$\rm ^3_{\Lambda}H$ and $\rm ^3_{\overline \Lambda}\overline H$ production and characterization in Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm{NN}}}=200$GeV
Feng Xian Liu, Gang Chen, Zhi Lei She, Liang Zheng, Yi Long Xie, Zi, Jian Dong, Dai Mei Zhou, Ben Hao Sa

TL;DR
This study investigates the production and characteristics of hypertriton and anti-hypertriton nuclei in Cu+Cu collisions at 200 GeV, revealing that their yields increase with collision centrality and suggesting the formation of deconfined quark matter.
Contribution
It introduces a combined use of the coalescence and PACIAE models to analyze hypernuclei production in Cu+Cu collisions at high energy.
Findings
Yields of light nuclei and hypernuclei increase with collision centrality.
Anti-particle to particle ratios remain constant across centralities.
Strangeness population factor S_3 is close to unity, indicating similar phase-space populations for strange and light quarks.
Abstract
Production of the (anti)hypertriton nuclei and in Cu+Cu interactions at GeV is studied at three centrality bins of 0-10\%, 10-30\% and 30-60\% using the dynamically constrained phase-space coalescence model together with [PACIAE] model simulations. The and nuclei has been compared. It is indicated by the study that the yields of light nuclei and hypernuclei increase rapidly from peripheral to central collisions while their anti-particle to particle ratios keep unchanged for different centrality bins. The strangeness population factor was found to be close to unity, and was compatible with the STAR data and theoretical model calculation, suggesting that the phase-space population of strange quarks…
| Centrality | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PACIAE | 103.4 | 67.9 | 28.4 | |
| STAR | ||||
| p | PACIAE | |||
| STAR | ||||
| PACIAE | ||||
| STAR | ||||
| PACIAE | ||||
| STAR | 4.680.45 | 2.670.27 | 1.060.11 | |
| PACIAE | ||||
| STAR | 3.790.37 | 2.180.23 | 0.880.09 |
| Nucleus type | STAR | PACIAE0-10 | PACIAE10-30 | PACIAE30-60 |
| a calculated with MeV for , ; and MeV for , , , . | ||||
| Ratio | STAR | PACIAE(0-10%) | PACIAE(10-30%) | PACIAE(30-60%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.800.04 | ||||
| 0.820.12 | ||||
| 0.840.09 | ||||
| 0.830.08 |
| Centrality | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-10% | |||||
| PACIAE+DCPC | 10-30% | ||||
| 30-60% | |||||
| STAR | 0-80% | ||||
| Melting AMPT+Coal. | 0-80% |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
and production
and characterization in Cu+Cu collisions at GeV
Feng-Xian Liu1,2, Gang Chen1,2111Corresponding Author: [email protected], Zhi-Lei She1,2, Liang Zheng2, Yi-Long Xie2, Zi-Jian Dong2, Dai-Mei Zhou4 and Ben-Hao Sa3,4
1Institute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
2School of Mathematics and Physics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
3 China Institute of Atomic Energy, P.O. Box 275 (10), Beijing 102413, China.
4 Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China.
Abstract
Production of the (anti)hypertriton nuclei and in Cu+Cu interactions at GeV is studied at three centrality bins of 0-10%, 10-30% and 30-60% using the dynamically constrained phase-space coalescence model together with PACIAE model simulations. The and nuclei has been compared. It is indicated by the study that the yields of light nuclei and hypernuclei increase rapidly from peripheral to central collisions while their anti-particle to particle ratios keep unchanged for different centrality bins. The strangeness population factor was found to be close to unity, and was compatible with the STAR data and theoretical model calculation, suggesting that the phase-space population of strange quarks is similar with the ones of light quarks and the creation of deconfined high temperature quark matter in Cu+Cu collisions.
pacs:
25.75.-q, 24.85.+p, 24.10.Lx
I Introduction
The collisions of high-energy heavy-ion can recreate the condition similar to that of the universe microseconds after the Big Bang and produce abundant nuclei and anti-nuclei in this process star . Thus, high-energy heavy-ion collisions provide us a unique opportunity to study and understand the production and property of nuclei and anti-nuclei under the extreme energy conditions. Additionally, during the creation of deconfined quark gluon matter, the strange quark production is predicted to be largely enhanced due to thermal equilibrium, providing an important tool to produce light (anti-)hyper-nuclei andr .
