Projective versions of the properties
in the Scheepers Diagram
Alexander V. Osipov
Krasovskii Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics,
Ural Federal
University, Ural State University of Economics, Yekaterinburg, Russia
[email protected]
Abstract
Let P be a topological property. A.V. Arhangel’skii
calls X projectively P if every second
countable continuous image of X is P. Lj.D.R.
Kocˇinac characterized the classical covering properties
of Menger, Rothberger, Hurewicz and Gerlits-Nagy in term of
continuous images in Rω. In this paper we
study the functional characterizations of all projective versions
of the selection properties in the Scheepers Diagram.
keywords:
projectively Rothberger space , projectively Menger space , projectively Hurewicz space , projectively
Gerlits-Nagy space , function spaces , selection principles , Cp-theory , Scheepers Diagram
MSC:
[2010] 54C35 , 54C05 , 54C65 , 54A20 , 54D65
††journal: Topology and its Applications
1 Introduction
Many topological properties are characterized in terms
of the following classical selection principles.
Let A and B be sets consisting of
families of subsets of an infinite set X. Then:
S1(A,B) is the selection hypothesis: for
each sequence (An:n∈N) of elements of
A there is a sequence (bn:n∈N) such
that for each n, bn∈An, and {bn:n∈N} is an element of B.
Sfin(A,B) is the selection hypothesis:
for each sequence (An:n∈N) of elements of
A there is a sequence (Bn:n∈N) of
finite sets such that for each n, Bn⊆An, and
⋃n∈NBn∈B.
Ufin(A,B) is the selection hypothesis:
whenever U1, U2,...∈A and
none contains a finite subcover, there are finite sets
Fn⊆Un, n∈N, such
that {⋃Fn:n∈N}∈B.
The papers [10, 11, 22, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 31] have
initiated the simultaneous
consideration of these properties in the case where A and
B are important families of open covers of a
topological space X.
In this paper, by a cover we mean a nontrivial one, that is,
U is a cover of X if X=⋃U and
X∈/U.
An open cover U of a space X is:
∙ an ω-cover if every finite subset of X is contained in a
member of U.
∙ a γ-cover if it is infinite and each x∈X belongs to all but finitely many elements of U.
For a topological space X we denote:
∙ O — the family of all open covers of X;
∙ Oczω — the family of all
countable cozero covers of X;
∙ Γ — the family of all open γ-covers of
X;
∙ Γcz — the family of all cozero
γ-covers of X;
∙ Ω — the family of all open ω-covers of
X;
∙ Ωczω — the family of countable
cozero ω-covers of X;
∙ Ωclω — the family of all countable
clopen ω-covers of X;
∙ D — the family of all dense subsets of
X;
∙ S — the family of all sequentially dense
subsets of X;
∙ Dω — the family of all countable
dense subsets of X;
∙ Sω — the family of all countable
sequentially dense subsets of X.
Many equivalences hold among the selection properties, and the
surviving ones appear in the following the Scheepers Diagram
(where an arrow denotes implication), to which no arrow can be
added except perhaps from Ufin(O,Γ) or
Ufin(O,Ω) to Sfin(Γ,Ω)
[10].
Fig. 1. The Scheepers Diagram for Lindelo¨f spaces.
Let P be a topological property. A.V. Arhangel’skii
calls X *projectively P * if every second
countable continuous image of X is P [1].
A.V. Arhangel’skii consider projective P for
P=σ-compact, analytic and other properties in
[3]. The projective selection principles were introduced
and first time considered in [12]. Lj.D.R. Kocˇinac
characterized the classical covering properties of Menger,
Rothberger, Hurewicz and Gerlits-Nagy in term of continuous images
in Rω. Characterizations of the classical
covering properties in terms a selection principle restricted to
countable covers by cozero sets are given in [4].
In this paper we study the functional characterizations of the
projective versions of the properties in the Scheepers Diagram
(Fig. 1).
2 Main definitions and notation
Let X be a topological space, and x∈X. A subset A of X
converges to x, x=limA, if A is infinite, x∈/A, and for each neighborhood U of x, A∖U is
finite. Consider the following collection:
∙ Ωx={A⊆X:x∈A∖A};
∙ Γx={A⊆X:x=limA};
∙ Ωxω={A⊆X:∣A∣=ℵ0 and
x∈A∖A};
∙ Γxω={A⊆X:∣A∣=ℵ0 and
x=limA}.
We write Π(Ax,Bx) (resp., Π(A,Bx)) without specifying x, we mean
(∀x)Π(Ax,Bx) (resp., (∀x)Π(A,Bx)).
Throughout this paper, all spaces are assumed to be Tychonoff. The
set of positive integers is denoted by N. Let
R be the real line, we put I=[0,1]⊂R, and let Q be the rational numbers. For a
space X, we denote by Cp(X) the space of all real-valued
continuous functions on X with the topology of pointwise
convergence. The symbol 0 stands for the constant function
to [math]. Since Cp(X) is homogenous space we may always consider
the point 0 when studying local properties of this space.
A basic open neighborhood of 0 is of the form [F,(−ϵ,ϵ)]={f∈C(X):f(F)⊂(−ϵ,ϵ)}, where F is a finite subset of X and
ϵ>0.
We recall that a subset of X that is the
complete preimage of zero for a certain function from C(X) is called a zero-set.
A subset O⊆X is called a cozero-set (or functionally
open) of X if X∖O is a zero-set.
Recall that the cardinal p is the smallest cardinal
so that there is a collection of p many subsets of
the natural numbers with the strong finite intersection property
but no infinite pseudo-intersection. Note that ω1≤p≤c.
For f,g∈NN, let f≤∗g if
f(n)≤g(n) for all but finitely many n. b is
the minimal cardinality of a ≤∗-unbounded subset of
NN. A set B⊂[N]∞
is unbounded if the set of all increasing enumerations of elements
of B is unbounded in NN, with respect to
≤∗. It follows that ∣B∣≥b (See [7]
for more on small cardinals including p).
Theorem 2.1**.**
(Noble [14]) A space Cp(X) is separable
if and only if X has a coarser second countable topology.
If X is a space and A⊆X, then the sequential closure of A,
denoted by [A]seq, is the set of all limits of sequences
from A. A set D⊆X is said to be sequentially dense
if X=[D]seq. If D is a countable sequentially dense subset
of X then X call sequentially separable space.
Call X strongly sequentially separable if X is separable and
every countable dense subset of X is sequentially dense.
Clearly, every strongly sequentially separable space is
sequentially separable, and every sequentially separable space is
separable.
Definition 2.2**.**
A space X has the V-property (X ⊨ V), if there
exists a condensation (= a continuous bijection) f:X↦Y from a space X on a
separable metric space Y such that f(U) is an Fσ-set
of Y for any cozero-set U of X.
Theorem 2.3**.**
(Velichko [8]). A space Cp(X) is
sequentially separable if and only if X ⊨ V.
