Stellar population synthesis of galaxies with chemical evolution model
Shiyin Shen, Jun Yin

TL;DR
This paper introduces a chemical evolution model to improve the accuracy of stellar population analysis in galaxies by addressing the age-metallicity degeneracy, linking metallicity history with star formation history.
Contribution
It integrates a chemical evolution model into stellar population fitting to better constrain galaxy star formation histories.
Findings
Successfully tested on local dwarf galaxies
Improves constraints on star formation histories
Links metallicity evolution with star formation
Abstract
The derivation of accurate stellar populations of galaxies is a non-trivial task because of the well-known age-metallicity degeneracy. We aim to break this degeneracy by invoking a chemical evolution model(CEM) for isolated disk galaxy, where its metallicity enrichment history(MEH) is modelled to be tightly linked to its star formation history(SFH). Our CEM has been successfully tested on several local group dwarf galaxies whose SFHs and MEHs have been both independently measured from deep color-magnitude diagrams of individual stars. By introducing the CEM into the stellar population fitting algorithm as a prior, we expect that the SFH of galaxies could be better constrained.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Stellar population synthesis of galaxies with chemical evolution model
Shiyin Shen1,2
Jun Yin1
1 Key Laboratory for Research in Galaxies and Cosmology, Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 80 Nandan Road, Shanghai, 200030, China
2Key Lab for Astrophysics, Shanghai, 200234, China;
email: [email protected]
(2019)
Abstract
The derivation of accurate stellar populations of galaxies is a non-trivial task because of the well-known age-metallicity degeneracy. We aim to break this degeneracy by invoking a chemical evolution model(CEM) for isolated disk galaxy, where its metallicity enrichment history(MEH) is modelled to be tightly linked to its star formation history(SFH). Our CEM has been successfully tested on several local group dwarf galaxies whose SFHs and MEHs have been both independently measured from deep color-magnitude diagrams of individual stars. By introducing the CEM into the stellar population fitting algorithm as a prior, we expect that the SFH of galaxies could be better constrained.
keywords:
galaxies: stellar content,galaxies: evolution, galaxies: abundances
††volume: 341††journal: Challenges in Panchromatic Galaxy Modelling with Next Generation Facilities††editors: M. Boquien, E. Lusso, C. Gruppioni, and P. Tissera.
1 Introduction
Star formation history(SFH), i.e. the amount of stars formed in galaxies as function of time, is one of the elements that describes galaxy evolution. Stars are formed from cool phase gas and then evolved stars return metals into the interstellar medium(ISM). ISM cools and new generation of stars formed. Among this circle, SFH is the key factor that links the gas cooling and metallicity enrichment history(MEH) of galaxies.
However, recovering SFH of galaxies is difficult([Conroy 2013]). For very nearby galaxy, the deep color-magnitude diagram(CMD) reaching the turn-off stars is known as the only direct and most reliable method that can recover both of its detailed SFH and MEH. For galaxy at larger distance with only integrated stellar light observed, stellar population synthesis methods have been developed and used to fit its spectral energy distribution(SED) . In an idealized case, the SED of a galaxy can be viewed as a composition of single stellar populations(SSPs) with different ages and metallicities. However, because of the very similarities of the old SSPs( Gyr) and the age-metallicity degeneracy among SSPs, the recovering of the detailed weights of each SSPs, especially for those with age older than 1 Gyr, is very difficult. In reality, the observables are further complicated by many other details, e.g. stellar kinematics, ionized gas emissions, central AGNs, dust attenuation and emission etc. Therefore, typically, only the first order description of the SFH, e.g. the average age or the fraction of young stellar population( Gyr), rather than its detailed shape, could be reliably derived from the observed SEDs of galaxies.
2 Recovering detailed SFH
In popular SED fitting algorithms(e.g. STARLIGHT, [Cid Fernandes et al. 2005]), the ages and metallicties of SSPs are considered as independent parameters. To recover a detailed SFH and MEH of a galaxy, a library of SSPs with different ages and metallicities is first built, then the best combinations of these SSPs are searched in the huge library space. However, because of the age-metallicity degeneracy, the recovering of the SSP weights from SED is an ill-posed problem.
To show this problem more intuitively, we make a mock galaxy spectrum and test how good a full spectrum fitting can recover its SFH and MEH. We take the SFH and MEH of the LMC bar region, which are derived from deep CMD fitting([Ruiz-Lara et al. 2015]) and are shown as the solid circles in Fig. 1, to build the mock spectrum. We use SSPs from MILES library ([Falcón-Barroso et al., 2011]) to generate the mock spectrum in the wavelength range with resolution and S/N=50 per pixel. For simplicity, we neither consider the kinematics of stellar populations nor reshape the spectrum with dust attenuation.
