Two Orders of Magnitude Variation in the Star Formation Efficiency Across the Pre-Merger Galaxy NGC 2276
Neven Tomicic, Annie Hughes, Kathryn Kreckel, Florent Renaud, Jerome, Pety, Eva Schinnerer, Toshiki Saito, Miguel Querejeta, Christopher Faesi,, Santiago Garcia-Burillo

TL;DR
This study provides spatially resolved measurements of star formation efficiency in NGC 2276, revealing a 1-1.5 dex variation across the galaxy's disk, influenced by tidal forces and ram pressure, highlighting the impact of interactions on molecular gas and star formation.
Contribution
First spatially resolved study of molecular gas depletion time in NGC 2276, showing large variations driven by galactic interactions, not previously observed in pre-merger systems.
Findings
Depletion time varies by 1-1.5 dex across the galaxy
Abrupt drop in depletion time along the western edge
Variation decreases when using a metallicity-dependent X_CO factor
Abstract
We present the first spatially resolved (~0.5 kpc) measurements of the molecular gas depletion time across the disk of the interacting spiral galaxy NGC\,2276, a system with an asymmetric morphology in various SFR tracers. To estimate , we use new NOEMA observations of the CO(1-0) emission tracing the bulk molecular gas reservoir in NGC 2276, and extinction-corrected H measurements obtained with the PMAS/PPaK integral field unit for robust estimates of the SFR. We find a systematic decrease in of 1-1.5 dex across the disk of NGC 2276, with a further, abrupt drop in of ~1 dex along the galaxy's western edge. The global in NGC 2776 is Gyr, insistent with literature measurements for the nearby galaxy population. Such a large range in on sub-kpc scales has never previously…
| Parameter | Value | Reference |
| RA | Peak in | |
| DEC | Peak in | |
| Systematic velocity [km/s] | 2416 | Emission lines. |
| Distance [Mpc] | 35.52.5 | NED111https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/, Ackermann et al. (2012) |
| Scale [pc/arcsec] | 17010 | |
| Intergalactic medium density (IGM) | Mulchaey et al. (1993); Rasmussen et al. (2006) | |
| Projected distance from NGC 2300 [km/s] | 7515 | Rasmussen et al. (2006) |
| of NGC 2300 | 11.3 | From K-band, and from 3.4 m and 4.6 m (WISE) (using Querejeta et al. 2015) |
| Line of sight velocity relative to IGM [km/s] | 300 | Rasmussen et al. (2006) |
| Inclination | From radial velocities and radial stellar profile | |
| R25 [kpc] | 67 | HyperLeda222http://leda.univ-lyon1.fr/ |
| 10.70.2 | From 3.4 m and 4.6 m (WISE) (using Querejeta et al. 2015) | |
| 9.80.05 | From estimated in this paper | |
| 9.8 | Rasmussen et al. (2006) | |
| 0.13 | ||
| From IRAS; Sanders et al. (2003) | ||
| 175 | From the integrated spectra | |
| From FUV and 22 m maps | ||
| Literature (Wolter et al. 2015, Kennicutt 1983). |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Two Orders of Magnitude Variation in the Star Formation Efficiency Across the Pre-Merger Galaxy NGC 2276
Neven Tomičić
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (MPIA), Königstuhl 17, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany
Annie Hughes
Université de Toulouse, UPS-OMP, 31028 Toulouse, France
CNRS, IRAP, Av. du Colonel Roche BP 44346, 31028 Toulouse cedex 4, France
Kathryn Kreckel
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (MPIA), Königstuhl 17, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany
Florent Renaud
Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics, Lund Observatory, Box 43, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden
Jérôme Pety
IRAM, 300 rue de la Piscine, F-38406 Saint Martin d’Héres, France
Eva Schinnerer
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (MPIA), Königstuhl 17, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany
Toshiki Saito
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (MPIA), Königstuhl 17, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany
Miguel Querejeta
European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild Strasse 2, D-85748 Garching bei München, Germany
Observatorio Astronómico Nacional (OAN), C/Alfonso XII 3, Madrid E-28014, Spain
Christopher M. Faesi
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (MPIA), Königstuhl 17, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany
Santiago Garcia-Burillo
Observatorio Astronómico Nacional, Aptdo 1143, 28800 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
Observatorio Astronómico Nacional (OAN), C/Alfonso XII 3, Madrid E-28014, Spain