3 The projectively Rothberger property
Definition 3.1**.**
([15]) Let n∈N. A set A⊆Cp(X) is called n-dense in Cp(X), if for each n-finite set
{x1,...,xn}⊂X such that xi=xj for i=j
and an open sets W1,...,Wn in R there is f∈A
such that f(xi)∈Wi for i∈1,n.
Obviously, that if A is a n-dense set of Cp(X) for each
n∈N then A is a dense set of Cp(X).
For a space Cp(X) we denote:
D[n]
— the family of all n-dense subsets of Cp(X);
Dω[n]
— the family of all countable n-dense subsets of Cp(X).
Definition 3.2**.**
Let f∈C(X) and n∈N. A set B⊆Cp(X) is called n-dense at point f, if for each n-finite set
{x1,...,xn}⊂X and ϵ>0 there is h∈B such
that h(xi)∈(f(xi)−ϵ,f(xi)+ϵ) for i∈1,n.
Obviously, that if B is a n-dense at point f for each n∈N then f∈B.
For a space Cp(X) and f∈Cp(X) we denote:
Df[n]
— the family of all n-dense at point f subsets of Cp(X);
Dfω[n]
— the family of all countable n-dense at point f subsets of Cp(X).
By Theorem 11.3 in [17], we proved the following result
where the symbol 0 stands for the constant function
to [math].
Theorem 3.3**.**
For a space X, the following statements are
equivalent:
-
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(D[1],D[1]);*
2. 2.
X* satisfies S1(O,O)
[Rothberger property];*
3. 3.
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(D0[1],D0[1]);*
4. 4.
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(D[1],D0[1]);*
5. 5.
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(D,D[1]).*
In ([4], Theorem 37), M. Bonanzinga, F. Cammaroto, M.
Matveev proved
Theorem 3.4**.**
The following
conditions are equivalent for a space X:
-
X* is projectively S1(O,O)
[projectivelyRothberger];*
2. 2.
every Lindelo¨f continuous image of X is
Rothberger;
3. 3.
for every continuous mapping f:X↦Rω, f(X) is Rothberger;
4. 4.
for every continuous mapping f:X↦R,
f(X) is Rothberger;
5. 5.
X* satisfies
S1(Oczω,O).*
Then, we have the next result.
Theorem 3.5**.**
For a space X, the following statements are
equivalent:
-
Cp(X)* satisfies
S1(Dω[1],D[1]);*
2. 2.
X* is projectively S1(O,O);*
3. 3.
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(D0ω[1],D0[1]);*
4. 4.
Cp(X)* satisfies
S1(Dω[1],D0[1]);*
5. 5.
Cp(X)* satisfies
S1(Dω,D[1]).*
Proof.
(1)⇒(2). Let (On:n∈N) be a
sequence of countable cozero covers of X. Let
On={Uin:i∈N} for every n∈N, Uin=k∈N⋃Fi,kn
where Fi,kn is a zero-set of X for any n,i,k∈N. Renumber the rational numbers Q as {qk:k∈N}.
We set An={fi,kn∈C(X):fi,kn↾(X∖Uin)=1 and fi,kn↾Fi,kn=qk
for Uin∈On , the zero-set set Fi,kn⊂Uin and qk∈Q}. It is not difficult to see that
each An is a countable 1-dense subset of Cp(X) because
each On is a cover of X. By the assumption there
exists fi(n),k(n)n∈An such that {fi(n),k(n)n:n∈N}∈Dω[1].
For each fi(n),k(n)n we
take Ui(n)n∈On such that
fi(n),k(n)n↾(X∖Ui(n)n)=1.
Set U={Ui(n)n:n∈N}. For x∈X we consider the basic open neighborhood
[x,W] of 0, where W=(−21,21).
Note that there is m∈N such that
[x,W] contains fi(n),k(n)m∈{fi(n),k(n)n:n∈N}. This means x∈Ui(m)m. Consequently U is a countable cozero cover
of X. By Theorem 3.4, X is projectively
S1(O,O).
(2)⇒(3). Let Bn∈Dfω[1] for
each n∈N. We renumber {Bn}n∈N as
{Bi,j}i,j∈N. Since C(X) is homogeneous,
we may think that f=0. We set
Ui,j={g−1[(−1/i,1/i)]:g∈Bi,j} for
each i,j∈N. Since Bi,j∈D0ω[1], Ui,j is a
countable cozero cover of X for each i,j∈N. In
case the set M={i∈N:X∈Ui,j} is
infinite, choose gm∈Bm,j m∈M so that
g−1[(−1/m,1/m)]=X, then {gm:m∈N}∈D0[1].
So we may assume that there exists i′∈N such that
for each i≥i′ and g∈Bi,j we have that g−1[(−1/i,1/i)] is not X.
For the sequence Vi=(Ui,j:j∈N) of cozero covers there exists fi,j∈Bi,j
such that Ui={fi,j−1[(−1/i,1/i)]:j∈N} is a cover of X. Let [x,W] be any basic open
neighborhood of 0, where W=(−ϵ,ϵ),
ϵ>0. There exists m≥i′ and j∈N such
that 1/m<ϵ and x∈fm,j−1[(−1/m,1/m)]. This
means {fi,j:i,j∈N}∈D0ω[1].
(3)⇒(4) is immediate.
(4)⇒(1). Let An∈Dω[1] for each
n∈N. We renumber {An}n∈N as
{Ai,j}i,j∈N. Renumber the rational numbers
Q as {qi:i∈N}. Fix
i∈N. By the assumption there exists fi,j∈Ai,j such that {fi,j:j∈N}∈Dqi[1] where qi is the constant function to
qi. Then {fi,j:i,j∈N}∈Dω[1].
The remaining implications are proved in the same way as in the
proof of Theorem 11.3 in [17] by replacing n-dense (dense)
subsets of Cp(X) with countable n-dense (dense) subsets of
Cp(X).
∎
Proposition 3.6**.**
(Proposition 38 in [4])
-
A space is Rothberger iff it is Lindelo¨f and
projectively Rothberger **[12]**.
2. 2.
Every projectively Rothberger space is zero-dimensional.
3. 3.
Every space of cardinality less than cov(M) is
projectively Rothberger.
4. 4.
The projectively Rothberger property is preserved by
continuous images, by countably unions, by C∗-embedded
zero-sets, and by cozero sets.
Note that for a Tychonoff space X always there exists a
countable 1-dense subset in Cp(X). Namely, let A={fq∈C(X): where fq(x)=q for ∀x∈X and q∈Q}.
Theorem 3.7**.**
A space X is
Lindelo¨f if and only if each 1-dense set in Cp(X)
contains a countable 1-dense subset.
Proof.
(⇒). Let B be a 1-dense set in
Cp(X) and let A be a countable 1-dense in Cp(X). Fix
m∈N. For each x∈X there is fq,m,x∈A
such that fq,m,x(x)∈(−m1+q,m1+q) where
q∈Q. Fix q∈Q. Consider
γq,m={Vfq,m,x: x∈X} where
Vfq,m,x=fq,m,x−1[(−m1+q,m1+q)]
for each x∈X. Then γq,m is an open cover of X,
hence, there is countable subcover
γq,m′={Vfq,m,xi:i∈N}⊂γq,m of X. Consider γ=m∈N,q∈Q⋃γq,m′.