For this idealized case, whether can we recover the input SFH and MEH accurately using a full spectrum fitting? We take the same MILES SSP library and use a Monte Carlo Markov Chain to probe the full age and metallicity space and search for the best solution. The resulted SFH and MEH, converted from the likelihood distributions of SSP weights, are shown as the red squares in each panel of Fig. 1. As can be seen, the full spectrum fitting algorithm can not give a good constraint on either MEH or SFH.
Is an accurate MEH knowledge helpful to recover the accurate SFH? To test this idea, we set the metallicities of the different age SSPs to follow the input MEH(the blue circles in the bottom panel of Fig. 1). We then make the full spectrum fitting again. Now, we only need to probe the weights of the SSPs in age space. The resulted SFH is shown as the green crosses in the top panel of Fig. 1. As can be seen, when MEH is known as a prior, the SFH is recovered with much better accuracy.
Fig. 1 shows that the prior information on the MEH, which breaks the age-metallicity degeneracy, is a key factor to recover the accurate SFH of galaxies. Actually, the importance of the prior information on SFH or MEH have already been explored by many SED fitting codes. For example, the code STECKMAP([Ocvirk et al. 2006]) allows a penalization of the best fitting with an assumed MEH. However, a realistic MEH needs physical justification. That is the chemical evolution model we will discuss next.
3 Chemical evolution model
We consider galaxy as a pool of stars and gas. At any given time, there are both inflow and outflow of gas into the pool. The inflow gas is primordial, i.e. with zero metallicity. Stars formed from gas, and died stars return enriched gas into the pool. Some of the enriched gas makes up of the outflows.
We write the time dependent star formation rate(SFR), gas inflow and outflow rate as , and respectively. Stars are born from gas pool following the initial mass function(IMF).We assume that the massive stars() die immediately and return gas into the pool, while the low mass stars() have infinite lifetime. For the classical Salpter IMF, the gas return fraction is . Thus, the change rate of gas in pool is
[TABLE]
On the other hand, the surface star formation rate density of a galaxy is known to be tightly correlated with its surface gas density , i.e. the well-known Kennicutt-Schmidt relation, ([Kennicutt, 1998]). For gas outflow, we assume it is driven by supernova explosion so that it is proportional to SFR and inversely correlated with the potential well of a galaxy,
[TABLE]
where is the circular velocity of galaxy halo, and is the wind efficiency.
The evolution of metallicity is a balance between the star formation and metal outflow, which is written as
[TABLE]
where is the yield and we take .
With above equations (3.1 to 3.3), once with structure parameters(to convert gas mass to surface density), for any given of a galaxy, we can predict both its and gas inflow/outflow histories.
4 Test on LCID galaxies
We test above CEM with LCID galaxies([Gallart, 2007]), whose detailed SFHs and MEHs have been obtained using deep CMDs from HST. As an example, we take the SFHs of three different type LCID galaxies, Tucana(dSph), LGS-3(dTran), IC 1613(dIrr), and predict their from the above CEM. We calculate their average surface densities inside the half-light radii and use their stellar masses to estimate the circular velocities. The wind efficacy is set to be in all the cases. The results are shown in Fig. 2. As can be seen, for all three different galaxies, our CEM reproduces their MEHs from SFHs quite well.
5 Conclusion
Encouraged by Fig. 2, we believe that our CEM can be used to break the age-metallicity degeneracy in stellar population synthesis studies. Specifically, we may start from the SED fitting with both SFH and MEH free. New MEH then is predicted from preliminary SFH using CEM. With several iterations, a self-consistent SFH and MEH would be finally obtained. We expect that this algorithm would reduce the uncertainties of the final SFH estimation, and is proper for isolated disk galaxies.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[Cid Fernandes et al. 2005] Cid Fernandes R., Mateus A., Sodré L., et al., 2005, MNRAS, 358, 363
- 2[Conroy 2013] Conroy C. 2013, ARA&A , 51, 393
- 3[Falcón-Barroso et al., 2011] Falcón-Barroso J., Sánchez-Blázquez P., Vazdekis, A. et al., 2011, A&A, 532, A 95
- 4[Gallart, 2007] Gallart C. 2007, Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, 2
- 5[Kennicutt, 1998] Kennicutt R. C. 1998, ARA&A, 36, 189
- 6[Ruiz-Lara et al. 2015] Ruiz-Lara T., Pérez I., Gallart C., Alloin D., Monelli M., Koleva et al., 2015, A&A, 583, A 60
- 7[Ocvirk et al. 2006] Ocvirk P., Pichon C., Lançon A., Thiébaut E., 2006, MNRAS, 365, 74