Since Marian Danysz and Jerzy Pniewski made the first observation of the hyper-nucleus in a nuclear emulsion cosmic ray detector in 1952 dany , it opened a new field, called hyper-nuclear physics, extending the research scope of nuclear physics from the two-dimensional space of neutrons and protons to the three-dimensional space including the hyperons. Hypernucleus contains nucleon and hyperon (). Hyperons are usually unstable particles with at least one strange quark in its valence components.
Hypertriton () is the lightest hypernucleus, which contains a hyperon , and two nucleons proton plus neutron. Since the first was observed, several hypernuclei have been found, nevertheless, no anti-hypernucleus has ever been discovery until the observation of the anti-hypertriton () by the STAR collaboration at Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) in 2010 abel . Hypernuclear physics is used to provide fascinating and fundamental information about not only the interaction between the hyperon and the baryon(YN) or the hyperon and the hyperon (YY), but also the influence caused by the hyperon motion when it enters the nucleus. These interactions are related to nuclear astrophysics and nuclear physics, such as the formation of the neutron stars weber ; heise ; vida ; lona . The productions of hyper-nuclei and several anti-hyper-nuclei have been studied in heavy-ion collisions for many years, as mentioned earlier, for a review see Refs. braun ; e864 ; ma1 ; ma2 ; ma3 ; ma4 ; ma5 and references therein.
In this paper, the parton and hadron cascade model(PACIAE) sa is used to simulate the production of (anti)nucleon () and (anti)hyperon () in Cu+Cu collisions at GeV, and to analyze their yields at mid-rapidity (). These yields are compared with experimental data from the STAR collaboration agga ; agak ; star1 to fix the model parameters. Then, a dynamically constrained phase-space coalescence model(DCPC) Yan ; chen ; chen1 is used to study the production and properties of light (anti-)nuclei clusters. We expect that their yields in Cu+Cu collisions may provide some information about the nature of the and .
II Models
The PACIAE sa is based on PYTHIA 6.4 and designed for various collision types ranging from e+e, p+p, p+A to A+A collisions. In general, PACIAE has four main physics stages consisting of the parton initiation, parton rescattering, hadronization, and hadron rescattering. The parton initiation is the first stage in which the nucleus-nucleus collision is decomposed into the nucleon-nucleon (NN) collisions according to the collision geometry and NN total cross section. The strings created in the NN collisions will break up into free partons leading to the formation of the deconfined quark gluon matter. After the parton initiation stage, the decomposed partons rescatter on each other based on the 2 2 LO-pQCD parton-parton cross sections comb . Then, the hadronization proceeds throught the Lund string fragmentation model sjo or the phenomenological coalescence model sa . The final stage is the hadron rescattering process happened between the created hadrons until the hadronic freeze-out sa .
We calculate the production of light (anti)nuclei and (anti)hypernuclei with the dynamically constrained phase-space coalescence model (DCPC). The DCPC model has been studied and used in several collision systems, such as Au+Au chen ; chen1 ; chen2 ; dong , Pb+Pb chen3 , p+p collisions pana . We can obtain the yield of a single particle using the following integral
[TABLE]
where and present the Hamiltonian and energy of the particle, respectively. Then we can also know the yield of N particles calculated by the integral
[TABLE]
This equation, however, has to meet the constraint conditions as follows:
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
and (i=1, 2, … , N) denote the energies and momenta of particles. and respectively represent the rest mass and the allowed mass uncertainty. stands for the diameter of (anti)nuclei and (anti)hypernuclei, and presents the vector distance between particle and particle . Here, the diameters are calculated by , so we choose and then get fm for (), (), () in the model, respectively e864 ; sa ; ham ; yasu .