Claim that Cq={fq,m,xi:i∈N,m∈N}∈Bq, i.e. C is a 1-dense set in the point
fq(x)=q. Let y∈X and ϵ>0. Then there are m′∈N and fq,m′,xi′∈C such that
m′1<ϵ and fq,m′,xi′(yj)∈(−m′1+q,m′1+q)⊂(−ϵ+q,ϵ+q).
Define A=q∈Q⋃Cq. Clearly, that
A⊆B and A is a countable 1-dense subset of
Cp(X).
(⇐). Let γ={Uλ:λ∈Λ}
be an open cover of X. Consider a set B={fx,λ∈C(X):fx,λ(x)=q and f(X∖Uλ)⊂{0}
where x∈Uλ and q∈Q}. Since the space
X is Tychonoff and γ is an open cover of X, B is a
1-dense subset of Cp(X). There is a countable 1-dense
subset A={fxi,λi∈C(X):i∈N}⊂B. Then β={Uλi:i∈N} is a
countable cover of X.
∎
By Proposition 3.6 and Theorem 3.7, we have the next
Proposition 3.8**.**
-
A space Cp(X) has the property
S1(D[1],D[1]) if and only if it is has
the property S1(Dω[1],D[1]) and
each 1-dense subset of Cp(X) contains a countable 1-dense
subset of Cp(X).
2. 2.
If a space X has cardinality less than cov(M)
then Cp(X) has the property
S1(Dω[1],D[1]).
3. 3.
If f:X→Y is continuous mapping from a
Tychonoff space X onto a Tychonoff space Y and Cp(X) has
the property S1(Dω[1],D[1]), then
Cp(Y) has the property
S1(Dω[1],D[1]).
4. 4.
If Cp(X) has the property
S1(Dω[1],D[1]), then
Cp(X)ω has the property
S1(Dω[1],D[1]).
5. 5.
If X has the property projectively Rothberger and Y is
C∗-embedded zero-set in X (or cozero set of X), then
Cp(Y) has the property
S1(Dω[1],D[1]).
By Theorem 40 in [4] and Theorem 3.5, we have the
next result.
Proposition 3.9**.**
If Cp(Xn) has the property
S1(Dω[1],D[1]) for every n∈N, then all countable subspaces of Cp(X) have
countable strong fan tightness.
4 The projectively Menger property
By Theorem 12.1 in [17], we have the following result.
Theorem 4.1**.**
For a space X, the following statements are
equivalent:
-
Cp(X)* satisfies
Sfin(D[1],D[1]);*
2. 2.
X* satisfies Sfin(O,O) [Menger
property];*
3. 3.
Cp(X)* satisfies Sfin(D0[1],D0[1]);*
4. 4.
Cp(X)* satisfies Sfin(D[1],D0[1]);*
5. 5.
Cp(X)* satisfies Sfin(D,D[1]).*
In ([4], Theorem 6), M. Bonanzinga, F. Cammaroto, M.
Matveev proved
Theorem 4.2**.**
The following
conditions are equivalent for a space X:
-
X* is projectively Sfin(O,O)
[projectivelyMenger];*
2. 2.
every Lindelo¨f continuous image of X is Menger;
3. 3.
for every continuous mapping f:X↦Rω, f(X) is Menger;
4. 4.
for every continuous mapping f:X↦Rω, f(X) is not dominating;
5. 5.
X* satisfies
Sfin(Oczω,O).*
Theorem 4.3**.**
For a space X, the following statements are
equivalent:
-
Cp(X)* satisfies
Sfin(Dω[1],D[1]);*
2. 2.
X* is projectively Sfin(O,O);*
3. 3.
Cp(X)* satisfies Sfin(D0ω[1],D0[1]);*
4. 4.
Cp(X)* satisfies
Sfin(Dω[1],D0[1]);*
5. 5.
Cp(X)* satisfies
Sfin(Dω,D[1]).*
Proof.
Similarly to the proofs of Theorem 4.1
and Theorem 12.1 in [17].
∎
Proposition 4.4**.**
(Proposition 8 in [4])
-
A space is Menger if and only if it is Lindelo¨f
and projectively Menger **[12]**.
2. 2.
Every σ-pseudocompact space is projectively Menger.
3. 3.
Every space of cardinality less than d is
projectively Menger.
4. 4.
The projectively Menger property is preserved by continuous
images, by countably unions, by C∗-embedded zero-sets
(Proposition 14 in **[4]**), and by cozero sets (Proposition 16
in **[4]**).
By Proposition 4.4 and Theorem 4.3, we have the
next
Proposition 4.5**.**
-
A space Cp(X) has the property
Sfin(D[1],D[1]) iff is has the property
Sfin(Dω[1],D[1]) and each
1-dense set in Cp(X) contains a countable 1-dense set in
Cp(X).
2. 2.
If a space X has cardinality less than d then
Cp(X) has the property
S1(Dω[1],D[1]).
3. 3.
If f:X↦Y is continuous mapping from a Tychonoff
space X onto a Tychonoff space Y and Cp(X) has the property
Sfin(Dω[1],D[1]), then Cp(Y)
has the property
Sfin(Dω[1],D[1]).
4. 4.
If Cp(X) has the property
Sfin(Dω[1],D[1]), then
Cp(X)ω has the property
Sfin(Dω[1],D[1]).
5. 5.
If X has the projectively Menger property and Y is
C∗-embedded zero-set in X (or cozero set of X), then
Cp(Y) has the property
Sfin(Dω[1],D[1]).
By Theorem 18 in [4] and Theorem 4.3, we have the
next proposition.
Proposition 4.6**.**
If Cp(Xn) has the property
Sfin(Dω[1],D[1]) for every n∈N, then all countable subspaces of Cp(X) have
countable fan tightness.
5 The projectively Hurewicz property
Definition 5.1**.**
(Sakai)
An γ-cover U of cozero sets (Functionally
open sets) of X is γF-shrinkable if there exists
a γ-cover {FU:U∈U} of zero-sets of X
with FU⊂U for every U∈U.
For a topological space X we denote:
∙ ΓF — the family of all γF-shrinkable
covers of X.
By Theorem 4.1 in [18], X has the Hurewicz property if
and only if X satisfies Ufin(ΓF,Γ) and X is
Lindelo¨f.
Definition 5.2**.**
A countable set A⊂C(X) is called weakly
sequential dense subset of Cp(X) if A={Fn:Fn∈[A]<ω, n∈N} and for each
f∈C(X) there is {Fnk:k∈N}⊂A such that {h∈Fnkmin∣h−f∣:k∈N}∈Γ0.
Clearly that any countable sequential dense subset of Cp(X) is
weakly sequential dense.
For a topological space X and f∈C(X) we denote:
∙ wS — the family of all countable weakly
sequential dense subset of Cp(X).
