A Note on Inclusion Properties of Weighted Orlicz Spaces
Al Azhary Masta, Ifronika, Muhammad Taqiyuddin

TL;DR
This paper establishes precise conditions for when one weighted Orlicz space is included in another, improving upon previous results by utilizing characteristic function norms of Euclidean balls.
Contribution
It provides necessary and sufficient conditions for inclusion relations between weighted Orlicz spaces, extending Osan extcirlioul's 2014 findings.
Findings
Derived new inclusion criteria for weighted Orlicz spaces.
Utilized characteristic function norms of Euclidean balls in proofs.
Extended previous inclusion results with complete conditions.
Abstract
In this paper we present sufficient and necessary conditions for inclusion relation between two weighted Orlicz spaces which complete the Osan\c{c}liol result in 2014. One of the keys to prove our results is to use the norm of the characteristic functions of the balls in .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
affil0affil0affiliationtext: 1,3Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudi 229, Bandung 40154affil1affil1affiliationtext: 2Analysis and Geometry Group, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Bandung Institute of Technology, Jl. Ganesha 10, Bandung 40132 1[email protected], 2[email protected], 3[email protected]
A Note on Inclusion Properties of Weighted Orlicz Spaces
Al Azhary Masta1
Ifronika2
Muhammad Taqiyuddin3
Abstract
In this paper we present sufficient and necessary conditions for inclusion relation between two weighted Orlicz spaces which complete the Osançliol result in 2014. One of the keys to prove our results is to use the norm of the characteristic functions of the balls in .
**Keywords: Inclusion property, Weighted Lebesgue spaces, Weighted Orlicz spaces.
MSC 2010: Primary 46E30; Secondary 46B25, 42B35.**
1 Introduction
Orlicz spaces are generalization of Lebesgue spaces which were firstly introduced by Z. W. Birnbaum and W. Orlicz in 1931 (see [Luxemburg, Rao]). Let us first recall the definition of Orlicz spaces. Let be a Young function [that is, is convex, , left-continuous and ], the Orlicz space is the set of measurable functions such that for some . The space is a Banach space equipped with the norm
[TABLE]
Meanwhile, for is a Young function, the weak Orlicz space is the set of all measurable functions such that
[TABLE]
Now, we move to the weighted Orlicz spaces and weighted weak Orlicz spaces. Let be a Young function and is a weight on (i.e is a measurable function), the weighted Orlicz space is the set of all measurable functions such that . Note that, the space is a Banach space equipped with the norm
[TABLE]
Similar with weighted Orlicz spaces, for a Young function and a weight on , the weighted weak Orlicz space is the set of all measurable functions such that .
Let , we denote if there exists a constant such that for all . Note that, if then and
The study of Lebesgue spaces and Orlicz spaces has been studied by many researchers in the last few decades (see [Kufner, Luxemburg, Lech, Masta1, Orlicz, Taqi], etc.). In 1989, Maligranda [Lech] discussed inclusion properties of Orlicz spaces. Later in 2016, Masta* et al.* [Masta1] obtained sufficient and necessary conditions for inclusion relation between two Orlicz spaces and between two weak Orlicz spaces by using different technique from Maligranda. Moreover, they have found that two Orlicz spaces and two weak Orlicz spaces can be compared with respect to Young functions for any measurable set, although the Lebesgue space are not comparable with respect to the number .
On the other hand, Osançliol [Alen] have proved sufficient and necessary conditions for inclusion relation between two weighted Orlicz spaces, as in the following theorem.
Theorem 1.1**.**
[Alen]* Let be a continuous Young function satisfying the condition [that is, there exists such that for all ], and are measurable functions such that for every , where . Then the following statements are equivalent:*
(1)* .*
(2)* .*
(3)* There exists a constant such that , for every .*
Related result for weak type of Orlicz spaces can be found in [Masta4].
In this paper, we are interested in studying the inclusion properties of weighted Orlicz spaces. In connection with Theorem 1.1, we shall prove inclusion relation between weighted Orlicz spaces with respect to Young functions and weights .
To achieve our purpose, we will use the similar methods in [Gunawan, Masta1, Masta2, Masta3, Alen] which pay attention to the characteristic functions of open balls in . Next, we recall some lemmas which will be used later in next section.