Abstract
We present the first spatially resolved ( kpc) measurements of the molecular gas depletion time across the disk of the interacting spiral galaxy NGC 2276, a system with an asymmetric morphology in various SFR tracers. To estimate , we use new NOEMA observations of the 12CO(1-0) emission tracing the bulk molecular gas reservoir in NGC 2276, and extinction-corrected H measurements obtained with the PMAS/PPaK integral field unit for robust estimates of the SFR. We find a systematic decrease in of 1-1.5 dex across the disk of NGC 2276, with a further, abrupt drop in of 1 dex along the galaxy’s western edge. The global in NGC 2776 is Gyr, consistent with literature measurements for the nearby galaxy population. Such a large range in on sub-kpc scales has never previously been observed within an individual isolated or pre-merger system. When using a metallicity-dependent molecular gas conversion factor XCO the variation decreases by 0.5 dex. We attribute the variation in to the influence of galactic-scale tidal forces and ram pressure on NGC 2276’s molecular interstellar medium (ISM). Our observations add to the growing body of numerical and observational evidence that galaxy-galaxy interactions significantly modify the molecular gas properties and star-forming activity within galactic disks throughout the interaction, and not just during the final merger phase.
Subject headings:
galaxies: ISM — galaxies: star formation — galaxies: individual (NGC 2276)
1. Introduction
Star formation (SF) is a key process in the evolution of galaxies, affecting both their stellar populations and the properties of their interstellar medium (ISM). The Star Formation Rate (SFR) and the bulk molecular gas (H2) correlate well in nearby galaxies, both locally (e.g. Bigiel et al. 2008; Leroy et al. 2013) and globally (e.g. Kennicutt 1998). The ratio between the H2 mass and SFR yields the depletion time of the H2, i.e. the time needed to deplete the molecular gas reservoir assuming that the current SFR is constant, . A characteristic of 1-2 Gyr is observed for local normal star-forming disk galaxies on the main-sequence (Saintonge et al. 2011; Leroy et al. 2013). Surveys of nearby galaxies show a scatter in of dex at galactic and sub-galactic scales (Saintonge et al. 2011; Leroy et al. 2013). However, interacting starburst galaxies (Klaas et al. 2010; Nehlig et al. 2016; Saito et al. 2016) and ultra-luminous infrared galaxies (LIRGs, ULIRGS; Saintonge et al. 2011; Martinez-Badenes et al. 2012) exhibit a lower systematic of 0.05-0.8 Gyr.
Investigations into the physics that drive variations in among and within galaxies are still ongoing. Stellar feedback and molecular cloud evolution have each been put forward to explain these variations, but there is increasing evidence that internal and external galactic dynamics also affect . An example of internal dynamical processes is gravitational torques caused by galactic stellar structures, observed to modify the in the spiral arms of M51 (Meidt et al. 2013). Observations and numerical work indicate that external dynamical processes such as gravitation can also produce compressive and disruptive tides within galaxy gas disks during galaxy-galaxy interactions, leading to a broader distribution of (Renaud et al. 2014; Bournaud et al. 2015). Ram pressure, as another external force, is known for quenching star formation, particularly in dwarf galaxies (Steinhauser et al. 2016), but can also locally compress gas and have the opposite effect (Ebeling et al. 2014), especially in more massive systems where the background potential helps slowing down gas stripping. Studies of in galaxies at various stages of interaction indicate that the tidal gravitational forces change up to 0.4 dex (Martinez-Badenes et al., 2012; Nehlig et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2017). Nehlig et al. (2016) observed that ram pressure can decrease , but not as effectively as the tidal effects. Within starburst-like interacting galaxies, can vary by up to 1 dex (Saito et al. 2016; Pereira-Santaella et al. 2016). Renaud (in prep., priv. comm.) also conclude from their simulations of interacting galaxies that tidal forces generally decrease and increase its variation within galaxies. The aforementioned studies only address moderate to late stages of galaxy interactions, where the galaxies are already colliding or interacting at small separation from each other.