∙ wΓf={A : A={Fn:Fn∈[A]<ω, n∈N}⊂C(X)
such that {h∈Fnmin∣h−f∣:n∈N}∈Γ0}.
∙ wΩf={A: A={Fn:Fn∈[A]<ω, n∈N}⊂C(X)
such that {h∈Fnmin∣h−f∣:n∈N}∈Ω0}.
∙ wD={A: A={Fn:Fn∈[A]<ω, n∈N}⊂C(X)
such that A∈wΩg for each g∈C(X)}.
Note that S⊂wS, Γ0⊂wΓ0, Ω0⊂wΩ0 and D⊂wD.
In ([4], Theorem 30), M. Bonanzinga, F. Cammaroto, M.
Matveev proved
Theorem 5.3**.**
The following
conditions are equivalent for a space X:
-
X* is projectively Ufin(O,Γ)
[projectivelyHurewicz];*
2. 2.
Every Lindelo¨f continuous image of X is Hurewicz;
3. 3.
for every continuous mapping f:X↦Rω, f(X) is Hurewicz;
4. 4.
for every continuous mapping f:X↦Rω, f(X) is bounded;
5. 5.
X* satisfies Ufin(Oczω,Γ).*
Theorem 5.4**.**
A space X is projectively Hurewicz if and only if X has the property Ufin(ΓF,Γ).
Proof.
Assume that X has the property Ufin(ΓF,Γ). We claim that X satisfies
Ufin(Oczω,Γ). Let (Vi:i∈N) be a sequence of countable cozero covers of X
where Vi={Vin:n∈N} for each i∈N. Since Vin is a cozero set, we can represent
Vin=j=1⋃∞Fi,jn where Fi,jn
is a zero-set of X for each i,j,n∈N and
Fi,jn⊂Fi,j+1n for j∈N. Consider
Si={Sin:=p=1⋃nFi,np:n∈N} for each i∈N. Note that
Si∈ΓF. Since X has the property
Ufin(ΓF,Γ), there are finite sets
Di⊆Si, n∈N, such
that {⋃Di:i∈N}∈Γ. It
follows that X satisfies
Ufin(Oczω,Γ).
∎
By Theorem 4.2 in [18] and Theorem 5.4, we have the
next theorem.
Theorem 5.5**.**
For a space X, the following statements are
equivalent:
-
Cp(X)* satisfies Sfin(Γ0,wΓ0);*
2. 2.
X* satisfies Ufin(ΓF,Γ);*
3. 3.
X* is projectively Hurewicz.*
By Theorem 4.5 in [18] and Theorem 5.4 we have the
next theorem.
Theorem 5.6**.**
Assume that X has the V-property. Then the following statements are equivalent:
-
Cp(X)* satisfies Sfin(S,wS);*
2. 2.
X* satisfies Ufin(ΓF,Γ);*
3. 3.
X* is projectively Hurewicz;*
4. 4.
Cp(X)* satisfies Sfin(Γ0,wΓ0);*
5. 5.
Cp(X)* satisfies Sfin(S,wΓ0).*
Proposition 5.7**.**
(Proposition 31 in [4])
-
A space is Hurewicz iff it is Lindelo¨f and
projectively Hurewicz **[12]**.
2. 2.
Every σ-pseudocompact space is projectively Hurewicz.
3. 3.
Every space of cardinality less than b is
projectively Hurewicz.
4. 4.
The projectively Hurewicz property is preserved by
continuous images, by countably unions, by C∗-embedded
zero-sets, and by cozero sets.
By Proposition 5.7 and Theorem 5.6, we have the
next
Proposition 5.8**.**
-
A space Cp(X) has the property
Sfin(D[1],wS) iff it has the property
Sfin(S,wS) and each 1-dense set in
Cp(X) contains a countable 1-dense set in Cp(X).
2. 2.
If a space X has cardinality less than b then
Cp(X) has the property Sfin(S,wS).
3. 3.
If f:X↦Y is a continuous mapping from a Tychonoff
space X onto a Tychonoff space Y and Cp(X) has the property
Sfin(S,wS), then Cp(Y) has the
property Sfin(S,wS).
4. 4.
If Cp(X) has the property
Sfin(S,wS), then Cp(X)ω has
the property Sfin(Sω,wS).
5. 5.
If X has the projectively Hurewicz property and Y is a
C∗-embedded zero-set in X (or cozero set of X), then
Cp(Y) has the property Sfin(S,wS).
6 Projectively Hurewicz + projectively Rothberger properties
Theorem 6.1**.**
(Theorem 50 in [4]) The following conditions
are equivalent for a space X:
-
X* is both projectively Hurewicz and projectively
Rothberger;*
2. 2.
every Lindelo¨f continuous image of X is both
Hurewicz and Rothberger;
3. 3.
for every continuous mapping f:X↦Rω, f(X) is both Hurewicz and Rothberger;
4. 4.
for every continuous mapping f:X↦R,
f(X) is both Hurewicz and Rothberger;
5. 5.
For every sequence (Un:n∈N) of
countable covers of X by cozero sets, one can pick
Un∈Un so that (Un:n∈N) is
groupable, that is there is a strictly increasing function f:ω↦ω such that for every x∈X, x∈⋃{Ui:f(n)≤i<f(n+1)} for all but finitely many n.
Recall that add(M)=min{b,cov(M)} [13].
Proposition 6.2**.**
(Proposition 51 in [4])
-
A space is both Hurewicz and Rothberger iff it is
Lindelo¨f and it is both projectively Hurewicz and
projectively Rothberger **[12]**.
2. 2.
Every space of cardinality less than add(M) is
both projectively Hurewicz and projectively Rothberger.
By Proposition 6.2, Theorem 5.6 and Theorem
4.1, we have the next result.
Proposition 6.3**.**
-
A space Cp(X) has properties
Sfin(D[1],wS) and
S1(D[1],D[1]) iff it has properties
Sfin(S,wS) and
S1(Dω[1],D[1]) and each 1-dense
set in Cp(X) contains a countable 1-dense set in Cp(X).
2. 2.
If a space X has cardinality less than add(M)
then Cp(X) has properties Sfin(S,wS)
and S1(Dω[1],D[1]).
7 The projectively Gerlits-Nagy property
Gerlits and Nagy [9] proved
Theorem 7.1**.**
For a space X, the following statements are
equivalent:
-
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(Ω0,Γ0);*
2. 2.
X* satisfies S1(Ω,Γ).*
By Theorem 5.6 in [16], we have the next theorem.
Theorem 7.2**.**
Let X be a space with a coarser second countable topology. The
following assertions are equivalent:
-
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(D,S);*
2. 2.
Each dense subspace of Cp(X) contains a countable
sequentially dense set in Cp(X);
3. 3.
X* satisfies S1(Ω,Γ);*
4. 4.
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(Ω0,Γ0);*
5. 5.
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(D,Γ0).*
In ([4], Theorem 54), M. Bonanzinga, F. Cammaroto, M.
