# Bias and scatter in the Hubble diagram from cosmological large-scale   structure

**Authors:** Julian Adamek, Chris Clarkson, Louis Coates, Ruth Durrer, Martin Kunz

arXiv: 1812.04336 · 2019-07-22

## TL;DR

This paper investigates how cosmic structures affect the accuracy of the Hubble diagram used in cosmology, using advanced relativistic simulations to quantify bias and scatter caused by gravitational lensing and velocities.

## Contribution

It introduces a novel relativistic N-body simulation with ray tracing to analyze non-linear effects on the Hubble diagram, providing new insights into bias and scatter.

## Key findings

- Mean bias aligns with perturbation theory predictions
- Distribution of sources is skewed with long tail of magnified objects
- Bias in cosmological parameters depends on the distance function considered

## Abstract

An important part of cosmological model fitting relies on correlating distance indicators of objects (for example type Ia supernovae) with their redshift, often illustrated on a Hubble diagram. Comparing the observed correlation with a homogeneous model is one of the key pieces of evidence for dark energy. The presence of cosmic structures introduces a bias and scatter, mainly due to gravitational lensing and peculiar velocities, but also due to smaller non-linear relativistic contributions which are more difficult to account for. For the first time we perform ray tracing onto halos in a relativistic N-body simulation. Our simulation is the largest that takes into account all leading-order corrections from general relativity in the evolution of structure, and we present a novel methodology for working out the non-linear projection of that structure onto the observer's past light cone. We show that the mean of the bias in the Hubble diagram is indeed as small as expected from perturbation theory. However, the distribution of sources is significantly skewed with a very long tail of highly magnified objects and we illustrate that the bias of cosmological parameters strongly depends on the function of distance which we consider.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.04336/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.04336/full.md

## References

30 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.04336/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1812.04336