# Discrepancy in tidal deformability of GW170817 between the Advanced LIGO   twin detectors

**Authors:** Tatsuya Narikawa, Nami Uchikata, Kyohei Kawaguchi, Kenta Kiuchi,, Koutarou Kyutoku, Masaru Shibata, Hideyuki Tagoshi

arXiv: 1812.06100 · 2019-10-31

## TL;DR

This study reveals a significant discrepancy in the tidal deformability measurements of GW170817 between the Hanford and Livingston LIGO detectors, highlighting the need for noise analysis to improve gravitational wave data interpretation.

## Contribution

It demonstrates that the two LIGO detectors produce different posterior distributions for tidal deformability, emphasizing the importance of detector noise properties in gravitational wave analysis.

## Key findings

- Hanford and Livingston detectors yield different tidal deformability posteriors.
- Livingston detector's distribution varies irregularly with data frequency.
- Discrepancy suggests noise properties influence parameter estimation.

## Abstract

We find that the Hanford and Livingston detectors of Advanced LIGO derive a distinct posterior probability distribution of binary tidal deformability tilde{Lambda} of the first binary-neutron-star merger GW170817. By analyzing public data of GW170817 with a nested-sampling engine and the default TaylorF2 waveform provided by the LALInference package, the probability distribution of the binary tidal deformability derived by the LIGO-Virgo detector network turns out to be determined dominantly by the Hanford detector. Specifically, by imposing the flat prior on tidal deformability of individual stars, symmetric 90% credible intervals of tilde{Lambda} are estimated to be 527^{+619}_{-345} with the Hanford detector, 927^{+522}_{-619} with the Livingston detector, and 455^{+668}_{-281} with the LIGO-Virgo detector network. Furthermore, the distribution derived by the Livingston detector changes irregularly when we vary the maximum frequency of the data used in the analysis. This feature is not observed for the Hanford detector. While they are all consistent, the discrepancy and irregular behavior suggest that an in-depth study of noise properties might improve our understanding of GW170817 and future events.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.06100/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.06100/full.md

## References

33 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.06100/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.06100