Matveev proved
Theorem 7.3**.**
The following conditions are equivalent for a
space X:
-
X* satisfies projective S1(Ω,Γ) [
projectively Gerlits-Nagy ];*
2. 2.
every Lindelöf image of X has property (γ);
3. 3.
for every continuous mapping f:X↦Rω, f(X) satisfies S1(Ω,Γ);
4. 4.
for every continuous mapping f:X↦R,
f(X) satisfies S1(Ω,Γ);
5. 5.
for every countable ω-cover U of X by
cozero sets, one can pick Un∈U so that every x∈X is contained in all but finitely many Un;
6. 6.
X* satisfies S1(Ωczω,Γ).*
Theorem 7.4**.**
The following conditions are equivalent for a
space X:
-
X* is projective S1(Ω,Γ);*
2. 2.
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(Ω0ω,Γ0).*
Proof.
(1)⇒(2). By Theorem 63 in
[4].
(2)⇒(1). Let (Un:n∈N) be a
sequence of open ω-covers of X. We set An={f∈C(X):f↾(X∖U)=0 for some U∈Un}. It is not difficult to see that each An is dense in C(X)
since each Un is an ω-cover of X and X is
Tychonoff. Let f be the constant function to 1. By the
assumption there exist fn∈An such that fn↦f
(n↦∞).
For each fn we
take Un∈Un such that
fn↾(X∖Un)=0.
Set U={Un:n∈N}. For each finite subset
{x1,...,xk} of X we consider the basic open neighborhood
of f [x1,...,xk;W,...,W], where W=(0,2).
Note that there is n′∈N such that
[x1,...,xk;W,...,W] contains fn for n>n′. This means
{x1,...,xk}⊂Un for n>n′. Consequently
U is an γ-cover of X.
∎
Theorem 7.5**.**
Let X be a space with a coarser second countable topology. The
following assertions are equivalent:
-
Cp(X)* satisfies
S1(Dω,S);*
2. 2.
Cp(X)* is strongly sequentially separable;*
3. 3.
X* satisfies
S1(Ωczω,Γ);*
4. 4.
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(Ω0ω,Γ0);*
5. 5.
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(Dω,Γ0);*
6. 6.
X* is projectively S1(Ω,Γ) [ projectively
Gerlits-Nagy ].*
Recall that l∗(X)≤ℵ0 (X is called an
ϵ-space) if all finite powers of X are
Lindele¨of (or, by Proposition in [9], if every
ω-cover of X contains an at most countable
ω-subcover of X).
Proposition 7.6**.**
(Proposition 55 in [4])
-
A space has property S1(Ω,Γ) iff it is an
ϵ-space and projectively S1(Ω,Γ) **[12]**.
2. 2.
Every projectively S1(Ω,Γ) space is
zero-dimensional.
3. 3.
Every space of cardinality less than p is
projectively S1(Ω,Γ).
4. 4.
The projectively S1(Ω,Γ) property is preserved
by continuous images.
Proposition 7.7**.**
Let X be a space with a coarser second countable topology. A space X is an ϵ-space iff each dense subset of
Cp(X) consists a countable dense subset of Cp(X).
Proof.
(⇒). Let X be an ϵ-space, D be a dense subset of Cp(X). By the Noble’s Theorem 2.1, there is
a countable dense subset S={si:i∈N} of Cp(X).
By the Arhangel’skii-Pytkeev Theorem in [3], t(Cp(X))≤ℵ0. For every s∈S there exists Ds⊆D such
that ∣Ds∣=ℵ0 and s∈Ds. A set
P=s∈S⋃Ds. Then ∣P∣=ℵ0, P⊆D and P=Cp(X).
(⇐). Let V be a ω-cover of X.
Consider a set AV,K={f∈C(X):f(X∖V)⊆{0} and f(k)=qk where k∈K and qk∈Q}
where V∈V, K∈[X]<ω and K⊂V.
Then A=⋃{AV,K:V∈V, K∈[X]<ω and K⊂V} is a dense subset of Cp(X).
∎
Proposition 7.8**.**
-
A space Cp(X) is strongly sequentially dense and
separable iff it is strongly sequentially separable and each dense
subset of Cp(X) consists a countable dense subset of Cp(X).
2. 2.
If Cp(X) is strongly sequentially separable, then X is
zero-dimensional.
3. 3.
If a space X of cardinality less than p, then
Cp(X) is strongly sequentially separable.
4. 4.
If f:X↦Y is a continuous mapping from a Tychonoff
space X onto a Tychonoff space Y with a coarser second
countable topology and Cp(X) is strongly sequentially
separable, then Cp(Y) is strongly sequentially separable.
By Theorem 6.1 in [15], we have
Proposition 7.9**.**
(CH)* There is a consistent example of projectively S1(Ω,Γ) space X with a coarser second countable topology
such that X is not S1(Ω,Γ).*
Proposition 7.10**.**
There is a projectively S1(Ω,Γ) space
X such that X2 is not projectively S1(Ω,Γ).
Proof.
Example 58 in [4].
∎
Note that S1(Ω,Γ)=Sfin(Ω,Γ) (see
[10]). It follows that the projectively S1(Ω,Γ) property coincides with the projectively Sfin(Ω,Γ) property.
By Theorem 63 in [4] and Theorem 7.5,
Proposition 7.11**.**
If Cp(X) is strongly sequentially separable, then all countable subspaces of Cp(X) are strictly Freˊchet-Urysohn.
8 The projectively S1(Ω,Ω) property
In [20] (Lemma, Theorem 1), M. Sakai proved:
Theorem 8.1**.**
(Sakai)* For each space X the
following are equivalent.*
-
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(Ω0,Ω0).*
2. 2.
Xn* satisfies S1(O,O) (Xn has
Rothberger’s property C′′) for each n∈N.*
3. 3.
X* satisfies S1(Ω,Ω).*
In ([27], Theorem 13) M. Scheepers proved the following
result.
Theorem 8.2**.**
(Scheepers)* For each separable metric space X, the
following are equivalent:*
-
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(D,D);*
2. 2.
X* satisfies S1(Ω,Ω).*
By Theorem 57 in [5], [20] and Theorem 2.1,
we have
Theorem 8.3**.**
Let X be a space with a coarser second countable topology. The
following assertions are equivalent:
-
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(D,D) [
R-separable ];*
2. 2.
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(Ω0,Ω0);*
3. 3.
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(D,Ω0);*
4. 4.
X* satisfies S1(Ω,Ω);*
5. 5.
Xn* satisfies S1(O,O) for each
n∈N.*
Proposition 8.4**.**
The following conditions are equivalent for a
space X:
-
X* is projectively S1(Ω,Ω);*
2. 2.
X* satisfies S1(Ωczω,Ω);*
3. 3.
for every continuous mapping f:X↦Rω, f(X) is S1(Ω,Ω).
4. 4.
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(Ω0ω,Ω0);*
Proof.
