The reproducing kernel thesis for lower bounds of weighted composition operators
Isabelle Chalendar, Jonathan R. Partington

TL;DR
This paper establishes that the bounded below property of weighted composition operators on Hardy and Bergman spaces can be verified using simple test functions like reproducing kernels, employing reverse Carleson embedding techniques.
Contribution
It introduces a method to test bounded below properties of weighted composition operators via simple functions, advancing understanding of operator behavior on function spaces.
Findings
Bounded below property can be tested with reproducing kernels.
Reverse Carleson embeddings are effective in analyzing these operators.
Provides new criteria for operator boundedness on Hardy and Bergman spaces.
Abstract
It is shown that the property of being bounded below (having closed range) of weighted composition operators on Hardy and Bergman spaces can be tested by their action on a set of simple test functions, including reproducing kernels. The methods used in the analysis are based on the theory of reverse Carleson embeddings.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHolomorphic and Operator Theory · Algebraic and Geometric Analysis · Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics
The reproducing kernel thesis for lower bounds of weighted composition operators
I. Chalendar
Isabelle Chalendar, Université Paris Est, LAMA, (UMR 8050), UPEM, UPEC, CNRS, F-77454, Marne-la-Vallée (France)
and
J.R.Partington
Jonathan R. Partington, School of Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
Abstract.
It is shown that the property of being bounded below (having closed range) of weighted composition operators on Hardy and Bergman spaces can be tested by their action on a set of simple test functions, including reproducing kernels. The methods used in the analysis are based on the theory of reverse Carleson embeddings.
Key words and phrases:
reproducing kernel, weighted composition operator, reverse Carleson measure, Hardy space, Bergman space, test functions
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
47B33, 30H10, 32A36, 47B32
1. Introduction and notation
The reproducing kernel thesis is a term commonly used to describe a body of results that assert that the boundedness of various operators on function spaces such as the Hardy and Bergman space can be tested by their action on reproducing kernels: this is known to apply to Hankel operators, Toeplitz operators, Carleson embeddings, and – our main concern here – weighted composition operators, although not to the adjoints of weighted composition operators (see [13], also [4, 11]).
Surprisingly, the reproducing kernels may also be used in some circumstances as test functions for boundedness below of certain operators, and this is the theme of this paper. We give necessary and sufficient conditions for a bounded weighted composition operator on a Hardy space or a Bergman space to be bounded below, that is, for there to exist a constant such that for all in the space. Assuming that the operator is injective, which it is except in trivial cases, this property is equivalent to the property that has closed range. Some questions remain open in the case of Bergman spaces, particularly for the case if the weight has infinitely many zeros.
The results of this paper generalize in various directions earlier work from [2, 10, 12, 16, 18], as will be seen below.
We write for normalized Lebesgue measure on and for normalized area measure in .
2. Hardy spaces
For and holomorphic we define the weighted composition operator on by
[TABLE]
If , then is automatically bounded, by Littlewood’s subordination theorem, but this is not a necessary condition for boundedness.
For , we write for the reproducing kernel function for . Using the (isomorphic) duality between and , where is the conjugate index to [19, A5.7.8], we see that there are constants independent of such that for we have
[TABLE]
where is the functional . Now, the standard inner–outer factorization shows that every can be written as for inner and outer, and conversely every can be written as for inner and outer. We conclude easily that
[TABLE]
We write , noting that this definition depends on .
As in [3] we define the measure on Borel subsets of by
[TABLE]
where is normalized Lebesgue measure. In [3] it is shown that is bounded on if and only if is a Carleson measure: this follows from the fact that
[TABLE]
for .
Cima, Thomson and Wogen [2] showed that the composition operator on (the case , ) has closed range if and only if the Radon–Nikodym derivative
[TABLE]
is essentially bounded away from [math] on . See also [20] for another characterization. This was extended to by Galanopoulos and Panteris [10].
In [16], the result was extended to weighted composition operators on . In fact a similar argument gives the full result for .