Here we study the spiral galaxy NGC 2276, which is currently falling into NGC 2300 group and interacting with the early-type galaxy NGC 2300. The NGC 2300 group has four members including NGC 2300 being the most massive one. Details about NGC 2276 and the NGC 2300 group are listed in Tab. 1. NGC 2276 itself exhibits high global SFR and an asymmetric distribution in various multi-wavelength SFR tracers (X-Ray, FUV, H, infra-red and radio; Condon 1983; Gruendl et al. 1993; Davis et al. 1997; Rasmussen et al. 2006). These different tracers indicate SFRs between 5-19.4 M*⊙/yr (Wolter et al. 2015; Kennicutt 1983). Thus for its stellar mass, NGC 2276 is too star-forming to be on the main sequence (expected SFR5-6 M⊙*/yr; Elbaz et al. 2007). NGC 2276’s total infra-red emission is , which is not bright enough to be classified as a LIRG.
Previous papers (Gruendl et al. 1993; Hummel & Beck 1995; Rasmussen et al. 2006; Wolter et al. 2015) argue that the enhanced and asymmetric SF in NGC 2276 may be caused by tidal forces or ram pressure. While these papers argue that NGC 2276 is in a phase after the first passage through the pericenter, they do not derive specific orbital characteristics for this system. Tidal forces could be sufficient to trigger SF despite the large projected separation ( kpc) to neighbor NGC 2300, as Scudder et al. (2012) show in their simulations that SFR may be enhanced by 0.3-0.6 dex at large separations (up to 70 kpc) between merging galaxies. The presence of tidal forces in NGC 2276 has also been invoked to explain the extended south-east arm in radio emission of NGC 2276 (Condon 1983), and truncation of the R-band continuum (Gruendl et al. 1993; Davis et al. 1997). Additional evidence for tidal forces includes a north-east extension in the I-band continuum of NGC 2300 (Forbes & Thomson 1992; Davis et al. 1997), and the enhanced magnetic fields (Hummel & Beck 1995).
Enhanced X-ray emission outside NGC 2276, and the bow-shock feature on the western edge of NGC 2276’s disk was attributed to ram pressure (Rasmussen et al. 2006) as similar features have been observed in galaxies with ongoing ram pressure (Iglesias-Paramo & Vilchez 1997; Sivanandam et al. 2014; Troncoso Iribarren et al. 2016). The high ram pressure acting on NGC 2276 is linked to the unusually high density of the group’s inter-galactic medium (Mulchaey et al. 1993). Simulations by Wolter et al. (2015) show that ram pressure alone could explain the morphology and the lack of some HI gas in NGC 2276.
Despite its exceptional SFR, the distribution of NGC 2276’s molecular gas reservoir has not previously been mapped at high spatial resolution. Spatial variations in could indicate if tidal forces and/or ram pressure have an impact on the ISM physics and as such in NGC 2276. This letter presents observations of H2 gas (as traced by CO emission) at sub-kpc scales and spatially resolved measurements of in NGC 2276 for the first time. Additionally, we correct our IFU measurements of H emission from the star-forming regions for internal extinction caused by dust, an important step that has not been applied to previous studies of SF in NGC 2276 using narrowband imaging.
2. Data
Observations with the integral field unit (IFU) PMAS in PPaK mode (Kelz et al. 2006) on the Calar Alto 3.5m telescope are used to obtain spatially resolved H emission. We observed a mosaic of 6 pointings ( in diameter) with three dither positions, covering the entire galaxy. The raw data were calibrated using the P3D software package (Sandin et al. 2010) and established calibration procedures. We used PanSTARRS images for astrometry and R-band images from the La Palma observatory (NED333https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/) for absolute flux calibration. The final data cube was re-sampled onto a grid with 1 arcsec spatial pixels (spaxels) corresponding to pc. The datacube is Nyquist-sampled with 3 spaxels across the instrumental point spread function. The reduced spectra have a spectral resolution of R=1000 and cover 3700-7010 Å. We analyzed the reduced spectra and extracted the emission lines using the GANDALF software package (Sarzi et al. 2006). During the process, the spectra were corrected for foreground Galactic extinction. The angular resolution of the final data is 2”.7 ( pc). More details will be provided in Tomičić (in prep.).