(1)⇒(2). Let (Un:n∈N) be a
sequence of countable ω-covers of X by cozero sets. For
every n∈N and every U∈Un fix a
continuous function fU:X↦R such that
U=fU−1[R∖{0}]. Put h=∏{fU:U∈Un,n∈N}. Then h is a continuous
mapping from X onto h(X)⊂Rω, thus by
(1), h(X) satisfies S1(Ω,Ω). Since
(h(Un):n∈N) be a sequence of open
ω-covers of h(X) we get (2).
(2)⇒(3). Let f be a continuous mapping f:X↦Rω, and let (Un:n∈N)
be a sequence of open ω-covers of f(X). Since f(X) is
separable metrizable space, there is a refinement Vn
of Un that countable ω-cover of f(X) and
consists of cozero sets. Put On={f−1(V):V∈Vn}. Then On is a countable
ω-cover of X by cozero sets. By (2), there is Hn∈On such that {Hn:n∈N} is a
countable ω-cover of X and consists of cozero sets. For
every n∈N pick UHn∈Un such that
UHn⊃f(Hn). Put F={UHn:n∈N}. Then F is an open ω-cover of
f(X). This proves that f(X) satisfies S1(Ω,Ω).
(3)⇒(1) follows from the fact that every second
countable space can be embedded into Rω.
(2)⇒(4). Let f∈n⋂An,
where An is a countable subset of C(X). Since C(X) is
homogeneous, we may think that f is the constant function to the
zero. We set Un={g−1[(−1/n,1/n)]:g∈An}
for each n∈N. For each n∈N and each
finite subset {x1,...,xk} of X a neighborhood
[x1,...,xk;W,...,W] of f, where W=(−1/n,1/n), contains
some g∈An. This means that each Un is a
countable cozero ω-cover of X. In case the set M={n∈N:X∈Un} is infinite, choose gm∈Am m∈M so that g−1(−1/m,1/m)=X, then gm↦f.
So we may assume that there exists n∈N such that for
each m≥n and g∈Am g−1[(−1/m,1/m)] is not X.
For the sequence {Um:m≥n} of cozero
ω-covers there exist fm∈Am such that
U={fm−1[(−1/m,1/m)]:m>n} is a ω-cover of
X. Let [x1,...,xk;W,...,W] be any basic open neighborhood
of f, where W=(−ϵ,ϵ), ϵ>0. There
exists m≥n such that {x1,...,xk}⊂fm−1[(−1/m,1/m)] and 1/m<ϵ. This means f∈{fm:m∈N}.
(4)⇒(2). Let {Un:n∈N} be
a sequence of countable cozero ω-covers of X. Let
Un={Un,m:m∈N}. Since Un,m is
cozero set, Un,m=i∈N⋃Fin,m
where Fin,m is zero set of X and Fin,m⊂Fi+1n,m for each i∈N.
We set An={fin,m∈C(X):fin,m↾(X∖Un,m)=1 and fin,m↾Fin,m=0 for m,i∈N}. It is not difficult to
see that f0∈An (f0 is the constant function
to the zero) for each n∈N since each
Un is an ω-cover of X and X is Tychonoff.
By the assumption, there exists fi(n)n,m(n)∈An such
that f0∈{fi(n)n,m(n):n∈N}.
For each fi(n)n,m(n) we
take Un,m(n)∈Un. Set U={Un,m(n):n∈N}.
For each finite subset
{x1,...,xk} of X we consider the basic open neighborhood
of f0 [x1,...,xk;W,...,W], where W=(−1,1).
Note that there is n∈N such that
[x1,...,xk;W,...,W] contains fi(n)n,m(n). This means
{x1,...,xk}⊂Un,m(n). Consequently U is
an ω-cover of X.
∎
Definition 8.5**.**
A space X is Rω-separable if for every sequence (Dn:n∈N) of countable dense subspaces of X one can pick
pn∈Dn so that {pn:n∈N} is dense in X,
i.e X satisfies S1(Dω,D).
Theorem 8.6**.**
For a space X with a coarser second countable topology, the
following are equivalent:
-
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(Dω,D)
[ Rω-separable ];*
2. 2.
X* satisfies S1(Ωczω,Ω);*
3. 3.
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(Ω0ω,Ω0);*
4. 4.
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(D0ω,Ω0);*
5. 5.
X* is projectively S1(Ω,Ω).*
Proof.
(1)⇒(2). Let {Un:n∈N} be a
sequence of countable cozero ω-covers of X and {hj:j∈N} be a countable dense subset of Cp(X). Let
Un={Un,m:m∈N}. Since Un,m is
cozero set, Un,m=i∈N⋃Fin,m
where Fin,m is zero set of X and Fin,m⊂Fi+1n,m for each i∈N.
We set An={fin,m∈C(X):fin,m↾(X∖Un,m)=1 and fin,m↾Fin,m=hi for m,i∈N}. It is not difficult
to see that An is a countable dense subspace of Cp(X) for
each n∈N since each Un is an
ω-cover of X and X is Tychonoff.
By the assumption there exists hi(n)n,m(n)∈An such
that {hi(n)n,m(n):n∈N} is a dense subset
of Cp(X).
For each hi(n)n,m(n) we
take Un,m(n)∈Un. Set U={Un,m(n):n∈N}.
For each finite subset
{x1,...,xk} of X we consider the basic open neighborhood
of 0 [x1,...,xk;W,...,W], where W=(−1,1).
Note that there is n∈N such that
[x1,...,xk;W,...,W] contains hi(n)n,m(n). This means
{x1,...,xk}⊂Un,m(n). Consequently U is
an ω-cover of X.
(2)⇔(3)⇔(5). By Proposition
8.4 and Noble’s Theorem 2.1.
(3)⇒(4) is immediate.
(4)⇒(1). Let D={dn:n∈N} be a
countable dense subspace of Cp(X). Given a sequence of
countable dense subspace of Cp(X), enumerate it as {Sn,m:n,m∈N}. For each n∈N, pick
dn,m∈Sn,m so that dn∈{dn,m:m∈N}. Then {dn,m:m,n∈N} is dense in
Cp(X).
∎
By definition of projectively S1(Ω,Ω) space, a
separable metrizable projectively S1(Ω,Ω) space
has the property S1(Ω,Ω).
Proposition 8.7**.**
(CH)* There is a consistent example of projectively S1(Ω,Ω) space X with a coarser second countable topology
such that X is not S1(Ω,Ω).*
Proof.
The Brendle’s Theorem in [6] shows that there is a set of
reals Z of size c (=ℵ1) which has
property S1(BΩ,BΓ). We can certainly assume
that Z⊂(0,1). Let Y=Z∪(−Z). Let X be a set Y
with the topology of Sorgenfrey line. Then the space X such that
X satisfies S1(Ωczω,Γ) and
iw(X)=ℵ0, but X2 is not Lindelo¨f (Theorem 6.1
in [15]).
Since Γczω⊂Ωczω, by Proposition 8.4, X
projectively S1(Ω,Ω). Since the property
S1(Ω,Ω) is preserved under taking finite powers
(Theorem 3.4 in [10]), X has not property S1(Ω,Ω) because X2 is not Lindelo¨f.