Lemma 2.1**.**
Let and let and holomorphic be such that is bounded. Then is bounded below if and only if , as defined in (2), is essentially bounded away from [math] on .
Proof.
It follows from (1) that
[TABLE]
and so is bounded below if is essentially bounded away from [math].
Conversely, if is not essentially bounded away from [math], then for each there is a set such that and
[TABLE]
As in [6, p. 24], for example, there exists a function such that
[TABLE]
Now for we have but pointwise on , so
[TABLE]
∎
This leads to a reproducing kernel thesis for boundedness below on .
Theorem 2.2**.**
*Let and let and be holomorphic with bounded. The following assertions are equivalent:
(i) is bounded below;
(ii) There exists such that for all .*
Proof.
By Theorem 2.1 in [14] (see also [9]), the function is essentially bounded away from [math] if and only if there is a constant such that
[TABLE]
Using (1) and Lemma 2.1 we have the result. ∎
For unweighted composition operators, and , this result may be found in the thesis of Luery [18].
Now for , let be defined by
[TABLE]
so that for all . We may use these test functions for boundedness below of weighted composition operators on .
Theorem 2.3**.**
Let , , and be holomorphic such that the weighted composition operator is bounded. Then is bounded below if and only if there is a constant such that for all .
Proof.
Without loss of generality, we may assume that is outer, and hence non-vanishing, since if with inner and outer, then the operator is bounded below if and only if is; a similar observation applies to boundedness below on test functions. The condition on test functions may be written as
[TABLE]
and since is non-vanishing we may write , where . Thus with we have
[TABLE]
for all , and so the weighted composition operator is bounded below on , by Theorem 2.2. It now follows from Lemma 2.1 that is bounded below on . ∎
As a corollary of Theorem 2.2 we have a reproducing kernel thesis for boundedness below of composition operators on the right half-plane . Note that these operators are not automatically bounded, but an exact expression for their norm is given in [7].
By means of a unitary equivalence between and induced by the self-inverse Möbius bijection , namely,
[TABLE]
the composition operator on is seen to be unitarily equivalent to the weighted composition operator on , where and (see [1, 16]).
Let , given by
[TABLE]
denote the normalized reproducing kernel at . Since for , we conclude that , where , and hence obtain the following corollary, which can also be proved fairly directly.
Corollary 2.4**.**
If the composition operator is bounded on , then it is bounded below if and only if there is a constant such that for all .
Clearly similar results hold for weighted composition operators, and also for for other values of .
Another easy corollary of the main theorem of [14] is a reproducing kernel thesis for Toeplitz operators. If is a bounded (Carleson) embedding, then it is clearly bounded below if and only if is bounded below as an operator on (consider ).
Corollary 2.5**.**
Suppose that with a.e. Then the Toeplitz operator is bounded below if and only if it is bounded below on normalized reproducing kernels.
Proof.
Let denote the measure with Radon–Nikodym derivative , so that
[TABLE]
for . Since we can test on normalized reproducing kernels, by [18], or indeed Theorem 2.2, the result follows. ∎
3. Bergman spaces
We now consider weighted composition operators acting on the Bergman space . Once again a measure is associated with such an operator, this time defined on Borel subsets of the disc by
[TABLE]
and we have
[TABLE]
This is done in [16, Lem. 3.1] for the case , but the argument works for all . It follows that is bounded and bounded below if and only if satisfies the Carleson and reverse Carleson properties. The unweighted case of this result for may be found in [20].
We begin with the case and write for and for the Radon–Nikodym derivative of . We have, using Corollary 1 of [17], that is bounded below if and only if there exist constants such that
[TABLE]
for all discs with centres on . (See [16, Thm. 3.1].)
More recently, Ghatage and Tjani [12] have analysed the unweighted case by means of the Berezin transform: in our context we define it by
[TABLE]
where now is the normalized Bergman kernel,
[TABLE]
The following theorem gives an extension of [12] to weighted composition operators.