To estimate the SFR surface density (H,corr), we use extinction-corrected H surface brightness (H,corr). Based on BPT diagrams (Kewley et al. 2006) of emission lines, we find that the H emission arises from star-forming regions and not from shocks. For the extinction correction, we assume the foreground screen model, apply the Cardelli et al. (1989) extinction curve, assume H/H=2.86 (case B recombination at a gas temperature of K) and a selective extinction R3.1. To convert (H,corr) to (H,corr), we use the SFR prescription from Murphy et al. (2011, Eq. 1 and 2). We show (H,corr) map of NGC 2276 in Fig. 1.
To estimate the mass surface density of the H2 (), we mapped the emission from NGC 2276 with the NOEMA interferometer at Plateau de Bure (NOrthern Extended Millimeter Array; project ID: w14cg001) and the IRAM 30m telescope (project ID: 246-14). The NOEMA observations consisted of a 19-point hexagonal mosaic (with a field of view 2.2’ in diameter) centered on RA(J2000) and Dec.(J2000) . The 30m observations covered a arcminute field centered on the same position. Both targeted the emission assuming a systemic LSR velocity of 2425 km/s. The final combined (NOEMA+30m) cube has an angular resolution of 2.5”2.1”, a channel width of 5 km/s, and sensitivity of 60 mK per channel. For the analysis in this paper, we use a version of the cube that has been smoothed to 2.7” resolution using a Gaussian convolution kernel. The sensitivity of this cube is 50 mK per 5 km/s channel. More details will be presented in Hughes (in prep.).
For , we assumed the Galactic value XCO= (Bolatto et al. 2013) of the conversion factor. We show the map of NGC 2276 in Fig. 1. We use this conversion factor as NGC 2276’s nebular metallicity, estimated from the [NII]/[SII] and [NII]/H ratios and using Eq. 3 in Dopita et al. (2016), is similar to the solar value (log[O/H]+12 ranges between 8.4 and 8.9). We also present in Fig. 2 the NGC 2276 data for the case of a spatially varying XCO factor taking into account local variation in metallicity.
3. Results
3.1. The depletion time
The distribution is consistent with a fairly normal disk while (H,corr) show a prominent asymmetry toward the western edge (Fig. 1). The resulting distribution is shown in Fig. 1. The standard deviation of values is 0.52 dex. The highest observed (H2) value is 9 Gyr, and it gradually decreases to 0.1 Gyr across the disk, from north-east (NE) to south-west (SW). The lowest values (10 Myr-100 Myr) are found along the western edge of the disk. The mean galactic value is 0.55 Gyr. From the integrated spectra, we estimate NGC 2276’s galactic SFR to be 175 M*⊙*/yr.
To demonstrate the amplitude of the variation in in NGC 2276, we plot the pixel-by-pixel data on the Kennicutt-Schmidt diagram (Fig. 2). The left panel shows NGC 2276 data from the 20*′′* wide slit oriented in NE-SW direction (that follows the gradient), and other panels present NGC 2276 data from the entire disk. The right panel shows NGC 2276 data from the entire disk where we used a variable XCO factor corrected for local variation in metallicity (Narayanan et al. 2012). The contours show the data from the HERACLES survey of nearby galaxies (Leroy et al. 2013), and symbol represents the NGC 2276’s mean galactic value. The HERACLES survey examines 1 kpc regions in 30 galaxies. We added sub-galactic regions from the mid-stage merger VV 114 (Saito et al. 2015), luminous merger remnant NGC 1614 (Saito et al. 2016), and Antennae (Klaas et al. 2010). The NGC 2276 data from the slit show a decrease in from 3 Gyr to 10 Myr from NE toward SW, while the center exhibits a of about 0.4 Gyr. The values in the disk show a 0.5 dex narrower range when we use metallicity-dependent XCO factor compared to when we use a single XCO factor. The change in is most pronounced in the outskirts of the disk, esp. the Western edge, where metallicities are lower. However, we caution that metallicity estimates in the Western edge region could potentially be affected by the stellar cluster’s age, and thus ionization parameters (see Sec. 3.2).
