# Joint Entity Extraction and Assertion Detection for Clinical Text

**Authors:** Parminder Bhatia, Busra Celikkaya, Mohammed Khalilia

arXiv: 1812.05270 · 2020-01-23

## TL;DR

This paper introduces an end-to-end neural model that jointly extracts clinical entities and detects negations, significantly improving performance over previous rule-based and machine learning systems.

## Contribution

The authors propose a novel multi-task neural architecture with shared encoders and decoders, including a Conditional Softmax Shared Decoder, for joint entity extraction and negation detection in clinical text.

## Key findings

- Achieves state-of-the-art results on i2b2/VA dataset.
- Outperforms previous rule-based and ML systems.
- Effective in low-resource clinical settings.

## Abstract

Negative medical findings are prevalent in clinical reports, yet discriminating them from positive findings remains a challenging task for information extraction. Most of the existing systems treat this task as a pipeline of two separate tasks, i.e., named entity recognition (NER) and rule-based negation detection. We consider this as a multi-task problem and present a novel end-to-end neural model to jointly extract entities and negations. We extend a standard hierarchical encoder-decoder NER model and first adopt a shared encoder followed by separate decoders for the two tasks. This architecture performs considerably better than the previous rule-based and machine learning-based systems. To overcome the problem of increased parameter size especially for low-resource settings, we propose the Conditional Softmax Shared Decoder architecture which achieves state-of-art results for NER and negation detection on the 2010 i2b2/VA challenge dataset and a proprietary de-identified clinical dataset.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.05270/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.05270/full.md

## References

26 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.05270/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.05270