III Results and discussion
First the final state particles are produced by the PACIAE model. In the PACIAE simulations, we assume that the hyperons heavier than are already decayed before the creation of hyper-nuclei. The model parameters are selected appropriately to fit the STAR data of p, , and in Cu+Cu collisions at GeV for different centrality bins of 0-10%, 10-30% and 30-60%, as shown in Table I, where the yields of particles are calculated with the and GeV/c for p and , and and GeV/c for the and . The participants and corresponding experimental data agga ; agak ; star1 are also presented in Table I. It can be seen from Table I that the yields of particles (p, , and ) all decrease rapidly with the increase of centrality, and the PACIAE model results agree with the STAR data within uncertainties.
Figure 1 shows the transverse momentum distributions of p and (open symbols) at the mid-rapidity for different centralities Cu+Cu collisions at GeV measured by PACIAE model. The solid symbols in this figure are the experimental data taken from Ref. agga . Obviously, one can see from Fig.1 that the transverse momentum distributions of particles (p and ) calculated by PACIAE model are compatible with the STAR data.
In the following, the nucleon and hyperon produced within PACIAE are used as input of the DCPC model. We generate 100 million minimum bias events for Cu+Cu collisions at GeV with the PACIAE model. Then we obtain the integrated yields dN/dy for light nuclei and hypernuclei with and GeV/c for the centrality bins of 0-10%, 10-30% and 30-60%, respectively. Figure 2 compares their average yield per event at mid-rapidity for central (0-10%) Cu+Cu collisions at GeV with varying from 0.3 to 3 MeV. We find that ln(dN/dy) increase linearly with ln. The behaviors of integrated yields dN/dy of light nuclei and hypernuclei are found to be similar.
Table II demonstrates the integrated yields dN/dy of (), (), () calculated by PACIAE+DCPC model in 0-10%, 10-30% and 30-60% centrality classes Cu+Cu collisions of GeV. Here the appropriate parameters are fixed to be MeV for (), and MeV for , , and . The experimental data are taken from STAR Collaboration zhou . Meanwhile, the PACIAE+DCPC model results are comparable to that of the experimental data within the current statistical errors.
In the heavy-ion collisions, production mechanism is generated through hadron coalescence due to final-state correlations between particles. The ratios of particle yields can be predicted by the coalescence model, which have been checked for various particle species. For instance, the CERN SPS has found that the production of nuclei in Pb+Pb collisions at GeV is consistent with a coalescence picture na52 .
Theoretically, the ratios of different (anti)nuclei and (anti)hypernuclei can be directly related to ratios of hadronic yields in the simple coalescence framework cley ; xue . E.g. if the and are formed by coalescence of () and (), then the yield ratio of should be proportional to ()()(), and the other ratios are the same. The ratios can be written as following:
[TABLE]
and mixed ratios:
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
The ratios , and calculated by PACIAE+DCPC model with and GeV/c, as a function of the , as shown in Fig.3. It is clear that the ratios are close to 0.5 for almost all the mass uncertainty () range. The ratios of anti-nuclei to nuclei are independent of , although their integrated yield dN/dy has a strong dependence on as shown in Fig.2.
Table III represents ratios of anti-particles to corresponding particles (, , , , ) and their mixed ratios (, , , , , ) for the centrality bins of 0-10%, 10-30% and 30-60% in Cu+Cu collisions at GeV, where, , are calculated with MeV and , , , with MeV. The result with centrality bin of 0-10% is drawn in Fig.4. We can see from Table III, the yield ratios of , , , , and their mixed ratios , , , , , are all independent of the centrality bin, although their yields decrease rapidly with the centrality as shown in Table I and Table II. The ratio of the (anti)hypertriton to (anti)nuclei (, , , ) are less than 1, which means that the yield of (anti)hypertriton is less than that of (anti)nuclei.