3.2. Tidal forces and ram pressure
Galactic-scale tidal forces are responsible for features such as stellar streams, disk thickening and asymmetries in stellar disks. We derived map of NGC 2276 and NGC 2300 from WISE images at 3.4 m and 4.6 m following Eq. 8 in Querejeta et al. (2015). The resulting map on Fig. 3, confirms that the distribution in NGC2276 is strongly asymmetric, and shows a steeper drop on the SW side compared to the NE side. While other external (e.g. minor mergers, gas accretion) or internal (asymmetries in the dark matter halo) mechanisms cannot be ruled out as the origin of these features (Laine et al. 2014), we propose (as previous authors have done) that the asymmetric in NGC 2276 is due to tidal forces.
To compare NGC 2276 to other galaxies, we quantify the tidal strength of the interaction experienced by NGC 2276 following Eq. 1 in Argudo-Fernández et al. (2015), i.e.
[TABLE]
where and are the stellar masses of NGC 2300 and NGC 2276, respectively; is the B-band optical diameter of NGC 2276, and kpc is the projected separation between NGC 2300 and NGC 2276. For NGC 2276, we find , which is significantly higher than the typical value for isolated galaxies () and on the high end of isolated galaxy pairs (, Argudo-Fernández et al. 2015).
As well as galactic-scale tides, our new observations also show evidences for ram pressure affecting NGC 2276. First, the scale-length of the ionized gas on the SW side of NGC 2276’s disk is significantly shorter (up to 1-2 kpc) than the stellar emission scale-length (Fig. 3). In contrast, the ionized gas follows well the stellar distribution on the NE side. This feature cannot be explained by tidal forces alone, and may be a signature of ram pressure stripping of the interstellar gas. Secondly, the H,corr/fν(FUV,corr) ratio increase along the western rim of NGC 2276’s disk (Fig. 4). We retrieved the FUV images from the public AIS survey444http://galex.stsci.edu/GR6/?page=tilelist&survey=ais (Bianchi et al. 2014). To calibrate the FUV images, we subtracted the background emission from NGC 2276, and corrected the FUV map for the foreground Milky Way extinction (applying E). The H,corr/fν(FUV,corr) ratio robustly indicates the age of stellar clusters (Sánchez-Gil et al. 2011), showing that the westernmost regions are dominated by the youngest clusters. We link this most recent SF on the western edge of the disk to ram pressure (as similarly observed in the Large Magellanic Cloud by Piatti et al. 2018).
4. Discussion and summary
In this letter, we have presented spatially resolved measurements of the H2 and in NGC 2276 for the first time. On galactic scales, the mean of NGC 2276 is 0.55 Gyr, which is lower than the =1-2 Gyr found in surveys of nearby galaxies (COLD GASS, HERACLES; Saintonge et al. 2011; Leroy et al. 2013), but still within the range of those galaxies (Fig. 2 or Fig. 14 in Leroy et al. 2013). We note that NGC 2276 exhibits (H,corr) and values that are higher than in the HERACLES survey, and lower values than in the galaxies at the coalescence phase (Saito et al. 2015, 2016). On the other hand, we observe a large variation in at sub-galactic scales in NGC 2276. On a pixel-to-pixel scale (pixels pc in size) in a 20” wide NE-SW slit, ranges from 10 Myr to 3 Gyr. This is almost 2-3 orders of magnitude variation in within a single disk. Furthermore, our results reveal a gradual decrease in across the disk in the NE-SW direction.
