# CI Camelopardalis: The first sgB[e]-High Mass X-ray Binary Twenty Years on, a Supernova Imposter in our own Galaxy?

## TL;DR

This paper investigates the complex X-ray and optical behavior of the sgB[e] star CI Camelopardalis, revealing its binary nature, accretion processes, and similarities to supernova imposters, expanding understanding of such systems in our galaxy.

## Contribution

It provides a detailed multiwavelength analysis of CI Cam, highlighting its variability, accretion dynamics, and potential classification as a supernova imposter, which was not previously established.

## Key findings

- CI Cam exhibits high X-ray variability in quiescence.
- No pulsations detected in X-ray light curve.
- Similarity to SN2010da suggests possible supernova imposter classification.

## Abstract

The Galactic supergiant B[e] star CI Camelopardalis (CI Cam) was the first sgB[e] star detected during an X-ray outburst. The star brightened to $\sim$2 Crab in the X-ray regime within hours before decaying to a quiescent level in less than 2 weeks, clearly indicative of binarity. Since the outburst of CI Cam, a number of sgB[e] stars have been identified as X-ray overluminous for a single star (i.e. $L_X > 10^{-7}~L_{bol}$). This small population has recently expanded to include two Ultra Luminous X-ray sources (ULX), Holmberg II X-1 and NGC300 ULX-1/supernova imposter SN2010da. We revisit CI Cam to investigate its behaviour over several timescales and shed further light on the nature of the compact object in the system, its X-ray outburst in 1998 and the binary system parameters. We analyse archival XMM-Newton EPIC-pn spectra and light curves along with new data from Swift and NuSTAR. We also present high-resolution MERCATOR/HERMES optical spectra, including a spectrum taken 1.02 days after our NuSTAR observation. Despite being in quiescence, CI Cam is highly X-ray variable on timescales of days, both in terms of total integrated flux and spectral shape. We interpret these variations by invoking the presence of an accreting compact companion immersed in a dense, highly structured, aspherical circumstellar envelope. The differences in the accretion flux and circumstellar extinction represent either changes in this environment, triggered by variable mass loss from the star, or the local conditions to the accretor due to its orbital motion. We find no evidence for pulsations in the X-ray light curve. CI Cam has many similarities with SN2010da across mid-IR, optical and X-ray wavelengths suggesting that, subject to distance determination for CI Cam, if CI Cam was located in an external galaxy its 1998 outburst would have led to a classification as a supernova imposter.