Informing Artificial Intelligence Generative Techniques using Cognitive Theories of Human Creativity
Steve DiPaola, Liane Gabora, and Graeme McCaig

TL;DR
This paper explores integrating cognitive theories of human creativity into AI generative models, demonstrating how concepts like honing theory and intrinsic motivation can enhance computational art, and vice versa.
Contribution
It presents a novel synthesis of deep learning and cognitive theories, showing how human creativity models can improve AI-generated art and inform psychological understanding.
Findings
Implementation of honing theory and intrinsic motivation in generative art
Impact of cognitive concepts on the quality of AI-generated outputs
Cross-fertilization ideas between AI creativity and psychology
Abstract
The common view that our creativity is what makes us uniquely human suggests that incorporating research on human creativity into generative deep learning techniques might be a fruitful avenue for making their outputs more compelling and human-like. Using an original synthesis of Deep Dream-based convolutional neural networks and cognitive based computational art rendering systems, we show how honing theory, intrinsic motivation, and the notion of a 'seed incident' can be implemented computationally, and demonstrate their impact on the resulting generative art. Conversely, we discuss how explorations in deep learn-ing convolutional neural net generative systems can inform our understanding of human creativity. We conclude with ideas for further cross-fertilization between AI based computational creativity and psychology of creativity.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