Table III and Fig.4 show that the ratios of the (anti)hypernuclei to (anti)nuclei (,, , ), as Eqs.(6)-(10) predict, are compatible to the ratio of hyperon to proton within uncertainties. The simulation results in our model are found to be in agreement with the experimental data from STAR (0-80% centrality) Au+Au collisions at GeV abel ; agga ; agak . Furthermore, the model predictions of , and are also presented in Fig.4.
The strangeness population factor for light nuclei in a naive coalescence model, should be a value near unity, as the Ref. e864 shows. The ratio is sensitive to the local baryon-strangeness correlation koch ; maju ; mcheng ; adams ; braun1 ; gavai , hence it can provide a possible chance to study the nature of matter created in the collision sato ; zhang . The values obtained by the PACIAE+DCPC model for different centrality bins of 0-10%, 10-30% and 30-60% are shown in Fig.5 and Table IV. These values are compared with theoretical model zhang and the data from STAR abel .
The models used for the comparison are the string melting of the AMPT (A Multi-Phase Transport Model for Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions) AMPT plus coalescence described in Ref. zhang . The present results in Cu+Cu collisions at GeV show the values of close to unity, indicating that the phase-space populations for strange and light quarks are similar implying the high-temperature deconfined quarks can be formed in Cu+Cu collisions. These results are also consistent with the STAR experiment abel and the AMPT with string melting plus coalescence model in Au+Au collisions at GeV within uncertainties.
IV Conclusion
In the paper, we have used the PACIAE model to simulate Cu+Cu collisions at a center-of-mass energy GeV. The obtained yields of final state particles , , n, , and within PACIAE model are in very good agreement with experimental data from STAR. The , , n, , and are used as input for the DCPC model to construct , , , , and clusters through coalescence. A comparison between , and , , , in Cu+Cu collisions at GeV for three centrality classes(0-10%, 10-30% and 30-60%) has been presented.
The results show that yields of , , , and decrease rapidly with the increase of centrality bins, but their yield ratios are independent of centrality, which is consistent with the STAR experimental data. The ratios of the (anti)hypertriton to (anti)nuclei(, , , ) are less than 1, which means that the yield of (anti)hyper-triton is less than that of (anti)nuclei. The strangeness population factor for matter and anti-matter with the tritium and helium-3 is measured to be close to unity, which is compatible with the STAR data and the AMPT with string melting plus coalescence model, suggesting that the phase-space population of strange is similar with the ones of light quarks and support the generation of high-temperature matter of deconfined quarks. The yields and yield ratios of (), and in Cu+Cu collisions at GeV, are first predicted with the theoretical model.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The financial support from NSFC (11475149) is acknowledged, and supported by the high-performance computing platform of China University of Geosciences. The authors thank PH.D. Huan Chen and Wei Dai for helpful discussions.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1(1) Agakishiev. H et al., (STAR collaboration). Nature 473 , 353-356(2011).
- 2(2) A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, J. Stachel, H. Stocker., Phys. Lett. B 697 ,203-207(2011), ar Xiv:1010.2995 [nucl-th].
- 3(3) M. Danysz and J. Pniewski., Philos. Mag. 44 ,348(1953).
- 4(4) Abelev, B. I. et al., Science 328 , 58-62(2010).
- 5(5) F. Weber, R. Negreiros, P. Rosenfield, A.T.i. Cuadrat., AIP Conf. Proc. 892 , 515-517(2007), ar Xiv:astro-ph/0612132.
- 6(6) H. Heiselberg., Phases of dense matter in neutron stars. ar Xiv:astro-ph/9910200.
- 7(7) I. Vidana., Nucl. Phys. A 914 ,367-376(2013).
- 8(8) D. Lonardoni, F. Pederiva, S. Gandolfi., J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 529 ,012012(2014), ar Xiv:1408.4492 [nucl-th].