This is a factor of 30 larger range at sub-galactic scales compared to other nearby galaxies. For individual galaxies in the HERACLES survey, sub-galactic regions show a typical spread of 0.5 dex (Fig. 18 and 19 in Leroy et al. 2013). However, a spread in NGC 2276’s decrease by 0.5 dex (down to 2.5 dex) when we use variable metallicity-dependent XCO factor, which indicates that sub-galactic variation in may be affected by a different metallicity prescriptions or when using a single XCO factor. The NGC 2276’s variation in the is comparable only with the merging starburst LIRGs observed by Pereira-Santaella et al. (2016) and Saito et al. (2016), although their mean galactic values exhibit lower than NGC 2276. The mid-stage merging galaxy VV114 (Saito et al. 2016) covers a similar range in parameters ( and ) as NGC 2276 on the Kennicutt-Schmidt diagram and shows almost 2 dex variation in . Renaud (in prep.) find a 1-3 dex difference in between regions in their simulations of the Antennae during early phases of interaction. However, the observed variation in is only 0.5 dex in late-phase merging LIRGs such as the Antennae (Klaas et al. 2010) and NGC (Nehlig et al. 2016).
Based on the clear asymmetric distribution of the stellar disk, we tentatively attribute the large-scale gradient in as to tidal forces acting on NGC 2276. The tidal forces act on the entire disk, and likely cause a gradual 1-1.5 dex decrease of between the two sides of the disk. The ram pressure further disturbs the morphology of the gas disk, and particularly compresses gas on its western edge, which has younger stellar clusters and 1 dex lower compared to the rest of the disk.
NGC 2276 shows that galaxies in the pre-coalescence phase of interaction may already exhibit large variations in at sub-galactic scales, while still showing a typical value for the galaxy-wide average. Our observations demonstrate clearly that a galaxy-galaxy interaction significantly modifies the star formation efficiency of molecular gas locally, that the effect is distributed throughout the galactic disk and not just at the galaxy center, and that these changes occur well before coalescence.
Facilities: IRAM (NOEMA and 30m), CAHA (PMAS)
Software: P3D (Sandin et al. 2010), GANDALF (Sarzi et al. 2006)
We thank the referee for constructive comments that improved this letter. We thank Mónica Relaño, Rebecca McElroy and Sharon Meidt for constructive comments on the paper. NT and KK acknowledge grants SCHI 536/8-2 and KR 4598/1-2 from the DFG Priority Program 1573. FR acknowledges support from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation. JP acknowledges support from the Program National "Physique et Chimie du Milieu Interstellaire" (PCMI) of CNRS/INSU with INC/INP, co-funded by CEA and CNES. This work is based on observations made with the NASA Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX). GALEX is operated for NASA by the California Institute of Technology under NASA contract NAS5-98034. This work is based on observations carried out under project number w14cg001 with the IRAM NOEMA Interferometer and 30m telescope. IRAM is supported by INSU/CNRS (France), MPG (Germany) and IGN (Spain). This work is also based on observations collected at the Centro Astronómico Hispano-Alemán (CAHA), operated jointly by the Max-Planck Institut für Astronomie and the Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (CSIC).
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Ackermann et al. (2012) Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., Allafort, A., et al. 2012, Ap J, 755, 164
- 2Argudo-Fernández et al. (2015) Argudo-Fernández, M., Verley, S., Bergond, G., et al. 2015, A&A, 578, A 110
- 3Bianchi et al. (2014) Bianchi, L., Conti, A., & Shiao, B. 2014, Advances in Space Research, 53, 900
- 4Bigiel et al. (2008) Bigiel, F., Leroy, A., Walter, F., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 2846
- 5Bolatto et al. (2013) Bolatto, A. D., Wolfire, M., & Leroy, A. K. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 207
- 6Bournaud et al. (2015) Bournaud, F., Daddi, E., Weiß, A., et al. 2015, A&A, 575, A 56
- 7Cardelli et al. (1989) Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, Ap J, 345, 245
- 8Condon (1983) Condon, J. J. 1983, Ap JS, 53, 459
