# Matched-filter study and energy budget suggest no detectable   gravitational-wave 'extended emission' from GW170817

**Authors:** Miquel Oliver, David Keitel, Andrew L. Miller, Hector Estelles, Alicia, M. Sintes

arXiv: 1812.06724 · 2022-10-07

## TL;DR

This study critically examines claims of extended gravitational-wave emission from GW170817, concluding such emission is incompatible with neutron star physics and unlikely to be detectable with current LIGO sensitivity.

## Contribution

The paper provides a detailed analysis showing that reported extended emission is inconsistent with neutron star models and assesses the detectability limits with existing gravitational-wave detectors.

## Key findings

- Reported emission incompatible with neutron star physics
- Detectability of such signals requires extreme assumptions
- Current LIGO sensitivity insufficient for confident detection

## Abstract

Van Putten & Della Valle (2018) have reported a possible detection of gravitational-wave 'extended emission' from a neutron star remnant of GW170817. Starting from the time-frequency evolution and total emitted energy of their reported candidate, we show that such an emission is not compatible with the current understanding of neutron stars. We explore the additional required physical assumptions to make a full waveform model, for example, taking the optimistic emission from a spining-down neutron star with fixed quadrupolar deformation, and study whether even an ideal single-template matched-filter analysis could detect an ideal, fully phase-coherent signal. We find that even in the most optimistic case an increase in energy and extreme parameters would be required for a confident detection with LIGO sensitivity as of 2018-08-17. The argument also holds for other waveform models following a similar time-frequency track and overall energy budget. Single-template matched filtering on the LIGO data around GW170817, and on data with added simulated signals, verifies the expected sensitivity scaling and the overall statistical expectation.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.06724/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.06724/full.md

## References

55 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.06724/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.06724