 Introduction
The notion of a stable range of a ring was introduced by H. Bass, and became especially popular because of its various applications to the problem of cancellation and substitution of modules. Let us say that a module satisfies the power-cancellation property if for all modules and , implies that for some positive integer (here denotes the direct sum of copies of ). Let us say that a right -module has the power-substitution property if given any right -module decomposition which each , there exist a positive integer and a submodule such that .
Prof. K. Goodearl pointed out that a commutative rind has the power-substitution property if and only if is of (right) power stable range 1, i.e. if than for some and some integer depending on [1].
Recall that a ring is said to have 1 in the stable range provided that whenever in , there exists such that is a unit in . The following Warfield’s theorem shows that 1 in the stable range is equivalent to a substitution property.
Theorem 1**.**
[1]** Let be a right -module, and set . Then has 1 in the stable range if and only if for any right -module decomposition with each , there exists a submodule such that .
A ring is said to have 2 in the stable range if for any where such that , there exist elements such that .
K. Goodearl pointed out to us the following result.
Proposition 1**.**
[1]** Let be a commutative ring which has 2 in the stable range. If satisfies right power-substitution, then so does , for all .
Our goal this paper is to study certain algebraic versions of the notion of stable range 1. In this paper we study a Bezout ring which has 2 in the stable range and which is a ring square stable range 1.
A ring is said to have (right) square stable range 1 (written ) if for any implies that is an invertible element of for some . Considering the problem of factorizing the matrix into a product of two Toeplitz matrices. D. Khurana, T.Y. Lam and Zhou Wang were led to ask go units of the form given that .
Obviously, a commutative ring which has 1 in the stable range is a ring which has (right) square stable range 1, but not vice versa in general. Examples of rings which have (right) square stable range 1 are rings of continuous real-valued functions on topological spaces and real holomorphy rings in formally real fields [2].
Proposition 2**.**
[2]** For any ring with , we have that is right quasi-duo (i.e. is a ring in which every maximal right ideal is an ideal).
We say that matrices and over a ring are equivalent if there exist invertible matrices and of appropriate sizes such that . If for a matrix there exists a diagonal matrix such that and are equivalent and for every then we say that the matrix has a canonical diagonal reduction. A ring is called an elementary divisor ring if every matrix over has a canonical diagonal reduction. If every -matrix (-matrix) over a ring has a canonical diagonal reduction then is called a right (left) Hermitian ring. A ring which is both right and left Hermitian is called an Hermitian ring. Obviously, a commutative right (left) Hermitian ring is an Hermitian ring. We note that a right Hermitian ring is a ring in which every finitely generated right ideal is principal.
Theorem 2**.**
[3]** Let be a right quasi-duo elementary divisor ring. Then for any there exists an element such that . If in addition all zero-divisors of lie in the Jacobson radical, then is a duo ring.
Recall that a right (left) duo ring is a ring in which every right (left) ideal is two-sided. A duo ring is a ring which is both left and right duo ring.
We have proved the next result.
Theorem 3**.**
Let be an elementary divisor ring which has (right) square stable range 1 and which all zero-divisors of lie in Jacobson radical of , then is a duo ring.
Proof.
By Proposition 2 we have that is a right quasi-duo ring. By Theorem 2 we have that is a duo ring. ∎
Proposition 3**.**
Let be a Hermitian duo ring. For every such that the following conditions are equivalent:
there exist elements such that ;
- 2)
there exist elements such that , where and .
Proof.
1)2) Since we have and since is a duo ring we have . Than , i.e. for some elements . Then and where and . Element exist, since is a duo ring. Then , where for some element . That is, we have for some element . We have . Let . We have , where , since and , since .
2)1) Since then . Let for some elements . Then . Since , we have for some element , where for some element . Since , therefore . Since is an Hermitian duo ring then we have where , and . Then since and , , i.e. we have . Hence, we have . ∎
Remark 1**.**
In Proposition 3 we can choose the elements and such that .
Proposition 4**.**
Let be an Hermitian duo ring. Then the following conditions are equivalent:
* is an elementary divisor duo ring;*
- 2)
for every such that and there exists an element such that , where and .
Proof.
1)2) Let be an elementary divisor ring. By [4] for any , , such that there exist elements such that .
Since , and the fact that is a Hermitian duo ring we have . By Proposition 3 we have where , . Since where , we have , .
2)1) Let and and , , where . Since is a duo ring then . So now and , we have , i.e. for some elements . Then .
Since , by Conditions 2 of Proposition 3 there exists an element such that where and . Since and . We have . Let . Since and we have . Since , we have , where .