∎
Proposition 8.8**.**
(♢ω1)* There is a consistent example of projectively S1(Ω,Ω) space X with
a coarser second countable topology such that X is not
S1(Ω,Ω).*
Proof.
By Theorem 6.2 in [15].
∎
Corollary 8.9**.**
(CH or ♢ω1) There is a consistent example of space X with a coarser second countable topology such that
X satisfies S1(Ωczω,Ω), but X2 is
not S1(Oczω,O).
Clearly, that a countable Rω-separable space is a
R-separable space.
It is interesting to consider the following Question (Question 64, [5]):
Does there exists an X such that
Cp(X) is not R-separable but contains a dense R-separable
subspace ?
Note that D. Repovsˇ and L. Zdomskyy showed that there
exists a Tychonoff space S such that Cp(S) is not
M-separable, but Cp(S) contains a dense subset which is
GN-separable (hence R-separable) under
p=d [19]. This implies a positive
answer to Question under p=d.
By Proposition 8.7, we get a positive answer to this
Question under CH or ♢ω1.
Corollary 8.10**.**
(CH or ♢ω1) There is a consistent example of space X with a coarser second countable topology such that Cp(X) is not R-separable, but for every
countable dense subspace M⊂Cp(X), M is R-separable.
Proposition 8.11**.**
Every space of cardinality less than cov(M) is
projectively S1(Ω,Ω).
9 The projectively Sfin(Ω,Ω) property
In ([3], Theorem 2.2.2 in [2]) A.V. Arhangel’skii proved the following result
Theorem 9.1**.**
(A.V.Arhangel′skii)* For a space X, the
following are equivalent:*
-
Cp(X)* satisfies Sfin(Ω0,Ω0);*
2. 2.
(∀n∈N)* Xn satisfies Sfin(O,O).*
It is known (see [10]) that X satisfies Sfin(Ω,Ω) iff (∀n∈N) Xn satisfies
Sfin(O,O).
By Theorem 21 in [5] and Theorem 3.9 in [10], we
have a next result.
Theorem 9.2**.**
For a space X with a coarser second countable topology the
following are equivalent:
-
Cp(X)* satisfies Sfin(D,D);*
2. 2.
X* satisfies Sfin(Ω,Ω);*
3. 3.
(∀n∈N)* Xn∈Sfin(O,O);*
4. 4.
Cp(X)* satisfies Sfin(Ω0,Ω0);*
5. 5.
Cp(X)* satisfies Sfin(D,Ω0).*
Proposition 9.3**.**
The following conditions are equivalent for a
space X:
-
X* is projectively Sfin(Ω,Ω);*
2. 2.
X* satisfies Sfin(Ωczω,Ω);*
3. 3.
for every continuous mapping f:X↦Rω, f(X) is Sfin(Ω,Ω);
4. 4.
Cp(X)* satisfies Sfin(Ω0ω,Ω0).*
Proof.
By Theorem 4.3 in [23], each of the conditions
(1),(2),(4) are equivalent to the condition: for any sequence
Un={Un,m:m∈N} (n∈N)
of countable ω-covers of X consisting of cozero-sets in
X, there is some φ∈ωω such that
{Un,m:n∈N,m≤φ(n)} is an
ω-cover of X.
(3)⇒(1) follows from the fact that every second
countable space can be embedded into Rω.
∎
Definition 9.4**.**
A space X is Mω-separable if for every sequence (Dn:n∈N) of countable dense subspaces of X one can
select finite Fn⊂Dn so that ⋃{Fn:n∈N} is dense in X, i.e X satisfies
Sfin(Dω,D).
Theorem 9.5**.**
For a space X with a coarser second countable topology, the
following are equivalent:
-
Cp(X)* satisfies
Sfin(Dω,D);*
2. 2.
X* satisfies Sfin(Ωczω,Ω);*
3. 3.
Cp(X)* satisfies Sfin(Ω0ω,Ω0);*
4. 4.
Cp(X)* satisfies Sfin(Dω,Ω0);*
5. 5.
X* is projectively Sfin(Ω,Ω).*
Proposition 9.6**.**
Every space of cardinality less than d is
projectively Sfin(Ω,Ω).
10 The projectively S1(Γ,Ω) property
Recall that a set A in a space X is a Zσ-set in X,
if A=i=1⋃∞Fi where Fi is a zero-set
in X for each i∈N. A set B is a
CZσ-set in X, if X∖B is a Zσ-set
in X.
Definition 10.1**.**
A space X is called a z-space, if any
Zσ-set in X is a CZσ-set in X.
Note that if a perfectly normal space X is a z-space, then X
is a σ-space (every Fσ-set is a
Gδ-set).
Theorem 10.2**.**
For a z-space X, the following statements are
equivalent:
-
X* is projectively S1(Γ,Ω);*
2. 2.
X* satisfies S1(Γcz,Ω);*
3. 3.
X* satisfies S1(ΓF,Ω);*
4. 4.
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(Γ0,Ω0).*
Proof.
(1)⇒(2). Assume that X is projectively
S1(Γ,Ω). Let (Un:n∈N) be
a sequence of countable covers of X such that Un∈Γcz for each n∈N. For every n∈N and U∈Un, fix a continuous function
fU:X↦R such that
U=fU−1(R∖{0}). Put f=∏{fU:U∈Un,n∈N}. Then f is a continuous
mapping from X to Rω, and thus by (1),
Y=f(X) has the property S1(Γ,Ω). Put
Vn={f(U):U∈Un}. Then Vn
is an γ-cover of Y. Since Y has the property
S1(Γ,Ω), there is Hn∈Vn such that
{Hn:n∈N} is ω-cover of Y. Put
Fn=f−1(Hn). Then Fn∈Un, and {Fn:n∈N} is ω-cover of X.
(2)⇒(1). Let f:X↦Y be continuous mapping from
X onto a second countable space Y, and let (Un:n∈N) be a sequence of γ-covers of Y. Since
Y is second countable, there is a countable subcover
Wn⊂Vn. Put
On={f−1(W):W∈Wn}. Then
On is a countable γ-cover of X by cozero
sets. By (2), there is Hn∈On such that {Hn:n∈N} is ω-cover of X. For every n∈N, pick UH∈Un such that UH⊃f(H). Put F={UHn:n∈N}. Then
F is ω-cover of Y. This proves that Y has
the property S1(Γ,Ω).
(2)⇔(3). By Proposition 3.3 in [21].
(3)⇔(4). By Proposition 6.4 in [16].
∎
By Theorem 6.6 in [16] and Proposition 10.2, we have
the next result.
Theorem 10.3**.**
For a z-space X with a coarser second countable topology, the following
statements are equivalent:
-
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(S,D);*
2. 2.
X* satisfies S1(ΓF,Ω);*
3. 3.
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(Γ0,Ω0);*
4. 4.
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(S,Ω0);*
5. 5.
X* is projectively S1(Γ,Ω).*
Proposition 10.4**.**
Every space of cardinality less than d is
projectively S1(Γ,Ω).