Lemma 1.2**.**
[Nakai1]* Suppose that is a Young function and . We have*
(1)* .*
(2)* for .*
(3)* for .*
Lemma 1.3**.**
[Masta3]* Let be Young functions. For any , if there exists such that , then we have for *
In this paper, the letter will be used for constants that may change from line to line, while constants with subscripts, such as , do not change in different lines.
2 Results
First,we will investigate the inclusion properties of weighted Orlicz spaces with respect to distinct Young functions and . For getting the result, we give attention to estimate the norm of the characteristic function of open ball in as in the following lemma.
Lemma 2.1**.**
[Ning, Masta1]* Let be a Young function, , and be arbitrary. Then we have \left\|\frac{\chi_{B(a,r)}}{u}\right\|_{L_{\Phi}^{u}(\mathbb{R}^{n})}=\|\chi_{B(a,r)}\|_{\L_{\Phi}(\mathbb{R}^{n})}=\frac{1}{\Phi^{-1}\bigl{(}\frac{1}{|B(a,r)|}\bigr{)}} where denotes the volume of open ball centered at with radius .*
Now we come to the inclusion relation between and with respect to Young functions . Given two Young functions , we write if there exists a constant such that for all .
Theorem 2.2**.**
Let be Young functions and be a measurable function. Then the following statements are equivalent:
(1)* .*
(2)* .*
(3)* There exists a constant such that , for every .*
Proof. Assume that (1) holds. Suppose that . Observe that
[TABLE]
By definition of , we have This proves that .
Next, since is a Banach pair, it follows from [Krein, Lemma 3.3] that (2) and (3) are equivalent. It thus remains to show that (3) implies (1).
Assume now that (3) holds. By Lemma 2.1, we have
[TABLE]
Since \frac{1}{\Phi_{1}^{-1}\Bigl{(}\frac{1}{|B(a,r)|}\Bigr{)}}\leq\frac{C}{\Phi_{2}^{-1}\Bigl{(}\frac{1}{|B(a,r)|}\Bigr{)}} is equivalent to for arbitrary and , by Lemma 1.3, we have
[TABLE]
for . Since and are arbitrary, we conclude that for every .∎
Remark 2.3**.**
For , Theorem 2.2 reduces to Theorem 2.5 in [Masta1].
Next, we also give the sufficient and necessary conditions for inclusion relation between weighted Orlicz spaces and with respect to Young functions and weights . To get the result, we need the following lemma.
Lemma 2.4**.**
Let be a measurable function such that for every . If is a Young function, then:
(1)* For all and for all , we have where .*
(2)* If and , then there exists a constant (depends on ) such that*
[TABLE]
Proof.
(1) Let and , then
[TABLE]
Observe that (by setting ), we have
[TABLE]
This shows that .
(2) Let and , then there exist a constant (depends on ) such that By Lemma 2.4 (1), then we have
[TABLE]
for every .
Since for every ,we have . Observe that
[TABLE]
This shows that .
Choose, C:=\mathop{\max}\Bigl{\{}C_{1},\frac{\mathop{\sup}\limits_{v\in{\mathbb{R}}^{n}}u(-v)}{\|f\|_{L_{\Phi}(\mathbb{R}^{n})}}\Bigr{\}}. Hence, we conclude that , as desired. ∎
Now, we present the sufficient and necessary conditions for the inclusion properties of weighted Orlicz spaces and with respect to Young functions and weights .
Theorem 2.5**.**
Let be Young functions such that and are measurable functions such that for every , where . Then the following statements are equivalent:
(1)* .*
(2)* .*
(3)* There exists a constant such that , for every .*
Proof.
Assume that (1) holds. Let be an element of . Since and , there exists constants such that for all and for every . Using a similar argument in the proof of Theorem 2.2 we have
[TABLE]
As before, we have that (2) and (3) are equivalent. It thus remains to show that (3) implies (1). Assume that (3) holds. By Lemma 2.4, we have
[TABLE]
for every . So, we obtain .∎
Note that, for for every , Theorem 2.5 reduces to Theorem 1.1.