Recall that then . Since . So and then .
Therefore, . This means that the Condition 2 of Proposition 3 is true. By Proposition 3 we conclude that for every with there exist elements such that , i.e. according to [4], is an elementary divisor ring. ∎
Definition 1**.**
Let be a duo ring. We say that an element is neat if for any elements such that there exist elements such that , where , , .
Definition 2**.**
We say that a duo ring has neat range 1 if for every such that there exists an element such that is a neat element.
According to Propositions 3, 4 and Remark 1 we have the following result.
Theorem 4**.**
A Hermitian duo ring is an elementary divisor ring if and only if has neat range 1.
The term "neat range 1" substantiates the following theorem.
Theorem 5**.**
Let be a Hermitian duo ring. If is a neat element of then is a clean ring.
Proof.
Let , where , for any element . Let , . From the equality we have for some elements . Hence and we have , . Let . It is obvious that and . Since , we have for elements . Hence we have where for some element . Then , i.e. . Similarly from the equality , it follows . According to [5] is an exchange ring. Since is a duo ring, is a clean ring. ∎
Taking into account the Theorem 3 and Theorem 4 we have the following result.
Theorem 6**.**
A Hermitian ring which has (right) square stable range 1 is an elementary divisor ring if and only if is a duo ring of neat range 1.
Let be a commutative Bezout ring. The matrix of order 2 over is said to be a Toeplitz matrix if it is of the form
[TABLE]
where .
Notice that if is an invertible Toeplitz matrix, then is also an invertible Toeplitz matrix.
Definition 3**.**
A commutative Hermitian ring is called a Toeplitz ring if for any there exist an invertible Toeplitz matrix such that for some element .
Theorem 7**.**
A commutative Hermitian ring is a Toeplitz ring if and only if is a ring of (right) square range 1.
Proof.
Let be a commutative Hermitian ring of (right) square stable range 1 and for some elements . Then , where is an invertible element of .
Let
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
i.e. we have
[TABLE]
Since
[TABLE]
we have that is a Toeplitz matrix. So . If and then by , and [4]. Then there exists an element such that , where is an invertible element of .
Let
[TABLE]
Note that is an invertible Toeplitz matrix. Then , i.e. is a Toeplitz ring.
Let be a Toeplitz ring and . The exists an invertible Toeplitz matrix such that . Let , where . So is an invertible element of . Since , we have , . By equality we have , i.e. is a ring of (right) square stable range 1. ∎
Theorem 8**.**
Let be a commutative ring of square stable range 1. Then for any row , where , there exists an invertible Toeplitz matrix
[TABLE]
where .
Proof.
By Theorem 7 we have for some invertible Toeplitz matrix . Let . Then , and is an invertible Toeplitz matrix. ∎
Recall that denotes a group of elementary matrices over ring . The following theorem demonstrated that it is sufficient to consider only the case of matrices of order 2 in Theorem 7.
Theorem 9**.**
[4]** Let be a commutative elementary divisor ring. Then for any matrix (, ) one can find matrices and such that
[TABLE]
where is a divisor of , , and is a or matrix for some .
Theorem 10**.**
Let be a commutative elementary divisor ring of (right) square stable range 1. Then for any matrix one can find invertible Toeplitz matrices and such that
[TABLE]
where is a divisor of .
Proof.
Since is a Toeplitz ring it is enough to consider matrices of the form
[TABLE]
where . Since is an elementary divisor ring by [4] there exist elements such that , i.e. for some elements . Since and , by Theorem 8 we have the invertible Toeplitz matrices , such that
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
where and are invertible Toeplitz matrices. So
[TABLE]
Theorem is proved. ∎
Open Question. Is it true that every commutative Bezout domain of stable range 2 which has (right) square stable range 1 is an elementary divisor ring?
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] K. R. Goodearl, Power-cancellation of groups and modules, Pacific J. Math . 64 (1976) 487–411.
- 2[2] D. Khurana, T. Y. Lam and Zh. Wang, Rings of square stable range one, J. Algebra 338 (2011) 122–143.
- 3[3] B. V. Zabavsky and M. Ya. Komarnytskii, Distributive elementary divisor domains, Ukr. Math. J. 42 (1990) 890–892.
- 4[4] B. V. Zabavsky Diagonal reduction of matrices over rings (Mathematical Studies, Monograph Series, volume XVI, VNTL Publishers, Lviv, 2012).
- 5[5] W. K. Nicholson, Lifting idempotents and exchange rings, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 229 (1977) 269–278.