11 The projectively Sfin(Γ,Ω) property
Proposition 11.1**.**
For a z-space X, the following statements are
equivalent:
-
X* is projectively Sfin(Γ,Ω);*
2. 2.
X* satisfies Sfin(Γcz,Ω);*
3. 3.
X* satisfies Sfin(ΓF,Ω);*
4. 4.
Cp(X)* satisfies Sfin(Γ0,Ω0).*
Proof.
Similar the proof in Proposition 10.2 and by Theorem 7.2 in
[16] and Theorem 76 in [4].
∎
By Theorem 7.2 in [16] and Proposition 11.1, we have
the next result.
Theorem 11.2**.**
For a z-space X with a coarser second countable topology, the following
statements are equivalent:
-
Cp(X)* satisfies Sfin(S,D);*
2. 2.
X* satisfies Sfin(ΓF,Ω);*
3. 3.
Cp(X)* satisfies Sfin(Γ0,Ω0);*
4. 4.
Cp(X)* satisfies Sfin(S,Ω0);*
5. 5.
X* is projectively Sfin(Γ,Ω).*
Proposition 11.3**.**
Every space of cardinality less than d is
projectively Sfin(Γ,Ω).
12 The projectively S1(Γ,Γ) property
In [21] (Theorem 2.5), M. Sakai proved:
Theorem 12.1**.**
(Sakai)* For a space X, the following statements are
equivalent:*
-
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(Γ0,Γ0);*
2. 2.
X* satisfies S1(CΓ,CΓ) and it is strongly
zero-dimensional.*
Theorem 12.2**.**
(Theorem 67 in [4]) The following properties
are equivalent for a space X:
-
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(Γ0,Γ0);*
2. 2.
X* satisfies S1(Γcz,Γ);*
3. 3.
X* is projectively S1(Γ,Γ).*
By Theorem 8.8 in [16] and Theorem 12.2, we have the
next result.
Theorem 12.3**.**
For a z-space X and X ⊨ V, the following statements are equivalent:
-
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(S,S);*
2. 2.
X* satisfies S1(ΓF,Γ);*
3. 3.
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(Γ0,Γ0);*
4. 4.
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(S,Γ0);*
5. 5.
X* is projectively S1(Γ,Γ);*
6. 6.
X* is projectively Sfin(Γ,Γ).*
Proposition 12.4**.**
Every space of cardinality less than b is
projectively S1(Γ,Γ).
13 The projectively Ufin(O,Ω) property
By Theorem 3.4 in [18], X satisfies
Ufin(O,Ω) if and only if X satisfies
Ufin(ΓF,Ω) and X is Lindelo¨f.
Theorem 13.1**.**
For a space X, the following statements are
equivalent:
-
X* is projectively Ufin(O,Ω);*
2. 2.
X* satisfies Ufin(Oczω,Ω);*
3. 3.
X* satisfies Ufin(ΓF,Ω).*
Proof.
(1)⇒(2). Assume that X is projectively
Ufin(O,Ω). Let (Un:n∈N) be a sequence of countable covers of X by cozero
sets. For every n∈N and U∈Un, fix a
continuous function fU:X↦R such that
U=fU−1(R∖{0}). Put f=∏{fU:U∈Un,n∈N}. Then f is a continuous
mapping from X to Rω, and thus by (1),
Y=f(X) has the property Ufin(O,Ω). Put
Vn={f(U):U∈Un}. Then Vn
is an open cover of Y. Since Y has the property
Ufin(O,Ω), there are finite subfamilies
Hn⊂Vn such that ⋃{Hn:n∈N} is ω-cover of Y. Put
Fn={f−1(H):H∈Hn}. Then
Fn is a finite subfamily of Un, and
⋃{Fn:n∈N} is ω-cover of
X.
(2)⇒(1). Let f:X↦Y be continuous mapping from
X onto a second countable space Y, and let (Un:n∈N) be a sequence of open covers of Y. Since Y
is Lindelo¨f, there is a countable subcover
Wn⊂Vn. Put
On={f−1(W):W∈Wn}. Then
On is a countable cover of X by cozero sets. By
(2), there are finite subfamilies Hn⊂On such that ⋃{Hn:n∈N} is ω-cover of X. For every n∈N and every H∈Hn, pick UH∈Un such that UH⊃f(H). Put
Fn={UH:H∈Hn}. Then Fn
is a finite subfamily of Un, and ⋃{Fn:n∈N} is ω-cover of Y.
This proves that Y has the property Ufin(O,Ω).
(2)⇔(3). Proved analogously to the proof of
Theorem 5.4.
∎
By Theorem 13.1, Theorem 3.1 in [18] we have the
next result.
Theorem 13.2**.**
For a space X, the following statements are
equivalent:
-
Cp(X)* satisfies Ffin(Γ0,Ω0);*
2. 2.
X* satisfies Ufin(ΓF,Ω).*
3. 3.
X* is projectively Ufin(O,Ω);*
4. 4.
X* satisfies Ufin(Oczω,Ω).*
By Theorem 13.1, Theorem 3.3 in [18] and Theorem
13.2 we have the next result.
Theorem 13.3**.**
Let X be a space with a coarser second countable topology. Then the following statements are equivalent:
-
Cp(X)* satisfies Sfin(S,wD);*
2. 2.
X* satisfies Ufin(ΓF,Ω);*
3. 3.
Cp(X)* satisfies Sfin(Γ0,wΩ0);*
4. 4.
Cp(X)* satisfies Sfin(S,wΩ0);*
5. 5.
X* is projectively Ufin(O,Ω);*
6. 6.
X* satisfies Ufin(Oczω,Ω).*
Proposition 13.4**.**
Every space of cardinality less than d is
projectively Ufin(O,Ω).
14 The projectively S1(Γ,O) property
Similarly to the proof of Theorem 10.2 we have the next
result.
Proposition 14.1**.**
For a z-space X, the following statements are
equivalent:
-
X* is projectively S1(Γ,O);*
2. 2.
X* satisfies S1(Γcz,O);*
3. 3.
X* satisfies S1(ΓF,O);*
4. 4.
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(Γ0,D0[1]).*
Theorem 14.2**.**
For a z-space X with a coarser second countable topology, the following
statements are equivalent:
-
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(S,D[1]);*
2. 2.
X* satisfies S1(ΓF,O);*
3. 3.
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(Γ0,D0[1]);*
4. 4.
Cp(X)* satisfies S1(S,O0);*
5. 5.
X* is projectively S1(Γ,O).*
Proposition 14.3**.**
Every space of cardinality less than d is
projectively S1(Γ,O).
We can summarize the relationships between considered notions in
next diagrams.
Fig. 2. The Diagram of selectors for sequences of dense
(1-dense) sets of Cp(X).
Fig. 3. The Diagram of projective selection principles for a space
X (with corresponding conditions) corresponding to selectors for
sequences of dense sets of Cp(X).
15 Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank the referee for their careful
reading of this paper.