Theorem 3.1**.**
*For a bounded weighted composition operator on the following conditions are equivalent:
(i) is bounded below;
(ii) satisfies the reverse Carleson condition;
(iii) is bounded away from zero; that is, there is a constant such that for all .*
Proof.
The equivalence of (i) and (ii) is given in [16, Lem. 3.1]; the equivalence of (ii) and (iii) is contained in Theorem 4.1 of [12], which asserts that a measure satisfies the reverse Carleson condition if and only if its Berezin transform is bounded away from [math], together with (5). ∎
Remark 3.2**.**
In the case of weighted composition operators on weighted Bergman spaces , with and the norm given by
[TABLE]
we still have the equivalence of (i) and (ii) in Theorem 3.1, since the proof of Lemma 3.1 in [16] is easily seen to extend to this situation. However, at present we do not know whether the equivalence with (iii) still holds. **
As with Corollary 2.4 we may obtain a corollary for composition operators on the Bergman space of . We note that the norm of a bounded composition operator on is given in [8]. In the following result is the normalized reproducing kernel for .
Corollary 3.3**.**
If the composition operator is bounded on then it is bounded below if and only if there is a constant such that for all .
Since the proof is very similar to the proof of Corollary 2.4, we omit it.
Now for , let be defined by
[TABLE]
so that for all . We may use these test functions for boundedness below of weighted composition operators on . The following theorem corresponds to Theorem 2.3 for the Hardy space, but requires a supplementary condition on , as we do not have a suitable inner–outer factorization available.
Theorem 3.4**.**
Let , with at most finitely-many zeros, and holomorphic such that the weighted composition operator is bounded. Then is bounded below if and only if there is a constant such that for all .
Proof.
As in the proof of Theorem 2.3 we may assume without loss of generality that has no zeros. This time we divide out its zeros by a contractive divisor , as in [5, 15]. Since is analytic on a neighbourhood of the disc, it is also bounded, and thus plays the same role as the inner function did in the Hardy space. That is, and are both bounded below (or not) together.
The condition on test functions may be written as
[TABLE]
and since is non-vanishing we may write , where . Thus
[TABLE]
for all , and so the weighted composition operator is bounded below on , by Theorem 3.1.
Looking at (3) and (4), noting that , and observing that Luecking’s condition for a reverse Carleson measure [17, Cor. 1] is independent of , we see that is bounded below on . ∎
It would be interesting to know whether Theorem 3.4 extends to the case when has infinitely-many zeros, and the corresponding contractive divisor may not be bounded.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] I. Chalendar and J. R. Partington. On the structure of invariant subspaces for isometric composition operators on H 2 ( 𝔻 ) superscript 𝐻 2 𝔻 H^{2}(\mathbb{D}) and H 2 ( ℂ + ) superscript 𝐻 2 subscript ℂ H^{2}(\mathbb{C}_{+}) . Arch. Math. (Basel) , 81(2):193–207, 2003.
- 2[2] J. A. Cima, J. Thomson, and W. Wogen. On some properties of composition operators. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 24:215–220, 1974/75.
- 3[3] M. D. Contreras and A. G. Hernández-Díaz. Weighted composition operators on Hardy spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 263(1):224–233, 2001.
- 4[4] Z. Cučković and R. Zhao. Weighted composition operators between different weighted Bergman spaces and different Hardy spaces. Illinois J. Math. , 51(2):479–498, 2007.
- 5[5] P. Duren, D. Khavinson, H. S. Shapiro, and C. Sundberg. Contractive zero-divisors in Bergman spaces. Pacific J. Math. , 157(1):37–56, 1993.
- 6[6] P. L. Duren. Theory of H p superscript 𝐻 𝑝 H^{p} spaces . Dover Publications, 2003. 2nd edition.
- 7[7] S. Elliott and M. T. Jury. Composition operators on Hardy spaces of a half-plane. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. , 44(3):489–495, 2012.
- 8[8] S. J. Elliott and A. Wynn. Composition operators on weighted Bergman spaces of a half-plane. Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. (2) , 54(2):373–379, 2011.
